Can electricity reform help Mexico achieve carbon emission reductions?

References

• Accut, M., and C. Elliot. 1999. Regulatory Conflict? Environmental and Economic Regulation of Electricity Generation. Milano: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei. 24.
   Google Scholar
• Arocena, P., and C. Waddams-Price. 1999. Generating Efficiency: Economic and Environmental Regulation of Public and Private Electricity Generators in Spain. Coventry: Centre for Management under Regulation, Warwick Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, W.B. 2005. “Out-of-Equilibrium Economics and Agent-Based Modeling.” In Handbook of Computational Economics, Vol. 2: Agent-Based Computational Economics, edited by K. Judd and L. Tesfatsion. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, R.W., and J. Besant-Jones. 2001. “Global Electric Power Reform, Privatization and Liberalization of the Electric Power Industry in Developing Countries.” Annual Reviews Energy & the Environment 26: 231–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlas, Y., and S. Carpenter. 1990. “ Philosophical Roots of Model Validation: Two Paradigms.” System Dynamics Review 6: 148–166.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes-Regueiro, F., M. Leach, and M. Ruth. 2002. “The Mexican Energy Sector: Integrated Dynamic Analysis of the Natural Gas/Refining System.” Energy Policy 30 (9): 767–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BERR (Department for Business, Enterprise & Regulatory Reform). 2007. Meeting the Energy Challenge A White Paper on Nuclear Power January 2008. London: Department for Business, Enterprise & Regulatory Reform (BERR); HM Government.
   Google Scholar
• Bigano, A., and S. Proost. 2003. The Opening of European Electricity Market and Environmental Policy: Does the Degree of Competition Matter? Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Bower, J. 2001. “An Agent-Based Analysis of the Sources of Market Power in Deregulated Electricity Markets. Decision Science.” PhD diss., London Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Burtraw, D., K. Palmer, and M. Heintzelman. 2000. Electricity Restructuring: Consequences and Opportunities for the Environment. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• CFE (Comision Federal de Electricidad). 2012. Programa de Obras e Inversiones del Sector Eléctrico 2012–2026. México, D.F.: Comisión Federal de Electricidad.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, U. 1998. “Liberalisation in the Energy Sector: Environmental Threat or Opportunity?” In Deregulation in the European Union: Environmental Perspectives, edited by U. Collier, 93–113. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DEFRA (Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs). 2007. Draft Climate Change Bill. London: Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Dyner, I., and E. Larsen. 2001. “From Planning to Strategy in the Electricity Industry.” Energy Policy 29: 1145–1154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiddaman, T.S. 2002. “Exploring Policy Options with a Behavioral Climate-Economy Model.” System Dynamics Review 18 (2): 243–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, A. 1999. Modeling the Environment: An Introduction to System Dynamics Models of Environmental Systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, A. 2008. “Simulation Scenarios for Rapid Reduction in Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the Western Electricity System.” Energy Policy 36: 443–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuentes-Bracamontes, R. 2012. “How to Reform the Power Sector in Mexico? Insights from a Simulation Model.” International Journal of Energy Sector Management 6 (4): 438–464.
   Google Scholar
• Gary, S., and E.R. Larsen. 2000. “Improving Firm Performance in Out-of-Equilibrium, Deregulated Markets Using Feedback Simulation Models.” Energy Policy 28: 845–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouldson, A., and J. Murphy. 1997. “Ecological Modernisation: Economic Restructuring and the Environment.” The Political Quarterly 68 (5): 74–86.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, P.E., and R.K. Chawla. 1970. “An International Comparison of Production Functions: The Coal-Fired Electricity Generating Industry.” Economica 37 (146): 164–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janicke, M., H. Monch, T. Ranneberg, and U. Simonis. 1988. “Economics Structure and Environmental Impact: Empirical Evidence on Thirty-one Countries in East and West.” Working Paper FS II 88-402, Internationales Institute Fur Umwelt und gesellschaft, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin Fur Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Janicke, M., H. Monch, T. Ranneberg, and U.E. Simoni. 1989. “Economics Structure and Environmental Impacts: East West Comparisons.” The Environmentalist 9 (3): 171–183.
   Google Scholar
• Jannuzzi, G. 2005. “Power Sector Reforms in Brazil and Its Impacts on Energy Efficiency and Research and Development Activities.” Energy Policy 33: 1753–1762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jebaraj, S., and S. Iniyan. 2006. “A Review of Energy Models.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 10 (4): 281–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keay, M. 2006. The Dynamics of Power: Power Generation Investments in Liberalised Electricity Markets. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Kemfert, C., W. Lise, and R. Östling. 2003. The European Electricity Market – Does Liberalisation Bring Cheaper and Greener Electricity? Oldenburg: University of Oldenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Lanoie, P., B. Laplante, and M. Roy. 1997. Can Capital Markets Create Incentives for Pollution Control? Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Linderhof, V., W. Lise, and F. Oosterhuis. 2003. “Environmental Policy in a Liberalised Market: The Case of the Netherlands.” Paper presented at the third meeting of the GRENELEM project, September 29–30. Buenos Aires.
   Google Scholar
• Markiewicz, K., N. Rose, and C. Wolfram. 2004. “Has Restructuring Improved Operating Efficiency at US Electricity Generating Plants?” Center for the Study of Energy Markets (CSEM) Working Paper 135, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, K., and D. Burtraw. 2005. The Environmental Impacts of Electricity Restructuring: Looking Back and Looking Forward. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, K., D. Burtraw, R. Bharvirkar, and A. Paul. 2001. Restructuring and the Cost of Reducing NO_x Emissions in Electricity Generation. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, K., D. Burtraw, R. Bharvirkar, and A. Paul. 2002. Electricity Restructuring, Environmental Policy, and Emissions. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, A., and D. Burtraw. 2002. The RFF Haiku Electricity Market Model. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. 2000. “Electricity Liberalisation, Air Pollution and Environmental Policy in the UK.” In The International Energy Experience: Markets, Regulation and the Environment, edited by G. MacKerron and P. Pearson, 289–302. London: Imperial College London Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perez-Arriaga, I.J., and P. Linares. 2008. “Markets vs Regulation: A Roles for Indicative Planning.” The Energy Journal 29 (Special Issue in honour of David Newbery): 149–164.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, R. 2005. “Electricity Sector Restructuring In India: An Environmentally Beneficial Policy?” Energy Policy 33 (4): 439–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K.R. 2002. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Quaddus, M.A., and M.A.B. Siddique. 2004. Handbook of Sustainable Development Planning: Studies in Modelling and Decision Support. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Qudrat-Ullah, H. 2005a. “MDESRAP: A Model for Understanding the Dynamics of Electricity Supply, Resources and Pollution.” International Journal Global Energy Issues 23 (1): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Qudrat-Ullah, H., and P.I. Davidsen. 2001. “Understanding the Dynamics of Electricity Supply, Resources and Pollution: Pakistan's Case.” Energy 26 (6): 595–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riahi, K., A. Grubler, and N. Nakicenovic. 2007. “Scenarios of Long-Term Socio-economic and Environmental Development Under Climate Stabilization.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74: 887–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SEMARNAT. 2004. Evaluacion de las externalidades ambientales de la generacion termoelectica en Mexico. Mexico, D.F: SEMARNAT.
   Google Scholar
• SENER. 2012. Prospectiva del sector eléctrico 2012–2026. México. D.F.: Secretaría de Energía.
   Google Scholar
• Simmonis, U. 1989. “Industrial Restructuring for Sustainable Development: Three Points of Departure.” Working Paper FS II 89-401, International Institute Fur Umwelt und Gesselschaft, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin Fur Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Speck, S. 2003. “Liberalisation of the Electricity Markets and Environmental Policy Issues: Synergy or Controversy.” Paper presented at the Research Symposium European Electricity Markets, September 26. The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• Strachan, N., and R. Kannan. 2008. “Hybrid Modelling of Long-Term Carbon Reduction Scenarios for the UK.” Energy Economics 30 (6): 2947–2963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strachan, N., R. Kannan, and S. Pye. 2007. Final Report on DTI-DEFRA Scenarios and Sensitivities, Using the UK MARKAL and MARKAL-MACRO Energy System Models. London: DEFRA-DETI.
   Google Scholar
• Strachan, N., S. Pye, and R. Kannan. 2009. “The Iterative Contribution and Relevance of Modelling to UK Energy Policy.” Energy Policy 37 (3): 850–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Economist. 2001. “A Survey of Energy.” The Economist, February 8.
   Google Scholar
• Toke, D., and A. Fragaki. 2008. “Do Liberalised Electricity Markets Help or Hinder CHP and District Heating? The Case of the UK.” Energy Policy 36 (4): 1448–1456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogstad, K.-O. 2004a. “A System Dynamics Analysis of the Nordic Electricity Markets: The Transition from a Fossil Fueled Toward a Renewable Supply Within a Liberalised Electricity Market.” PhD diss., Department of Electrical Power Engineering. Trondheim, Norway, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Vogstad, K.O. 2004b. “Counterproductive Environmental Policies: Long Term Versus Short Term Substitution Effects of Gas in a Liberalised Electricity Market.” Proceedings of 22nd International System Dynamics Conference, July 25–29. Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Vrolijk, C. 2002. Climate Change and Power: Economic Instruments for European Electricity. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Weinmann, J. 2001. “Privatisation and Restructuring of the Latin-American Electricity Sector: The Role of Fiscal Deficits, Technical Constraints and Distributional Conflict.” Paper presented at the 18th Congress World Energy Council. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
   Google Scholar
• Weinmann, J., and D. Bunn. 2004. “Resource Endowment and Electricity Sector Reform.” EMG Working Paper, London Business School, London.
   Google Scholar