The four dimensions of power: conflict and democracy

References

• Alexander, J., 2006. The civil sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, J., 2011. Performance and power. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, A., 1998. Rethinking power. Hyptia, 13 (1), 21–40. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01350.x
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H., 1970. On violence. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J.L., 1975. How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M., 1962. The two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56 (4), 947–952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z., 1989. Modernity and the holocaust. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1989. Distinction. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1990. The logic of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breen, K., 2007. Violence and power: a critique of Hannah Arendt on the “political”. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 33 (3), 343–372.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J., 1997. The psychic life of power. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S., 1989. Frameworks of power. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1957. The concept of power. Behavioural Science, 2 (3), 201–215.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A. 1968. Power. In: D.L. Shills, ed. International encyclopedia of the social sciences. New York: Macmillan, Vol. 12, 405–415.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, A., 2018. Zionist hegemony, the settler colonial conquest of Palestine and the problem with conflict: a critical genealogy of the notion of binary conflict. Settler Colonial Studies, 8 (3), 364–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digeser, P., 1992. The fourth face of power. Journal of Politics, 54 (4), 977–1007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowding, K., 2003. Resources, power and systematic luck: a response to Barry. Politics Philosophy and Economics, 2 (3), 305–322.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É., 1982. The rules of sociological method. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É., 2008. The elementary forms of religious life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, N., 1995. The civilizing process: the history of manners and state formation and civilization. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, E., 1995. Childhood and society. London: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., ed., 1975. I, Pierre Riviére, having slaughtered my mother, my sister, and my brother. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1979. Discipline and punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1980. Power knowledge: selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977, ed. C. Gordon. Brighton: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1982. The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8 (4), 777–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1988. In: L. Kritzman, ed. Politics, philosophy, culture: interviews and other writings 1977–1984. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1989. The archaeology of knowledge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H., 1984. Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Gellner, E., 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A., 1984. The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 1997. The constitution of power. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2010. Power: a “family resemblance concept”. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 13 (4):419–38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M. 2012. Rethinking the four dimensions of power. Journal of Political Power, 5 (1), 35–54.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2016. Two types of freedom and four dimensions of power. Revue International Philosophie, 70 (275), 37–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2018. What is authority? Journal of Classical Sociology, 18 (2), 104–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2020. The four dimensions of power: understanding domination, empowerment and democracy. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, C., 2013. How Americans make race. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A., 1995. The struggle for recognition: the moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• James, W., 1981. Pragmatism. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, A. and Vinthagen, S., 2015. Dimensions of everyday resistance: the Palestinian Sumud. Journal of Political Power, 8 (1), 109–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kant, I., 2012. Groundwork of the metaphysics of Morals. Trans. C. Korsgaard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korsgaard, C., 1996. Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T., 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. .
   Google Scholar
• Levi, P., 1991. If this is a man. London: Abacus.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 1974. Power: radical view. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 2005. Power: a radical view. 2nd. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Macmillan.
Moi, T., 2010. “The Adulteress Wife”. A review of the second sex by Simone de Beauvoir’. London Review of Books, 32 (3), 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Morriss, P., 2002. Power: a philosophical analysis. Second. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, F., 2006. In: K. Pearson, ed. The nietzsche reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pansardi, P., 2012. Power to and power over: two distinct concepts? Journal of Political Power, 5 (1), 73–89.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. 1963.‘On the concept of political power’. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 107(3): 232–62
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, O., 1982. Slavery and social death. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P., 2014. Just freedom: a moral compass for a complex world. New York: Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K., 2002. The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J., 1993. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, B., 1938. Power: a new social analysis. London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Said, E., 2003. Orientalism. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Schutz, A., 1967. The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J.C., 1990. Domination and the arts of resistance: hidden transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J., 1996. The construction of social reality. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, G., 2010. From dictatorship to democracy: a conceptual framework for liberation. Boston: The Albert Einstein Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., 1989. Sources of the self: the making of modern identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1976. The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. 2nd. London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1978. In: G. Roth and C. Wittich, eds. Economy and society (Vol. 1), an outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 2011 ‘Objectivity of social science and policy’. Anthropos-Lab.: www.anthropos-lab.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Weber-objectivity-in-the-social-sciences.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L., 1967. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar