Disciplining the “Second World”: the relationship between transnational and local forces in contemporary Hungarian women's social movements

References

• al-Natour, M. 2012. “The Role of Women in the Egyptian 25th January Revolution.” Journal of International Women's Studies 13 (5): 59–76.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International (AI). 2007. “Magyarország: Meg nem hallott segélykiáltások – A nők nem kapnak megfelelő védelmet a családon belüli szexális erőszak ellen [Hungary: Cries Unheard – The Failure to Protect Women from Rape and Sexual Violence in the Home].” http://amnesty.hu/NEEM%20jelentes.html (in Hungarian); http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/EUR27/002/2007 (in English).
   Google Scholar
• A.T.v. Hungary. 2005. “Communication No. 2/2003, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/32/D/2/2003,” 26 January. http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/protocol/decisions-views/CEDAW%20Decision%20on%20AT%20vs%20Hungary%20English.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Babb, F. 1996. “After the Revolution: Neoliberal Policy and Gender in Nicaragua.” Latin American Perspectives 23 (1): 27–48. doi: 10.1177/0094582X9602300103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bán, Z. 2012. “Vodafone: tettek az erőszak ellen [Vodafone: They Worked Together Against Violence].” Népszabadság, August 28. Accessed December 15, 2012. http://nol.hu/lap/jotett/20120828-vodafone__tettek_az_eroszak_ellen
   Google Scholar
• Bayes, J., P. Begné, L. Gonzalez, L. Harder, M. Hawkesworth, and L. Macdonald. 2005. Women, Democracy, and Globalization in North America: A Comparative Study. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Benedek, D., R. Firle, and Á. Scharle. 2006. A jóléti újraelosztás mértéke és hatékonysága [The Degree and Effectiveness of Welfare Distribution]. Budapest: Ministry of Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Benford, R., and D. Snow. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–639. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bírónők Egyesülete [Association of Women Judges]. 2013. ““Domestic violence” jelensége a világ különböző kultúráiban című tanácskozás [Domestic Violence in Various Cultures of the World],” July 26. http://www.birosag.hu/media/videok/interju-osszeallitas-bironok-egyesuletenek-tanacskozasan-20130626
   Google Scholar
• Cowles, M., J. Caporaso, and T. Risse. 2001. Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, D. 2000. “Social Identity and Its Influence on Women's Roles in East-Central Europe.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 2 (2): 214–243. doi: 10.1080/14616740050137447
   Google Scholar
• Earl, J., and K. Kimport. 2011. Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eyerman, R., and A. Jamison. 1998. Music and Social Movements: Mobilizing Traditions in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fábián, K. 2009. Contemporary Women's Movements in Hungary: Globalization, Democracy, and Gender Equality. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press and the Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fábián, K., ed. 2010. Domestic Violence in Postcommunist States: Local Activism, National Policies, and Global Forces. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fábián, E. 2013. “Kapcsolati erőszak [Partner Violence].” Jogi Fórum, June 26. http://www.jogiforum.hu/hirek/29896
   Google Scholar
• Fábián, K. forthcoming. “Naming Rights: Nation, Family, and Women's Rights in the Debates on Domestic Violence in Contemporary Hungary.” Hungarian Studies Review 41 (1–2).
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M., and K. Sikkink. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52 (4): 887–917. doi: 10.1162/002081898550789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flam, H., ed. 2001. Pink, Purple, Green: Women's, Religious, Environmental, and Gay/Lesbian Movements in Central Europe Today. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1978. History of Sexuality. Translated by R. Hurley. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 2009. “Feminism, Capitalism and the Cunning of History.” New Left Review 56: 97–117.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, M. 2011. ”Nők és férfiak a munkaerőpiacon, különös tekintettel a válságkezelés hatásaira [Women and Men in the Labor Market during Times of Economic Crisis].“ In Szerepváltozások, edited by I. Nagy and T. Pongrácz, 17–48. Budapest: Nemzeti Erőforrás Minisztérium.
   Google Scholar
• Fuszara, M. 1991. “Legal Regulation of Abortion in Poland.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 17 (1): 117–128. doi: 10.1086/494716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal, S., and G. Kligman. 2000. The Politics of Gender After Socialism: A Comparative-Historical Essay. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghodsee, K. 2012. “Rethinking State Socialist Mass Women's Organizations: The Committee of the Bulgarian Women's Movement and the United Nations Decade for Women, 1975–1985.” Journal of Women's History 24 (4): 49–73. doi: 10.1353/jowh.2012.0044
   Google Scholar
• Grabowska, M. 2012. “Bringing the Second World in: Conservative Revolution(s), Socialist Legacies, and Transnational Silences in the Trajectories of Polish Feminism.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 37 (2): 385–411. doi: 10.1086/661728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther, K. 2011. “The Possibilities and Pitfalls of NGO Feminism: Insights from Postsocialist Eastern Europe.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 26 (4): 863–887. doi: 10.1086/658504
   Google Scholar
• de Haan, F. 2010. “Continuing Cold War Paradigms in Western Historiography of Transnational Women's Organizations: The Case of Women's International Democratic Federation.” Women's History Review 19 (4): 547–573. doi: 10.1080/09612025.2010.502399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitlinger, A. 1996. “Framing Feminism in Post-Communist Czech Republic.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 29 (4): 77–93. doi: 10.1016/S0967-067X(96)80013-4
   Google Scholar
• Hemment, J. 2007. Empowering Women in Russia: Activism, Aid, and NGOs. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holc, J. 2004. “The Purest Democrat: Fetal Citizenship and Subjectivity in the Construction of Democracy in Poland.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 29 (3): 755–782. doi: 10.1086/381106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrycak, A. 2002. “From Mothers’ Rights to Equal Rights: Post-Soviet Grassroots Women's Associations.” In Women's Community Activism and Globalization: Linking the Local and Global for Social Change, edited by N. Naples and M. K. Desai, 62–79. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hrycak, A. 2012. “Global Campaigns to Combat Violence Against Women: Their Impact in Postcommunist Ukraine.” In Gender, State and Politics in Ukraine, edited by O. Hankivsky and A. Salnykova, 98–129. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hryciuk, R., and E. Korolczuk. 2013. “At the Intersection of Gender and Class: Social Mobilization Around Mothers’ Rights in Poland.” In Beyond NGO-ization: The Development of Social Movements in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by K. Jasobsson and S. Saxonberg, 49–70. Burlington: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch. 2012. “Hungary: EU, US Action Needed to Safeguard Rights, Rule of Law.” http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/01/06/hungaryreverse-interference-courts-media
   Google Scholar
• Ishkanian, A. 2007. “En-Gendering Civil Society and Democracy Building: The Anti-Domestic Violence Campaign in Armenia.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society 14 (4): 488–525. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxm020
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. E. 2009. Gender Violence in Russia: The Politics of Feminist Intervention. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. E., and G. Zaynullina. 2010. “Global Feminism, Foreign Funding, and Russian Writing About Domestic Violence.” In Domestic Violence Policies and Movement Activism in Europe and Postcommunist Eurasia, edited by K. Fábián, 78–110. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, H., and B. Klandermans, eds. 1995. Social Movements and Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kapitány, B., and Zs. Spéder. 2009. “Gyermekvállalás.” In Demográfiai Portré Jelentés, edited by J. Monostori, P. Őri, E. Molnár, and Zs Spéder, 29–40. Budapest: KSH Népességtudományi Kutató Intézet.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, M., and K. Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Transnational Activist Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, R. M., J. Bayes, and M. Hawkesworth, eds. 2001. Gender, Globalization, and Democratization. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Kenney, P. 2004. “Opposition Networks and Transnational Diffusion in the Revolutions of 1989.” In Transnational Moments of Change, edited by G. R. Horn and P. Kenney, 207–223. Manham: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Kenney, P. 2010. “Borders Breached: The Transnational in Eastern Europe Since Solidarity.” Journal of Modern European History 8 (2): 179–195.
   Google Scholar
• Kiss, M., and J. Schwertner. 1992. “Életre szóló ötletek: Elhalasztott nyugdíjkorhatár-emelés [Ideas for Life: Postponed Raising of Retirement Age].” Heti világgazdaság, November 28.
   Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R., and S. Olzak. 2004. “Discursive Opportunities and the Evolution of Right-Wing Violence in Germany.” American Journal of Sociology 110 (1): 198–230. doi: 10.1086/386271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krezinger, Sz. 2013. “Abortusz: támogatott védekezés, felvilágosítás kell [Abortion: Need to Offer Information and Provide Birth Control at Reasonable Cost].” Metropol, February 22. http://www.metropol.hu/cikk/1001945-abortusz-tamogatott-vedekezes-felvilagositas-kell
   Google Scholar
• Kulcsár, L. 1997. “Case Study of Hungary. FAO Economic and Social Development.” http://www.fao.org/docrep/w6543e/w6543e01.htm
   Google Scholar
• Lang, S. 2009. “Gendering European Publics? Transnational Women's Advocacy Networks in the European Union.” In Media Agoras: Democracy, Diversity and Communication, edited by I. Blanco, S. van Bauwel, and B. Cammaerts, 198–219. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Legro, J. 1997. “Which Norms Matter? Revisiting the ‘Failure’ of Internationalism.” International Organization 51 (1): 31–63. doi: 10.1162/002081897550294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, P., and D. Staiger. 2004. “Abortion Policy and Fertility Outcomes: The Eastern European Experience.” Journal of Law and Economics 47 (1): 223–243. doi: 10.1086/380475
   Google Scholar
• Lukić, J., J. Regulska, and D. Zaviršek, eds. 2006. Women and Citizenship in Central and Eastern Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Lütz, S., and M. Kranke. 2010. The European Rescue of the Washington Consensus? EU and IMF Lending to Central and Eastern European Countries. London School of Economics LEQS Paper No. 22. London: London School of Economics. www.lse.ac.uk/europeanInstitute/LEQS/LEQSPaper22.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Magyar Női Érdekérvényesítő Szövetség. 2012. “Egyezményes fellépést a nők elleni erőszak ellen – kövessük a lengyel példát [Sign the Convention – Let Us Follow the Polish Example],” December 11. Accessed December 15, 2012. http://noierdek.hu/?p=482
   Google Scholar
• Makara, K. 1993. “Válságdíj: Abortusz-szabályok [Price for a Crisis: Rules of Abortion].” Heti Világgazdaság 15, 74–76.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., S. Tarrow, and C. Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mendelson, S., and J. Glenn, eds. 2002. The Power and Limits of NGOs. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merry, S. E. 2006. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montoya, C. 2009. “International Initiative and Domestic Reforms: European Union Efforts to Combat Violence Against Women.” Politics and Gender 5 (3): 325–348. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X0999016X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narozhna, T. 2004. “Foreign Aid for a Post-Euphoric Eastern Europe: The Limitations of Western Assistance in Developing Civil Society.” Journal of International Relations and Development 7 (1): 243–266. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800024
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, L. 2005. “Trade Unions in Hungary: Between Social Partnership, Political Action, and Organizing Drive.” In Trade Union Strategies in Central and Eastern Europe: Towards Decent Work, edited by D. Dimitrova and J. Vilrokx, 63–110. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Open Society Institute (OSI) Network Women's Program. 2003. Grant Program for 16 Days Media Campaigns to Combat Violence Against Women. http://www.osi.hu/vaw/introduction.htm
   Google Scholar
• Orenstein, M. 2008. Privatizing Pensions: The Transnational Campaign for Social Security Reform. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ost, D. 2009. “The Consequences of Postcommunism: Trade Unions in Eastern Europe's Future.” East European Politics and Societies 23 (1): 13–33. doi: 10.1177/0888325408326791
   Google Scholar
• Petrova, T., and S. Tarrow. 2007. “Participatory Activism in the Emerging European Polity: The Puzzle of East-Central Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (1): 74–94. doi: 10.1177/0010414006291189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigniczky, R. 1997. “Hungarian Abortion Legislation.” In Ana's Land: Sisterhood in Eastern Europe, edited by T. Renne, 113–115. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Regulska, J., and M. Grabowska. 2013. “Social Justice, Hegemony, and Women's Mobilizations.” In Postcommunism from Within: Social Justice, Mobilization, and Hegemony, edited by J. Kubik and A. Linch, 139–190. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robnik, S. 2010. “Domestic Violence Against Women: When the Practice Creates the Theory, the Slovenian Case.” In Domestic Violence Policies and Movement Activism in Europe and Postcommunist Eurasia, edited by K. Fábián, 195–218. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosser, B., and M. Vcherashnaya Rosser. 2001. “Failure of the Washington Consensus on Inequality and the Underground Economy in the Transition Economies.” Challenge: Magazine of Economic Affairs 44 (2): 39–50.
   Google Scholar
• Rueschmeyer, M., and S. Wolchik, eds. 2009. Women in Power in Post-Communist Parliaments. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggie, M. 1984. The State and Working Women: A Comparative Study of Britain and Sweden. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shawki, N. 2011. “Civil Society Advocacy and the Diffusion of Violence Against Women Norms: An Analysis of the International Violence Against Women Act.” Global Social Policy 11 (2–3): 175–193. doi: 10.1177/1468018111421415
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law and Domestic Enforcement. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slavova, K. 2006. “Looking at Western Feminisms Through the Double Lens of Eastern Europe and the Third World.” In Women and Citizenship in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by J. Lukić, J. Regulska, and D. Zaviršek, 245–263. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Sloat, A. 2005. “The Rebirth of Civil Society: The Growth of Women's NGOs in Central and Eastern Europe.” European Journal of Women's Studies 12 (4): 437–452. doi: 10.1177/1350506805057100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, S. 2005. “Where in the Transnational World are U.S. Women of Color?” In Women's Studies for the Future, edited by E. Kennedy and A. Beins, 111–124. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staggenborg, S. 1986. “Coalition Work in the Pro-Choice Movement: Organizational and Environmental Opportunities and Obstacles.” Social Problems 33 (5): 374–390. doi: 10.2307/800657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchland, J. 2011. “Is Postsocialism Transnational?” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 36 (4): 837–862. doi: 10.1086/658899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabad Döntés Jogáért Kampánycsoport. 1992. “Állásfoglalás a Kormány 6494. számú “a magzati élet védelméről” szóló törvényjavaslatáról [Statement on the Government's Bill],” October 9. http://www.esely.org/kiadvanyok/1993_1/allasfoglalas.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Szász, A. 2001. “A bántalmazott nők életét, érdekeit védelmező szervezetek [Organizations that Protect Battered Women].” Esély 3 (1): 106–119.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. 2010. “Outsiders Inside and Insiders Outside: Linking Transnational and Domestic Public Action for Human Rights.” Human Rights Review 11 (1): 171–182. doi: 10.1007/s12142-009-0115-5
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, J. 1997. Reinventing Political Science: A Feminist Approach. Fernwood: Halifax.
   Google Scholar
• Weldon, L. 2002. Protest, Policy, and the Problem of Violence Against Women: A Cross-National Comparison. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, N. 2006. “Intersectionality and Feminist Politics.” European Journal of Women's Studies 13 (3): 193–209. doi: 10.1177/1350506806065752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwingel, S. 2012. “How Do Norms Travel? Theorizing International Women's Rights in Transnational Perspective.” International Studies Quarterly 56 (1): 115–130. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00701.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar