Socialism as an Organic Democratic Form of Life: On Axel Honneth’s Project of a Renewal of Socialism Based on Social Freedom

References

• Cohen, J. 1982. Class and Civil Society: The Limits of Marxian Critical Theory. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dubiel, H. 1985. Theory and Politics: Studies in the Development of Critical Theory. Translated by B. Gregg. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Genel, K. 2013. Autorité et émancipation—Horkheimer et la Théorie Critique [Authority and Emancipation—Horkheimer and Critical Theory]. Paris: Payot.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1973. “Natural Law and Revolution.” In Theory and Practice, by J. Habermas, translated by J. Viertel, 82–120. Boston: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1990. “What Does Socialism Mean Today?” New Left Review 183 (1): 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1996. Between Facts and Norms. Translated by W. Rehg. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hegel, G. W. F. 1991. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Translated by H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 1996. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Translated by J. Anderson. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 1998. “Democracy as Reflexive Cooperation—John Dewey and the Theory of Democracy Today.” Political Theory 26 (6): 763–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2000. Suffering from Indeterminacy: An Attempt at a Reactualization of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Assen: Van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2001. “Invisibility: On the Epistemology of ‘Recognition.’” Translated by M. Cooke and J. Seitzer. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75 (1): 111–126.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2003. “Redistribution as Recognition: A Response to Nancy Fraser.” In Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, by N. Fraser and A. Honneth, translated by J. Golb and J. Ingram, 110–197. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2004. “Organized Self-Realization: Some Paradoxes of Individualization.” Translated by J. Ben-Levi. European Journal of Social Theory 7 (4): 463–478.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2007a. “Recognition as Ideology.” In Recognition and Power: Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory, edited by B. v. d. Brink and D. Owen, 323–347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2007b. “The Social Dynamics of Disrespect: On the Location of Critical Theory Today.” In Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory, by A. Honneth, translated by J. Farell, 63–79. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2008. Reification: A Recognition-Theoretical View. Edited by M. Jay. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2010. The Pathologies of Individual Freedom: Hegel’s Social Theory. Translated by L. Löb. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2012. “Labour and Recognition: A Redefinition.” In The I in We, by A. Honneth, translated by J. Ganahl, 56–74. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2014. Freedom’s Right. Translated by J. Ganahl. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2015. “Rejoinder.” Critical Horizons 16 (2): 204–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2017. The Idea of Socialism: Towards a Renewal. Translated by J. Ganahl. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2019. “Recognition, Democracy and Social Liberty: A Reply.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 45 (6): 694–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honneth, A., and M. Hartmann. 2006. “Paradoxes of Capitalism.” Constellations 13 (1): 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M. (1937) 2002. “Traditional and Critical Theory.” In Critical Theory—Selected Essays, by M. Horkheimer, translated by M. J. O’Connell, 188–243. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M. (1940) 1978. “Authoritarian State.” In The Essential Frankfurt School Reader, edited by A. Arato and E. Gebhardt, 95–117. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M. (1941) 1978. “The End of Reason.” In The Essential Frankfurt School Reader, edited by A. Arato and E. Gebhardt, 26–48. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M. (1943) 2016. “On the Sociology of Class Relations.” nonsite.org, no. 18. https://nonsite.org/the-tank/max-horkheimer-and-the-sociology-of-class-relations.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, M. 1996. The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923–1950. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jütten, T. 2015. “Is the Market a Sphere of Social Freedom?” Critical Horizons 16 (2): 187–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manin, B. 1987. “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation.” Political Theory 15 (3): 338–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. 1969. An Essay on Liberation. Boston: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Marramao, G. 1975. “Political Economy and Critical Theory.” Telos 24: 56–80.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1977. Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Translated by A. Jolin and J. O’Malley. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 2010. “A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy.” In Marx Today Selected Works and Recent Debates, edited by J. F. Sitton, 91–94. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Melo, R. 2014. “From Theory to Praxis: Axel Honneth and the Struggles for Recognition in Contemporary Political Theory.” Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, no. 15: 17–36.
   Google Scholar
• Nobre, M. 2015. “How Practical Can Critical Theory Be?” In Critical Theory and the Challenge of Praxis, edited by S. G. Ludovisi, 159–172. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Piromalli, E. 2017. “Does Socialism Need Fraternity? On Axel Honneth’s The Idea of Socialism.” European Journal of Political Theory 19 (3): 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, F. (1941) 1978. “State Capitalism: Its Possibilities and Limitations.” In The Essential Frankfurt School Reader, edited by A. Arato and E. Gebhardt, 71–94. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Repa, L. 2016. “Critique of the Left, Critique of Reason—An Overview on Horkheimer’s Thought in the 1940s.” Cadernos de filosofia alemã 22 (3): 93–109.
   Google Scholar
• Schaub, J. 2015. “Misdevelopments, Pathologies, and Normative Revolutions: Normative Reconstruction as Method of Critical Theory.” Critical Horizons 16 (2): 107–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, F. G. 2013. “Um ponto cego no pensamento político? Teoria Crítica e a democratização da intimidade” [A Blind Spot in Political Thought? Critical Theory and the Democratization of Intimacy]. In A teoria crítica de Axel Honneth: Reconhecimento, liberdade e justiça [Axel Honneth’s Critical Theory: Recognition, Freedom and Justice], edited by R. Melo, 201–234. São Paulo: Saraiva.
   Google Scholar
• Stirk, P. 1992. Max Horkheimer: A New Interpretation. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira, M. 2017. “The Sociological Roots and Deficits of Axel Honneth’s Theory of Recognition.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Theory, edited by M. J. Thompson, 587–609. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zurn, C. 2015. Axel Honneth: A Critical Theory of the Social. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar