Rehearsing for the future: play, place and art

References

• Agnew, J. (2011). Space and place. In J. Agnew, & D. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of geographical knowledge (pp. 316–330). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Alistair Bonnett’s. (2014). Off the Map: Lost Spaces, Invisible Cities, Forgotten Islands, Feral Places and What They Tell Us about the world. London: Aurum Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Altman, I., & Low, S. M. (1992). Place attachment. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Augé, M. (1992). Non-places introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bech, T. (n.d.). Tine Bech Studio - Public Art, Installations and Exhibitions. http://www.tinebech.com/ (Accessed 12 Mar 2021)
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells: Participatory Art and the politics of spectatorship. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S., & Vaughan, C. (2010). Play: How it shapes the brain, opens the imagination, and invigorates the soul. London: Avery.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, T. (2011). Learning through play: For babies, toddlers and young children. London: Hodder Education.
   Google Scholar
• Counterplay. (n.d.). http://www.counterplay.org/ (Accessed 11 June 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Deterding, S. (2018). Alibis for adult play. Games and Culture, 13(3), 260–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsche, R. (1996). Evictions: Art and spatial politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 295–296.
   Google Scholar
• Dokk1. (n.d). (https://dokk1.dk/english) (Accessed 11 June 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Dönmez, D. (2017). The paradox of rules and freedom; ant and life in the simile of play. In M. MacLean, W. Russell, & E. Ryall (Eds.), Philosophical perspectives on play (pp. 166–176). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forss, A. (2007). Paikan estetiikka: Eletyn ja koetun ympäristön fenomenologiaa (Aesthetics of Place: The Phenomenology of Lived and Experienced Environment). Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.
   Google Scholar
• Frosham, D. (2015). Mapping beyond cartography: The experimental maps of artists working with locative media (Doctoral thesis). Exter: University of Exeter.
   Google Scholar
• Granö, P. (2004). Näkymätön ja näkyvä lapsuuden maa, leikkipaikka pellon laidasta tietokonepeliin (An invisible and visible childhood land, a playground from the field to a computer game) Piironen, (ed) (2004) Leikin pikkujättiläinen. Helsinki, WSOY. p. 40-49.
   Google Scholar
• Hänninen, R. (2003). Leikki: Ilmiö ja käsite (play: A phenomenon and a concept). Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto.
   Google Scholar
• Heljakka, K. (2013). Principles of adult play(fulness) in contemporary toy cultures: From wow to flow to glow. Available from Aaltodoc.
   Google Scholar
• Hidalgo, C., & Hernández, B. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 273–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horlings, L. G. (Ed.) (2019). Sustainable place-shaping: what, why and how. Findings of the SUSPLACE program; Deliverable D7.6 Synthesis report. Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen. https://www.sustainableplaceshaping.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/D7.6-SUSPLACE-Synthesis-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hugly, P., & Sayward, C. (1987). Relativism and ontology. Philosophical Quarterly, 37(148), 278–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huizinga, J. (1955). Homo ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. Beacon press. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, L. (1998). Trickster Makes This World: How disruptive imagination creates culture. Edinburgh and London, Canongate.
   Google Scholar
• In-Situ. (2018). Artistic Acupuncture for Places in Europe. In-Situ: European Platform for Artistic Creation in Public Space. http://www.in-situ.info/en/activities/en/think-tank- artistic-acupuncture-for-places-in-europe-20?fbclid = IwAR2zRCsAmL3DTyscUNmV-r-zKH8ShFKjKLP_EL NsoR5EEIde78a1DyrOUf0)
   Google Scholar
• Innocent, T. (2020). Citizens of play: Revisiting the relationship between playable and smart cities. In A. Nijholt (Ed.), Making smart cities more playable (pp. 25–49). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jankowski, F. (2019). Combining attachment surveys, collaborative photography and forum theatre for eliciting and debating the plurality of relation to place. Unpublished manuscript. https://www.lyyti.fi/att/7f13d3a67e/Bbb5BA6ec7c866e3aDf298546A902E89196324700639
   Google Scholar
• Johanson, K., & Glow, H. (2018). Reinstating the artist’s voice: Artists’ perspectives on participatory projects. Journal of Sociology, 55(3), 411–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. (2017). Wonderland: How play made the modern world. London: Pan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jokela, T. (2019). Arts–based action research in the north. In George W. Noblit (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of education. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.522.
   Google Scholar
• Kester, G. (2004). Conversation pieces: Community and Communication in modern Art. Berkeley: University of California Press, p. 58.
   Google Scholar
• Korstanje, M. (2015). The Anthropology of artports: Criticism to non-place theory. Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR), 3(1), 40–58.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, R., & Johnson, G. (2003). Metaphors We live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas, E. L. (1989) The Levinas reader, Edited by Sean Hand, Oxford: Blackwell
   Google Scholar
• Lundman, R. (2019). Participatory Urban Design – researching for best practices (PARTI). Turku: University of Turku.
   Google Scholar
• Matarasso, F. (2012). ‘All in this together’: The depoliticisation of community art in Britain, 1970-2011, Community, Art, Power: Essays from ICAF. Rotterdam: ICAF.
   Google Scholar
• Mesch, G. S., & Manor, O. (1998). Social ties, Environmental perception and local attachment. Environment and Behaviour, 30, 504–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. (2013). Practice as research in the arts: Principles, protocols, pedagogies, resistances. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nemeth, J., & Schmidt, S. (2011). The privatization of public space: Modeling and measuring publicness. Environment and Planning B Planning and Design, 38(1), 5–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijholt, A. (2015). Designing humor for playable cities. Procedia Manufacturing, 3(C), 2175–2182.
   Google Scholar
• Playful Mapping Collective. (2016). Playful mapping in the digital age. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.
   Google Scholar
• Riikonen, E. (2013). Työ ja elinvoima: eli miksi harrastukset, leikki ja taide ovat siirtymässä työn ja hyvinvointiajattelun ytimeen? (Work and vitality: so why are hobbies, play and art moving to the heart of work and well-being) Helsinki: Osuuskunta Toivo.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, W. (2013). Towards a spatial theory of playwork: What can lefebvre offer as a response to playwork's inherent contradictions? In E. Ryall, W. Russell, & M. Maclean (Eds.), The philosophy of play (pp. 166–174). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schrag, A. (2016). Agonistic tendencies: The role of conflict in institutionally supported participatory art projects (PhD thesis), Newcastle: Newcastle University.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, J., & Thomas, D. (2019). Fun, taste, & games - an aesthetics of the idle, unproductive, and otherwise playful. Connecticut: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skovbjerg, H.-M. (2018). Counterplay 2017 – ‘this is play!’. International Journal of Play, 7(1), 115–118.
   Google Scholar
• Stott, T. (2017). Play and participation in contemporary arts practices. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, G. (2010). Art practice as research: Inquiry in visual arts. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tate. (n.d.). ‘Socially Engaged Practice’ tate.org. (https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/s/socially-engaged-practice (Accessed 12 March 2020)
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, A. (2019). Giving permission for adults to play. The Journal of Play in Adulthood, 1(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Zimna, K. (2010). Play in the theory and practice of art (PhD Thesis). Loughborough: Loughborough University.
   Google Scholar