Co-production: A resource to guide co-producing research in the sport, exercise, and health sciences

References

• Armstrong, A., E. Flynn, K. Salt, J. Briggs, R. Clarke, J. Vines, and A. MacDonald. 2022. “Trust and Temporality in Participatory Research.” Qualitative Research 146879412110651. doi:10.1177/14687941211065163.
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S.R. 1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35 (4): 216–224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, S., A. Hart, K. Pahl, and P. Ward, Eds. 2018. Co-producing Research: A Community Development Approach. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banner, D., M. Bains, S. Carroll, D. K. Kandola, D. E. Rolfe, C. Wong, and I. D. Graham. 2019. “Patient and Public Engagement in Integrated Knowledge Translation Research: Are We There Yet?” Research Involvement & Engagement 5 (1): 8. doi:10.1186/s40900-019-0139-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Batalden, P. 2018. “Getting More Health from Healthcare: Quality Improvement Must Acknowledge Patient Coproduction—an Essay by Paul Batalden.” The British Medical Journal 362: k3617. doi:10.1136/bmj.k3617.
   Google Scholar
• Batlle, I., and S. Carr. 2021. “Trust and Relationships in Qualitative Research: A Critical Reflection on How We Can Value Time.” In Temporality in Qualitative Inquiry, edited by I. Batlle and S. Carr, 158–171. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D. M., and K. Pahl. 2018. “Co-production: Towards a Utopian Approach.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 21 (1): 105–117. doi:10.1080/13645579.2017.1348581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. 2005. “Developing the Theoretical Basis for Service User/survivor-led Research and Equal Involvement in Research.” Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 14 (1): 4–9. doi:10.1017/S1121189X0000186X.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beresford, P. 2007. “The Role of Service User Research in Generating Knowledge-based Health and Social Care: From Conflict to Contribution.” Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 3 (3): 329–341. doi:10.1332/174426407781738074.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. 2020. “PPI or User Involvement: Taking Stock from a Service User Perspective in the Twenty First Century.” Research Involvement and Engagement 6 (1): 36. doi:10.1186/s40900-020-00211-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bird, M. L., B. W. Mortenson, F. Chu, N. Acerra, E. Bagnall, A. Wright, K. Hayley, J. Yao, and J. J. Eng. 2019. “Building a Bridge to the Community: An Integrated Knowledge Translation Approach to Improving Participation in Community-based Exercise for People after Stroke.” Physical Therapy 99 (3): 286–296. doi:10.1093/ptj/pzy146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., and E. Loeffler. 2021. “Developing Evidence-based Co-production: A Research Agenda.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Co-production of Public Services and Outcomes, edited by E. Loeffler and T. Bovaird, 693–713, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, S., and I. Graham. 2013. “Integrated Knowledge Translation.” In Knowledge Translation in Health Care: Moving from Evidence to Practice. 2nded., edited by S. Straus, J. Tetroe, and I. Graham, 14–23. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., and M. Honingh. 2016. “Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction: A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical Definitions.” Public Administration Review 76 (3): 427–435. doi:10.1111/puar.12465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., and M. Honingh. 2018. “Definitions of Co-production and Co-creation.” In Co-Production and Co-creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services, edited by T. Brandsen, T. Steen, and B. Verschuere, 9–17. Milton Parks: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S. 2015. “Perils and Potentials in Qualitative Psychology.” Integrative Psychological and Behavioural Science 49 (2): 162–173. doi:10.1007/s12124-014-9293-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, B., D. Thijssen, R. Murphy, L. Graves, G. Whyte, F. Gillison, D. Crone, P. Wilson, D. Hindley, and P. Watson. 2019. “Preliminary Effects and Acceptability of a Co-produced Physical Activity Referral Intervention.” Health Education Journal 78 (8): 869–884. doi:10.1177/0017896919853322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundon, A., and B. Smith. 2017. “From Inspired to Inspiring: Community-based Research, Digital Storytelling, and a Networked Paralympic Movement.” In Sharing Qualitative Research: Showing Lived Experiences and Community Narratives, edited by S. Gair and A. van Luyn, 10–24. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Strategy for Patient-oriented Research – Patient Engagement Framework. Ottawa, Canada (2014). http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/48413.html accessed 17th November 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Carr, S. 2018. “Who Owns Co-production?” In Social Policy First Hand: An International Introduction to Participatory Welfare, edited by P. Beresford and S. Carr, 74–83. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton, J. I. 1998. Nothing about Us without Us: Disability Oppression and Empowerment. Berkley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Co-production Collective (2021). https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk (accessed 3rd July 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Co-production Network for Wales (2021). https://copronet.wales (accessed 3rd July 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Dal Mas, F., H. Biancuzzi, M. Massaro, and L. Miceli. 2020. “Adopting A Knowledge Translation Approach in Healthcare Co-production. A Case Study.” Management Decision 58 (9): 1841–1862. doi:10.1108/MD-10-2019-1444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly-Smith, A., T. Quarmby, V.S.J. Archbold, C. Corrigan, D. Wilson, G. Resaland, J. Bartholomew, et al. 2020. “Using a Multi-stakeholder Experience-based Design Process to Co-develop the Creating Active Schools Framework.” International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 17 (1): 13. doi:10.1186/s12966-020-0917-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darby, S. 2017. “Making Space for Co-produced Research ‘Impact’: Learning from a Participatory Action Research Case study.” Area 49 (2): 230–237. doi:10.1111/area.12321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudau, A., R. Glennon, and B. Verschuere. 2019. “Following the Yellow Brick Road? (Dis)enchantment with Co-design, Co-production and Value Co-creation in Public Services.” Public Management Review 21 (11): 1577–1594. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1653604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., and T. Brannelly. 2017. “Approaches to Democratizing Qualitative Research Methods.” Qualitative Research 17 (3): 271–277. doi:10.1177/1468794117706869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ersoy, A., Ed. 2017. The Impact of Co-production: From Community Engagement to Social Justice. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, A., N. Barker-Ruchti, J. Blackwell, G. Clay, F. Dowling, S. Frydendal, Gliemann, et al. 2021. “Qualitative Research in Sports Studies: Challenges, Possibilities and the Current State of Play.” European Journal for Sport and Society 18 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1080/16138171.2021.1899969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewert, B., and A. Evers. 2014. “An Ambiguous Concept: On the Meanings of Co-production for Health Care Users and User Organisations?” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organisations 25 (2): 425–442. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9345-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farr, M., R. Davies, P. Davies, D. Bagnall, E. Brangan, and H. Andrews. 2020. A Map of Resources for Co- Producing Research in Health and Social Care (Version 1.2). Bristol: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) ARC West and People in Health West of England; University of Bristol and University of West of England.
   Google Scholar
• Fledderus, J., T Brandsen, and M. Honingh. 2015. “User Co-production of Public Service Delivery: An Uncertainty Approach.” Public Policy and Administration 30 (2): 145–164. doi:10.1177/0952076715572362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flinders, M., M. Wood, and M. Cunningham. 2016. “The Politics of Co- Production: Risks, Limits and Pollution.” Evidence and Policy 12 (2): 261–279. doi:10.1332/174426415X14412037949967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, M. 2010. “Replies to Alcoff, Goldberg, and Hookway on Epistemic Injustice.” Episteme 7 (2): 164–178. doi:10.3366/epi.2010.0006.
   Google Scholar
• Gainforth, H., F. Hoekstra, R. McKay, C. McBride, S. Sweet, K. Martin Ginis, K. Anderson, et al. 2021. “Integrated Knowledge Translation Guiding Principles for Conducting and Disseminating Spinal Cord Injury Research in Partnership.” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 102 (4): 656–663. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, L. P., R. Morshead, C. McWilliam, G. Forbes, M. Ussher, A. Simpson, M. Lucock, and S. Gillard. 2019. “Co-producing Randomized Controlled Trials: How Do We Work Together?” Frontiers in Sociology 4: 21. doi:10.3389/fsoc.2019.00021.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Golob, M., and A. Giles. 2013. “Challenging and Transforming Power Relations within Community-based Participatory Research: The Promise of a Foucauldian Analysis.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 5 (3): 356–372. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2013.846273.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, I. D., A. Kothari, C. McCutcheon. 2018. “Moving Knowledge into Action for More Effective Practice, Programmes and Policy: Protocol for a Research Programme on Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network Project Leads.” Implementation Science 13 (1): 22. DOI:10.1186/s13012-017-0700-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, I. D., C. McCutcheon, and A. Kothari. 2019. “Exploring the Frontiers of Research Co-production: The Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network Concept Papers.” Health Research Policy and Systems 17 (1): 88. doi:10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, G. 2016. “Power to the People: To What Extent Has Public Involvement in Applied Health Research Achieved This?” Research Involvement and Engagement 2 (1): 28. doi:10.1186/s40900-016-0042-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hickey, G., A. Allam, U. Boolaky, T. McManus, S. Staniszewska, and D. Tembo. 2021. “Co-producing and Funding Research in the Context of a Global Health Pandemic.” In COVID-19 and Co-production in Health and Social Care Research, Policy, and Practice (Volume 12): The Challenges of Co-production and Necessity of Co-production, edited by P. Beresford, M. Farr, G. Hickey, J. Kaur, M Ocloo, D. Tembo, and O. Williams, 39–47. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, F., and H. G. Gainforth, SCI Guiding Principles Consensus Panel. 2021. “Principles and Related Strategies for Spinal Cord Injury Research Partnership Approaches: A Qualitative Study.” Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice. doi: 10.1332/174426421X16161715996124.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, F., K. Mrklas, M. Khan, R. McKay, M. Vis-Dunbar, K. Sibley, T. Nguyen, I. Graham, and H L. Gainforth, . 2020. “A Review of Reviews on Principles, Strategies, Outcomes and Impacts of Research Partnerships Approaches: A First Step in Synthesising the Research Partnership Literature.” Health Research Policy and Systems 18 (1) 1–23. DOI:10.1186/s12961-020-0544-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M., and H. Thomas-Hughes. 2021. “Conceptualising Quality in Co-produced Research.” Qualitative Research 21 (5): 788–805. doi:10.1177/1468794120919092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, H., and T. Gorst. 2019. “Co-production with People with Parkinson’s Disease: Making Physical Activity Effective, Meaningful and Sustainable.” JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports 17 (4): 442–443. doi:10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00088.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• INVOVE (2021). Guidance on Co-producing a Research Project. https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project (accessed 17 November 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N., L. Byrne, and S. Carr. 2020. “If Not Now, When? COVID-19, Lived Experience, and a Moment for Real Change.” The Lancet Psychiatry 7 (12): 1008–1009. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30374-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jull, J., A. Giles, and I. D. Graham. 2017. “Community-based Participatory Research and Integrated Knowledge Translation: Advancing the Co-creation of Knowledge.” Implementation Science 12 (1): 150. doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0696-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kara, H. 2017. “Identity and Power in Co-produced Activist Research.” Qualitative Research 17 (3): 289–301. doi:10.1177/1468794117696033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjellström, S., K. Areskoug-Josefsson, B. Andersson Gäre, and G. Robert. 2020. “Exploring, Measuring and Enhancing the Coproduction of Health and Well-being at the National, Regional and Local Levels through Comparative Case Studies in Sweden and England: The ‘Samskapa’ Research Programme Protocol.” BMJ Open 9 (7): e029723. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles, S. E., D. Allen, A. Donnelly, J. Flynn, K. Gallacher, A. Lewis, G. McCorkle, M. Mistry, P. Walkington, and J. Drinkwater. 2021. “More than a Method: Trusting Relationships, Productive Tensions, and Two-way Learning as Mechanisms of Authentic Co-production.” Research Involvement and Engagement 7 (1): 34. doi:10.1186/s40900-021-00262-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kothari, A., C. McCutcheon, ID. Graham, and For The Ikt Research Network. 2017. “Defining Integrated Knowledge Translation and Moving Forward: A Response to Recent Commentaries.” International Journal of Health Policy Management 6 (5): 1–2. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2017.15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraff, H. (2020). A critical exploration of agonistic participatory design. The Design, Journal, 23 (1): 31–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T.S. 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kusenbach, M. 2020. “Mobile Methods.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research in Education, edited by M. Ward and S. Delamont, 257–269, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, N., and S. Carr. 2018. “‘Outside the Original Remit’: Co‐production in UK Mental Health Research, Lessons from the Field.” International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 27 (4): 1273–1281. doi:10.1111/inm.12499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leggat, F., R. Wadey, M. Day, S. Winter, and P. Sanders. 2021. “Bridging the Know-do Gap Using Integrated Knowledge Translation and Qualitative Inquiry: A Narrative Review.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 1–14. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2021.1954074.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lenette, C., N. Stavropoulou, C. Nunn, S.T. Kong, T. Cook, K. Coddington, and S. Banks. 2019. “Brushed under the Carpet: Examining the Complexities of Participatory Research.” Research for All 3 (2): 161–179. doi:10.18546/RFA.03.2.04.
   Google Scholar
• Liddiard, K., K. Runswick-Cole, D. Goodley, S. Whitney, E. Vogelmann, and L. Watts. 2019. ““I Was Excited by the Idea of a Project that Focuses on Those Unasked Questions”: Co-producing Disability Research with Disabled Young People.” Children and Society 33 (2): 154–167. doi:10.1111/chso.12308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liegghio, M. 2013. “A Denial of Being: Psychiatrization as Epistemic Violence.” In Mad Matters. A Critical Reader in Canadian Mad Studies, edited by B. LeFrançois, R. Menzies, and G. Reaume, 122–129. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loeffler, E. 2021. Co-Production of Public Services and Outcomes. Eastbourne, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Löhr, K., M. Weinhard, and S. Sieber. 2020. “The “World Cafe ́” as a Participatory Method for Collecting Qualitative Data.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19: 1–15. doi:10.1177/1609406920916976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luguetti, C., L. Singehebhuye, and R. Spaaij. 2021. ““Stop Mocking, Start Respecting’: An Activist Approach Meets African Australian Refugee-background Young Women in Grassroots Football”. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 14 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2021.1888152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, J.K., C.R. West, and K.A. Martin Ginis. 2019. “The Effects of A Patient and Provider Co-developed, Behavioral Physical Activity Intervention on Physical Activity, Psychosocial Predictors, and Fitness in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Sports Medicine 49 (7): 1117–1131. doi:10.1007/s40279-019-01118-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, L., T. Kay, N. Anokye, and J. Fox-Rushby. 2019. “Community Sport and the Politics of Aging: Co-design and Partnership Approaches to Understanding the Embodied Experiences of Low-income Older People.” Frontiers in Sociology 4: 5. doi:10.3389/fsoc.2019.00005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin, G. P. 2008. “‘Ordinary People Only’: Knowledge, Representativeness, and the Publics of Public Participation in Healthcare.” Sociology of Health & Illness 30 (1): 35–54. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01027.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S. 2010. “Co-production of Social Research: Strategies for Engaged Scholarship.” Public Money and Management 30 (4): 211–218. doi:10.1080/09540962.2010.492180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin Ginis, K., P. van der Ploeg, C. Foster, K. Lai, C. McBride, K. Ng, B Pratt, et al. 2021. “Physical Activity among People with Disabilities: A Global Perspective.” The Lancet 398 (10298): 443–455. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01164-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, W. 2021. “On Staying: Extended Temporalities, Relationships and Practices in Community Engaged Scholarship.” Qualitative Research 146879412110493. doi:10.1177/14687941211049318.
   Google Scholar
• Miettinen, R., J. Tuunainen, and T. Esko. 2015. “Epistemological, Artefactual and Interactional–institutional Foundations of Social Impact of Academic Research.” Minerva 53 (3): 257–277. doi:10.1007/s11024-015-9278-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mind (2021). https://www.mind.org.uk/about-us/our-policy-work/sport-physical-activity-and-mental-health/resources/mental-health-and-physical-activity-toolkit/guide-3-involving-people-with-lived-experience-of-mental-health-problems-in-the-design-and-delivery-of-your-work/ (accessed September 23rd 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 1993. The Return of the Political. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2000. Political Science Series 72. Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism. London: Institute for Advanced Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2013. Hegemony, Radical Democracy and the Political. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moussa, Z. 2009. “Rivers of Life.” Participatory Learning and Action 60: 182–186.
   Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T., A. Sancino, and M. Sicilia. 2017. “Varieties of Participation in Public Services: The Who, When, and What of Coproduction.” Public Administration Review 77 (5): 766–776. doi:10.1111/puar.12765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Development Team for Inclusion (2021). https://www.ndti.org.uk/search?keywords=co-production (accessed 23rd September 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T., I. D. Graham, K. J. Mrklas, S. Bowen, M. Cargo, C. A. Estabrooks, A. Kothari, et al. 2020. “How Does Integrated Knowledge Translation (IKT) Compare to Other Collaborative Research Approaches to Generating and Translating Knowledge? Learning from Experts in the Field.” Health Research Policy & Systems 18 (1): 35. doi:10.1186/s12961-020-0539-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobles, J., C. Thomas, Z. Banks Gross, M. Hamilton, Z. Trinder-Widdess, C. Speed, A. Gibson, et al. 2020. ““Let’s Talk about Physical Activity”: Understanding the Preferences of Under-served Communities When Messaging Physical Activity Guidelines to the Public.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17 (8): 2782. doi:10.3390/ijerph17082782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, K., A. Kothari, and N. Mays. 2019. “The Dark Side of Coproduction: Do the Costs Outweigh the Benefits for Health Research?” Health Research Policy and Systems 17 (1): 33. doi:10.1186/s12961-019-0432-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Österåker, M. 2001. “To Put Your Cards on the Table–collection of Data through Silent Interviews.” Management Decision 39 (7): 578–582. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000005806.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1996. “Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development.” World Development 24 (6): 1073–1087. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V., and E. Ostrom. 1977. “Public Goods and Public Choices.” In Alternatives for Delivering Public Services: Toward Improved Performance, edited by E. S. Savas, 7–49. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., R. Parks, G. Whitaker, and S. Percy. 1978. “The Public Service Production Process: A Framework for Analysing Police Services.” Policy Studies Journal 7 (s1): 381. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1978.tb01782.x.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, V.J., W. Weavell, R. Callander, D. Piper, L. Richard, L. Maher, H. Boyd, et al. 2019. “The Participatory Zeitgeist: An Explanatory Theoretical Model of Change in an Era of Coproduction and Codesign in Healthcare Improvement.” Medical Humanities 45 (3): 247–257. doi:10.1136/medhum-2017-011398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, R., P. Baker, L. Kiser, R. Oakerson, E. Ostrom, V. Ostrom, S. L. Percy, M. B. Vandivort, G. Whitaker, and R. Wison. 1981. “Consumers as Co-producers of Public Services: Some Economic and Institutional Considerations.” Policy Studies Journal 9 (7): 1001–1011. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb01208.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PCORI Engagement Rubric - PCORI (Patient Centred Outcomes Research Institute) Website (2016). https://www.pcori.org/sites/default/files/Engagement-Rubric.pdf (accessed 3rd December 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, C. 2021. “The Complexities of Developing Equal Relationships in Patient and Public Involvement in Health Research.” Social Theory and Health 19 (4): 362–379. doi:10.1057/s41285-020-00142-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelletier, C.A., K. Ward, A. Pousette, and G. Fox. 2021. “Meaning and Experiences of Physical Activity in Rural and Northern Communities.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 13 (4): 690–703. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2020.1761434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petróczi, A., A. Heyes, S. Thrower, L. Martinelli, S. Backhouse, and I. Boardley. 2021. “Understanding and Building Clean(er) Sport Together: Community-based Participatory Research with Elite Athletes and Anti-doping Organisations from Five European Countries.” Psychology of Sport and Exercise 55: 101932. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettican, A., E. Speed, C. Kilbride, W. Bryant, and P. Beresford. 2021. “An Occupational Justice Perspective on Playing Football and Living with Mental Distress.” Journal of Occupational Science 28 (1): 159–172. doi:10.1080/14427591.2020.1816208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popp, J., E. Grüne, J. Carl, J. Semrau, and K. Pfeifer. 2021. “Co-creating Physical Activity Interventions: A Mixed Methods Evaluation Approach.” Health Research Policy & Systems 19 (1): 37. doi:10.1186/s12961-021-00699-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts, A., K. Shearn, G. Frith, and E. Christy. 2021. “Working with Local People as Part of a Whole-systems Approach to Physical Activity: Reflections from Local Delivery Pilots.” Perspectives in Public Health 141 (2): 74–75. doi:10.1177/1757913920982645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radl-Karimi, C., A. Nicolaisen, M. Sodemann, P. Batalden, and C. von Plessen. 2020. “Under What Circumstances Can Immigrant Patients and Healthcare Professionals Co-produce Health? - an Interpretive Scoping Review.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being 15 (1): 1. doi:10.1080/17482631.2020.1838052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redman, R., T. Greenhalgh, L. Adedokun, S. Staniszewska, and S. Denegri. 2021. “On Behalf of the Co-production of Knowledge Collection Steering Committee. Co-production of Knowledge: The Future.” British Medical Journal 372: 434.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, N.A., K.C. Kowalski, A.D. Mosewich, and L.J. Ferguson. 2021. “‘That’s How I Am Dealing with It–that Is Dealing with It’: Exploring Men Athletes’ Self-compassion through the Lens of Masculinity.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 14 (1): 1–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rogers, E., A. Papathomas, and F-E. Kinnafick. 2021. “Preparing for a Physical Activity Intervention in a Secure Psychiatric Hospital: Reflexive Insights on Entering the Field.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 13 (2): 235–249. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2019.1685587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolfe, D. E., V. Ramsden, D. Banner, and I. D. Graham. 2018. “Using Qualitative Health Research Methods to Improve Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement in Research.” Research Involvement and Engagement 4 (1): 49. doi:10.1186/s40900-018-0129-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rose, D., and J. Kalathil. 2019. “Power, Privilege and Knowledge: The Untenable Promise of Co-production in Mental “Health”.” Frontiers in Sociology 5 (57).
   Google Scholar
• Rütten, A., A. Frahsa, T. Abel, M. Bergmann, E. de Leeuw, D. Hunter, M. Jansen, A. King, and L. Potvin. 2019. “Co-producing Active Lifestyles as Whole-system-approach: Theory, Intervention and Knowledge-to-action Implications.” Health Promotion International 34 (1): 47–59. doi:10.1093/heapro/dax053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. 2015. Thinking Qualitatively: Methods of Mind. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schaillée, H., R. Spaaij, R. Jeanes, and M. Theeboom. 2019. “Knowledge Translation Practices, Enablers, and Constraints: Bridging the Research–practice Divide in Sport Management.” Journal of Sport Management 33 (5): 366–378. doi:10.1123/jsm.2018-0175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schinke, R., B. Smith, and K.R. McGannon. 2013. “Pathways for Community Research in Sport and Physical Activity: Criteria for Consideration.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 5 (3): 460–468. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2013.846274.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Co-Production Network (2021). https://www.coproductionscotland.org.uk (accessed 5th January 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Slattery, P., A. K. Saeri, and P. Bragge. 2020. “Research Co-design in Health: A Rapid Overview of Reviews.” Health Research and Policy Systems 18 (1): 17. doi:10.1186/s12961-020-0528-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B., K. Mallick, C. Foster, and J. Monforte. 2021. “Disability, the Communication of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour, and Ableism: A Call for Inclusive Messages.” British Journal of Sports Medicine 55 (20): 1121–1122. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2020-103780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R., L. Mansfield, and E. Wainwright. 2021. “’Should I Really Be Here?’: Problems of Trust and Ethics in PAR with Young People from Refugee Backgrounds in Sport and Leisure.” Sport in Society.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B., and K. McGannon. 2018. “Developing Rigor in Qualitative Research: Problems and Opportunities within Sport and Exercise Psychology.” International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 11 (1): 101–121. doi:10.1080/1750984X.2017.1317357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B., and K.R. McGannon. forthcoming. “Co-production and Impact: Challenges and Opportunities.” In SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln, M.D. Giardina, and G.S. Cannella. 6th ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B., J. Netherway, P. Jachyra, L. Bone, B. Baxter, J. Blackshaw, and C. Foster. 2022. “Infographic. Communicate Physical Activity Guidelines for Disabled Children and Young People.” British Journal of Sports Medicine 2022–105411. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2022-105411.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B., and A. Sparkes. 2020. “Qualitative Advances.” In Handbook of Sport Psychology. 4thed., edited by G. Tenenbaum and R. C. Eklund, 999–1019. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B., and L. Wightman. 2021. “Promoting Physical Activity to Disabled People: Messengers, Messages, Guidelines and Communication Formats.” Disability and Rehabilitation 43 (24): 3427–3431. doi:10.1080/09638288.2019.1679896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Care Institute for Excellence. (2013). Co-production in Social Care: What It Is and How to Do It https://www.scie.org.uk/publications/guides/guide51/what-is-coproduction/ (accessed 7TH February 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Sparkes, A., and B. Smith. 2014. Qualitative Research Methods in Sport, Exercise and Health. From Process to Product. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Staniszewska, S., S. Denegri, R. Matthews, and V. Minogue. 2018. “Reviewing Progress in Public Involvement in NIHR Research: Developing and Implementing a New Vision for the Future.” BMJ Open 8 (7): e017124. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, T., and T. Brandsen. 2020. “Coproduction during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic: Will It Last?” Public Administration Review 80 (5): 851–855. doi:10.1111/puar.13258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, E. 2021. “Fugitive Coproduction: Conceptualising Informal Community Practices in Scotland’s Hospitals.” Social Policy and Administration 55 (7): 1310–1324. doi:10.1111/spol.12727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suderman, K., N. Dolgoy, J. Yurick, C. Sellar, K. Nishimura, S.N. Culos-Reed, A.A. Joy, and M.L. McNeely. 2020. “A Practical Approach to Using Integrated Knowledge Translation to Inform A Community-based Exercise Study.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17 (11): 3911. doi:10.3390/ijerph17113911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tembo, D., G. Hickey, C. Montenegro, D. Chandler, E. Nelson, K. Porter, L. Dikomitis, et al. 2021. “Effective Engagement and Involvement with Community Stakeholders in the Co-production of Global Health Research.” British Medical Journal 372: 178. doi:10.1136/bmj.n178.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas-Hughes, H. 2018. “Ethical ‘Mess’ in Co-produced Research: Reflections from a UK-based Case Study.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 21 (2): 231–242. doi:10.1080/13645579.2017.1364065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, R., and C. Cushion. 2021. “‘Put that in Your Fucking Research’: Reflexivity, Ethnography and Disability Sport Coaching.” Qualitative Research 21 (2): 251–267. doi:10.1177/1468794120931349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, R., T. Huntley, C. Cushion, and D. Culver. 2021. “Infusing Disability into Coach Education and Development: A Critical Review and Agenda for Change.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 1–14. doi:10.1080/17408989.2021.1873932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Ven, K., I. Boardley, and M. Chandler. 2021. “Identifying Best-practice Amongst Health Professionals Who Work with People Using Image and Performance Enhancing Drugs (Ipeds) through Participatory Action Research.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 14 (1): 1–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Graaf, P., M. Cheetham, S. Redgate, C. Humble, and A. Adamson. 2021. “Co-production in Local Government: Process, Codification and Capacity Building of New Knowledge in Collective Reflection Spaces. Workshops Findings from a UK Mixed Methods Study.” Health Research Policy and Systems 19 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1186/s12961-021-00677-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warwick-Booth, L., A-M. Bagnall, and S. Coan. 2021. Creating Participatory Research: Principles, Practice and Reality. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, C. 2019. “Evidencing Impact: A Case Study of UK Academic Perspectives on Evidencing Research Impact.” Studies in Higher Education 44 (1): 72–85. doi:10.1080/03075079.2017.1339028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, T.L. 2018. “Exploring Narratives of Physical Activity and Disability over Time: A novel Integrated Qualitative Methods Approach.” Psychology of Sport and Exercise 37: 224–234. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K., and J. Grant. 2018. “A Comparative Review of How the Policy and Procedures to Assess Research Impact Evolved in Australia and the UK.” Research Evaluation 27 (2): 93–105. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvx042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, O., B. Lindenfalk, and G. Robert. In press. “Mitigating and Negotiating the Co-creation of Dis/value: Elinor Ostrom’s Design Principles and Co-creating Public Value.” Public Money and Management.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, T.L., L. Lozano-Sufrategui, and J. Tomasone. 2021. “Stories of Physical Activity and Disability: Exploring Sport and Exercise Students’ Narrative Imagination through Story Completion.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 1–19. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2021.2001031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, O., G. Robert, GP. Martin, E. Hanna, and J. O’Hara. 2020b. “Is Co-production Just Really Good PPI? Making Sense of Patient and Public Involvement and Co-production Networks.” In Decentering Healthcare Networks, edited by M. Bevir and J. Waring, 213–237. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, O., S. Sarre, C. Papoulias, S. Knowles, G. Robert, P. Beresford, D. Rose, S. Carr, M. Kaur, and V. J. Palmer. 2020a. “Lost in the Shadows: Reflections on the Dark Side of Co-production.” Health Research Policy and Systems 18 (1): 43. doi:10.1186/s12961-020-00558-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, T.L., and R. L. Shaw. 2016. “Synthesizing Qualitative Research.” In International Handbook of Qualitative Methods in Sport and Exercise, edited by B. Smith and A. C. Sparkes, 274–287. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, O., D. Tembo, J. Ocloo, M. Kaur, G. Hickey, M. Farr, and P. Beresford. 2021. “Co-production Methods and Working Together at a Distance: Introduction to Volume 2.” In COVID-19 and Co-production in Health and Social Care Research, Policy, and Practice (Volume 2): Co-production Methods and Working Togetherat a Distance, edited by O. Williams, D. Tembo, J. Ocloo, M. Kaur, G. Hickey, M. Farr, and P. Beresford, 1–16. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, K., S. Coen, A. Piaskoski, and J. Gilliland. 2019. “Children’s Perspectives on Neighbourhood Barriers and Enablers to Active School Travel: A Participatory Mapping Study.” The Canadian Geographer 63 (1): 112–128. doi:10.1111/cag.12488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D.S., E. Ostrom, and M.E. Cox. 2013. “Generalizing the Core Design Principles for the Efficacy of Groups.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 90: S21–S32. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar