Electoral Geography of Bosnia and Herzegovina – is there anything beyond the ethnic rule?

References

• Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina. 2016. Census of Population, Households and Dwellings in Bosnia and Herzegovina 2013 (Sarajevo).
   Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. A. 1988. “‘Better Thieves Than Reds’? The Nationalization Thesis and the Possibility of a Geography of Italian Politics.” Political Geography Quarterly 7 (4): 307–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. A. 1996. “Mapping Politics: How Context Counts in Electoral Geography.” Political Geography 15 (2): 129–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso, S. 2012. Challenging the State: Devolution and the Battle for Partisan Credibility. A Comparison of Belgium, Italy, Spain and the UK. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anselin, L. 1995. “Local Indicators of Spatial Association – LISA.” Geographical Analysis 27 (2): 93–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L. 2003. GeoDa 0.9 User’s Guide. Spatial Analysis Laboratory (SAL). Urbana-Champaign, IL: Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, E. 2012. “Parent States Versus Secessionist Entities: Measuring Political Legitimacy in Cyprus, Moldova and Bosnia & Hercegovina.” Europe-Asia Studies 64 (7): 1271–1296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Books, J. W., and C. L. Prysby. 1991. Political Behavior and the Local Context. Westport: Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bornschier, S. 2009. “Cleavage Politics in Old and New Democracies.” Living Reviews in Democracy 1.
   Google Scholar
• Calori, A. 2015. “Salt and Socialism: A Deconstruction of Tuzla’s Political Identity in the Context of the Bosnian Conflict.” Ethnopolitics Papers 35: 1–29. https://www.psa.ac.uk/sites/default/files/page-files/Calori_EP_No35.pdf (accessed on 29 June 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Caramani, D., and I. van Biezen. 2007. “Cleavage Structuring in Western vs Central and Eastern Europe: State Formation, Nation-Building and Economic Modernisation.” Paper presented at the Conference ECPR Joint Sessions, Helsinki, 7-12 May.
   Google Scholar
• Caspersen, N. 2004. “Intra-Ethnic Challenges to Nationalist Parties: SDS and Serb Opposition Before, During and After the war in Cooperation with the Institute for Strengthening Democracy.” Bih; Paper presented at the 7th International Seminar Democracy and Human Rights in Multi-ethnic Societies, Panel I: Nationalism, 18-11-2004, pp. 1–12, at http://www.kakanien.ac.at/beitr/fallstudie/NCaspersen1.pdf (Accessed on 29 June 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Clem, R. S. 2006. “Russia’s Electoral Geography: A Review.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 47 (4): 381–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clem, R. S., and P. R. Craumer. 2004. “Redrawing the Political map of Russia: The Duma Election of December 2003.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 45 (4): 241–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clem, R. S., and P. R. Craumer. 2005. “Shades of Orange: The Electoral Geography of Ukraine’s 2004 Presidential Elections.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 46 (5): 364–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cliff, A. D., and J. K. Ord. 1981. Spatial Processes: Models and Applications. London: Pion.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, K. R. 1969. “The Voting Decision in a Spatial Context.” Progress in Geography 1: 81–117.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. 2008. “Change in European Societies Since the 1970s.” West European Politics 31 (1–2): 14–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Miguel, C. 2017. “The Role of Electoral Geography in the Territorialization of Party Systems.” Electoral Studies 47: 67–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastmond, M. 2006. “Transnational Returns and Reconstruction in Post-War Bosnia and Herzegovina.” International Migration 44 (3): 141–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enyedi, Z. 2005. “The Role of Agency in Cleavage Formation.” European Journal of Political Research 44 (5): 697–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, G., and S. Whitefield. 2000. “Explaining the Formation of Electoral Cleavages in Postcommunist Democracies.” In Elections in Central and Eastern Europe: the First Wave, edited by H.-D. Klingemann, E. Mochman and, and K. Newton, 36–70. Berlin: Sigma.
   Google Scholar
• Flint, C., and P. J. Taylor. 2007. Political Geography: World-Economy, Nation-State, and Locality. Harlow: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Forest, B. 2018. “Electoral Geography: From Mapping Votes to Representing Power.” Geography Compass 12 (1): e12352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin, M.-J., and M. R. T. Dale. 2009. “Spatial Autocorrelation.” In The SAGE Handbook of Spatial Analysis, edited by A. S. Fotheringham and A. Rogerson, 89–104. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M., M. Laver, and P. Mair. 2011. Representative Government in Modern Europe. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gent, W. P. C., E. F. Jansen, and J. H. F. Smits. 2014. “Right-Wing Radical Populism in City and Suburbs: An Electoral Geography of the Partij Voor de Vrijheid in the Netherlands.” Urban Studies 51 (9): 1775–1794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, R. 2017. “Mountain Militarism and Urban Modernity: Balkanism, Identity and the Discourse of Urban-Rural Cleavages During the Bosnian War.” M. A. Thesis. University of British Columbia. Accessed July 7, 2020. http://summit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/17164/etd9982_RGraves.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hassanat, A. B., M. A. Abbadi, G. A. Altarawneh, and A. A. Alhasanat. 2014. “Solving the Problem of the K Parameter in the KNN Classifier Using an Ensemble Learning Approach.” International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security 12 (8): 33–39.
   Google Scholar
• Haveric, S. 2018. “Beyond Ethnic Voting: Economic and Patronage Driven Electoral Mobilization.” Doctoral dissertation. Universität zu Köln. Accessed July 7, 2020. https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/8596/1/Haveric%2C%20Sabina%20%282018%29%20Dissertation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2018. “Cleavage Theory Meets Europe’s Crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the Transnational Cleavage.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (1): 109–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulsey, J. W. 2010. “‘Why did They Vote for Those Guys Again?’ Challenges and Contradictions in the Promotion of Political Moderation in Post-war Bosnia and Herzegovina.” Democratization 17 (6): 1132–1152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R., and C. Pattie. 2006. Putting Voters in Their Place: Geography and Elections in Great Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R., and C. Pattie. 2008. “Place and Vote.” In The SAGE Handbook of Political Geography, edited by K. R. Cox, M. Low, and J. Robinson, 357–374. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jović, D. 2006. “Croatia and the European Union: A Long Delayed Journey.” Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans 8 (1): 85–103.
   Google Scholar
• Kačapor-Džihić, Z., and N. Oruč. 2012. “Social Impact of Emigration and Rural-Urban Migration in Central and Eastern Europe.” Final Country Report. Bosnia and Herzegovina.
   Google Scholar
• Kartsonaki, A. 2016. “Twenty Years after Dayton: Bosnia-Herzegovina (Still) Stable and Explosive.” Civil Wars 18 (4): 488–516. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2017.1297052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ker-Lindsay, J. 2016. “The Hollow Threat of Secession in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Legal and Political Impediments to a Unilateral Declaration of Independence by Republika Srpska.” LSEE Papers on South Eastern Europe, London.
   Google Scholar
• King, G. 1996. “Why Context Should Not Count.” Political Geography 15 (2): 159–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. 1995. “Formation of Party Cleavages in Post-Communist Democracies.” Party Politics 1 (4): 447–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutsen, O. 2010. “The Regional Cleavage in Western Europe: Can Social Composition, Value Orientations and Territorial Identities Explain the Impact of Region on Party Choice?” West European Politics 33 (3): 553–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeSage, J. P., and R. K. Pace. 2010. “Spatial Econometric Models.” In Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis, edited by M. M. Fischer and A. Getis, 355–376. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. M., and S. Rokkan. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcinkiewicz, K. 2018. “The Economy or an Urban–Rural Divide? Explaining Spatial Patterns of Voting Behaviour in Poland.” East European Politics and Societies 32: 693–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maškarinec, P. 2019. “The Rise of New Populist Political Parties in Czech Parliamentary Elections Between 2010 and 2017: The Geography of Party Replacement.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 60 (5): 511–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massetti, E. 2009. “Explaining Regionalist Party Positioning in a Multi-Dimensional Ideological Space: A Framework for Analysis.” Regional and Federal Studies 19 (4–5): 501–531.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, C. P., and J. Western. 2009. “The Death of Dayton. How to Stop Bosnia from Falling Apart.” Foreign Affairs 88 (5): 69–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalvo, J. G., and M. Reynal-Querol. 2003. “Religious Polarization and Economic Development.” Economic Letters 80 (2): 201–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, P. A. P. 1950. “Notes on Continuous Stochastic Phenomena.” Biometrika 37 (1/2): 17–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mujkić, A., and J. Hulsey. 2010. “Explaining the Success of Nationalist Parties in Bosnia and Herzegovina.” Politička Misao: Časopis za Politologiju 47 (2): 143–158.
   Google Scholar
• Mykhnenko, V. 2009. “Class Voting and the Orange Revolution: A Cultural Political Economy Perspective on Ukraine’s Electoral Geography.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 25 (2–3): 278–296.
   Google Scholar
• Németh, Á, and Z. Dövényi. 2019. “Patterns of Ethnic Homogenisation, Fragmentation and Polarisation and the Vote Shares for Nationalist Parties in Latvia.” Europe-Asia Studies 71 (5): 774–804. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2019.1604945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O”Loughlin, J. 2001. “The Regional Factor in Contemporary Ukrainian Politics: Scale, Place, Space, or Bogus Effect?” Post-Soviet Geography and Economics 42 (1): 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Pantić, D., and Z. M. Pavlović. 2009. Political Culture of Voters in Serbia. Belgrade: Institut društvenih nauka.
   Google Scholar
• Plešivčák, M. 2013. “The Regional Dimension of the Socio-political Urban-Rural Conflict in Slovakia.” AUC Geographica 48: 47–58.
   Google Scholar
• Saarts, T. 2018. “The Sociological Approach in Party System Analysis: The Baltic States in the Central and Eastern European Context.” PhD diss. Tallinn: Tallinn University.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, M. 2015. “Electoral Geography in the Twenty-First Century.” In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Political Geography, edited by J. A. Agnew, V. Mamadouh, A. Secor, and J. Sharp, 279–296. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Sichinava, D. 2017. “Cleavages, Electoral Geography, and the Territorialization of Political Parties in the Republic of Georgia.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 58 (6): 670–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szöcsik, E., and C. I. Zuber. 2012. “Ethnonationalism in Party Competition in Western and Eastern Europe.” Paper presented at the conference Territorial Politics Biennial Conference of the PSA Specialist Group, Brussels, 13–14 September 2012, pp. 24.
   Google Scholar
• Szöcsik, E., and C. I. Zuber. 2015. “EPAC – a New Dataset on Ethnonationalism in Party Competition in 22 European Democracies.” Party Politics 21 (1): 153–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todosijević, B. 2013. “Serbia.” In The Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe, edited by S. Berglund, J. Ekman, K. Deegan-Krause, and T. Knutsen, 523–567. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Vida, G., and Z. Kovács. 2017. “Magyarország átalakuló választási földrajza a 2010-es és a 2014-es parlamenti választások tükrében [The Changing Electoral Geography of Hungary in the Light of the 2010 and 2014 Parliamentary Elections.].” Földrajzi Közlemények 141 (2): 125–138.
   Google Scholar
• Vida, G., and T. Kovalcsik. 2018. “Magyarország választási földrajzi sajátosságai a 2014-es és a 2018-as parlamenti választások tükrében [Electoral Geographical Characteristics of Hungary in the Light of the 2014 and 2018 Parliamentary Elections].” Modern Geográfia 2018 (4): 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Walks, A. R. 2006. “The Causes of City-Suburban Political Polarization? A Canadian Case Study.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96 (2): 390–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, A. 1996. Political Parties and Party Systems (Vol. 9). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warf, B. 2011. “Class, Ethnicity, Religion and Place in the 2008 US Presidential Election.” In Revitalizing Electoral Geography, edited by B. Warf and L. Jonathan, 133–155. Burlington: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, P., D. Farrell, and I. Holliday. 2002. Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M., and K. Husk. 2013. “Can We, Should We, Measure Ethnicity?” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 16 (4): 285–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakošek, N. 2002. Politički sustav Hrvatske [The Political System of Croatia.]. Zagreb: Fakultet političkih znanosti, Zagreb.
   Google Scholar
• Zdeb, A. 2016. “‘The Need to Have Something „of Their Own’: Croat Parallel Institutions in Bosnia and Herzegovina.” Swiss Political Science Review 22 (4): 545–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zdeb, A. 2019. “Ethno-nationalism and Political Conflict in Bosnia (Europe).” In The Palgrave Handbook of Ethnicity, edited by S. Ratuva, 1–19. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zuber, C. I., and E. Szöcsik. 2019. “The Second Edition of the EPAC Expert Survey on Ethnonationalism in Party Competition–Testing for Validity and Reliability.” Regional & Federal Studies 29 (1): 91–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar