Power and domination

References

• Allen, A., 2005; Feminist perspectives on power. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (substantively revised 2016). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016//entries/feminist-power/
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, D.A., 2021. The faces of power revisited. Journal of Political Power. this issue.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 2000. In: R. Nice, trans. Pascalian Meditations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 2001. In: R. Nice, trans.. Masculine Domination. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandmayr, F., 2018. Hétérogenéité et flexibilité dans les usages politiques de l’argument de l’excuse sociologique”. Zilsel, 4 (2), 59–91. doi:10.3917/zil.004.0059
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, R.L., 2017. The racial glass ceiling: subordination in American law and culture. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1957. The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2, 201–215.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1958. A critique of the ruling elite model. American Political Science Review, 52, 463–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1961. Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darity Jr., W., et al., 2018. What we get wrong about closing the racial wealth gap. Durham, NC: Duke University, Samuel Dubois Center on Social Equity and Insight Center for Community Economic Development.
   Google Scholar
• Digeser, P., 1992. The fourth face of power. The Journal of Politics, 54 (4), 977–1007. doi:10.2307/2132105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowding, K., 2019. Rational choice and political power. (The original 1991 text with two new chapters). Bristol: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J., 1980. Power and powerlessness: quiescence and rebellion in an Appalachian valley. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guzzini, S., 2012. The diffusion of power in global governance: international political economy meets Foucault. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Guzzini, S. 2013. Power,realism and constructivism. Abingdon, Oxford: Routledge. 2013
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, C., 2000. Defacing power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, C., 2018. On structural power. Journal of Political Power, 11 (1), 56–67. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2018.1433756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, C., 2017. Neorepublicanism and the domination of posterity. Ethics, Politics and Environment, 20 (3), 294–313. doi:10.1080/21550085.2017.1374034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchin, S., 2013. Thick Concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Komter, A., 1989. Hidden power in marriage. Gender and Society, 3 (2), 187–219. doi:10.1177/089124389003002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, S., 2013. Beyond non-domination: agency, inequality and the meaning of freedom. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 39 (2), 187–208. doi:10.1177/0191453712470360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laborde, C., 2008. Critical republicanism: the hijab controversy and political philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• List, C. and Valenteini, L., 2016. Freedom as Independence. Ethics, 126 (4m), 1043–1074. doi:10.1086/686006
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, F., 2010. A general theory of domination and justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, F., 2012. What counts as arbitrary power? Journal of Political Power, 5 (1), 135–152. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2012.660026
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, F., 2018. Republicanism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/republicanism/
   Google Scholar
• McCammon, C., 2018. Domination. Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy. htttps://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/domination/
   Google Scholar
• Miliband, R., 1970. Reply to Nicos Poulantzas. New Left Review, 59, 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Miliband, R., 1973. Poulantzas and the capitalist state. New Left Review, 82, 83–92.
   Google Scholar
• Morriss, P., 2002. Power: a philosophical analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nozick, R., 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pansardi, P., 2012. A non-normative theory of power and domination. Critical Review of Social and Political Philosophy, 16 (5), 614–633. doi:10.1080/13698230.2012.691204
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P., 1997. Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P., 2012. On the people’s terms. A republican theory and model of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P., 2014. Just freedom: a moral compass for a complex world. New York and London: W.W.Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Polsby, N.W. 1980. Community power and political theory. Second edition. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poulantzas, N., 1969. The problem of the capitalist state. New Left Review, 58, 67–78.
   Google Scholar
• Poulantzas, N., 1973. Political power and social classes. London: New Left Books a Sheed and Ward.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J.C., 1990. Domination and the arts of resistance: hidden transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, I., 2012. On non-domination. University of Toronto Law Journal, 62 (3), 293–335. doi:10.3138/utlj.62.3.293
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro., I., 2016. Politics against nomination. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strawson, P.F., 1962. Freedom and resentment. Proceedings of the British Academy, 48, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompason, M.J., 2013. A functionalist theory of social domination. Journal of Political Power, 6 (2), 170–199.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M.J., 2018. The two faces of domination in republican political theory. European Journal of Political Theory, 17 (1), 44–64. doi:10.1177/1474885115580352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, M.Victoria., 2007. Freedom and non-domination: normativity and indeterminacy. Journal of Value Inquiry, 41 (2/4), 291–307. doi:10.1007/s10790-007-9072-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wartenberg, T.E., 1990. The forms of power: from domination to transformation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ypi, L., 2020. On dominated dominators.Colloquium lecture by Lea Ypi (LSE London), organized by the Department of Ethics, Social and Political Philosophy. University of Gronigen. https://www.rug.nl/filosofie/organization/news-and-events/news/events/2020-all/lea-ypi-on-dominated-dominators?/lang=en
   Google Scholar