Considerations for making informed choices about engaging in open qualitative research

References

• Ali-Khan, S. E., L. W. Harris, and E. R. Gold. 2017. “Point of View: Motivating Participation in Open Science by Examining Researcher Incentives.” Elife 6: e29319. doi:https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.29319.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. 2017. “Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (2002, Amended Effective June 1, 2010, and January 1, 2017).” http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. 2018. “ARC Open Access Policy Version 2017.1.” https://www.arc.gov.au/policies-strategies/policy/arc-open-access-policy-version-20171
   Google Scholar
• Bergum, V., and J. B. Dossetor. 2005. Relational Ethics: The Full Meaning of Respect. Hagerstown, MD: University Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, L. 2009. “Ethical Sharing and Reuse of Qualitative Data.” Australian Journal of Social Issues 44: 255–272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1839-4655.2009.tb00145.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, S. 2016. “Rethinking ‘Validity’ and ‘Trustworthiness’ in Qualitative Inquiry: How Might We Judge the Quality of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise Sciences?” In Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise, edited by B. Smith and A. C. Sparkes, 330–339. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, C., and L. Tzavella. 2020. “Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future.” Unpublished paper available on OSF. doi:https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298.
   Google Scholar
• Chauvette, A., K. Schick-Makaroff, and A. E. Molzahn. 2019. “Open Data in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 18: 1–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918823863.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, N., N. Caddick, and N. Frost. 2016. “Pluralistic Data Analysis: Theory and Practice.” In Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise, edited by B. Smith and A. C. Sparkes, 368–381. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Corti, L., and P. Thompson. 2007. “Secondary Analysis of Archived Data.” In Qualitative Research Practice: Concise Paperback Edition, edited by C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, and D. Silverman, 297–313. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N., and Y. S. Lincoln. 2011. “Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 1–19. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., and Y. S. Lincoln. 2008. The Landscape of Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dodds, C., P. Keogh, A. Bourne, L. McDaid, C. Squire, P. Weatherburn, and I. Young. 2020. “The Long and Winding Road: Archiving and Re-Using Qualitative Data from 12 Research Projects Spanning 16 Years.” Sociological Research Online 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780420924044.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C. 2007. “Telling Secrets, Revealing Lives: Relational Ethics in Research with Intimate Others.” Qualitative Inquiry 13 (2): 3–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406294947.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, N. 2004. “Getting the most from archived qualitative data: Epistemological, practical and professional obstacles.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 7: 97–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570310001640699.
   Google Scholar
• Frisby, W., C. J. Reid, S. Millar, and L. Hoeber. 2005. “Putting ‘Participatory’ into Participatory Forms of Action Research.” Journal of Sport Management 19: 367–386. doi:https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.19.4.367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, N., S. M. Nolas, B. Brooks-Gordon, C. Esin, A. Holt, L. Mehdizadeh, and P. Shinebourne. 2010. “Pluralism in Qualitative Research: The Impact of Different Researchers and Qualitative Approaches on the Analysis of Qualitative Data.” Qualitative Research 10 (4): 441–460. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110366802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Canada. 2016a. “Tri-Agency Open Access Policy on Publications.” http://www.science.gc.ca/eic/site/063.nsf/eng/h_F6765465.html
   Google Scholar
• Government of Canada. 2016b. “Tri-Agency Statement of Principles on Digital Data Management.” http://www.science.gc.ca/eic/site/063.nsf/eng/h_83F7624E.html
   Google Scholar
• Government of Canada. 2018. “Tri-Council Policy Statement on Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.” https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/documents/tcps2-2018-en-interactive-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grinyer, A. 2009. “The Ethics of the Secondary Analysis and Further Use of Qualitative Data.” Social Research Update 56 (4): 1–4. https://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU56.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Haaker, M., and B. Morgan-Brett. 2017. “Developing Research-Led Teaching: Two Cases of Practical Data Reuse in the Classroom.” Sage Open 7 (2): 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017701800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haven, T. L., and L. Van Grootel. 2019. “Preregistering Qualitative Research.” Accountability in Research 26 (3): 229–244. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, S. 2013. “Qualitative Secondary Data Analysis: Ethics, Epistemology and Context.” Progress in Development Studies 13: 495–306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1464993413490479.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, K. 2009. “Protecting Respondent Confidentiality in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Health Research 19 (11): 1632–1641. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309350879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, C. J 2016. “Teaching qualitative research.” In Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise, edited by B. Smith and A. C. Sparkes, 409-423. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuula, A. 2011. “Methodological and ethical dilemmas of archiving qualitative data.” IASSIST Quarterly 34/35:12-17. doi:https://doi.org/10.29173/iq455.
   Google Scholar
• Kwasnicka, D., G. A. Ten Hoor, A. Van Dongen, E. Gruszczyńska, M. S. Hagger, K. Hamilton, N. Hankonen, et al. 2020. “Promoting Scientific Integrity through Open Science in Health Psychology: Results of the Synergy Expert Meeting of the European Health Psychology Society.” Health Psychology Review 1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2020.1844037.
   Google Scholar
• Laine, H. 2017. “Afraid of Scooping – Case Study on Researcher Strategies against Fear of Scooping in the Context of Open Science.” Data Science Journal 16 (29): 1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. 2018. “Lively Data, Social Fitness and Biovalue: The Intersections of Health Self-Tracking and Social Media.” In The SAGE Handbook of Social Media, edited by J. Burgess, A. Marwick, and T. Poell, 562–578. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, N. E., R. Stanwick, and A. Lynk. 2014. “Canada’s Shameful History of Nutrition Research on Residential School Children: The Need for Strong Medical Ethics in Aboriginal Health Research.” Pediatrics & Child Health 19 (2): 64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/19.2.64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, C., and G. Nilsonne. 2018. “Data Sharing in Qualitative Research: Opportunities and Concerns.” MedEdPublish 7: 1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2018.0000255.1.
   Google Scholar
• McKiernan, E. C., P. E. Bourne, C. T. Brown, S. Buck, A. Kenall, J. Lin, D. McDougall, et al. 2016. “How Open Science Helps Researchers Succeed.” eLife 5 :1–19, e16800. doi:https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. 2008. “Emergent Design.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods, edited by L. M. Given, 246–248. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mosconi, G., Q. Li, D. Randall, H. Karasti, P. Tolmie, J. Barutzky, M. Korn, and V. Pipek. 2019. “Three Gaps in Opening Science.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 28 (3): 749–789. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-019-09354-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., E. D. Beck, L. Campbell, J. K. Flake, T. E. Hardwicke, D. T. Mellor, A. E. Van’t Veer, and S. Vazire. 2019. “Preregistration Is Hard, and Worthwhile.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 23 (10): 815–818. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., G. Alter, G. C. Banks, D. Borsboom, S. D. Bowman, S. J. Breckler, S. Buck, et al. 2015. “Promoting an Open Science Culture.” Science 348 (6242): 1422–1425. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., J. R. Spies, and M. Motyl. 2012. “Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth over Publishability.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (6): 615–631. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nusbaum, L., B. Douglas, K. Damus, M. Paasche-Orlow, and N. Estrella-Luna. 2017. “Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study.” Global Qualitative Nursing Research 4: 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393617732017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, M. G., S. Kaplan, and R. Whittington. 2019. “Editorial Essay: The Tumult over Transparency: Decoupling Transparency from Replication in Establishing Trustworthy Qualitative Research.” Administrative Science Quarterly 65 (1): 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219887663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, S., J. Brooks, S. Goodman, S. Cahill, P. Branney, G. J. Treharne, and C. Sullivan. 2019. “Celebrations Amongst Challenges: Considering the Past, Present and Future of the Qualitative Methods in Psychology Section of the British Psychology Society.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 16 (3): 464–482. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2019.1605275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, M. W., M. Y. Iguchi, and S. Panicker. 2018. “Ethical Aspects of Data Sharing and Research Participant Protections.” American Psychologist 73 (2): 138–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryen, A. 2004. “Ethical Issues.” In Qualitative Research Practice, edited by C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, and D. Silverman, 230–247. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shrout, P. E., and J. L. Rodgers. 2018. “Psychology, Science, and Knowledge Construction: Broadening Perspectives from the Replication Crisis.” Annual Review of Psychology 69: 487–510. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B., and K. R. McGannon. 2018. “Developing Rigor in Qualitative Research: Problems and Opportunities within Sport and Exercise Psychology.” International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 11: 101–121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2017.1317357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. J. 2008. “How Ethical Is Ethical Research? Recruiting Marginalized, Vulnerable Groups into Health Services Research.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 62: 248–257. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04567.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparkes, A. C., and B. Smith. 2009. “Judging the Quality of Qualitative Inquiry: Criteriology and Relativism in Action.” Psychology of Sport and Exercise 10: 491–497. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamminen, K. A., and Z. A. Poucher. 2018. “Open Science in Sport and Exercise Psychology: Review of Current Approaches and Considerations for Qualitative Inquiry.” Psychology of Sport and Exercise 36: 17–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, H., and R. Olive. 2016. “Conducting Observations in Sport and Exercise Settings.” In Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise, edited by B. Smith and A. C. Sparkes, 124–138. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tuval-Mashiach, R. 2017. “Raising the Curtain: The Importance of Transparency in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Psychology 4 (2): 126–138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000062.
   Google Scholar
• UK Research and Innovation. 2020. “RCUK Open Access Policy.” https://www.ukri.org/funding/information-for-award-holders/open-access/open-access-policy/
   Google Scholar
• Walford, G. 2005. “Research Ethical Guidelines and Anonymity.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 28 (1): 83–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01406720500036786.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, C. G., W. Xia, M. Li, J. C. Denny, P. A. Harris, and B. A. Malin. 2018. “Enabling Open-Science Initiatives in Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry without Sacrificing Patients’ Privacy: Current Practices and Future Challenges.” Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1 (1): 104–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917749652.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, D. C., and J. P. Gone. 2012. “Decolonizing Psychological Inquiry in American Indian Communities: The Promise of Qualitative Methods.” In Qualitative Strategies for Ethnocultural Research, edited by D. K. Nagata, L. Kohn-Wood, and L. A. Suzuki, 161–178. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, M. 1992. “The Concepts and Principles of Equity and Health.” International Journal of Health Services 22: 429–445. doi:https://doi.org/10.2190/986L-LHQ6-2VTE-YRRN.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolcott, H. F. 1995. The Art of Fieldwork. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yardley, L. 2000. “Dilemmas in Qualitative Health Research.” Psychology & Health 15: 215–228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440008400302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar