Scale heterogeneity in the valuation of road traffic risk reductions: the case of Newfoundland's moose-vehicle collisions

References

• Akter S., J. Bennett, and S. Akhter. 2008. “Preference Uncertainty in Contingent Valuation.” Ecological Economics 67 (3): 345–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberini A. 1995. “Efficiency Vs Bias of Willingness-to-Pay Estimates: Bivariate and Interval-Data Models.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29 (2): 169–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberini A., M. Cropper, A. Krupnick, and N. B. Simon. 2004. “Does the Value of a Statistical Life Vary with Age and Health Status? Evidence From the US and Canada.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 48 (1): 769–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberini A., B. Kanninen, and R. T. Carson. 1997. “Modeling Response Incentive Effects in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Data.” Land Economics 73 (3): 309–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez R. M., and J. Brehm. 1995. “American Ambivalence Towards Abortion Policy: Development of a Heteroskedastic Probit Model of Competing Values.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 1055–1082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez R. M., and J. Brehm. 1997. “Are Americans Ambivalent Towards Racial Policies?” American Journal of Political Science 41 (2): 345–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson H. 2007. “Willingness to Pay for Road Safety and Estimates of the Risk of Death: Evidence From a Swedish Contingent Valuation Study.” Accident Analysis and Prevention 39 (4): 853–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson H., J. K. Hammitt, G. Lindberg, and K. Sundstrm. 2013. “Willingness to Pay and Sensitivity to Time Framing: A Theoretical Analysis and an Application on Car Safety.” Environmental and Resource Economics 56 (3): 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson H., and G. Lindberg. 2009. “Benevolence and the Value of Road Safety.” Accident Analysis and Prevention 41 (2): 286–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson H., and M. Svensson. 2008. “Cognitive Ability and Scale Bias in the Contingent Valuation Method: An Analysis of Willingness to Pay to Reduce Mortality Risk.” Environmental and Resource Economics 39 (4): 481–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson H., and N. Treich. 2011. “The Value of a Statistical Life.” In Handbook in Transport Economics, edited by A. de Palma, R. Lindsey, E. Quinet, and R. Vickerman, 396–424. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Angrist J. D., and J.-S. Pischke. 2008. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Chapter 3. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aprahamian F., O. Chanel, and S. Luchini. 2008. “Heterogeneous Anchoring and the Shift Effect in Iterative Valuation Questions.” Resource and Energy Economics 30 (1): 12–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araña J. E., and C. J. León. 2008. “Do Emotions Matter? Coherent Preferences Under Anchoring and Emotional Effects.” Ecological Economics 66 (4): 700–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araña J. E., and C. J. León. 2007. “Repeated Dichotomous Choice Formats for Elicitation of Willingness to Pay: Simultaneous Estimation and Anchoring Effect.” Environmental and Resource Economics 36 (4): 475–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman I. J., I. H. Langford, A. P. Jones, and G. N. Kerr. 2001. “Bound and Path Effects in Double and Triple Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation.” Resource and Energy Economics 23 (3): 191–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomquist G. C., K. Blumenschein, and M. Johannesson. 2009. “Eliciting Willingness to Pay Without Bias Using Follow-up Certainty Statements: Comparisons Between Probably/Definitely and a 10-Point Certainty Scale.” Environmental and Resource Economics 43 (4): 473–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeri M., E. Doherty, D. Campbell, and A. Longo. 2012. “Investigating Scale Heterogeneity in Latent Class Models. The Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit (SEMRU).” National University of Ireland, GalwayWorking Paper 12-WP-SEMRU-06.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle K. J., F. R. Johnson, D. W. McCollum, and W. H. Desvousges. 1996. “Valuing Public Goods: Discrete Versus Continuous Contingent-Valuation Responses.” Land Economics 72 (3): 381–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton A. C., K. S. Carson, S. M. Chilton, and W. G. Hutchinson. 2003. “An Experimental Investigation of Explanations for Inconsistencies in Responses to Second Offers in Double Referenda.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46 (3): 472–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron T. A., and J. Englin. 1997. “Respondent Experience and Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33 (3): 296–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron T. A., G. L. Poe, R. G. Ethier, and W. D. Schulze. 2002. “Alternative Non-Market Value-Elicitation Methods: Are the Underlying Preferences the Same?.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44 (3): 391–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron T. A., and J. Quiggin. 1994. “Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data From a ‘Dichotomous Choice with Follow-up’ Questionnaire.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27 (3): 218–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson F., and O. Johansson-Stenman. 2010. “Scale Factors and Hypothetical Referenda: A Clarifying Note.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59 (3): 286–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson F., O. Johansson-Stenman, and P. Martinsson. 2004. “Is Transport Safety more Valuable in the Air?” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 28 (2): 147–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson R. T., J. Wright, A. Alberni, N. Carson, and N. Flores. 1994. “A Bibliography of Contingent Valuation Studies and Papers.” Technical report, Natural Resource Damage Assessment, Inc., La Jolla, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Chien Y.-L., C. J. Huang, and D. Shaw. 2005. “A General Model of Starting Point Bias in Double-Bounded Dichotomous Contingent Valuation Surveys.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 50 (2): 362–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clevenger A., B. Chruszcz, and K. Gunson. 2001. “Highway Mitigation Fencing Reduces Wildlife-Vehicle Collisions.” Wildlife Society Bulletin 29 (2): 646–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clevenger A. P. 2011. “Moose-Vehicle Collisions and their Mitigation in Newfoundland.” Technical report.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings R. G., S. Elliott, G. W. Harrison, and J. Murphy. 1997. “Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible?” Journal of Political Economy 105 (3): 609–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker T., R. Brouwer, M. Hofkes, and K. Moeltner. 2011. “The Effect of Risk Context on the Value of a Statistical Life: A Bayesian Meta-model.” Environmental and Resource Economics 49 (4): 597–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeShazo J. R. 2002. “Designing Transactions Without Framing Effects in Iterative Question Formats.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 43 (3): 360–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubourg W., M. Jones-Lee, and G. Loomes. 1997. “Imprecise Preferences and Survey Design in Contingent Valuation.” Economica 64: 115–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flachaire E., and G. Hollard. 2006. “Controlling Starting-point Bias in Double-bounded Contingent Valuation Surveys.” Land Economics 82 (1): 103–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flachaire E., and G. Hollard. 2007a. “Model Selection in Iterative Valuation Questions.” Revue d'Economie Politique 117 (5): 853–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flachaire E., and G. Hollard. 2007b. “Starting Point Bias and Respondent Uncertainty in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys.” Resource and Energy Economics 29 (3): 183–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haab T. C., H. Ju-Chin, and J. C. Whitehead. 1999. “Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible? A Comment.” Journal of Political Economy 107 (1): 186–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorsen B., and K. Sælensminde. 1998. “Differences Between Willingness-to-Pay Estimates From Open-Ended and Discrete-Choice Contingent Valuation Methods: The Effects of Heteroscedasticity.” Land Economics 74 (2): 262–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammitt J., and K. Haninger. 2010. “Valuing Fatal Risks to Children and Adults: Effects of Disease, Latency, and Risk Aversion.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 40 (1): 57–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammitt J. K. 2000. “Valuing Mortality Risk: Theory and Practice.” Environmental Science and Technology 34 (8): 1396–1400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammitt J. K., and J. D. Graham. 1999. “Willingness to Pay for Health Protection: Inadequate Sensitivity to Probability?” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 18 (1): 33–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanemann W. M., and B. J. Kanninen. 1999. “The Statistical Analysis of Discrete-Pesponse CV Data.” In Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EC and Developing Countries, edited by I. Bateman and K. Willis, 302–442. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanemann W. M., J. Loomis, and B. J. Kanninen. 1991. “Statistical Efficiency of Double-bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73 (4): 1255–1263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herriges J. A., and J. F. Shogren. 1996. “Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous Choice Valuation with Follow-Up Questioning.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30 (1): 112–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijser M. P., J. W. Duffield, A. P. Clevenger, R. J. Ament, and P. T. McGowen. 2009. “Cost-Benefit Analyses of Mitigation Measures Aimed at Reducing Collisions with Large Ungulates in the United States and Canada; A Decision Support Tool.” Ecology and Society 14 (2): 15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultkrantz L., G. Lindberg, and C. Andersson. 2006. “The Value of Improved Road Safety.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 32 (2): 151–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultkrantz L., and M. Svensson. 2012. “The Value of a Statistical Life in Sweden: A Review of the Empirical Literature.” Health Policy 108 (2–3): 302–310. 1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings S., S. Yamazaki, and J. Lyle. 2010. “Testing Heterogeneous Anchoring and Shift Effect in Double-Bounded Models: The Case of Recreational Fishing in Tasmania.” 2010 Conference (54th), 2010. Adelaide, Australia 59089, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, February 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Johannesson M., P.-O. Johansson, and R. O'Conor. 1996. “The Value of Private Safety Versus the Value of Public Safety.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 13 (3): 263–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones-Lee M. W., M. Hammerton, and P. R. Philips. 1985. “The Value of Safety: Results of a National Sample Survey.” The Economic Journal 95 (377): 49–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., and A. Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.” Econometrica 47 (2): 263–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCurdy J. 1943. The Structure of Morale. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Espiñeira R., and N. Lyssenko. 2014. Valuation of a Moose-Vehicle Accident Mitigation Policy in Newfoundland. Technical Report, Collaborative Applied Research in Economics (CARE), Department of Economics, Memorial University of Newfoundland. Final Report. 414 p. http://www.ucs.mun.ca/rmartinezesp/MVCprojectJUNE15th2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mon E. E., S. Jomnonkwao, B. Khampirat, W. Satiennam, and V. Ratanavaraha. 2018. “Willingness to Pay for Mortality Risk Reduction for Traffic Accidents in Myanmar.” Accident Analysis & Prevention 118: 18–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson U., A. Norinder, K. Hjalte, and K. Gralén. 2001. “The Value of a Statistical Life in Transport: Findings from a New Contingent Valuation Study in Sweden.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 23 (2): 121–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramp D., V. K. Wilson, and D. B. Croft. 2016. “Contradiction and Complacency Shape Attitudes Towards the Toll of Roads on Wildlife.” Animals 6 (6): 40–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosado M. A., M. A. Cunha-E-Sá, M. M. Ducla-Soares, and L. Nunes. 2006. “Combining Averting Behavior and Contingent Valuation Data: An Application to Drinking Water Treatment in Brazil.” Environment and Development Economics 11 (6): 729–746.
   Google Scholar
• Schwabe K., and P. Schuhmann. 2002. “Deer-vehicle Collisions and Deer Value: An Analysis of Competing Literatures.” Wildlife Society Bulletin 30 (2): 609–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwabe K. A., P. W. Schuhmann, and M. Tonkovich. 2002. “A Dynamic Exercise in Reducing Deer-Vehicle Collisions: Management Through Vehicle Mitigation Techniques and Hunting.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 27 (1): 261–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzinger M., F. Carrat, and S. Luchini. 2009. “‘If You Have the Flu Symptoms, Your Asymptomatic Spouse May Better Answer the Willingness-to-Pay Question.’ Evidence From a Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Model with Heterogeneous Anchoring.” Journal of Health Economics 28 (4): 873–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiler A., J.-O. Helldin, and C. Seiler. 2004. “Road Mortality in Swedish Mammals: Results of a Drivers' Questionnaire.” Wildlife Biology 10 (3): 225–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State Farm Insurance Agency Canada. 2017. “The Traffic Injury Research Foundation (TIRF) Launches new Wildlife Roadsharing Resource Centre to Help Prevent Vehicle Collisions with Wildlife.” https://www.statefarm.ca/about-us/newsroom/2015/09/15/wildlife-roadsharing-resource-centre.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson M. 2009. “The Value of a Statistical Life in Sweden: Estimates From Two Studies Using the ‘Certainty Approach’ Calibration.” Accident Analysis & Prevention 41 (3): 430–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson M., and M. Vredin Johansson. 2010. “Willingness to Pay for Private and Public Road Safety in Stated Preference Studies: Why the Difference?.” Accident Analysis and Prevention 42 (4): 1205–1212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transport Canada. 2014. “National Collision Database.” http://wwwapps2.tc.gc.ca/Saf-Sec-Sur/7/NCDB-BNDC/.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky A., and D. Kahneman. 1973. “Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability.” Cognitive Psychology 5 (2): 207–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wathieu L. 2004. “Consumer Habituation.” Management Science 50 (5): 587–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead J. C. 2002. “Incentive Compatibility and Starting Point Bias in Iterative Valuation Questions.” Land Economics 78 (2): 285–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yatchew A., and Z. Griliches. 1985. “Specification Error in Probit Models.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 67 (1): 134–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar