Research on customers’ willingness-to-pay for service changes in UK water company price reviews 1994–2019

References

• Accent and PJM Economics. 2014. Comparative Review of Willingness-To-Pay Studies. London: Accent Market Research.
   Google Scholar
• Aecom. 2017. PR19 Understanding Customer Values Work Package 6 – Trust Experiment. Report to Yorkshire Water. London: AECOM.
   Google Scholar
• Anciaes, P. 2022. “Revealed Preference Valuation of Beach and River Water Quality in Wales.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 10, 11 (1), 75–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2020.1864778.
   Google Scholar
• Anciaes, P., P. Metcalfe, and A. Sen. 2020. “A Combined SP-RP Model to Estimate the Value of Improvements in Freshwater Angling in England.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 9 (2): 167–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmford, B. 2020. “Designing Auctions for the Procurement of Environmental Services: Insights from Practice.” Paper presented to the UKNEE Annual Conference, London.
   Google Scholar
• Bormann, A., A. Provins, A. Chalak, L. Gahan, M. Baker, and S. Reid. 2013. “South Staffs Water PR14 Stated Preference Study: Final Report to South Staffs Water.”
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, J., and M. Huby. 2013. “Water Poverty in England and Wales.” Journal of Poverty and Social Justice 21 (2): 137–148.
   Google Scholar
• Breen, B., J. Curtis, and S. Hynes. 2018. “Water Quality and Recreational use of Public Water Ways.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 7 (1): 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretschger, L., and K. Pittel. 2020. “Twenty Key Challenges in Environmental and Resource Economics.” Environmental and Resource Economics 77: 725–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burge, P., F. Tsang, and C. Rohr. 2007. Northumbrian Water Customer Priorities Research: Modelling Report. Cambridge: Rand Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Cascade Consulting and eftec. 2011. The Use of Revealed Customer Behaviour in Future Price Limits. Report to Ofwat. Manchester: Cascade Consulting, London: eftec.
   Google Scholar
• Cascade Consulting, eftec, and ICS Consulting. 2010. Review of Cost-Benefit Analysis and Benefit Valuation. Report to UK Water Industry Research Ltd., London. Report Ref. No. 10/rg/07/18. Appendix 3 Quantitative Analysis. Manchester: Cascade Consulting.
   Google Scholar
• Chilton, S., M. J. Lee, R. McDonald, and H. Metcalf. 2012. “Does the WTA/WTP Ratio Diminish as the Severity of a Health Complaint Is Reduced? Testing for Smoothness of the Underlying Utility of Wealth Function.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 45 (1): 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claydon, E. 2019. “Reverse Auctions as a Tool for Securing Multiple Environmental Outcomes.” Paper presented to the UKNEE Annual Conference, London.
   Google Scholar
• Curnow, J. 2019. “Environmental Economics in UK Environmental Policy: Defra’s 25 Year Environment Plan.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 8 (4): 353–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, K. J., A. Binner, A. Bell, B. Day, T. Poete, S. Rees, G. Smith, K. Wilson, and I. Bateman. 2019. “A Generalisable Integrated Natural Capital Methodology for Targeting Investment in Coastal Defence.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 8 (4): 429–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeShazo, J. R., and G. Fermo. 2002. “Designing Choice Sets for Started Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44: 123–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eftec. 2009. Development of Guidelines for Use of Benefits Transfer in Policy and Project Appraisal. Report to Defra. London: Eftec.
   Google Scholar
• Environment Agency. 2003a. Economic Appraisal for the Environment Programme in PR04. Bristol: EA.
   Google Scholar
• Environment Agency. 2003b. AMP4 Benefits Assessment Guidance—Corrigenda. Bristol: EA.
   Google Scholar
• Foundation for Water Research. 1994. Assessing the Benefits of River Water Quality Improvements. Marlow: FWR.
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, N., R. E. Wright, and B. Alvarez-Farizo. 2006. “Estimating the Economic Value of Improvements in River Ecology Using Choice Experiments: An Application to the Water Framework Directive.” Journal of Environmental Management 78 (2): 183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D., N. Shore, and K. Train. 2005. “Households’ Willingness-to-Pay for Water Service Attributes.” Environmental and Resource Economics 32: 509–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. 2020. The Green Book: Central Government Guidance on Appraisal and Valuation. London: HM Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• Hoehn, J. P., and J. B. Loomis. 1993. “Substitution Effects in the Valuation of Multiple Environmental Programs.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 25 (1): 56–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoehn, J. P., and A. Randall. 1989. “To Many Proposals Pass the Benefit Cost Test.” American Economic Review 79: 544–551.
   Google Scholar
• ICF Consulting and eftec. 2017. Improving Willingness-to-Pay Research in the Water Sector. Report to the Consumer Council for Water, Birmingham. London: ICF Consulting.
   Google Scholar
• Lanz, B., and A. Provins. 2015. “Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Regulate the Provision of Water Services: Do Status Quo Choices Reflect Preferences?” Journal of Regulatory Economics 47 (3): 300–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanz, B., and A. Provins. 2016. “The Demand for Tap Water Quality: Survey Evidence on Water Hardness and Aesthetic Quality.” Water Resources and Economics 16: 52–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanz, B., and A. Provins. 2017. “Using Averting Expenditures to Estimate the Demand for Public Goods: Combining Objective and Perceived Quality.” Resource and Energy Economics 47: 20–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanz, B., A. Provins, I. Bateman, R. Scarpa, K. Willis, and E. Ozdemiroglu. 2010. “Investigating Willingness to Pay – Willingness to Accept Asymmetry in Choice Experiments.” In Choice Modelling: the State-of-the-Art and the State-of-Practice: Proceedings from the Inaugural International Choice Modelling Conference, edited by S. Hess and A. Daly, 517–542. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Louviere, J. J., T. N. Flynn, and A. A. J. Marley. 2015. Best-Worst Scaling: Theory, Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, P. J. 2021. “Max Diff and Contingent Valuation: Welsh Water PR19.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 10.
   Google Scholar
• NERA. 2011. Carrying Out Willingness to Pay Surveys. Report to Ofwat. London: National Economic Research Associates (NERA).
   Google Scholar
• OFWAT. 2000. Maintaining Serviceability to Customers. MD161: Letters to Managing Directors of All Water and Sewerage Companies and Water Only Companies. Birmingham: Office of Water Services.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, Ronan. 1998. Multi Attribute Techniques and Their Application to Water. Bristol: Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Powe, N. A., K. G. Willis, and G. D. Garrod. 2006. “Difficulties in Valuing Street Light Improvements: Trust, Surprise, and Bound Effects.” Applied Economics 38: 371–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radmehr, M., K. Willis, and H. Metcalf. 2018. “A Mechanism to Derive More Truthful Willingness to Accept Values for Renewable Energy Systems.” Heliyon. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00503.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, S., A. Chalak, and J. Hecht. 2010. “Determining the Optimal Investment Plan for Water Utilities: the Case of Veolia Water Central.” Water Supply 10 (3): 367–375.
   Google Scholar
• Scarpa, R., S. Ferrini, and K. Willis. 2005. “Performance of Error Component Models for Status Quo Effects in Choice Experiments.” In Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics, edited by R. Scarpa and A. Alberini, 247–273. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Scarpa, R., K. G. Willis, and M. Acutt. 2004. “Individual-Specific Welfare Measures for Public Goods: A Latent Class Approach to Residential Customers of Yorkshire Water.” In Econometrics Informing Natural Resources Management, edited by P. Kounddouri, 316–337. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Scarpa, R., K. G. Willis, and M. Acutt. 2007. “Valuing Externalities from Water Supply: Status Quo, Choice Complexity and Individual Random Effects in Panel Kernel Logit Analysis of Choice Experiments.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 50 (4): 449–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South Staffordshire and Cambridge Water Customer Panel. 2019. “Independent Report to OFWAT to Accompany the PR19 Business Plan of South Staffs Water (SSC).”
   Google Scholar
• Swait, J., and W. Adamowicz. 1999. Choice Environment, Market Complexity, and Consumer Behavior: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach for Incorporating Decision Complexity into Models of Consumer Choice. Staff Paper 99-04. Edmonton: Department for Rural Economy, University of Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Thiene, M., R. Scarpa, and J. J. Louviere. 2015. “Addressing Preference Heterogeneity, Multiple Scales and Attribute Attendance with a Correlated Finite Mixing Model of Tap Water Choice.” Environmental and Resource Economics 62: 637–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinch, R., N. Beaumont, T. Sunderland, E. Ozdemiroglu, D. Barton, C. Bowe, T. Börger, et al. 2019. “Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Goods and Services: A Review for Decision Makers.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 8 (4): 359–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Utilities Water. 2016. Improving Customer Research and Engagement. Warrington: United Utilities Water.
   Google Scholar
• United Utilities Water Ltd. 2018. Ecosystem Resilience: Ecosystem Resilience Through Catchment Management, Partnership and Markets. Chapter 4: Supplementary Document. Document Reference S4004. Warrington: United Utilities Water.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, K. G. 2008. “Evaluating Environmental Benefits from Changes in Water Abstraction and Waste Water Disposal.” Water Policy 10 (5): 439–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, K. G. 2012. Valuing Health Benefits from Reductions in the Lead Content of Tap Water: A Value Transfer Analysis. Report to Yorkshire Water. Newcastle upon Tyne: Centre for Research in Environmental Appraisal and Management, University of Newcastle.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, K. G., R. Scarpa, and M. Acutt. 2005. “Assessing Water Company Customer Preferences and Willingness-to-Pay for Service Improvements: A Stated Choice Analysis.” Water Resources Research 41: W02019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar