From party cartel to one-party dominance. The case of institutional failure

References

• Ágh, Attila. 1995. “The ‘Early Freezing’ of the East Central European Parties: The Case of the Hungarian Socialist Party.” Budapest Papers on Democratic Transition, no. 129. Budapest: Hungarian Center for Democratic Studies Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• van Biezen, Ingrid. 2003. Political Parties in New Democracies: Party Organization in Southern and East-Central Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• van Biezen, Ingrid. 2012. “Constitutionalizing Party Democracy: The Constitutive Codification of Political Parties in Post-war Europe.” British Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 187–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Biezen, Ingrid, and Ekaterina R. Rashkova. 2012. “Deterring New Party Entry? The Impact of State Regulation on the Permeability of Party Systems.” Party Politics. doi: 10.1177/1354068812458616.
   Google Scholar
• Colomer, Josep. M. 2005. “It's Parties That Choose Electoral Systems (or, Duverger's Laws Upside Down).” Political Studies 53 (1): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enyedi, Zsolt. 2006. “A befagyott felszín és ami alatta van. A 2006-os választás és a magyar pártrendszer.” In A 2006-os Országgyűlési választások. elemzések és adatok, edited by Gergely Karácsony, 204–228. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány.
   Google Scholar
• Enyedi, Zsolt. 2007. “Party Funding in Hungary.” In Political Finance and Corruption in Eastern Europe: The Transition Period, edited by Daniel Smilov and Jurij Toplak, 91–104. Hampshire: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Enyedi, Zsolt, and Kenneth Benoit. 2011. “Kritikus választás 2010. A magyar pártrendszer átrendeződése a bal–jobb dimenzióban.” In Új képlet. A 2010-es Választások Magyarországon, edited by Zsolt Enyedi, Andrea Szabó and Róbert Tardos, 17–42. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány
   Google Scholar
• Enyedi, Zsolt, and Lukas Linek. 2008. “Searching for the Right Organization.” Party Politics 14 (4): 457–479.
   Google Scholar
• Gunther, Richard, and Larry Diamond. 2003. “Species of Political Parties. A New Typology.” Party Politics 9 (2): 167–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higley, John, and Michael G. Burton. 1989. “The Elite Variable in Democratic Transitions and Breakdowns.” American Sociological Review 54 (1): 7–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ignazi, Piero. 1996. “The Crisis of Parties and the Rise of New Political Parties.” Party Politics 2 (4): 549–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilonszki, Gabriella. 2008. “Hungary: Rules, Norms and Stability Undermined.” In Public Finance and Post-Communist Party Development, edited by Steven D. Roper and Janis Ikstens, 129–142. Hampshire: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Ilonszki, Gabriella and Michael Edinger. 2007. “MPs in Post-Communist and Post-Soviet Nations: A Parliamentary Elite in the Making.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 13 (1): 142–163.
   Google Scholar
• Jáger, Krisztina, Réka Várnagy, and Gabriella Ilonszki. 2011. “Reaching Legislative Consensus: Policy or Political Consideration?” Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Italian Political Science Association, Palermo, September 8–10.
   Google Scholar
• Janda, Kenneth. 2005. Political Parties and Democracy in Theoretical and Practical Perspectives. Adopting Party Law. Washington, DC: National Democratic Institute for International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Juhász, Gábor. 2007. Pénzképviselet. Pártkasszák titkai. Budapest: Kisszikra Kiadóház.
   Google Scholar
• Karvonen, Lauri. 2007. “Legislation on Political Parties. A Global Comparison.” Party Politics 13 (4): 437–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, Richard S., and Peter Mair. 1995. “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party.” Party Politics 1 (1): 5–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert. 1989. The Logics of Party Formation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kopecky, Petr and Maria Spirova. 2011. “Jobs for the Boys’? Patterns of Party Patronage in Post-Communist Europe.” West European Politics 34 (5): 897–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linz, Juan J., and Alfred Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moe, T. M. 1990. “Political Institutions: The Neglected Side of the Story.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 6 (1990): 213–253.
   Google Scholar
• Offe, Carl. 1996. “Designing Institutions in Eat European Transitions.” In The Theory of Institutional Design, edited by Richard E. Goodin, 199–226. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework of Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sieberer, Ulrich, Wolgang C. Müller, and Maiko Isabelle Heller. 2011. “Reforming the Rules of Parliamentary Game: Measuring and Explaining Changes in Parliamentary Rules in Austria, Germany and Switzerland, 1945–2010.” West European Politics 34 (5): 948–975.
   Google Scholar
• State Audit Office. 2012. “Report on the Audit on the Financial Management of Jobbik, Movement for a Better Hungary in 2009–2010.” Accessed March 10, 2012. www.asz.hu
   Google Scholar
• Transparency International. 2012. “Report on National Integrity.” Accessed March 10, 2012. www.transparency.hu
   Google Scholar
• Várnagy, Réka. 2008. “Az országgyűlési képviselők helyi beágyazottsága.” In Amatőr és hivatásos politikusok. Képviselők Magyarországon II., edited by Gabriella Ilonszki, 43–67. Budapest: Új Mandátum Kiadó.
   Google Scholar
• Várnagy, Réka, and Gabriella Ilonszki. 2012. “The Determinants of Parliamentary Opposition Behaviour in the Hungarian Legislative Process.” Paper presented at the IPSA XXII. World Congress of Political Science, Madrid, July 8–12.
   Google Scholar