China and Market Socialism: A New Socioeconomic Formation

References

• Althusser, L., and E. Balibar. 1970. Reading Capital. Paris: NLB.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, S. 2013. “China 2013.” Monthly Review 64 (10): 15–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burlamaqui, L. 2015. “Finance, Development and the Chinese Entrepreneurial State: A Schumpeter-Keynes-Minsky Approach.” Brazilian Review of Political Economy 4 (141): 728–774.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Macroeconomic Research at Xiamen University. 2018. China’s Macroeconomic Outlook. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, J., B. Morck, and B. Yeung. 2011. “Capitalizing China.” NBER working paper, no. 17687.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, L. 2000. O enigma do Socialismo Real [The Enigma of Real Socialism]. Rio de Janeiro: Mauad.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriele, A. 2009. “The Role of State in China’s Industrial Development: A Reassessment.” MPRA working paper, no. 1451.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriele, A. 2016. “Lessons from Enterprise Reforms in China and Vietnam.” MPRA working paper, no. 71026.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriele, A., and F. Schettino. 2012. “Socialist Market Economy as a Distinct SEF Internal to the Modern MP.” New Proposals: Journal of Marxism and Interdisciplinary Inquiry 5 (2): 20–50.
   Google Scholar
• Harnecker, M. 2012. “Question 5: Social and Long-Term Planning?” Science & Society 76 (2): 243–266.
   Google Scholar
• Harry, W. 2001. “Property Rights and Legal Reform in Township and Village Enterprises in China.” Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal 1 (2): 226–258.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2005. Neoliberalismo: história e implicações [Neoliberalism: History and Implications]. São Paulo: Loyola.
   Google Scholar
• Hobsbawn, E. 1985. “Introdução” [Introduction]. In Formações econômicas pré–capitalistas [Pre-Capitalist Economic Formations], edited by K. Marx, 13–75. São Paulo: Paz e Terra.
   Google Scholar
• Jabbour, E. 2012. China Hoje: Projeto Nacional, Desenvolvimento e Socialismo de Mercado [China Today: National Project, Development and Market Socialism]. São Paulo: Anita Garibaldi/EDUEPB.
   Google Scholar
• Jabbour, E., and A. Dantas. 2017. “The Political Economy of Reforms and the Present Chinese Transition.” Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 37 (4): 789–807.
   Google Scholar
• Jabbour, E., and A. Dantas. 2018. “O socialismo de mercado e suas lógicas de funcionamento” [Market Socialism and Its Laws of Motions]. Carta Capital Online, August 10. Accessed March 20, 2019. https://www.cartacapital.com.br/blogs/brasil-debate/o-socialismo-de-mercado-e-suas-logicas-de-funcionamento/.
   Google Scholar
• Jabbour, E., A. Dantas, and A. Belmonte. 2017. “Ciclos econômicos, desenvolvimento e mercado: anotações sobre o socialismo e a ‘etapa primária’” [Economic Cycles, Development and Market: Notes on Socialism and the “Primary Stage”]. In 100 anos da Revolução Russa: legados e lições [100 Years of the Russian Revolution: Legacies and Lessons], edited by O. Bertolino and A. Monteiro, 27–48. São Paulo: Anita Garibaldi.
   Google Scholar
• Jabbour, E., and L. F. Paula. 2018. “A China e a ‘socialização do investimento’: uma abordagem Keynes-Gerschenkron-Rangel-Hirschman” [China and “Socialization of Investment”: A Keynes-Gerschenkron-Rangel-Hirschman Approach]. Revista de Economia Contemporânea 22 (1): 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Lenin, V. (1921) 1964. “The Tax in Kind (The Significance of the New Policy and Its Conditions).” In Lenin Collected Works, vol. 32, 326–365. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, K. 2014. “‘Socialism with Chinese Characteristics’: Uneven Development, Variegated Neoliberalization and the Dialectical Differentiation of State Spatiality.” Progress in Human Geography 38 (2): 221–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Losurdo, D. 2010. Stálin: história crítica de uma lenda negra [Stalin: Critical Story of a Black Legend]. São Paulo: Revan.
   Google Scholar
• Mamigonian, A. 2001. “Capitalismo e Socialismo em fins do século XX (visão marxista)” [Capitalism and Socialism at the End of the 20th Century (Marxist Approach)]. Ciência Geográfica 7 (18): 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Mamigonian, A. 2008. “A China e o marxismo: Li Dazhao, Mao e Deng” [China and Marxism: Li Dazhao, Mao and Deng]. In Marxismo e Oriente: quando as periferias tornam-se os centros [Marxism and the Orient: When the Peripheries Become the Centers], edited by M. Del Roio, 38–75. Marília: Ícone.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1859) 2008. Contribuição à Crítica da Economia Política [A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy]. São Paulo: Expressão Popular.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1881) 2017. “Carta a Vera Zasulich, 1881” [Letter to Vera Zasulich, 1881]. In Marx tardio e a via russa: Marx e as periferias do capitalismo [Late Marx and the Russian Way: Marx and the Peripheries of Capitalism], edited by T. Shanin, 13–25. São Paulo: Expressão Popular.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., and F. Engels. (1848) 1998. Manifesto Comunista [Communist Manifesto]. Boitempo: São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, C. 2013. “Padrões de investimento, mudança institucional e transformação estrutural na economia chinesa” [Investment Patterns, Institutional Change and Structural Transformation in the Chinese Economy]. In Padrões de desenvolvimento econômico: América Latina, Ásia e Rússia (1950–2008) [Patterns of Economic Development: Latin America, Asia and Russia (1950–2008)], edited by R. Bielshowisky, 426–467. Brasília: CGEE.
   Google Scholar
• Naughton, B. 2017. “Is China Socialist?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 31 (1): 3–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nogueira, I. 2018. “Estado e capital em uma China com classes” [State and Capital in China with Social Class]. Revista de Economia Contemporânea 22 (1): 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, T., L. Yanf, and G. Zucman. 2017. “Capital Accumulation, Private Property and Rising Inequality in China.” NBER working paper, no. 23368.
   Google Scholar
• Rangel, I. (1957) 2005. “Recursos ociosos e política econômica” [Idle Resources and Economic Policy]. In Obras Reunidas [Collected Works], by I. Rangel, 447–549. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto.
   Google Scholar
• Rangel, I. (1981) 2005. “Dualidade Básica da Economia Brasileira” [Basic Duality of the Brazilian Economy]. In Obras Reunidas [Collected Works], by I. Rangel, 22–56. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. 2017. “Xi Jinping Thought and the Nature of China Today.” Redline: Contemporary Marxist Analysis. Accessed March 10, 2019. https://rdln.wordpress.com/2017/10/26/xi-jinping-thought-and-the-nature-of-china-today/.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenstein-Rodan, P. N. 1943. “Problems of Industrialization of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe.” Economic Journal 53: 202–211.
   Google Scholar
• Sereni, E. (1971) 2013. “De Marx a Lênin: a categoria de ‘formação económico-social’” [From Marx to Lenin: The Category of “Socioeconomic Formation”]. Meridiano – Revista de Geografía, no. 2: 248–346.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, M. A. 2012. “A categoria de formação sócio-espacial e a questão regional: uma aproximação com Gramsci” [The Category of Sociospatial Formation and the Regional Question: An Approach with Gramsci]. Observatorio Geográfico de América Latina, no. 11: 1–7.
   Google Scholar