Thin but visible: the role of populist attitudes and their subdimensions in populist support within the 2021 Czech legislative election

References

• Abedi, Arim. 2002. “Challenges to Established Parties: The Effects of Party System Features on the Electoral Fortunes of Anti-Political-Establishment Parties.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (4): 551–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.t01-1-00022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aichholzer, Julian, Daniel Danner, and Beatrice Rammstedt. 2018. “Facets of Personality and “Ideological Asymmetries.” Journal of Research in Personality 77 (December): 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.09.010.
   Google Scholar
• Akkerman, Agnes, Cas Mudde, and Andrej Zaslove. 2013. “How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters.” Comparative Political Studies 47: 1324–1353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013512600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreadis, Ioannis, Kirk A. Hawkins, Ivan Llamazares, Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, and Matthew Singer. 2019. “Conditional Populist Voting in Chile, Greece, Spain and Bolivia.” In The Ideational Approach to Populism, edited by Kirk A. Hawkins, Ryan E. Carlin, Levente Littvay, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, 128–149. 1st Ed. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315196923-7.
   Google Scholar
• Art, David. 2022. “The Myth of Global Populism.” Perspectives on Politics 20 (3): 999–1011. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592720003552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balík, Stanislav, Vít Hloušek, Lubomír Kopeček, Jan Holzer, Pavel Pšeja, and Andrew Lawrence Roberts. 2017. Czech Politics: From West to East and Back Again. Opladen: Barbara Budrich publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Balta, Evren, Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, and Alper H. Yagci. 2022. “Populist Attitudes and Conspiratorial Thinking.” Party Politics 28 (4): 625–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688211003304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonikowski, Bart, and Noam Gidron. 2016. “The Populist Style in American Politics: Presidential Campaign Discourse, 1952–1996.” Social Forces 94 (4): 1593–1621. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sov120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breyer, Magdalena. 2023. “Populist Positions in Party Competition: Do Parties Strategically Vary Their Degree of Populism in Reaction to Vote and Office Loss?” Party Politics 29 (4): 672–684. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688221097082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brug, Wouter van der, and Anthony Mughan. 2007. “Charisma, Leader Effects and Support for Right-Wing Populist Parties.” Party Politics 13 (1): 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068806071260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busby, Ethan C., Joshua R. Gubler, and Kirk A. Hawkins. 2019. “Framing and Blame Attribution in Populist Rhetoric.” The Journal of Politics 81:616–630. https://doi.org/10.1086/701832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buštíková, Lenka. 2019. Extreme Reactions: Radical Right Mobilization in Eastern Europe. First published. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108697248.
   Google Scholar
• Buštíková, Lenka, and Pavol Baboš. 2020. “Best in Covid: Populists in the Time of Pandemic.” Politics and Governance 8 (4): 496–508. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buštíková, Lenka, and Petra Guasti. 2019. “The State as a Firm: Understanding the Autocratic Roots of Technocratic Populism.” East European Politics and Societies 33 (2): 302–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325418791723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castanho Silva, Bruno, Ioannis Andreadis, Eva Anduiza, Nebojša Blanuša, Yazmin Morlet Corti, Gisela Delfino, Guillem Rico, et al. 2019. “Public Opinion Surveys: A New Scale.” In The Ideational Approach to Populism, edited by Kirk A. Hawkins, Ryan E. Carlin, Levente Littvay, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, 150–177. 1st ed. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. doi:10.4324/9781315196923-8.
   Google Scholar
• Castanho Silva, Bruno, Mario Fuks, and Eduardo Ryô Tamaki. 2022. “So Thin It’s Almost Invisible: Populist Attitudes and Voting Behavior in Brazil.” Electoral Studies 75 (February): 102434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102434.
   Google Scholar
• Castanho Silva, Bruno, Fabian Guy Neuner, and Christopher Wratil. 2022. “Populism and Candidate Support in the US: The Effects of “Thin” and “Host” Ideology.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 10:438–447. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2022.9.
   Google Scholar
• Červenka, Jan. 2021. “Hodnocení Reakce Státu Na Epidemii COVID-19 - Naše Společnost - Speciál - Duben 2021.” Median, s.r.o. https://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/media/com_form2content/documents/c2/a5380/f9/pi210512.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Červenka, Jan. 2022. “Důvěra Ústavním Institucím - Květen Až Červenec 2022.” Centrum pro výzkum veřejného mínění, Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v. v. i. https://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/media/com_form2content/documents/c2/a5544/f9/pi220720.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Fang Fang, Adele Hayes, Charles S. Carver, Jean-Philippe Laurenceau, and Zugui Zhang. 2012. “Modeling General and Specific Variance in Multifaceted Constructs: A Comparison of the Bifactor Model to Other Approaches.” Journal of Personality 80 (1): 219–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00739.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Fang Fang, Stephen G. West, and Karen H. Sousa. 2006. “A Comparison of Bifactor and Second-Order Models of Quality of Life.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 41 (2): 189–225. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4102_5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chytilek, Roman, and Otto Eibl. 2011. “České Politické Strany v Politickém Prostoru.” Czech Sociological Review 47 (1): 61–88. https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2011.47.1.04
   Google Scholar
• Coltman, Tim, Timothy M. Devinney, David F. Midgley, and Sunil Venaik. 2008. “Formative Versus Reflective Measurement Models: Two Applications of Formative Measurement.” Journal of Business Research 61 (12): 1250–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, Paul T., and Robert R. McCrae. 1995. “Domains and Facets: Hierarchical Personality Assessment Using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory.” Journal of Personality Assessment 64 (1): 21–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6401_2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ČTK. 2021. “Nechceme multikulturní ekofanatický pirátostát a nechceme sdílet naši zemi, řekl Babiš poslancům.” iROZHLAS. June 3. https://www.irozhlas.cz/zpravy-domov/andrej-babis-piratostat-projev-jednani-snemovny-neduvera-vlada_2106031128_tzr.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, Yaoyao, and Alexander Kustov. 2022. “When Do Politicians Use Populist Rhetoric? Populism as a Campaign Gamble.” Political Communication 39 (3): 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2025505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, Yaoyao, and Alexander Kustov. 2023. “The (in)Effectiveness of Populist Rhetoric: A Conjoint Experiment of Campaign Messaging.” Political Science Research and Methods: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2023.55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, James N., Lawrence R. Jacobs, and Eric Ostermeier. 2004. “Candidate Strategies to Prime Issues and Image.” The Journal of Politics 66 (4): 1180–1202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3816.2004.00295.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dvořák, Tomáš. 2022. “Populism, Anti-Establishment Politics, and Dimensions of Political Competition: Analysis of Populist Attitudes in the Czech Republic.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 55 (3): 140–162. https://doi.org/10.1525/cpcs.2022.1676093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, George C., William Mitchell, and Reed Welch. 1995. “Explaining Presidential Approval: The Significance of Issue Salience.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 108–134. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engler, Sarah, Bartek Pytlas, and Kevin Deegan-Krause. 2019. “Assessing the Diversity of Anti-Establishment and Populist Politics in Central and Eastern Europe.” West European Politics 42 (6): 1310–1336. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1596696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enyedi, Zsolt. 2020. “Right-Wing Authoritarian Innovations in Central and Eastern Europe.” East European Politics 36 (3): 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2020.1787162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garzia, Diego, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, and Andrea De Angelis. 2022. “Partisan Dealignment and the Personalisation of Politics in West European Parliamentary Democracies, 1961–2018.” West European Politics 45 (2): 311–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1845941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George-Betz, Hans. 2017. “Nativism and the Success of Populist Mobilization.” International Journal of Political Thought 12:169–188.
   Google Scholar
• Gründl, Johann, and Julian Aichholzer. 2020. “Support for the Populist Radical Right: Between Uncertainty Avoidance and Risky Choice.” Political Psychology 41 (4): 641–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyárfášová, Oľga, and Roman Hlatky. 2023. “Personalized Politics: Evidence from the Czech and Slovak Republics.” Electoral Studies 81 (February): 102567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102567.
   Google Scholar
• Hameleers, Michael, Desirée Schmuck, Anne Schulz, Dominique Stefanie Wirz, Jörg Matthes, Linda Bos, Nicoleta Corbu, and Ioannis Andreadis. 2021. “The Effects of Populist Identity Framing on Populist Attitudes Across Europe: Evidence from a 15-Country Comparative Experiment.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 33 (3): 491–510. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edaa018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, Seán. 2012a. “The Czech Republicans 1990–1998: A Populist Outsider in a Consolidating Democracy.” In Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy?, edited by Cas Mudde and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, 68–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139152365.005.
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, Seán. 2012b. “Dynamics of new Party Formation in the Czech Republic 1996–2010: Looking for the Origins of a ‘Political Earthquake’.” East European Politics 28 (2): 119–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2012.669733.
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, Seán, and Milada Anna Vachudova. 2018. “Understanding the Illiberal Turn: Democratic Backsliding in the Czech Republic.” East European Politics 34 (3): 276–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2018.1493457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, Austin. 2013. “Can Candidates Activate or Deactivate the Economic Vote? Evidence from Two Mexican Elections.” The Journal of Politics 75 (4): 1051–1063. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613001011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, Tim, and Kevin Deegan-Krause. 2020. The New Party Challenge: Changing Cycles of Party Birth and Death in Central Europe and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Havlík, Vlastimil. 2012. “The Czech Republic.” In Populist Political Parties in East-Central Europe, edited by Vlastimil Havlík and Aneta Pinková, 97–134. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
   Google Scholar
• Havlík, Vlastimil. 2019. “Technocratic Populism and Political Illiberalism in Central Europe.” Problems of Post-Communism 66 (6): 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2019.1580590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havlík, Vlastimil, and Alena Kluknavská. 2022. “The Populist Vs Anti-Populist Divide in the Time of Pandemic: The 2021 Czech National Election and its Consequences for European Politics*.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 60 (S1): 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13413.
   Google Scholar
• Havlík, Vlastimil, and Jakub Lysek. 2022. “The Czech 2021 General Election and Its Impact on the Party System.” Politologický Časopis - Czech Journal of Political Science 29 (3): 225–238. https://doi.org/10.5817/PC2022-3-225.
   Google Scholar
• Havlík, Vlastimil, and Petr Voda. 2016. “The Rise of New Political Parties and Re-Alignment of Party Politics in the Czech Republic.” Acta Politologica 8 (2): 119–144.
   Google Scholar
• Havlík, Vlastimil, and Petr Voda. 2018. “Cleavages, Protest or Voting for Hope? The Rise of Centrist Populist Parties in the Czech Republic.” Swiss Political Science Review 24 (2): 161–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havlík, Vlastimil, and Jakub Wondreys. 2021. “The 2021 Czech Parliamentary Elections: The Surprising Victory of the Anti-Populist Coalition.” WHO Governs in Europe and Beyond. October 11. https://whogoverns.eu/the-2021-parliamentary-elections-in-czechia-the-surprising-victory-of-the-anti-populist-coalition/.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, Kirk A., Ryan E. Carlin, Levente Littvay, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, eds. 2019. The Ideational Approach to Populism Concept, Theory, and Analysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, Kirk A., Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, and Ioannis Andreadis. 2020. “The Activation of Populist Attitudes.” Government and Opposition 55 (2): 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2018.23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hieda, Takeshi, Masahiro Zenkyo, and Masaru Nishikawa. 2021. “Do Populists Support Populism? An Examination Through an Online Survey Following the 2017 Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly Election.” Party Politics 27 (2): 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819848112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hloušek, Vít, and Lubomír Kopeček. 2008. “Cleavages in the Contemporary Czech and Slovak Politics Between Persistence and Change.” East European Politics and Societies: And Cultures 22 (3): 518–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325408315833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hloušek, Vít, Lubomír Kopeček, and Petra Vodová. 2020. The Rise of Entrepreneurial Parties in European Politics. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-41916-5.
   Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara, Eva Anduiza, Ali Carkoglu, Georg Lutz, and Nicolas Sauger. 2016. “Democracy Divided? People, Politicians and the Politics of Populism.” https://cses.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/CSES5_ContentSubcommittee_FinalReport.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, Robert A., Michael Jankowski, and Carsten Wegscheider. 2023. “Explaining Populist Attitudes: The Impact of Policy Discontent and Representation.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 64 (1): 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-022-00422-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunger, Sophia, and Fred Paxton. 2021. “What’s in a Buzzword? A Systematic Review of the State of Populism Research in Political Science.” Political Science Research and Methods 10:617–633. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2021.44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly, Seth, Ryan Bakker, Liesbet Hooghe, Gary Marks, Jonathan Polk, Jan Rovny, Marco Steenbergen, and Milada Anna Vachudova. 2022. “Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999–2019.” Electoral Studies 75 (February): 102420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102420.
   Google Scholar
• Jungkunz, Sebastian, Robert Fahey, and Airo Hino. 2021. “Populists Vote for Populists, Right? How Populist Attitude Scales Fail to Capture Support for Populists in Power.” https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/be39q.
   Google Scholar
• Kokkonen, Andrej, and Jonas Linde. 2023. “Nativist Attitudes and Opportunistic Support for Democracy.” West European Politics 46 (1): 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.2007459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2008. West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, Ernesto. 2005. On Populist Reason. New York: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Linek, Lukáš, and Pat Lyons. 2013. Dočasná Stabilita? Volební Podpora Politických Stran v České Republice v Letech 1990–2010. 1st ed. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství SLON.
   Google Scholar
• Loew, Nicole, and Thorsten Faas. 2019. “Between Thin- and Host-Ideologies: How Populist Attitudes Interact with Policy Preferences in Shaping Voting Behaviour.” Representation 55 (4): 493–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2019.1643772.
   Google Scholar
• Marcos-Marne, Hugo, Homero Gil de Zúñiga, and Porismita Borah. 2023. “What Do We (Not) Know About Demand-Side Populism? A Systematic Literature Review on Populist Attitudes.” European Political Science 22 (3): 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-022-00397-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcos-Marne, Hugo, Carolina Plaza-Colodro, and Tina Freyburg. 2020. “Who Votes for New Parties? Economic Voting, Political Ideology and Populist Attitudes.” West European Politics 43 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1608752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, Maurits, and Andrej Zaslove. 2018. “Populism and Political Parties Expert Survey 2018 (POPPA).” Harvard Dataverse. doi:10.7910/DVN/8NEL7B.
   Google Scholar
• Michel, Elie, Diego Garzia, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, and Andrea De Angelis. 2020. “Leader Effects and Voting for the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe.” Swiss Political Science Review 26 (3): 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffitt, Benjamin. 2020. “What Is Populism?” In Populism. Key Concepts in Political Theory, 21–39. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39 (4): 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas. 2007a. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas, ed. 2007b. “Who’s Afraid of … ?” In Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe, 63–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492037.004.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas. 2013. “Three Decades of Populist Radical Right Parties in Western Europe: So What?” European Journal of Political Research 52 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02065.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser. 2017. “Causes and Responses.” In Populism: A Very Short Introduction, 97–118. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser. 2018. “Studying Populism in Comparative Perspective: Reflections on the Contemporary and Future Research Agenda.” Comparative Political Studies 51 (13): 1667–1693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018789490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuner, Fabian G., and Christopher Wratil. 2020. “The Populist Marketplace: Unpacking the Role of “Thin” and “Thick” Ideology.” Political Behavior 44:551–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09629-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowakowski, Adam. 2021. “Do Unhappy Citizens Vote for Populism?” European Journal of Political Economy 68 (June): 101985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101985.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. Eric, and Wendy M. Rahn. 2016. “Rise of the Trumpenvolk: Populism in the 2016 Election.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 667 (1): 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716216662639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrov, Jan. 2020. “The COVID-19 Emergency in the Age of Executive Aggrandizement: What Role for Legislative and Judicial Checks?” The Theory and Practice of Legislation 8 (1-2): 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2020.1788232.
   Google Scholar
• Richey, Sean. 2012. “Campaign Advertising and the Stimulation and Activation of the Authoritarian Personality.” Political Communication 29 (1): 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2011.616874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rico, Guillem, Marc Guinjoan, and Eva Anduiza. 2017. “The Emotional Underpinnings of Populism: How Anger and Fear Affect Populist Attitudes.” Swiss Political Science Review 23 (4): 444–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, Matthijs. 2019. “State of the Field: How to Study Populism and Adjacent Topics? A Plea for Both More and Less Focus.” European Journal of Political Research 58 (1): 362–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, Matthijs, Sarah L de Lange, and Wouter van der Brug. 2014. “A Populist Zeitgeist? Programmatic Contagion by Populist Parties in Western Europe.” Party Politics 20 (4): 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811436065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, Matthijs, and Teun Pauwels. 2011. “Measuring Populism: Comparing Two Methods of Content Analysis.” West European Politics 34 (6): 1272–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.616665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, Matthijs, Andrea L.P. Pirro, Daphne Halikiopoulou, Caterina Froio, Stijn Van Kessel, Sarah L. De Lange, Cas Mudde, and Paul Taggart. 2023. “The PopuList 3.0: An Overview of Populist, Far-Left and Far-Right Parties in Europe.” https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2EWKQ.
   Google Scholar
• Santana, Andrés, Piotr Zagórski, and José Rama. 2020. “At Odds with Europe: Explaining Populist Radical Right Voting in Central and Eastern Europe.” East European Politics 36 (2): 288–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2020.1737523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxonberg, Steven, and Reinhard Heinisch. 2022. “Filling the Demand Gap: The Success of Centrist Entrepreneurial Populism in the Czech Republic.” Europe-Asia Studies 76 (0): 363–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2022.2136624.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, Anne, Philipp Müller, Christian Schemer, Dominique Stefanie Wirz, Martin Wettstein, and Werner Wirth. 2018. “Measuring Populist Attitudes on Three Dimensions.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 30 (2): 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwörer, Jakob. 2021. The Growth of Populism in the Political Mainstream: The Contagion Effect of Populist Messages on Mainstream Parties’ Communication. Springer Series in Electoral Politics. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72449-8.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, Bruno Castanho, and Christopher Wratil. 2021. “Do Parties’ Representation Failures Affect Populist Attitudes? Evidence from a Multinational Survey Experiment.” Political Science Research and Methods 11:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2021.63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPD. 2021. “Program pro volby do Poslanecké sněmovny 2021.” SPD - Svoboda a přímá demokracie. July 10. https://www.spd.cz/program-vypis/.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, Ben. 2008. “The Thin Ideology of Populism.” Journal of Political Ideologies 13 (1): 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310701822289.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, Ben. 2011. “Populism, Nationalism, or National Populism? An Analysis of Slovak Voting Behaviour at the 2010 Parliamentary Election.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 44 (4): 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2011.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsatsanis, Emmanouil, Ioannis Andreadis, and Eftichia Teperoglou. 2018. “Populism from Below: Socio-Economic and Ideological Correlates of Mass Attitudes in Greece.” South European Society and Politics 23 (4): 429–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2018.1510635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Učeň, Peter. 2004. “Centrist Populism as a New Competitive and Mobilization Strategy in Slovak Politics.” In Party Government in Slovakia: Experience and Perspectives, edited by Olga Gyarfasova and Grigorij Meseznikov, 45–73. Bratislava: Institute for Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, Nadia. 2019. “Political Theory of Populism.” Annual Review of Political Science 22 (1): 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hauwaert, Steven M., and Stijn Van Kessel. 2018. “Beyond Protest and Discontent: A Cross-National Analysis of the Effect of Populist Attitudes and Issue Positions on Populist Party Support.” European Journal of Political Research 57 (1): 68–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wettstein, Martin, Anne Schulz, Marco Steenbergen, Christian Schemer, Philipp Müller, Dominique S Wirz, and Werner Wirth. 2020. “Measuring Populism Across Nations: Testing for Measurement Invariance of an Inventory of Populist Attitudes.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 32 (2): 284–305. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edz018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesehomeier, Nina. 2019. Expert Surveys. In The Ideational Approach to Populism, edited by Kirk A. Hawkins, Ryan E. Carlin, Levente Littvay, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, 90–111. 1st ed. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315196923-5.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesehomeier, Nina, Kenneth Benoit, Matthew Singer, and Saskia Ruth-Lovell. 2022. “Political Representation, Executives, and Political Parties Survey: Data from Expert Surveys in 31 EUR + Countries, 2020-2021.” IE University, London School of Economics, University of Connecticut and Radboud University. [DOI tba].
   Google Scholar
• Wondreys, Jakub. 2021. “The “Refugee Crisis” and the Transformation of the Far Right and the Political Mainstream: The Extreme Case of the Czech Republic.” East European Politics 37 (4): 722–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2020.1856088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuttke, Alexander, Christian Schimpf, and Harald Schoen. 2020. “When the Whole Is Greater Than the Sum of Its Parts: On the Conceptualization and Measurement of Populist Attitudes and Other Multidimensional Constructs.” American Political Science Review 114 (2): 356–374. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Bo, Tianjun Sun, Mengyang Cao, and Fritz Drasgow. 2020. “Using Bifactor Models to Examine the Predictive Validity of Hierarchical Constructs: Pros, Cons, and Solutions.” Organizational Research Methods 24:530–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120915522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar