Heterogeneity in the effects of resources, proximity, and identity on preference voting in PR systems

References

• [dataset] Czech National Election Study. 2017. Fieldwork done by Center for public opinion research, Institute of Sociology, Czech Academy of Sciences, dates: 23rd October to 12th November 2017, N = 1559.
   Google Scholar
• André, Audrey, and Sam Depauw. 2017. “Too Much Choice, Too Little Impact: A Multilevel Analysis of the Contextual Determinants of Preference Voting.” West European Politics 40 (3): 598–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1271596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• André, Audrey, Bram Wauters, and Jean-Benoit Pilet. 2012. “It's Not Only About Lists: Explaining Preference Voting in Belgium.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 22 (3): 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2012.692374.
   Google Scholar
• Balmas, Meital, Gideon Rahat, Tamir Sheafer, and Shaul R Shenhav. 2014. “Two Routes to Personalized Politics.” Party Politics 20 (1): 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811436037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, Åsa, Kasper M. Hansen, Ólafur Th. Hardarson, Hanne Marthe Narud, and Henrik Oscarsson. 2014. The Nordic Voter: Myths of Exceptionalism. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blais, André, Elisabeth Gidengil, Agnieszka Dobrzynska, Neil Nevitte, and Richard Nadeau. 2003. “Does the Local Candidate Matter? Candidate Effects in the Canadian Election of 2000.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 36 (3): 657–664. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423903778810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bormann, Nils-Christian, and Matt Golder. 2022. “Democratic Electoral Systems Around the World, 1946–2020.” Electoral Studies 78 (August): 102487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102487.
   Google Scholar
• Däubler, Thomas. 2020. “Do More Flexible Lists Increase the Take-up of Preference Voting?” Electoral Studies 68: 102232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodeigne, Jérémy, and Jean-Benoit Pilet. 2021. “Centralized or Decentralized Personalization? Measuring Intra-Party Competition in Open and Flexible List PR Systems.” Party Politics 27 (2): 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819855710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, David M. 2011. Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Giger, Nathalie, Anne Maria Holli, Zoe Lefkofridi, and Hanna Wass. 2014. “The Gender Gap in Same-Gender Voting: The Role of Context.” Electoral Studies 35 (September): 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.02.009.
   Google Scholar
• Górecki, Maciej A., and Michael Marsh. 2014. “A Decline of ‘Friends and Neighbours Voting’ in Ireland? Local Candidate Effects in the 2011 Irish ‘Earthquake Election’.” Political Geography 41: 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski, Michael. 2016. “Voting for Locals: Voters’ Information Processing Strategies in Open-List PR Systems.” Electoral Studies 43: 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski, Michael, and Kamil Marcinkiewicz. 2019. “Ineffective and Counterproductive? The Impact of Gender Quotas in Open-List Proportional Representation Systems.” Politics & Gender 15 (1): 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X17000538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhiste, Maarja. 2015. “Party Gatekeepers’ Support for Viable Female Candidacy in PR-List Systems.” Politics & Gender 11 (1): 89–116. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X14000580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcinkiewicz, Kamil. 2014. “Electoral Contexts That Assist Voter Coordination: Ballot Position Effects in Poland.” Electoral Studies 33: 322–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.07.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcinkiewicz, Kamil, and Mary Stegmaier. 2015. “Ballot Position Effects Under Compulsory and Optional Preferential-List PR Electoral Systems.” Political Behavior 37 (2): 465–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-014-9294-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Nicole S. 2016. “Do Ethnic Minority Candidates Mobilise Ethnic Minority Voters? Evidence from the 2010 UK General Election.” Parliamentary Affairs 69 (1): 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsv014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondak, Jeffery J. 1999. “Reconsidering the Measurement of Political Knowledge.” Political Analysis 8 (1): 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a029805.
   Google Scholar
• Passarelli, Gianluca. 2020. Preferential Voting Systems: Influence on Intra-Party Competition and Voting Behaviour. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, Markus. 2018. Hooked: How Politics Captures People’s Interest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Put, Gert-Jan, Åsa von Schoultz, and Veikko Isotalo. 2020. “Fighting Over Friends and Neighbors: The Effect of Inter-Candidate Geographic Distance on Intra-Party Competition.” Political Geography 81 (August): 102219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102219.
   Google Scholar
• Stegmaier, Mary, Jane Tosun, and Klára Vlachová. 2014. “Women’s Parliamentary Representation in the Czech Republic.” East European Politics and Societies: And Cultures 28 (1): 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325413494771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturgis, Patrick, Nick Allum, and Patten Smith. 2008. “An Experiment on the Measurement of Political Knowledge in Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (1): 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavits, Margit. 2010. “Effect of Local Ties On Electoral Success and Parliamentary Behaviour.” Party Politics 16 (2): 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068809341053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thijssen, Peter, Bram Wauters, and Patrick van Erkel. 2018. “Preferential Voting in Local Versus National Elections: The Role of Proximity Revisited.” In In Mind the Gap: Political Participation and Representation in Belgium, edited by Kris Deschouwer, 275–293. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• van Erkel, Patrick. 2019. “Sharing Is Caring: The Role of Voter-Candidate Similarities in Intra-Party Electoral Competition.” European Political Science Review 11 (1): 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577391800022X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Erkel, Patrick, and Peter Thijssen. 2016. “The First One Wins: Distilling the Primacy Effect.” Electoral Studies 44: 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wauters, Bram, Caroline Weekers, and Bart Maddens. 2010. “Explaining the Number of Preferential Votes for Women in an Open-List PR System: An Investigation of the 2003 Federal Elections in Flanders (Belgium).” Acta Politica 45 (4): 468–490. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2010.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wauters, Bram, Peter Thijssen, Peter van Aelst, and Jean-Benoit Pilet. 2018. “Centralized Personalization at the Expense of Decentralized Personalization. The Decline of Preferential Voting in Belgium (2003–2014).” Party Politics 24 (5): 511–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816678882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wauters, Bram, Peter Thijssen, and Patrick van Erkel. 2020. “Preference Voting in the Low Countries.” Politics of the Low Countries 2 (1): 77–106. https://doi.org/10.5553/PLC/258999292020002001004.
   Google Scholar
• Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar