The Eastern Partnership: civil society in between the European and domestic level: the case of Georgia

References

• Ambrosio, T. 2009. Authoritarian Backlash, Russian Resistance to Democratization in the Former Soviet Union. Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Areshidze, I. 2007. Democracy and Autocracy in Eurasia: Georgia in Transition. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broers, L. 2005. “After the Revolution.” Central Asian Survey 24 (3): 333–350. doi: 10.1080/02634930500310444
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs. 2010. FY 2010 Foreign Operations Appropriated Assistance: Georgia. Washington, DC: US Department of State.
   Google Scholar
• Carothers, T., and M. Ottaway, eds. 2000. Funding Virtue, Civil Society Aid and Democratisation Promotion. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Coalition for the European Georgia. 2011. Manifesto. Tbilisi: Coalition for the European Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• Companjen, F. 2010. “Georgia.” In The Colour Revolutions in the Former Soviet Republics: Successes and Failures, edited by D. Ó Beacháin and A. Polese, 13–29. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, T. 2001. The Helsinki Effect: International Norms, Human Rights, and the Demise of Communism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delegation of the EU to Georgia. 2012. European Union Selects 14 Best Projects By Non-Governmental Organisations in Georgia. Tbilisi: Delegation of the EU to Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• De Waal, T. 2011. Georgia's Choices. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum. 2011a. A Strategic Roadmap for Civil Society in the Eastern Partnership. Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum Steering Committee, Brussels. http://www.eap-csf.eu/assets/files/publications/strategic_roadmap_for_CS_EaPCSF2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum. 2011b. “Our Work in Progress.” Civil Society Forum. Accessed February 14, 2012. http://www.eap-csf.eu/en/working-groups/our-work-in-progress/
   Google Scholar
• ENPI Info Centre. 2011. €22 Million for New Civil Society Facility as EU Steps up Neighbourhood Response. Brussels: ENPI Info Centre.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2001. White Paper on European Governance. COM(2001) 370 final. Brussels: European Commission
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2004. Communication from the Commission “European Neighbourhood Policy” Strategy Paper. COM(2004) 373 final. Brussels: European Commission
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2006a. European Neighbourhood Instrument National Indicative Programme 2007–2010 Georgia. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2006b. “EU/Georgia Action Plan.” Accessed February 12, 2012. http://ec.europa.eu/world/enp/pdf/action_plans/georgia_enp_ap_final_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2008. “Eastern Partnership.” Accessed September 13, 2011. http://eeas.europa.eu/eastern/docs/com08_823_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum Concept Paper. Brussels: European Commission
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. “The European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights.” Accessed February 11, 2012. http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/how/finance/eidhr_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Commission and the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security. 2012. “Eastern Partnership Roadmap 2012-13: the Bilateral Dimension.” Accessed August 18, 2012. http://ec.europa.eu/world/enp/docs/2012_enp_pack/e_pship_bilateral_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Community. 1996. “Partnership and Cooperation Agreement.” Accessed February 10, 2012. http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/georgia/documents/eu_georgia/eu_georgia_pca_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, A. 2010. Europe's Balkan Dilemma, Paths to Civil Society or State-Building? London: I.B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Freyburg, T., S. Lavenex, F. Schimmelfennig, T. Skripka, and A. Wetzel 2009. “EU Promotion of Democratic Governance in the Neighbourhood.” Journal of European Public Policy 16 (6): 916–934. doi: 10.1080/13501760903088405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füle, S. 2012. “Presentation of the European Neighbourhood Policy Package.” Speech at the European Parliament Foreign Affairs Committee, 21 March 2012, Strasbourg
   Google Scholar
• Gänzle, S., 2008. “Externalizing EU Governance: The Case of the European Neighbourhood Policy.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, San Francisco, March 26–29, 2008
   Google Scholar
• Georgian Civil Society Organizations and Experts. 2012. Statement Regarding the Changes and Amendments to the Legislation on Food Safety and Consumer Rights. Tbilisi. http://www.epfound.ge/files/statement_on_food_safety_and_consumer_rights.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gromadzki, G. 2010. A Challenging Opportunity, The EU Plus Six – the Eastern Partnership. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Herd, G. 2005. “Colorful Revolutions and the CIS, ‘Manufactured’ Versus ‘Managed’ Democracy?.” Problems of Post-Communism 52 (2): 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M. 2002. “The Weakness of Post Communist Civil Society.” Journal of Democracy 13 (1): 157–169. doi: 10.1353/jod.2002.0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keck, M. E., and K. Sikkink 1998. Activists Beyond Borders. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. 2006. “New Wine in Old Wineskins: Promoting Reforms Through the New ENP.” Journal of Common Market Studies 44 (1): 29–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00613.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. 1986. “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest.” British Journal of Political Science 16 (1): 57–85. doi: 10.1017/S000712340000380X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostanyan, H., and M. Nasienak 2012. Moving the EU from a Laggard to a Leader in Democracy Assistance. Brussels: CEPS.
   Google Scholar
• Lanskoy, M., and G. Areshidze 2008. “Georgia's Year of Turmoil.” Journal of Democracy 19 (4): 154–168. doi: 10.1353/jod.0.0034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S. 2008. “A Governance Perspective on the European Neighbourhood Policy: Integration Beyond Conditionality?.” Journal of European Public Policy 15 (6): 938–955. doi: 10.1080/13501760802196879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, S. 2005. Die Europäische Union im Südkaukasus. Interessen und Institutionen in der Auswärtigen Politikgestaltung. Berlin: Nomos Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Muskhelishvili, M., and G. Jorjoliani 2009. “Georgia's Ongoing Struggle for a Better Future Continued.” Democratization 16 (4): 682–708. doi: 10.1080/13510340903083000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ó Beacháin, D. 2009. “Roses and Tulips: Dynamics of Regime Change in Georgia and Kyrgyzstan.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 25 (2–3): 199–226. doi: 10.1080/13523270902860550
   Google Scholar
• Open Society Georgia Foundation/For Transparency of Public Finances. 2007. Georgia and the European Neighbourhood Policy Perspectives and Challenges. Tbilisi: OSFG.
   Google Scholar
• Polese, A., and D. Ó Beacháin 2011. “The Colour Revolution Virus and Authoritarian Antidotes: Political Protest and Regime Counter Attacks in Post Communist Spaces.” Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 19 (3): 111–132.
   Google Scholar
• President of Russia. 2012. Law Regulating the Activities of NGOs Acting as Foreign Agents. Moscow: President of Russia. Accessed August 14, 2012. http://eng.kremlin.ru/news/4209
   Google Scholar
• Project on Civil Monitoring of European Neighborhood Policy Action Plan Implementation in Georgia. 2008. Survey of Civil Society in the Context of Monitoring the Implementation of European Neighborhood Policy Action Plan. Tbilisi: OSGF/EPF.
   Google Scholar
• Radio Free Europe. 2012. U.S. Concerned Over Egypt‘s Prosecution of NGO Cases. Prague: Radio Free Europe. Accessed February 10, 2012. http://www.rferl.org/content/washington_deeply_concerned_over_egypt_ngo_case_/24474523.html
   Google Scholar
• Rotter, M. 2012. “Sensible but Insufficient.” Development and Cooperation. Accessed May 9, 2012. http://www.dandc.eu/articles/220194/index.en.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. 2005. “The Outsiders: the European Neighbourhood Policy.” International Affairs 81 (4): 757–773. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00483.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudbery, I. 2010. “The European Union as Political Resource: NGOs as Change Agents?.” Acta Politica 45 (1/2): 136–157. doi: 10.1057/ap.2009.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. 2010. Colour Revolutions: The View from Moscow and Beijing. Cambridge: CRASSH, Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• World Movement for Democracy and the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law. 2008. Defending Civil Society. Washington, DC: National Endowment for Democracy.
   Google Scholar