Worker cooperatives for social change: knowledge-making through constructive resistance within the capitalist market economy

References

• Ahlqvist, M., Grundqvist, M., and Wennö, J., 2017. Svensk kooperation: kunskap och attityd om kooperativt företagande. Stockholm: Kantar Sifo.
   Google Scholar
• Almqvist, K. and Anders Linder, P.J., 2017. Kapitalismens betydelse för Sveriges samhälls- och välståndsutveckling 1850-2016. Stockholm: Axess Publishing AB.
   Google Scholar
• Alperovitz, G., 2011. The emerging paradoxical possibility of a democratic economy. Review of Social Economy, 69 (3), 377–391. doi:10.1080/00346764.2011.592127
   Google Scholar
• Alperovitz, G. and Dubb, S., 2013. The possibility of a pluralist commonwealth and a community-sustaining economy. The Good Society, 22 (1), 1–25. doi:10.1353/gso.2013.0004
   Google Scholar
• Araujo, E., 2016. Consensus and activism through collective exchanges: A focus on El Cambalache, Mexico. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 36 (11/12), 741–755. doi:10.1108/IJSSP-12-2015-0134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baaz, M., et al., 2016. Defining and analyzing “resistance”: possible entrances to the study of subversive practices. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 41 (3), 137–153. doi:10.1177/0304375417700170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergh, A., 2014. Sweden and the revival of the capitalist welfare state. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bet. 2017 18. CU25. En ny lag om ekonomiska föreningar [online]. Stockholm: Civilutskottet. Available from: https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/arende/betankande/en-ny-lag-om-ekonomiska-foreningar_H501CU25/html [Accessed 24 September 2019]
   Google Scholar
• Birchall, J., 2012. The comparative advantages of member-owned businesses. Review of Social Economy, 70 (3), 263–294.
   Google Scholar
• Bolagsverket., 2019. Statistik om företag och föreningar [online]. Available from: https://bolagsverket.se/be/sok/etjanster/statistik/statistik-1.3538 [Accessed 7 January 2019]
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L. and Chiapello, E., 2007/1999. The new spirit of capitalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Burr, V., 2003. Social constructionism. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J., 1993. Bodies that matter: on the discursive limits of “sex”. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, M., 2012. Breaking out of co-operation’s ‘iron cage’: from movement degeneration to building a developmental movement. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 83, 199–214.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J., 1989. From here to there; or, if cooperative ownership is so desirable, why are there so few cooperatives? Social Philosophy and Policy, 6 (2), 93–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N., 2001. Language and Power. 2nd. Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Faulk, K.A., 2008. If they touch one of us, they touch all of us: cooperativism as a counterlogic to neoliberal capitalism. Anthropological Quarterly, 81, 579–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1977. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1980a. Truth and power. In: C. Gordon, ed. Power/Knowledge: selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books, 109–133.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1980b. Two lectures. In: C. Gordon, ed. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books, 78–108.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1990. The history of sexuality, Volume 1: introduction. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1997. Society must be defended: lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 2007. What is critique? In: S. Lotringer, ed. The politics of truth. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), 41–81.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, M.K., 1945. Constructive programme: its meaning and place. 2nd. Ahmedabad: Navjivan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A., 1971. Prison notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D., 1988. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14 (3), 575–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 1997. The constitution of power: A theoretical analysis of power, knowledge and structure. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, J.A. and Einwohner, R.L., 2004. Conceptualizing resistance. Sociological Forum, 19, 533–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmén, H., 1990. State, cooperatives and development in Africa. Research Report. No. 86. Uppsala: The Scandinavian Institute of African Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Jaumier, S., Daudigeos, T., and Joannidès, V., 2017. Co-operatives, compromises, and critiques: what do French co-operators tell us about individual responses to pluralism? In: C. Cloutier, B. Leca and J.P. Gond, ed. Justification, evaluation and critique in the study of organizations: contributions from French Pragmatist Sociology, Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 73–108.
   Google Scholar
• Koefoed, M., 2018. The art of enacting the impossible: A conceptual, empirical and methodological exploration of constructive resistance by the Kurdish movement in Turkey. Thesis (PhD). University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Land, C. and King, D., 2014. Organizing otherwise: translating anarchism in a voluntary sector organization. Ephemera. Theory & Politics in Organization, 14 (4), 923–950.
   Google Scholar
• Langmead, K., 2016. Challenging the degeneration thesis: the role of democracy in worker cooperatives? Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity, 5 (1), 79–98.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 1993. We have never been modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, P., 1992. Demanding the impossible: A history of anarchism. London: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., 2013/1867. Capital: A critical analysis of capitalist production. Ware: Wordsworth Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. and Engels., F., 1998/1845. The German ideology. New York: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, C.T., 1984. Under Western eyes: feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Boundary 2, 12/13, 333–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahnke, A., 2015. Institutionalizing economies of opposition: explaining and evaluating the success of the MST’s cooperatives and agroecological repeasantization’. Journal of Peasant Studies, 42 (6), 1087–1107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paranque, B. and Willmott, H., 2014. Cooperatives – saviours or gravediggers of capitalism? Critical performativity and the John Lewis Partnership. Organization, 21, 604–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V.A., 1991. Between markets and politics: co-operatives in Sweden. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F., 2002. Freedom is an endless meeting: democracy in American social movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., 1996. Representing reality: discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ranis, P., 2016. Cooperatives confront capitalism: challenging the neoliberal economy. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rothschild, J. and Whitt, J.A., 1986. The cooperative workplace: potentials and dilemmas of organizational democracy and participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B., 2012. Tillsammans: en fungerande ekonomisk demokrati. Stockholm: SNS förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, J.K., et al., 2017. Cooperative development, policy, and power in a period of contested neoliberalism: the Case of Evergreen Cooperative Corporation in Cleveland, Ohio. Socialist Studies/étudies Socialistes, 12 (1), 54–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satgar, V., 2007. Cooperative development and labour solidarity: A neo-Gramscian perspective on the global struggle against neoliberalization. LABOUR, Capital and Society, 40, 56–79.
   Google Scholar
• Sentama, E., 2009. Peacebuilding in post-genocide Rwanda: The role of cooperatives in the restoration of interpersonal relationships. Thesis (PhD). University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Shantz, J., 2010. Constructive anarchy: building infrastructures of resistance. Farnham: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, M.J., 2016. Constructive resistance: conceptualising and mapping the terrain. Journal of Resistance Studies, 2, 49–78.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, M.J. and Vinthagen, S., 2012. Nonviolent resistance and culture. Peace & Change, 37, 444–470.
   Google Scholar
• Spear, R., 2004. Governance in democratic member-based organisations. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 75, 33–59.
   Google Scholar
• Springer, S., 2010. Neoliberal discursive formations: on the contours of subjectivation, good governance, and symbolic violence in posttransitional Cambodia. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28 (5), 931–950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, S., 2016. Fuck neoliberalism. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 15, 285–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The International Co-operative Alliance, 2019. Cooperative identity, values and principles [online]. Available from: https://www.ica.coop/en/cooperatives/cooperative-identity [Accessed 7 January 2019]
   Google Scholar
• Therborn, G., 2018. Kapitalet, överheten och alla vi andra: klassamhället i Sverige – det rådande och det kommande. Lund: Arkiv förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Tillväxtverket, 2019. Socialt företagande [online]. Available from: https://tillvaxtverket.se/amnesomraden/affarsutveckling/socialt-foretagande.html [Accessed 24 September 2019]
   Google Scholar
• Vamstad, J., 2012. Kooperativt företagande i Sverige: en kunskapsöversikt om det kooperativa företagandets betydelse för demokrati, välfärd och tillväxt. Stockholm: Sector3.
   Google Scholar
• Vieta, M., 2014. The stream of self-determination and autogestión: prefiguring alternative economic realities. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 14, 781–809.
   Google Scholar
• Vinthagen, S., 2005. Ickevåldsaktion: En social praktik av motstånd och konstruktion. Thesis (PhD). University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, C., 1973. Anarchy in action. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, B.P., 1930. The cooperative movement in Great Britain. 10th. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 2007/1927. General economic history. New York: Cosmo Classics.
   Google Scholar
• White, R.J. and Williams, C.C., 2012. The pervasive nature of heterodox economic spaces at a time of neoliberal crisis: towards a “postneoliberal” anarchist future. Antipode, 44 (5), 1625–1644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, W.F. and Whyte, K.K., 1991. Making Mondragón: the growth and dynamics of the worker cooperative complex. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiksell, K., 2017. Campaigning for cooperatives as resistance to neoliberal capitalism. Journal of Political Power, 10 (2), 236–254. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2017.1335837
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R.C., 2007. The cooperative movement: globalization from below. Aldershot, Hampshire, Burlington: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar