Good parks – bad parks: the influence of perceptions of location on WTP and preference motives for urban parks

References

• Anderson, S.T., and S.E. West. 2006. “Open Space, Residential Property Values, and Spatial Context.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 36 (6): 773–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K., R. Solow, P.R. Portney, E.E. Leamer, R. Radner, and H. Schuman. 1993. “Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation.” Federal Register 58 (10): 4601–4614.
   Google Scholar
• Aspinall, P.A., C.W. Thompson, S. Alves, T. Sugiyama, R. Brice, and A. Vickers. 2010 “Preference and Relative Importance for Environmental Attributes of Neighbourhood Open Space in Older People.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 37 (6): 1022–1039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman, I.J., D. Abson, N. Beaumont, A. Darnell, C. Fezzi, N. Hanley, A. Kontoleon, et al. 2011. “Chapter 22 Economic Values from Ecosystems.” In The UK National Ecosystem Assessment Technical Report. Cambridge: UK National Ecosystem Assessment, UNEP-WCMC.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, I.J., R. Brouwer, M. Cranford, S. Hime, E. Ozdemiroglu, Z. Phang, and A. Provins, 2010. Valuing Environmental Impacts: Practical Guidelines for the Use of Value Transfer in Policy and Project Appraisal, Main Report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. London: Economics for the Environment Consultancy (eftec). http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/policy/natural-environ/documents/guidelines.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, I.J., R. Brouwer, S. Ferrini, M. Schaafsma, D.N. Barton, A. Dubgaard, B. Hasler, et al. 2011. “Making Benefit Transfers Work: Deriving and Testing Principles for Value Transfers for Similar and Dissimilar Sites Using a Case Study of the Non-Market Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Across Europe.” Environmental and Resource Economics 50 (3): 365–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman, I.J., D. Burgess, W.G. Hutchinson, and D.I. Matthews, 2008, “Learning Design Contingent Valuation (LDCV): NOAA Guidelines, Preference Learning and Coherent Arbitrariness.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55 (2): 127–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman, I.J., R.T. Carson, B. Day, M. Hanemann, N. Hanley, T. Hett, M. Jones-Lee, et al. 2002. Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, I.J., B.H. Day, S. Georgiou, and I. Lake, 2006, “The Aggregation of Environmental Benefit Values: Welfare Measures, Distance Decay and Total WTP.” Ecological Economics 60 (2): 450–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman, I.J., and I.H. Langford. 1997. “Non-Users' Willingness to Pay for a National Park: An Application and Critique of the Contingent Valuation Method.” Regional Studies 31 (6): 571–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, K.J., and J.C. Bergstrom. 1999. “Doubt, Doubts, and Doubters: The Genesis of a New Research Agenda?” In Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU and Developing Countries, edited by I.J. Bateman, K.G. Willis, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CABE. 2005. Does Money Grow on trees? London: Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, P., G.L. Poe, and I.J. Bateman. 2004. “The Structure of Motivation for Contingent Values: A Case Study of Lake Water Quality Improvement.” Ecological Economics 50 (1): 69–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, L., L. Kwiatkowski, J.J. Gaston, H. Beck, H. Brett, M. Batty, L. Scholes, et al. 2011. “Chapter 10 Urban.” In The UK National Ecosystem Assessment Technical Report. Cambridge: UK National Ecosystem Assessment, UNEP-WCMC. http://uknea.unep-wcmc.org/Resources/tabid/82/Default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Day, B., I.J. Bateman, and I. Lake. 2007. “Beyond Implicit Prices: Recovering Theoretically Consistent and Transferable Values for Noise Avoidance from a Hedonic Property Price Model.” Environmental and Resource Economics 37 (1): 211–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehring, C., and N. Dunse, 2006, “Housing Density and the Effect of Proximity to Public Open Space in Aberdeen, Scotland.” Real Estate Economics 34 (4): 553–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DCLG. 2013. Council tax Levels Set by Local Authorities in England: 2013 to 2014 (revised), Table 1. London: Department for Communities and Local Government, The Stationary office.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, J., J. van Leeuwen, and H. Timmermans. 2003. “Evaluating Design Alternatives Using Conjoint Experiments in Virtual Reality.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30: 357–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunse, N., M. White, and C. Dehring. 2007. “Urban Parks, Open Space and Residential Property Values.” RICS Research Paper Series 7 (8): 0–40.
   Google Scholar
• Espey, M., and K. Owusu-Edusei. 2001. “Neighbourhood Parks and Residential Property Values in Greenville, South Carolina.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 33 (3): 487–492.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrini, S., and C. Fezzi. 2012. “Generalized Additive Models for Nonmarket Valuation via Revealed or Stated Preference Methods.” Land Economics 88 (4): 782–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujiwara, D., R. Lawton, and S. Mourato. 2015. “The Health and Wellbeing Benefits of Public Libraries, Full Report.” Arts Council England and SIMETRICA. https://goo.gl/4IAVXk
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, X. 2014. “The Value of Rehabilitating Urban Rivers: The Yarqon River (Israel).” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 3 (3): 323–339.
   Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, B. 1996. “Ordering Effects in Contingent Valuation Surveys.” Environmental and Resource Economics 8 (4): 485–499.
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, N., and J. Knight. 1992. “Valuing the Environment: Recent UK Experience and an Application to Green Belt Land.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 35 (2): 145–160
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, N., F. Schläpfer, and J. Spurgeon, 2003. “Aggregating the Benefits of Environmental Improvements: Distance-Decay Functions for use and Non-Use Values.” Journal of Environmental Management 68 (3): 297–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R.J., J. Rolfe, R.S. Rosenberger, and R. Brouwer. 2015. “Introduction to Benefit Transfer Methods.” In Benefit Transfer of Environmental and Resource Values A Guide for Researchers and Practitioners, edited by R.J. Johnston, J. Rolfe, R.S. Rosenberger, and R. Brouwer, 19–59. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Karp, D.G. 1996. “Values and Their Effect on Pro-Environmental Behaviour.” Environment and Behaviour 28 (1): 111–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotchen, M.J., and S.D. Reiling. 2000. “Environmental Attitudes, Motivations, and Contingent Valuation of Nonuse Values: A Case Study Involving Endangered Species.” Ecological Economics 32 (1): 93–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laing, R., A.-M. Davies, D. Miller, A. Conniff, S. Scott, and J. Morrice. 2008. “The Application of Visual Environmental Economics in the Study of Public Preference and Urban Greenspace.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 36: 355–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis, J.B. 2012. “Comparing Households’ Total Economic Values and Recreation Value of Instream Flow in an Urban River.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 1 (1):5–17, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2011.640855
   Google Scholar
• Mahieu, P.-A., P. Riera, B. Kriström, R. Brännlund, and M. Giergiczny. 2014. “Exploring the Determinants of Uncertainty in Contingent Valuation Surveys.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy. 3 (2): 186–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2013.876941
   Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff, J., and U. Liebe. 2006, “Protest Beliefs in Contingent Valuation: Explaining Their Motivation.” Ecological Economics 57 (4): 583–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R.C., and R.T. Carson. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nordlund, A.M., and J. Garvill. 2002. “Value Structures Behind Pro-Environmental Behaviour.” Environment and Behaviour 34 (6): 740–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC. 2004. Valuing Ecosystem Services: Toward Better Environmental Decision-Making. Washington, DC: National Research Council (The National Academies Press).
   Google Scholar
• Ojea, E., and M.L. Loureiro. 2007. “Altruistic, Egoistic and Biospheric Values in Willingness to Pay (WTP) for Wildlife.” Ecological Economics, 63 (4): 807–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pate, J., and J. Loomis. 1997. “The Effect of Distance on Willingness to Pay Values: A Case Study of Wetlands and Salmon in California.” Ecological Economics 20 (3): 199–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberger, R.S., and J.B. Loomis. 2001. “Benefit Transfer of Outdoor Recreation use Values: A Technical Document Supporting the Forest Service Strategic Plan (2000 revision).” Gen Tech Rep RMRS-GTR-72. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research station.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, A., and C.L. Spash. 2008. “Measuring" Awareness of Environmental Consequences": Two Scales and Two Interpretations.” CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Socio-Economics and the Environment in Discussion (SEED) Working Paper Series 2008-10, 1–34. Canberra: CSIRO.
   Google Scholar
• Salazar, D.S., and L.G. Menéndez. 2007. “Estimating the Non-Market Benefits of an Urban Park: Does Proximity Matter?.” Land Use Policy 24 (1): 296–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S.H. 1992. “Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 25 (1): 1–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, R.D. 2016. “The Simple but Not-Too-Simple Valuation of Ecosystem Services: Basic Principles and an Illustrative Example.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/21606544.2016.1184594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., and S. Lichtenstein. 1983. “Preference Reversals: A Broader Perspective.” The American Economic Review 73 (4) 596–605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P.C., and T. Dietz. 1994. “The Value Basis of Environmental Concern.” Journal of social issues 50 (3): 65–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P.C., T. Dietz, and J.S. Black. 1985. “Support for Environmental Protection: The Role of Moral Norms.” Population & Environment 8 (3): 204–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P.C., T. Dietz, and G.A. Guagnano. 1995. “The New Ecological Paradigm in Social-Psychological Context.” Environment and Behaviour 27 (6): 723–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P.C., T. Dietz, and L. Kalof. 1993. “Value Orientations, Gender, and Environmental Concern.” Environment and Behaviour 25 (5): 322–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P.C., L. Kalof, T. Dietz, and G.A. Guagnano. 1995. “Values, Beliefs, and Proenvironmental Action: Attitude Formation Toward Emergent Attitude Objects.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25 (18): 1611–1636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strazzera, E., M. Genius, R. Scarpa, and G. Hutchinson. 2003. “The Effect of Protest Votes on the Estimates of WTP for Use Values of Recreational Sites.” Environmental and Resource Economics 25 (4): 461–476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vondolia, G.K., H. Eggert, S. Navrud, and J. Stage. 2014. “What do Respondents Bring to Contingent Valuation? A Comparison of Monetary and Labour Payment Vehicles.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 3 (3): 253–267.
   Google Scholar
• Whitford, V., A.R. Ennos, and J.F. Handley. 2001. “City form and Natural Process—Indicators for the Ecological Performance of Urban Areas and Their Application to Merseyside, UK.” Landscape and Urban Planning 57 (2): 91–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, K., B. Crabtree, L.M. Osman, and K. Cathrine. 2016. “Green Space and Health Benefits: A QALY and CEA of a Mental Health Programme.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 5 (2): 163–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar