The uncertain road to sustainable democracy: elite coalitions, citizen protests and the prospects of democracy in Central and Eastern Europe

References

• Bánkuti, M., G. Halmai, and K. L. Scheppele. 2012. “Disabling the Constitution.” Journal of Democracy 23 (3): 138–146. doi: 10.1353/jod.2012.0054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermeo, N. 2016. “On Democratic Backsliding.” Journal of Democracy 27 (1): 5–19. doi: 10.1353/jod.2016.0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A., A. Dimitrova, and F. Schimmelfennig. 2017. “European Union Enlargement and Integration Capacity: Concepts, Findings, and Policy Implications.” Journal of European Public Policy 24 (2): 157–176. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1265576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruszt, L., and J. Langbein. 2017. “Varieties of Dis-embedded Liberalism. EU Integration Strategies in the Eastern Peripheries of Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 24 (2): 297–315. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1264085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunce, V. 2003. “Rethinking Recent Democratization: Lessons from the Post Communist Experience.” World Politics 55 (2): 167–192. doi: 10.1353/wp.2003.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrov, G., K. Haralampiev, and S. Stoychev. 2016. The Adventures of the CVM in Bulgaria and Romania. MAXCAP Working Paper Series, No. 29, “Maximizing the integration capacity of the European Union: Lessons of and prospects for enlargement and beyond” (MAXCAP), Berlin. Accessed 17 June 2017. http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/kfgeu/maxcap/system/files/maxcap_wp_29.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, A. L. 2002. “Enlargement, Institution-Building and the EU’s Administrative Capacity Requirement.” West European Politics 25 (4): 171–190. doi: 10.1080/713601647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, A. L. 2010. “The New Member States of the EU in the Aftermath of Enlargement: Do New European Rules Remain Empty Shells?” Journal of European Public Policy 17 (1): 137–148. doi: 10.1080/13501760903464929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, A. L., and A. Buzogány. 2014. “Post-Accession Policy-Making in Bulgaria and Romania: Can Non-state Actors Use EU Rules to Promote Better Governance?” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (1): 139–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Palma, G. 1990. To Craft Democracies: An Essay on Democratic Transitions. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., and L. Holmes. 2002. Post-communist Democratization: Political Discourses across Thirteen Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J., C. Offe, U. K. Preuss, F. Boenker, U. Goetting, and F. W. Rueb. 1998. Institutional Design in Post-communist Societies: Rebuilding the Ship at Sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2017. “Reasoned Proposal in Accordance with Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union Regarding Rule of Law in Poland: Proposal for a Council Decision on the Determination of a Clear Risk of a Serious Breach by the Republic of Poland of the Rule of Law.” Brussels, 20.12.2017 COM(2017) 835 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2018. “Draft Report on a Proposal Calling on the Council to Determine, Pursuant to Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union, the Existence of a Clear Risk of a Serious Breach by Hungary of the Values on Which the Union is Founded.” (2017/2131(INL)).
   Google Scholar
• Fazekas, M., J. Gutierrez Chvalkovska, J. Skuhrovec, I. János Tóth, and L. P. King. 2014. “Are EU Funds a Corruption Risk? The Impact of EU Funds on Grand Corruption in Central and Eastern Europe.” In The Anti Corruption Report, vol. 2: the Anti Corruption Frontline, edited by A. Mungiu-Pippidi, 68–69. Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ganev, V. I. 2005. “Post-Communism as an Episode of State Building: A Reversed Tillyian Perspective.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 38: 425–445. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2005.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganev, V. I. 2007. Preying on the State: The Transformation of Bulgaria After 1989. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ganev, V. I. 2014. “Bulgaria’s Year of Civic Anger.” Journal of Democracy 25 (1): 33–45. doi: 10.1353/jod.2014.0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabbe, H. 2001. “How Does Europeanization Affect CEE Governance? Conditionality, Diffusion and Diversity.” Journal of European Public Policy 8 (6): 1013–1031. doi: 10.1080/13501760110098323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greskovits, B. 2015. “The Hollowing and Backsliding of Democracy in East Central Europe.” Global Policy 6 (S1): 28–37. doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12225
   Google Scholar
• Grzymala-Busse, A. 2003. “Political Competition and the Politicization of the State in East Central Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 36 (10): 1123–1147. doi: 10.1177/0010414003257610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzymała-Busse, A. 2007. Rebuilding Leviathan: Party Competition and State Exploitation in Post-Communist Democracies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grzymała-Busse, A. 2008. “Beyond Clientelism: Incumbent State Capture and State Formation.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (4–5): 638–673. doi: 10.1177/0010414007313118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzymala-Busse, A., and P. J. Luong. 2002. “Reconceptualizing the Post-Communist State.” Politics and Society 30 (4): 529–554. doi: 10.1177/003232902237825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellman, Joel S. 1998. “Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions.” World Politics 50 (2): 203–234. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100008091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellman, J., G. Jones, and D. Kaufman. 2000. Seize the State, Seize the Day: An Empirical Analysis of State Capture, Corruption and Influence in Transition. World Bank Policy research Working Paper 2444. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, A. 2014. “The Political Economy of State Capture in Central Europe.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (1): 88–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiss, Y. 2011. “Hungary’s Choices One Year On: In the Land of ‘Revolutionary Voting Booths.” Open Democracy. Accessed 17 May 2017. https://www.opendemocracy.net/yudit-kiss/hungary%E2%80%99s-choices-one-year-on-in-land-of-%E2%80%98revolutionary-voting-booths%E2%80%99.
   Google Scholar
• Kopecký, P., and M. Spirova. 2011. “‘Jobs for the boys’? Patterns of Party Patronage in Post-communist Europe.” West European Politics 34 (5): 897–921. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2011.591072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linz, J. J., and A. Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magyar, B. 2016. Post-Communist Mafia State: The Case of Hungary. Budapest: CEU Press and Noran Libro.
   Google Scholar
• Mares, I., A. Muntean, and T. Petrova. 2016. “Economic Intimidation in Contemporary Elections: Evidence From Romania and Bulgaria.” Government and Opposition 53: 486–517. doi:10.1017/gov.2016.39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2011. “The Durability of EU Civil Service Policy in Central and Eastern Europe After Accession.” Governance 24 (2): 231–260. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01523.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World (Vol. 268). Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mungiu-Pippidi, A. 2015. The Quest for Good Governance: How Societies Develop Control of Corruption. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Navracsics, T. 2011. “A New Constitution for Hungary: Locking in the Values of the Political Transition of 1989-1990s, at Last.” The Wall Street Journal, April 19.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C., J. J. Wallis, and B. R. Weingast. 2009. Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, B., and P. Kingsley. 2018. “Hungary’s Judges Warn of Threats to Judicial Independence.” The New York Times, 2 May 2018. Accessed 2 May 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/02/world/europe/hungary-judges-independence.html.
   Google Scholar
• O”Donnell, G., Schmitter, P. C., & Whitehead, L. eds. 1986. Transitions From Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives (vols. 1–4). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Dwyer, C. 2004. “Runaway State Building: How Political Parties Shape States in Postcommunist Eastern Europe.” World Politics 56 (4): 520–523. doi: 10.1353/wp.2005.0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, C. 2006. Runaway State Building: Patronage Politics and Democratic Development. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Offe, C. 1991. “Capitalism by Democratic Design? Democratic Theory Facing the Triple Transition in East Central Europe.” Social Research 58 (4): Winter 1991, 865–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Statement of Preliminary Findings and Conclusions, Hungary- Parliamentary elections 8 April 2018. Accessed 2 May 2018. https://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/hungary/377410?download=true.
   Google Scholar
• Ost, D. 2016. “Regime Change, Carried from Within.” The Nation, 8 January 2016. Accessed 15 June 2017. https://www.thenation.com/article/regime-change-in-poland-carried-out-from-within/.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. 2017. Religious Belief and National Belonging in Central and Eastern Europe. Accessed 17 June 2018. http://www.pewforum.org/2017/05/10/democracy-nationalism-and-pluralism/.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, A. 2005. “Constitutional Medicine.” Journal of Democracy 16 (1): 54–68. doi: 10.1353/jod.2005.0017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rustow, D. 1970. “Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model.” Comparative Politics 2 (3): 337–363. doi: 10.2307/421307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheppele, K. L. 2013. “Not Your Father’s Authoritarianism: The Creation of the ‘Frankenstate’.” Newsletter of the European Politics and Society Section of the American Political Science Association 23 (Winter): 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sedelmeier, U. 2008. “After Conditionality: Post Accession Compliance with EU law in East Central Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 15 (6): 806–825. doi: 10.1080/13501760802196549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedelmeier, U. 2014. “Anchoring Democracy From Above? The European Union and Democratic Backsliding in Hungary and Romania After Accession.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (1): 105–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, J. 2018. “Support for EU Membership Reaches Record High in Poland Despite Showdown with Brussels.” The Independent. Accessed 6 February 2018. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/poland-eu-membership-support-for-membership-courts-rule-of-law-mateusz-morawiecki-juncker-a8149876.html.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. 1987. How War Made States, and Vice Versa. New York: Centre for Studies of Social Change, New School for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. 1995. “Democracy Is a Lake.” In The Social Construction of Democracy, edited by George Reid Andrews and Herrick Chapman, 365–366. New York: New York University Press, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. 2004. Contention and Democracy in Europe, 1650–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toth, C. 2014. “Full Text of Viktor Orban’s Speech at the Fifteenth Bálványos Free Summer University and Youth Camp, Băile Tuşnad.” The Budapest Beacon, Accessed 5 June 2017. http://budapestbeacon.com/public-policy/full-text-of-viktor-orbans-speech-at-baile-tusnad-tusnadfurdo-of-26-july-2014/10592.
   Google Scholar
• Tudoroiu, T. 2015. “Democracy and State Capture in Moldova.” Democratization 22 (4): 655–678. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2013.868438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vachudova, M. A. 2015. “External Actors and Regime Change: How Post-Communism Transformed Comparative Politics.” East European Politics and Societies 29 (2): 519–530. doi: 10.1177/0888325415571411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volintiru, C. 2013. “Bucharest’s Recent Protests Show That Romanians are Beginning to Embrace Western Styles of Civic Engagement.” LSE Blogs, Accessed 15 June 2017. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2013/09/11/bucharests-recent-protests-show-that-romanians-are-beginning-to-embrace-western-styles-of-civic-engagement/.
   Google Scholar
• Volkov, V. 2002. Violent Entrepreneurs: The Use of Force in the Making of Russian Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar