Political foundations of bad governance in post-Soviet Eurasia: towards a research agenda

References

• Abrams, N., and M. S. Fish. 2015. “Policies First, Institutions Second: Lessons from Estonia’s Economic Reforms.” Post-Soviet Affairs 31 (6): 491–513. doi: 10.1080/1060586X.2015.1061739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D., and J. A. Robinson. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown Business.
   Google Scholar
• Appel, H. 2011. Tax Politics in Eastern Europe: Globalization, Regional Integration, and the Democratic Compromise. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Åslund, A. 2007. Russia’s Capitalist Revolution: Why Market Reforms Succeeded and Democracy Failed. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Auzan, A. 2015. “Lovushka ‘Kolei’” [The Trap of Path-Dependency]. Colta.ru, September 4. Accessed June 24, 2017. http://www.colta.ru/articles/society/8428 (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Aven, P., and A. Kokh. 2015. Gaidar’s Revolution: The Inside Account of the Economic Transformation in Russia. London: IB Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Bolkvadze, K. 2017. “Hitting the Saturation Point: Unpacking the Politics of Bureaucratic Reforms in Hybrid Regimes.” Democratization 24 (4): 751–769. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2016.1247808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownlee, J. 2007. “Hereditary Succession in Modern Autocracies.” World Politics 59 (4): 595–628. doi: 10.1353/wp.2008.0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno de Mesquita, B., and A. Smith. 2011. The Dictator’s Handbook: Why Bad Behavior is Almost Always Good Politics. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Bunce, V., and S. Wolchik. 2011. Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Postcommunist Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burakova, L. 2011. Pochemu u Gruzii poluchilos’ [ Why Georgia Succeeded]. Moscow: United Press (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Cooley, A., and J. Snyder. 2015. Ranking the World: Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawisha, K. 2014. Putin’s Kleptocracy: Who Owns Russia? New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Dekalchuk, A. A. 2017. “Choosing Between Bureaucracy and the Reformers: The Russian Pension Reform of 2001 as a Compromise Squared.” In Authoritarian Modernization in Russia: Ideas, Institutions, and Policies, edited by V. Gel’man, 166–182. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Denzau, A., and D. C. North. 1994. “Sharing Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions.” Kyklos 47 (1): 3–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.1994.tb02246.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easter, G. 2012. Capital, Coercion, and Postcommunist States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Easterly, W. R. 2001. The Elusive Quest for Growth: Adventures and Misadventures in the Tropics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Egorov, G., and K. Sonin. 2011. “Dictators and Their Viziers: Endogenizing the Loyalty-Competence Trade-off.” Journal of the European Economic Association 9 (5): 903–930. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01033.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdmann, G., and U. Engel. 2006. Neopatrimonialism Revisited: Beyond a Catch-all Concept. Hamburg: German Institute for Global and Area Studies. GIGA Working Papers, No.16. Accessed June 24, 2017. https://www.giga-hamburg.de/en/system/files/publications/wp16_erdmann-engel.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, M. S. 1998. “The Determinants of Economic Reform in the Post-Communist World.” East European Politics and Societies 12 (1): 31–78. doi: 10.1177/0888325498012001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisun, O. 2015. The Future of Ukraine’s Neopatrimonial Democracy. PONARS Policy Memos, No. 394. Accessed June 24, 2017. http://www.ponarseurasia.org/memo/future-ukraine-neopatrimonial-democracy.
   Google Scholar
• Freeland, С. 2000. Sale of the Century: Russia’s Wild Rule from Communism to Capitalism. New York: Crown Business.
   Google Scholar
• Frye, T. 2010. Building States and Markets after Communism: The Perils of Polarized Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frye, T., O. J. Reuter, and D. Szakonyi. 2014. “Political Machines at Work: Voter Mobilization and Electoral Subversion in the Workplace.” World Politics 66 (2): 195–228. doi: 10.1017/S004388711400001X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaddy, C. G. 2014. “Room for Error: The Economic Legacy of Soviet Spatial Misallocation.” In Historical Legacies of Communism in Russia and Eastern Europe, edited by M. R. Beissinger, and S. Kotkin, 52–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, B. 1994. Politician’s Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gel’man, V. 2015. Authoritarian Russia: Analyzing Post-Soviet Regime Changes. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gel’man, V. 2016. “The Vicious Circle of Post-Soviet Neopatrimonialism in Russia.” Post-Soviet Affairs 32 (5): 455–473. doi: 10.1080/1060586X.2015.1071014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gel’man, V., O. Marganiya, and D. Travin. 2014. Reexamining Economic and Political Reforms in Russia, 1985–2000: Generations, Ideas, and Changes. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gel’man, V., and A. Starodubtsev. 2016. “Opportunities and Constrains of Authoritarian Modernisation: Russian Policy Reforms of the 2000s.” Europe-Asia Studies 68 (1): 97–117. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2015.1113232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilman, M. 2010. No Precedent, No Plan: Inside Russia’s 1998 Default. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, S. 2014. Moscow in Movement: Power and Opposition in Putin’s Russia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, H. E. 2014. Patronal Politics: Eurasian Regime Dynamics in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hedlund, S. 2005. Russian Path Dependence. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hellman, J. 1998. “Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions.” World Politics 50 (2): 203–234. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100008091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera, Y. 2005. Mirrors of the Economy: National Accounts and International Norms in Russia and Beyond. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, M. M., and P. G. Roessler. 2006. “Liberalizing Electoral Outcomes in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 365–381. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00189.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. 1965. “Political Development and Political Decay.” World Politics 17 (3): 386–430. doi: 10.2307/2009286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huskey, E. 2014. “Legacies and Departures in the Russian State Executive.” In Historical Legacies of Communism in Russia and Eastern Europe, edited by M. R. Beissinger, and S. Kotkin, 111–127. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. 2016. Priests of Prosperity: How Central Bankers Transformed the Postcommunist World. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kotkin, S., and M. R. Beissinger. 2014. “The Historical Legacies of Communism: An Empirical Agenda.” In Historical Legacies of Communism in Russia and Eastern Europe, edited by M. R. Beissinger, and S. Kotkin, 1–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kryshtanovskaya, O., and S. White. 1996. “From Soviet Nomenklatura to Russian Elite.” Europe-Asia Studies 48 (5): 711–733. doi: 10.1080/09668139608412377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledeneva, A. V. 2013. Can Russia Modernise? Sistema, Power Networks, and Informal Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levada, Y., ed. 1993. Sovetskii prostoi chelovek: opyt sotsial’nogo portreta na rubezhe 80-kh – 90-kh [ Soviet Simple Man: An Experience of Social Portrait in the 1980–1990s]. Мoscow: Mirovoi okean (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, D., ed. 2012. The Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., and L. A. Way. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Melville, A., and M. Mironyuk. 2016. “‘Bad Enough Governance’: State Capacity and Quality of Institutions in Post-Soviet Autocracies.” Post-Soviet Affairs 32 (2): 132–151. doi: 10.1080/1060586X.2015.1052215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Changes, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C., J. J. Wallis, and B. R. Weingast. 2009. Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C., and B. R. Weingast. 1989. “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeen-Century England.” The Journal of Economic History 49 (4): 803–832. doi: 10.1017/S0022050700009451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, G. 1999. “Polyarchies and the (Un)Rule of Law in Latin America: A Partial Conclusion.” In The (Un)Rule of Law and the Underprivileged in Latin America, edited by J. E. Mendez, G. O’Donnell, and P. S. Pinheiro, 303–337. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. 1993. “Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development.” American Political Science Review 87 (3): 567–576. doi: 10.2307/2938736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paneyakh, E. 2014. “Faking Performances Together: Systems of Performance Evaluation in Russian Enforcement Agencies and Production of Bias and Privilege.” Post-Soviet Affairs 30 (2–3): 115–136. doi: 10.1080/1060586X.2013.858525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paneyakh, E. 2016. “Kaznit’ nel’zya pomilovat’: postupki i tsenosti rossiyan.” [Eats, Shoots, and Leaves: Deeds and Values of Russians]. Inliberty.ru, March 1. Accessed June 24, 2017. http://www.inliberty.ru/blog/2235-Kaznit-nelzya-pomilovat-postupki-i-cennosti-rossiyan (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Pipers, R. 1974. Russia under the Old Regime. New York: Scribner.
   Google Scholar
• Popova, M. 2014. Politicized Justice in Emerging Democracies: A Study of Courts in Russia and Ukraine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radnitz, S. 2012. Weapons of the Wealthy: Predatory Regimes and Elite-Led Protests in Central Asia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, O. J., and G. B. Robertson. 2012. “Subnational Appointments in Authoritarian Regimes: Evidence from Russian Gubernatorial Appointments.” The Journal of Politics 74 (4): 1023–1037. doi: 10.1017/S0022381612000631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. 2010. “The Myth of Authoritarian Growth.” Project Syndicate, August 9. Accessed June 24, 2017. http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-myth-of-authoritarian-growth.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. 2012. “Good Governance.” In The Oxford Handbook of Governance, edited by D. Levi-Faur, 143–154. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, A. 2013. The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., and U. Sedelmeier. 2004. “Governance by Conditionality: EU Rule Transfer to the Candidate Countries of Central and Eastern Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 11 (4): 661–679. doi: 10.1080/1350176042000248089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A., and D. Treisman. 2000. Without a Map: Political Tactics and Economic Reform in Russia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny. 1993. “Corruption.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (3): 599–617. doi: 10.2307/2118402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starodubtsev, A. 2017. “How Does the Government Implement Unpopular Reforms? Evidence from Education Policy in Russia.” In Authoritarian Modernization in Russia: Ideas, Institutions, and Policies, edited by V. Gel’man, 148–165. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, A. 1997. Between Past and Future: Elites, Democracy, and the State in Post-Communist Countries: A Comparison of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. 2014. “From Police State to Police State? Legacies and Law Enforcement in Russia.” In Historical Legacies of Communism in Russia and Eastern Europe, edited by M. R. Beissinger, and S. Kotkin, 128–151. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. 2015. “The Transformation of the Russian State.” In The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State, edited by S. Leibfried, E. Huber, M. Lange, J. D. Levy, F. Nullmeier and J. D. Stephens, 637–653. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Transparency International. 2015. “ Corruption Perceptions Index 2015.” Accessed June 24, 2017. http://www.transparency.org/cpi2015.
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, D. 2000. “The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Study.” Journal of Public Economics 76 (3): 399–457. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00092-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, D. 2015. “Income, Democracy, and Leader Turnover.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (4): 927–942. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkov, V., I. Griroriev, A. Dmitrieva, E. Moiseeva, E. Paneyakh, M. Pozdnyakov, K. Titaev, I. Chetverikova, and M. Shklyaruk. 2013. Kontseptsiya kompleksnoi organizatsionno-upravlencheskoi reform pravookhranitel’nykh organov RF [ The Concept of Complex Organizational and Management Reform of Law Enforcement Agencies in Russia]. St Petersburg: European University at St Petersburg, Institute for the Rule of Law. Accessed June 24, 2017. http://www.enforce.spb.ru/images/Issledovanya/IRL_KGI_Reform_final_11.13.pdf (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Way, L. A. 2015. Pluralism by Default: Weak Autocrats and the Rise of Competitive Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wintrobe, R. 1998. The Political Economy of Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2016. Worldwide Governance Indicators, 1996–2014. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Accessed June 24, 2017. http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home.
   Google Scholar
• Zaostrovtsev, A. 2017. “Authoritarianism and Institutional Decay in Russia: Disruption of Property Rights and the Rule of Law.” In Authoritarian Modernization in Russia: Ideas, Institutions, and Policies, edited by V. Gel’man, 73–94. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar