Conflicts of the Global State

References

• Arendt, H. 1972. Crisis of the Republic. Boston, MA: Mariner Books.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 2006. Power in the Global Age: A New Global Political Economy. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Chase-Dunn, C., and B. Lerro. 2013. Social Change: Globalization from the Stone Age to the Present. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Delanty, G. 2009. The Cosmopolitan Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deudney, D. 1995. “Nuclear Weapons and the Waning of the Real-State.” Daedalus 124 (2): 209–31.
   Google Scholar
• Deudney, D. 1999. “Geopolitics and Change.” In New Thinking in International Relations Theory, edited by M. Doyle and J. Ikenberry, 91–123. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deudney, D. 2000. “Regrounding Realism.” Security Studies 10 (1): 1–45. doi: 10.1080/09636410008429419
   Google Scholar
• Fine, R. 2007. Cosmopolitanism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1998. Die postnationale Konstellation [The postnational constellation]. Frankfurt, M.: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Haigh, S. 2003. The World State: Polity or Condition? Australasian Political Studies Association Conference. Hobart: University of Tasmania.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. 2008. The Dialectics of Globalization: Economic and Political Conflict in a Transnational World. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Held, D. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Held, D., and M. Koenig-Archibugi, eds. 2005. Global Governance and Public Accountability. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Held, D., and A. McGrew. 2003. Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Higgott, R., and J. Brasset. 2004. “Building the Normative Dimensions of a Global Polity.” Review of International Studies 29 (1): 29–55.
   Google Scholar
• Higgott, R., and M. Ougaard, eds. 2002. Towards a Global Polity? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 1995. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflict. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2011. Das Recht der Freiheit [The right of freedom]. Frankfurt, M.: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M., and T. W. Adorno. 2007. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hrubec, M. 2011. Od zneuznani ke spravedlnosti: Kriticka teorie globalni spolecnosti a politiky [From misrecognition to justice: A critical theory of global society and politics]. Prague: Filosofia.
   Google Scholar
• Hrubec, M. 2012. “Authoritarian versus Critical Theory.” International Critical Thought 2 (4): 431–44. doi: 10.1080/21598282.2012.730369
   Google Scholar
• Hrubec, M. 2013. “An Articulation of Extra-Territorial Recognition.” In Global Justice and the Politics of Recognition, edited by T. Burns, 271–95. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. 1999. Global Justice: Defending Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. 1997. Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant’s Cosmopolitan Ideal. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linklater, A. 2007. Critical Theory and World Politics: Citizenship, Sovereignty and Humanity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Linklater, A. 2010. “Global Civilizing Processes and the Ambiguities of Human Interconnectedness.” European Journal of International Relations 16 (2): 155–78. doi: 10.1177/1354066109350796
   Google Scholar
• Lutz-Bachmann, M., and J. Bohman. 2002. Weltstaat oder Staatenwelt? Für und wider die Idee einer Weltrepublik [World state or state world? For and against the idea of world republic]. Frankfurt, M.: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, K. 1987. “World Government, Security, and Global Justice.” In Problems of International Justice, edited by S. Luper-Foy, 263–82. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, W. I. 2003. Transnational Conflicts: Central America, Social Change, and Globalization. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, W. I. 2014. Global Capitalism and the Crisis of Humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, W. I., and J. Harris. 2000. “Towards a Global Ruling Class? Globalization and the Transnational Capitalist Class.” Science and Society 64 (1): 11–54.
   Google Scholar
• Scheuerman, W. E. 2011. The Realist Case for Global Reform. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Scheuerman, W. E. 2012. Frankfurt School Perspectives on Globalization, Democracy, and the Law. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C. 2007. The Concept of the Political. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. 2000. Theory of the Global State: Globality as an Unfinished Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sklair, L. 2001. The Transnational Capitalist Class. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sklair, L. 2009a. “The Globalization of Human Rights.” Journal of Global Ethics 5 (2): 81–96. doi: 10.1080/17449620903110235
   Google Scholar
• Sklair, L. 2009b. “The Emancipatory Potential of Generic Globalization.” Globalizations 6 (4): 525–39. doi: 10.1080/14747730903298918
   Google Scholar
• Toynbee, A. J. 1962. America and the World Revolution. New York/London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2013. We Can End Poverty: Millenium Development Goals and beyond 2015. New York: UN Department of Public Information.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2014. The Millenium Development Goals Report 2014. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, I. 2003. The Decline of American Power: The U.S. in a Chaotic World. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, I. 2006. European Universalism. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. 2003. “Why a World State Is Inevitable.” European Journal of International Relations 9 (4): 491–542. doi: 10.1177/135406610394001
   Google Scholar