Co-optation in the process of dominant party system building: the case of Russia

References

• Albrecht, H. 2005. “How Can Opposition Support Authoritarianism? Lessons from Egypt.” Democratization 12 (3): 378–397. doi: 10.1080/13510340500126798
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C. K., and M. S. Fish. 1999. “The Art of Being Indispensable: Noncharismatic Personalism in Contemporary Political Parties.” Comparative Political Studies 32 (3): 283–312. doi: 10.1177/0010414099032003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beichelt, T. 2009. “Legacies and the Radical Right in Post-1989 Central and Eastern Europe.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 42 (4): 505–526. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2009.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, S. 2007. “Electoral Systems and Electoral Misconduct.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (12): 1533–1556. doi: 10.1177/0010414006292886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boix, C., and M. W. Svolik. 2003. “The Foundations of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions, Commitment, and Power-Sharing in Dictatorships.” Journal of Politics 75 (2): 300–316.
   Google Scholar
• Brudny, Y. M. 1998. Reinventing Russia: Russian Nationalism and the Soviet State, 1953–1991. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bueno de Mesquita, B., A. Smith, R. Siverson, and J. Morrow. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaisty, P. 2012. “Members and Leaders in Russian Party Organizations.” East European Politics 28 (3): 283–297. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2012.683114
   Google Scholar
• Colton, T. J. 2000. Transitional Citizens: Voters and what Influences them in the New Russia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colton, T. J. and M. McFaul. 2003. Popular Choice and Managed Democracy: the Russian Elections of 1999 and 2000. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, C. 2007. “State Repression and the Tyrannical Peace.” Journal of Peace Research 44 (4): 485–504. doi: 10.1177/0022343307078940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckstein, H. 1975. “Case Study and Theory in Political Science.” In The Handbook of Political Science, edited by F. I. Greenstein and N. W. Polsby, Vol. 7, 79–138. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Flikke, G. 1999. “Patriotic Left-Centrism: The Zigzags of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation.” Europe-Asia Studies 51 (2): 275–298. doi: 10.1080/09668139999038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi, J., and A. Przeworski. 2006. “Cooperation, Cooptation, and Rebellion Under Dictatorships.” Economics and Politics 18 (1): 1–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0343.2006.00160.x
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, B. 2003. Paradigms and Sand Castles: Research Design in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gel'man, V. 2008. “Party Politics in Russia: From Competition to Hierarchy.” Europe-Asia Studies 60 (6): 913–930. doi: 10.1080/09668130802161165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. V. 1998. “Who Survives? Party Origins, Organisational Development, and Electoral Performance in Post-Communist Russia.” Political Studies 46 (3): 511–543. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. V. 2003. “The Vicious Circle of Party Underdevelopment in Russia: The Regional Connection.” International Political Science Review 24 (4): 427–444. doi: 10.1177/01925121030244002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. V. 2006. “The Structure of Party Alternatives and Voter Choice in Russia: Evidence from the 2003–2004 Regional Legislative Elections.” Party Politics 12 (6): 707–725. doi: 10.1177/1354068806068597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. V. 2011a. “Russia's Regional Legislative Elections, 2003–2007: Authoritarianism Incorporated.” Europe-Asia Studies 63 (3): 397–414. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2011.557533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. V. 2011b. “The Regional Roots of Electoral Authoritarianism in Russia.” Europe-Asia Studies 63 (4): 623–639. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2011.566427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. V. 2012. “The 2012 Political Reform in Russia: The Interplay of Liberalizing Concessions and Authoritarian Corrections.” Problems of Post-Communism 59 (6): 3–14. doi: 10.2753/PPC1075-8216590601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. V. 2013a. “Proportional Representation and Authoritarianism: Evidence from Russia's Regional Election Law Reform.” Representation 49 (1): 83–95. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2012.751050
   Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. V. 2013b. “Authoritarian Party Systems: Patterns of Emergence, Sustainability and Survival.” Comparative Sociology 12 (5): 617–644. doi: 10.1163/15691330-12341274
   Google Scholar
• Haber, S. 2006. “Authoritarian Government.” In Handbook of Political Economy, edited by B. R. Weingast and D. Wittman, 693–707. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, H. E. 2004. “The Origins of United Russia and the Putin Presidency: the Role of Contingency in Party-System Development.” Demokratizatsiya 12 (2): 169–194. doi: 10.3200/DEMO.12.2.169-194
   Google Scholar
• Hale, H. E., and T. Colton. 2010. “Russians and the Putin-Medvedev ‘Tandemocracy’: A Survey-Based Portrait of the 2007–2008 Election Season.” Problems of Post-Communism 57 (2): 3–20. doi: 10.2753/PPC1075-8216570201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, H. E., M. McFaul, and T. J. Colton. 2004. “Putin and the ‘Delegative Democracy’ Trap: Evidence from Russia's 2003–4 Elections.” Post-Soviet Affairs 20 (4): 285–319. doi: 10.2747/1060-586X.20.4.285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashim, S. M. 1999. “KPRF Ideology and its Implications for Democratization in Russia.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 32 (1): 77–89. doi: 10.1016/S0967-067X(98)00023-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutcheson, D. S. 2003. Political Parties in the Russian Regions. London: Routledge Curzon.
   Google Scholar
• Ishiyama, J. T. 1998. “‘Red’ versus ‘Expert’: Candidate Recruitment and Communist Party Adaptation in Post-Soviet Politics.” Party Politics 4 (3): 297–318. doi: 10.1177/1354068898004003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishiyama, J. T. 2001. “Party Organization and the Political Success of the Communist Successor Parties.” Social Science Quarterly 82 (4): 844–864. doi: 10.1111/0038-4941.00063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazee, T. A. 1980. “The Decision to Run for the U. S. Congress: Challenger Attitudes in the 1970s.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 5 (1): 79–100. doi: 10.2307/439443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., and A. Gelman. 1991. “Systemic Consequences of Incumbency Advantage in US House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 35 (1): 110–138. doi: 10.2307/2111440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korgunuyuk, Y. 2010. “Populist Tactics and Populist Rhetoric in Political Parties of Post-Soviet Russia.” Sociedade e cultura 13 (2): 233–244.
   Google Scholar
• Laruelle, M. 2009. Russian Nationalism and the National Reassertion of Russia. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., and L. Way. 2002. “The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 51–65. doi: 10.1353/jod.2002.0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. 1971. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.” American Political Science Review 65 (3): 682–693. doi: 10.2307/1955513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyubarev, A. 2011. “Electoral Legislation in Russian Regions.” Europe-Asia Studies 63 (3): 415–427. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2011.557534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magaloni, B. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magaloni, B., and R. Kricheli. 2010. “Political Order and One-Party Rule.” Annual Review of Political Science 13: 123–143. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.031908.220529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malesky, E., and P. Schuler. 2010. “Nodding or Needling: Analyzing Delegate Responsiveness in an Authoritarian Parliament.” American Political Science Review 104 (3): 482–502. doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, L. 2001. “For Victory? The Crises and Dilemmas of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation.” Europe-Asia Studies 53 (2): 263–290. doi: 10.1080/09668130020032299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, L. 2009. “Managing Opposition in a Hybrid Regime: Just Russia and Parastatal Opposition.” Slavic Review 68 (3): 504–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, I., and S. White. 2008. “‘It's the Economy, Comrade!’ Parties and Voters in the 2007 Russian Duma Election.” Europe-Asia Studies 60 (6): 931–957. doi: 10.1080/09668130802180959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraski, B. 2013. “Closed-List Proportional Representation in Russia: The Fates of Former District Deputies.” Party Politics. doi:10.1177/1354068812473634.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oates, S. 1998. “Party Platforms: Towards a Definition of the Russian Political Spectrum.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 14 (1–2): 76–97. doi: 10.1080/13523279808415370
   Google Scholar
• Oversloot, H., and R. Verheul. 2000. “The Party of Power in Russian Politics.” Acta Politica 35 (2): 123–145.
   Google Scholar
• Papkova, I. 2007. “The Russian Orthodox Church and Political Party Platforms.” Journal of Church and State 49 (1): 117–134. doi: 10.1093/jcs/49.1.117
   Google Scholar
• Pasynkova, V. 2005. “The Communist Party in Contemporary Russia: Problems of Transformation.” Perspectives on European Politics and Society 6 (2): 237–247. doi: 10.1080/15705850508438916
   Google Scholar
• Pepinsky, T. 2007. “Autocracy, Elections, and Fiscal Policy: Evidence from Malaysia.” Studies in Comparative International Development 42 (1): 136–163. doi: 10.1007/s12116-007-9006-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrenko, V., O. Mitina, and R. Brown. 1995. “The Semantic Space of Russian Political Parties on a Federal and Regional Level.” Europe-Asia Studies 47 (5): 835–857. doi: 10.1080/09668139508412290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przeworksi, A., and H. Teune. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, O. J., and T. F. Remington. 2009. “Dominant Party Regimes and the Commitment Problem: The Case of United Russia.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (4): 501–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, R., and W. Mishler. 2010. “A Supply-Demand Model of Party-System Institutionalization: The Russian Case.” Party Politics 16 (6): 801–821. doi: 10.1177/1354068809346074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakwa, R. 2005. “The 2003–2004 Russian Elections and Prospects for Democracy.” Europe-Asia Studies 57 (3): 369–398. doi: 10.1080/09668130500073332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schedler, A., ed. 2006. Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen, S. G. 2001. “Nationalism and the Russian Political Spectrum: Locating and Evaluating the Extremes.” Journal of Political Ideologies 6 (3): 263–288. doi: 10.1080/13569310120083008
   Google Scholar
• Slater, D. 2003. “Iron Cage in an Iron Fist: Authoritarian Institutions and the Personalization of Power in Malaysia.” Comparative Politics 36 (1): 81–101. doi: 10.2307/4150161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, R. 2006. Candidate Strategies and Electoral Competition in the Russian Federation: Democracy without Foundation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urban, J. B., and V. D. Solovei. 1997. Russia's Communists at the Crossroads. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wegren, S. K., and A. Konitzer. 2006. “The 2003 Russian Duma Election and the Decline in Rural Support for the Communist Party.” Electoral Studies 25 (4): 677–695. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2005.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S., R. Rose, and I. McAllister. 1997. How Russia Votes. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A. 2005. Virtual Politics: Faking Democracy in the Post-Soviet World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar