“The True Practice is Theory”: Edgar Bauer, Republicanism, and the Young Hegelians

References

• Avineri, S. 1968. The Social and Political Thought of Karl Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, C. 2021. “A Liberal before Liberalism: Karl Hermann Scheidler and the New Hegelians.” Modern Intellectual History 18 (3): 658–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, B. 1840. Die evangelische Landeskirche Preussens und die Wissenschaft [The Evangelical Prussian State Church and Science]. Leipzig: Wigand.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, B. 1841. Die Posaune des jüngsten Gerichts über Hegel den Atheisten und Antichristen [The Trumpet of the Last Judgement of Hegel, Atheist and Antichrist]. Leipzig: Wigand.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, E. 1841. “Vörlaufiges über ‘Bruno Bauer, Kritik der evangelischen Geschichte der Synoptiker’” [Overview of Bruno Bauer, Critique of the Evangelical History of the Synoptics]. Deutsche Jahrbücher für Wissenschaft und Kunst, no. 105: 417–419.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, B. 1842. Hegel’s Lehre von der Religion und Kunst von dem Standpuncte des Glaubens aus beurtheilt [Hegel’s Teaching on Religion and Art Judged from the Standpoint of Faith]. Leipzig: Wigand.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, E. 1842. Bruno Bauer und seine Gegner [Bruno Bauer and His Opponents]. Berlin: Jonas.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, E. 1843a. Der Streit der Kritik mit Kirche und Staat [The Struggle of Criticism with Church and State]. Charlottenburg: Edbert Bauer.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, E. 1843b. Die Ostpreußische Opposition [The East-Prussian Opposition]. Vol. 1 of Die liberalen Bestrebungen in Deutschland [The Liberal Aspirations in Germany]. Zurich und Winterthur: Literaischen Comptoirs.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, E. 1843c. Die Badischen Opposition [The Baden Opposition]. Vol. 2 of Die liberalen Bestrebungen in Deutschland [The Liberal Aspirations in Germany]. Zurich und Winterthur: Literaischen Comptoirs.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, E. 1843d. “Es leben feste Grundsätze” [A Life of Solid Principles]. In Berliner Novellen [Berlin Novells], edited by A. Weill and E. Bauer, 151–328. Berlin: Berliner Verlags-Buchhandlung.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, E. 1843e. Georg Herwegh und die literarische Zeitung [Georg Herwegh and the Literary Times]. Leipzig: Wigand.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, E. 1843f. Staat, Religion und Parthei [State, Religion and Party]. Leipzig: Wigand.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, E. 1844. Preßproceß Edgar Bauers, über das von ihm verfaßte Werk: Der Streit der Kritik mit Kirche und Staat [Press-Process Edgar Bauer, Concerning His Written Work: The Struggle of Criticism with Church and State]. Bern: Jenni.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, I. 2002. Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breckman, W. 1999. Marx, the Young Hegelians, and the Origins of Radical Social Theory: Dethroning the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breckman, W. 2015. “Arnold Ruge and the Machiavellian Moment.” In Die linken Hegelianer: Studien zum Verhältnis von Religion und Politik im Vormärz [The Left Hegelians: Studies in the Relation of Religion and Politics in the Vormärz], edited by M. Quante and A. Mohseni, 127–140. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink.
   Google Scholar
• Buhl, L. 1842. Der Beruf der Preußischen Presse [The Vocation of the Prussian Press]. Berlin: Klemann.
   Google Scholar
• Bunzel, W., and L. Lambrecht. 2011. “Group Formation and Divisions in the Young Hegelian School.” In Politics, Religion, and Art: Hegelian Debates, edited by D. Moggach, 27–44. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C. 2006. Iron Kingdom: The Rise and Downfall of Prussia, 1600–1947. Cambridge: Belknap.
   Google Scholar
• de Vriese, H. 2018. “Not a Man of Solid Principles: The Relevance of Edgar Bauer’s Polemical Portrait of Karl Marx in His 1843 novella Es leben feste Grundsätze!” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 25 (5): 679–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelstein, D. 2017. “Revolution in Permanence and the Fall of Popular Sovereignty.” In The Scaffolding of Sovereignty: Global and Aesthetic Perspectives on the History of a Concept, edited by Z. Benite, S. Geroulanos and N. Jerr, 371–392. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, F., and B. Bauer. 1842. Die frech bedräute, jedoch wunderbar befreite Bibel, oder, Der Triumph des Glaubens [The Insolently Threatened yet Miraculously Rescued Bible, or, the Triumph of Faith]. Zurich: Heß.
   Google Scholar
• Eßbach, W. 1988. Die Junghegelianer: Soziologie einer Intellektuellengruppe [The Young Hegelians: Sociology of an Intellectual Group]. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Furet, F. 1988. Marx and the French Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gall, L. 1989. Bürgertum in Deutschland [Citizens in Germany]. Berlin: Seidler.
   Google Scholar
• Hengstenberg, E. 1842. “Die Vollbrachte Revolution” [The Completed Revolution]. Evangelische Kirchenzeitung, no. 57: 449–451.
   Google Scholar
• Hook, S. 1962. From Hegel to Marx: Studies in the Intellectual Development of Karl Marx. Chicago: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, R. N. 1974. The Political Ideas of Marx and Engels: Marxism and Totalitarian Democracy, 1818–1850. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lambrecht, L., ed. 2013. Umstürzende Gedanken: radikale Theorie im Vorfeld der 1848er Revolution [Subversive Thoughts: Radical Theory Leading up to the 1848 Revolution]. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Lefort, C. 2007. Complications: Communism and the Dilemmas of Democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leipold, B. 2017. Citizen Marx: The Relationship between Karl Marx and Republicanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leipold, B. 2020. “Marx’s Social Republic: Radical Republicanism and the Political Institutions of Socialism.” In Radical Republicanism: Recovering the Tradition’s Popular Heritage, edited by B. Leipold, K. Nabulsi, and S. White, 172–193. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leo, H. 1838. Die Hegelingen: Actenstücke und Belege zu der s. g. Denunciation der ewigen Wahrheit [The Hegelings: Evidence and Documents Relating to the So-called Denunciation of Eternal Truth]. Halle: Eduard Anton.
   Google Scholar
• Löwith, K. 1965. From Hegel to Nietzsche: The Revolution in Nineteenth Century Thought. London: Holt, Reinhardt and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Luft, E. 2006. “Edgar Bauer and the Origins of the Theory of Terrorism.” In The New Hegelians: Politics and Philosophy in the Hegelian School, edited by D. Moggach, 136–165. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. 1968. Reason and Revolution: Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1975a. “Debates on Freedom of the Press and the Publication of the Proceedings of the Assembly of the Estates.” In Marx and Engels Collected Works, vol. 1, 132–181. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1975b. “The Attitude of Herwegh and Ruge to ‘The Free’.” In Marx and Engels Collected Works, vol. 1, 287. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1975. “The Holy Family.” In Marx and Engels Collected Works, vol. 4, 5–211. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1976. “The German Ideology.” In Marx and Engels Collected Works, vol. 5, 19–539. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• McLellan, D. 1969. The Young Hegelians and Karl Marx. London: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Moggach, D. 2003. The Philosophy and Politics of Bruno Bauer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moggach, D., ed. 2006. The New Hegelians: Philosophy and Politics in the Hegelian School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moggach, D. 2011. Politics, Religion and Art: Hegelian Debates. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pepperle, I. 1978. Junghegelianische Geschichtsphilosophie und Kunsttheorie [The Young Hegelian Philosophy of History and Theory of Art]. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quante, M., and A. Mohseni, eds. 2015. Die linken Hegelianer: Studien zum Verhältnis von Religion und Politik im Vormärz [The Left Hegelians: Studies of the Relation of Religion and Art in the Vormärz]. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, W. C. 2018. Marx’s Inferno: The Political Theory of Capital. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruge, A., and K. Marx, eds. 1844. Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher [German-French Yearbooks]. 1st and 2nd vols. Paris: Bureau des Annales.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Q. 2008. Hobbes and Republican Liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, M. K., and D. Moggach. 2019. “‘The Republic of Self-Consciousness’: Bruno Bauer’s Post-Kantian Perfectionism.” In Perfektionismus der Autonomie [Perfectionism and Autonomy], edited by D. Moggach, N. Mooren, and M. Quante, 203–226. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Stedman Jones, G. 2011. “The Young Hegelians, Marx and Engels.” In The Cambridge History of Nineteenth Century Political Thought, edited by G. Stedman Jones and G. Claeys, 556–600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stepelevich, L., ed. 1983. The Young Hegelians: An Anthology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomba, M. 2005. Krise und Kritik bei Bruno Bauer: Kategorien des Politischen im nachhegelschen Denken [Crisis and Critique in Bruno Bauer: Political Categories in Post-Hegelian Thought]. Berlin: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, R. 2016. The Sleeping Sovereign: The Invention of Modern Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar