Exit, choice and legacy: explaining the patterns of party politics in post-communist Slovakia

References

• Auers, D. 2013. “Latvia.” In The Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe, 3rd ed., edited by S. Berglund, J. Ekman, K. Deegan-Krause, and T. Knutsen, 85–124. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bakke, E., and N. Sitter. 2013. “Why Do Parties Fail? Cleavages, Government Fatigue and Electoral Failure in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary 1992–2012.” East European Politics 29 (2): 208–225. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2013.786702
   Google Scholar
• Batory, A. 2009. “The Dog that Did Not Bark? Assessing the Impact of the EU on Party Politics in Hungary.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 25 (4): 427–446. doi: 10.1080/13523270903310811
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, K., and M. Laver. 2006. Party Policy in Modern Democracies. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, S. 2003. Electoral Systems and Political Transformation in Post-Communist Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Bozóki, A., and J. Ishiyama, eds. 2002. The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe. New York: ME Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Bútora, M., G. Mesežnikov, and Z. Bútorová, eds. 1999. Kto? Prečo? Ako? Slovenské voľby. Bratislava: IVO.
   Google Scholar
• Bútorová, Z., O. Gyárfášová, M. Kollár, and G. Mesežnikov, eds. 2011. Slovenské voľby ‘10: Šanca na zmenu. Bratislava: IVO.
   Google Scholar
• Casal Bértoa, F. 2012a. “Parties, Regime and Cleavages: Explaining Party System Institutionalization in East Central Europe.” East European Politics 28 (4): 452–472. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2012.720569
   Google Scholar
• Casal Bértoa, F. 2012b. “Party Systems and Cleavage Structures Revisited: A Sociological Explanation of Party System Institutionalization.” Party Politics, on-line early doi:10.1177/1354068811436042.
   Google Scholar
• Casal Bértoa, F., K. Deegan-Krause, and T. Haughton. 2012. “Splitting the Difference: Assessing the Degree of Stability and Volatility of Party Politics in Post-Communist Eastern Europe (1990–2010)”. Elections, Public Opinion and Parties (EPOP) Annual Conference, University of Oxford, 7–9 September 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Casal Bértoa, F., K. Deegan-Krause, and P. Učen. 2012. “The Limits of Regulation: Party Law and Finance in Slovakia 1990–2012”. Paper presented to the Council of European Studies Conference, Boston, 22–24 March.
   Google Scholar
• Deegan-Krause, K. 2004. “Uniting the Enemy: Politics and the Convergence of Nationalisms in Slovakia.” East European Politics and Societies 18 (4): 651–696. doi: 10.1177/0888325404269596
   Google Scholar
• Deegan-Krause, K. 2006. Elected Affinities: Democracy and Party Competition in Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Pal Alto: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deegan-Krause, K. 2013. “Slovakia.” In The Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe, edited by S. Berglund, J. Ekman, K. Deegan-Krause, and T. Knutsen, 3rd ed., 255–290. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Deegan-Krause, K., and T. Haughton. 2010. “A Fragile Stability: The Institutional Roots of Low Party System Stability in the Czech Republic 1990–2009.” Politologicky casopis/Czech Journal of Political Science 10 (3): 227–241.
   Google Scholar
• Deegan-Krause, K., and T. Haughton. 2012. “In with the New (Again): ‘Annuals’, ‘Perennials’ and the Patterns of Party Politics in Central and Eastern Europe”. MPSA Conference, Chicago, 12–15 April.
   Google Scholar
• Duverger, M. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Meuthen.
   Google Scholar
• Ekiert, G., and S. Hanson, eds. 2003. Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Assessing the Legacy of Communist Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enyedi, Z. 2005. “The Role of Agency in Cleavage Formation.” European Journal of Political Research 44 (5): 697–720. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00244.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enyedi, Z. 2006. “The Survival of the Fittest: Party System Concentration in Hungary.” In Post-Communist EU Member States: Parties and Party Systems, edited by S. Jungerstam-Mulders, 177–201. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Esteban, J., and D. Ray. 1994. “On the Measurement of Polarization.” Econometrica 62 (4): 819–852. doi: 10.2307/2951734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, G., and S. Whitefield. 1993. “Identifying the Bases of Party Competition in Eastern Europe.” British Journal of Political Science 23 (4): 521–548. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400006712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fico, R. 2000. “Rationale for a New Political Party.” In Slovakia After Communism and Mečiarism, edited by K. Williams, 21–24. London: SSEES Occasional Papers.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, S. 2006. Political Change in Post-Communist Slovakia and Croatia: From Nationalist to Europeanist. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, B. 2004. “Concentrated Orange: Fidesz and the Remaking of the Hungarian Centre-Right, 1994–2002.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 20 (3): 80–114. doi: 10.1080/1352327042000260814
   Google Scholar
• Gould, J. 2011. The Politics of Privatization: Wealth and Power in Postcommunist Europe. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Grzymała-Busse, A. 2002. Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grzymała-Busse, A. 2003. “Redeeming the Past: Communist Successor Parties after 1989.” In Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Assessing the Legacy of Communist Rule, edited by G. Ekiert and S. Hanson, 157–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grzymała-Busse, A. 2006. “Authoritarian Determinants of Democratic Party Competition: The Communist Successor Parties in East Central Europe.” Party Politics 12 (3): 415–437. doi: 10.1177/1354068806063089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyárfášová, O., V. Krivý, G. Mesežnikov, M. Vašečka, and M. Velšic. 2001. Krajina v pohybe. Správa o politických názoroch a hodnotách ľudí na Slovensku. Bratislava: IVO.
   Google Scholar
• Gyárfášová, O., and G. Mesežnikov, eds. 2004. Vlada strana na Slovensku: skušenosti a perspektivy. Bratislava: IVO.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, H. 2006. Why Not Parties in Russia? Democracy, Federalism, and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, S. 2012. “Dynamics of New Party Formation in the Czech Republic 1996–2010: Looking for the Origins of a ‘Political Earthquake’.” East European Politics 28 (2): 119–143. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2012.669733
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, S., A. Szczerbiak, T. Haughton, and B. Fowler. 2008. “Sticking Together: Explaining Comparative Centre-Right Party Success in post-Communist Central and Eastern Europe.” Party Politics 14 (4): 407–434. doi: 10.1177/1354068808090253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, T. 2003. “‘We'll Finish What We've Started’: The 2002 Slovak Parliamentary Elections.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 19 (4): 65–90. doi: 10.1080/13523270300660029
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, T. 2004. “Explaining the Limited Success of the Communist-Successor Left in Slovakia: The Case of the Party of the Democratic Left (SDĽ).” Party Politics 10 (2): 177–191. doi: 10.1177/1354068804040499
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, T. 2013. “Battlefields, Ammunition and Uniforms: The Past and Politics in Post-Communist Central and Eastern Europe.” Comparative European Politics 11 (2): 249–260. doi: 10.1057/cep.2012.20
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, T., and S. Fisher. 2008. “From the Politics of State-building to Programmatic Politics: The Post-Federal Experience and the Development of Centre-Right Party Politics in Croatia and Slovakia.” Party Politics 14 (4): 435–454. doi: 10.1177/1354068808090254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, T., and M. Rybář. 2008. “A Change of Direction: The 2006 Parliamentary and Party Politics in Slovakia.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 24 (2): 232–255. doi: 10.1080/13523270802003053
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, T., and M. Rybář. 2009. “A Tool in the Toolbox: Assessing the Impact of EU Membership on Party Politics in Slovakia.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 25 (4): 540–563. doi: 10.1080/13523270903310928
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, K. 1995. “Czechoslovakia: The Failure of Consensus Politics and the Break-up of the Federation.” Journal of Regional & Federal Studies 5 (2): 111–133. doi: 10.1080/13597569508420927
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, K. 2006. “Slovak Political Parties and the EU: From Symbolic Politics to Policies.” In The European Union and Party Politics in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by P. Lewis and Z. Mansfeldová, 149–168. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hloušek, V., and L. Kopeček. 2008. “Cleavages in the Contemporary Czech and Slovak politics: Between Persistence and Change.” East European Politics and Societies 22 (3): 518–552. doi: 10.1177/0888325408315833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibenskas, R. 2012. “Activists or Money? Explaining the Electoral Success and Persistence of Political Parties in Lithuania.” Party Politics, on-line early doi:10.1177/1354068812458615.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, A. 2002. Czechoslovakia: The Short Goodbye. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. 2003. “Accounting for Postcommunist Regime Diversity: What Counts as a Good Cause?” In Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Assessing the Legacy of Communist Rule, edited by G. Ekiert and S. Hanson, 49–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H., Z. Mansfeldová, R. Markowski, and G. Tóka. 1999. Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation and Inter-Party Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kopeček, L. 2006. Demokracie, diktatury a politické stranictví na Slovensku. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.
   Google Scholar
• Kopeček, L. 2007. Politické strany na Slovensku: 1989 až 2006. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.
   Google Scholar
• Kostelecký, T. 2002. Political Parties after Communism: Developments in East-Central Europe. Baltimore: The Woodrow Wilson Center Press and the Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kreuzer, M., and V. Pettai. 2011. “Persistence and Decline Versus Transience and Genesis: The Challenge of Analyzing Patterns of Party System Formation in the Baltics”. Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, St Gallen, April 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Krivý, V. 1999. Čo prezrádzajú volebné výsledky? Parlamentné voľby 1992–1998. Bratislava: IVO.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, J.-E., and S. Ersson. 2007. “Party System Instability in Europe: Persistent Differences in Volatility between West and East?” Democratization 14 (1): 92–110. doi: 10.1080/13510340601024322
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, P. 2013. “Political Parties.” In Developments in Central and Eastern Europe 5, edited by S. White, J. Batt, and P. Lewis, 186–203. Basingstoke: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Linek, L. 2008. “Kdy vymřou voliči KSČM? K věkové struktuře elektorátu KSČM.” Politologický časopis 15 (4): 318–336.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S., and S. Rokkan. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, S., A. España, and C. Gervasoni. 2009. “Extra System Electoral Volatility and the Vote Share of Young Parties”. Prepared for the Canadian Political Science Conference, May 28. Accessed May 10, 2010. http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/papers-2009/Mainwaring.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Malová, D., E. Láštic, and M. Rybář. 2005. Slovensko ako nový členský štát Európskej únie: Výzva z periférie? Bratislava: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Mesežnikov, G., O. Gyárfášová, and M. Kollár, eds. 2002. Slovenské voľby ‘02: výsledky, dôsledky, súvislosti. Bratislava: IVO.
   Google Scholar
• Millard, F. 2009. Democratic Elections in Poland, 1991–2007. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. 2003. “Epilogue: From Area Studies to Contextualized Comparisons.” In Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Assessing the Legacy of Communist Rule, edited by G. Ekiert and S. Hanson, 353–366. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pop-Eleches, G., and J. Tucker. 2011. “Communism's Shadow: Postcommunist Legacies, Values and Behavior.” Comparative Politics 43 (4): 379–408. doi: 10.5129/001041511796301588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, E., and J. Tucker. 2013. “Revisiting Electoral Volatility in Post-Communist Countries: New Data, New Results and New Approaches.” British Journal of Political Science, FirstView. Accessed February 1, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000531
   Google Scholar
• Radičová, I. (with Lesná, Ľ.) 2013. Krajina hrubých čiar. Bratislava: Ikar.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, N. 2012. “Institutional Factors and Russian Political Parties: The Changing Needs of Regime Consolidation in a Neo-Patrimonial System.” East European Politics 12 (3): 298–309.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrschneider, R., and S. Whitefield. 2009. “Understanding Cleavages in Party Systems: Issue Position and Issue Salience in 13 Post-Communist Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (3): 280–313.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrschneider, R., and S. Whitefield. 2012. The Strain of Representation: How Parties Represent Diverse Voters in Western and Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rybář, M., ed. 2004. Politické strany ako organizácie: prípady zo Slovenska. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského.
   Google Scholar
• Rybář, M. 2006. “Old Parties and New: Changing Patterns of Party Politics in Slovakia.” In Post-Communist EU Member States: Parties and Party Systems, edited by S. Jungerstam-Mulders, 147–176. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Rybář, M. 2011. Medzi štátom a spoločnosťou: politické strany na Slovensku po roku 1989. Bratislava: Devin.
   Google Scholar
• Schuster, R. 1999. Návrat do veľkej politiky. Kosice: PressPrint.
   Google Scholar
• Sikk, A. 2012. “Newness as a Winning Formula for New Political Parties.” Party Politics 18 (4): 465–486. doi: 10.1177/1354068810389631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spirova, M. 2007. Political Parties in Post-Communist Societies: Formation, Persistence, and Change. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, E. 1997. Czecho/Slovakia: Ethnic Conflict, Constitutional Fissure, Negotiated Breakup. Ann Arbour, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll, H. 2008. “Social Cleavages and the Number of Parties: How the Measures You Choose Affect the Answers You Get.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (11): 1439–1465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczerbiak, A. 2002. “Poland's Unexpected Political Earthquake: The September 2001 Parliamentary Election.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 18 (3): 41–76. doi: 10.1080/714003608
   Google Scholar
• Tavits, M. 2008. “Party Systems in the Making: The Emergence and Success of New Parties in New Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 38 (1): 113–133. doi: 10.1017/S0007123408000069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavits, M. 2012. “Organizing for Success: Party Organizational Strength and Electoral Performance in Post-Communist Europe.” Journal of Politics 4 (1): 83–97.
   Google Scholar
• Učeň, P. 2003. “Centrist Populism Parties and the Ingredients of their Success.” In Slovak Elections 2002. Results, Implications, Context, edited by O. Gyárfášová, M. Kollár, G. Mesežnikov, and T. Nicholson, 49–62. Bratislava: Institute for Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Vachudova, M. 2005. Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage and Integration after Communism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vachudova, M. 2008. “Tempered by the EU? Political Parties and Party Systems Before and After Accession.” Journal of European Public Policy 15 (6): 861–879. doi: 10.1080/13501760802196614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vachudova, M., and L. Hooghe. 2009. “Postcommunist Politics in a Magnetic Field: How Transition and EU Accession Structure Party Competition on European Integration.” Comparative European Politics 7 (2): 179–212. doi: 10.1057/cep.2008.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voturba, M. 2011. “Slovak Coalitions: Getting Glued to a Word”. Accessed January 3, 2012. http://www.pitt.edu/~votruba/sstopics/slovaklawsonlanguage/Martin_Votruba_Slovak_Coalitions_Getting_Glued_to_a_Word.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Whitefield, S., and R. Rohrschneider. 2009. “The Europeanization of Political Parties in Central and Eastern Europe? The Impact of EU Entry on Issue Stances, Salience and Programmatic Coherence.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 25 (4): 564–584. doi: 10.1080/13523270903310936
   Google Scholar
• Wolchik, S. 1993. “The Politics of Ethnicity in Post-Communist Czechoslovakia.” East European Politics and Societies 8 (1): 153–188. doi: 10.1177/0888325494008001006
   Google Scholar