166
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Improving meta-analyses on hypothetical bias by using separate models for private and public goods

, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 260-271 | Received 27 Nov 2020, Accepted 18 Aug 2021, Published online: 05 Sep 2021

References

  • Arrow, K., R. Solow, P. R. Portney, E. E. Leamer, R. Radner, and H. Schuman. 1993. “Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation.” Federal Register 58 (10): 4601–4614.
  • Atozou, B., L. D. Tamini, S. Bergeron, and M. Doyon. 2020. “Factors Explaining Hypothetical Bias: How to Improve Models for Meta-Analyses.” Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics 45 (2): 376–395.
  • Bergeron, S., M. Doyon, and L. Muller. 2019. “Strategic Response: A Key to Understand How Cheap Talk Works.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d’agroéconomie 67 (1): 75–83.
  • Blumenschein, K., M. Johannesson, K. Yokoyama, and P. Freeman. 2001. “Hypothetical Versus Real Willingness to Pay in the Health Care Sector: Results from a Field Experiment.” Value in Health 4 (2): 79–80.
  • Broadbent, C. D., J. B. Grandy, and R. P. Berrens. 2010. “Testing for Hypothetical Bias in a Choice Experiment Using a Local Public Good: Riparian Forest Restoration.” International Journal of Ecological Economics and Statistics 19 (F10): 1–19.
  • Carson, R. T., and T. Groves. 2007. “Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions.” Environmental and Resource Economics 37 (1): 181–210.
  • Carson, R. T., T. Groves, and J. A. List. 2014. “Consequentiality: A Theoretical and Experimental Exploration of a Single Binary Choice.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 1 (1/2): 171–207.
  • Champ, P. A., and R. C. Bishop. 2001. “Donation Payment Mechanisms and Contingent Valuation: An Empirical Study of Hypothetical Bias.” Environmental and Resource Economics 19 (4): 383–402.
  • Champ, P. A., R. C. Bishop, T. C. Brown, and D. W. McCollum. 1997. “Using Donation Mechanisms to Value Nonuse Benefits from Public Goods.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33 (2): 151–162.
  • Cummings, R. G., and L. O. Taylor. 1999. “Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method.” American Economic Review 89 (3): 649–665.
  • Dekker, T., R. Brouwer, M. Hofkes, and K. Moeltner. 2011. “The Effect of Risk Context on the Value of a Statistical Life: A Bayesian Meta-Model.” Environmental and Resource Economics 49 (4): 597–624.
  • Doyon, M., and S. Bergeron. 2016. “Understanding Strategic Behavior and Its Contribution to Hypothetical Bias When Eliciting Values for a Private Good.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne dagroéconomie 64 (4): 653–666.
  • Foster, H., and J. Burrows. 2017. “Hypothetical Bias: A new Meta-Analysis.” In Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods:A Comprehensive Critique, 270–291. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Herriges, J., C. Kling, C. C. Liu, and J. Tobias. 2010. “What Are the Consequences of Consequentiality?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59 (1): 67–81.
  • Johnson, N. D., and A. A. Mislin. 2011. “Trust Games: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Economic Psychology 32 (5): 865–889.
  • Johnston, R. J., K. J. Boyle, W. Adamowicz, J. Bennett, R. Brouwer, T. A. Cameron, and R. Tourangeau. 2017. “Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4 (2): 319–405.
  • List, J. A., and C. A. Gallet. 2001. “What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?” Environmental and Resource Economics 20 (3): 241–254.
  • Little, J., C. D. Broadbent, and R. P. Berrens. 2012. “Meta-analysis of the Probability of Disparity Between Actual and Hypothetical Valuation Responses: Extension and Preliminary New Results.” Western Economic Forum 11 (1): 1–12.
  • Lusk, J. 2003. “Effects of Cheap Talk on Consumer Willingness-to-Pay for Golden Rice.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85 (4): 840–856.
  • Lusk, J. L., L. McLaughlin, and S. R. Jaeger. 2007. “Strategy and Response to Purchase Intention Questions.” Marketing Letters 18 (1-2): 31–44.
  • Moeltner, K., K. J. Boyle, and R. W. Paterson. 2007. “Meta-Analysis and Benefit Transfer for Resource Valuation-Addressing Classical Challenges with Bayesian Modeling.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 53 (2): 250–269.
  • Moeltner, K., and R. Woodward. 2009. “Meta-functional Benefit Transfer for Wetland Valuation: Making the Most of Small Samples.” Environmental and Resource Economics 42 (1): 89–108.
  • Murphy, J. J., P. G. Allen, T. H. Stevens, and D. Weatherhead. 2005. “A Meta-Analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation.” Environmental and Resource Economics 30 (3): 313–325.
  • Penn, J. M., and W. Hu. 2018. “Understanding Hypothetical Bias: An Enhanced Meta-Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 100 (4): 1186–1206.
  • Rotteveel, A. H., M. S. Lambooij, N. P. Zuithoff, J. van Exel, K. G. Moons, and G. A. de Wit. 2020. “Valuing Healthcare Goods and Services: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the WTA-WTP Disparity.” PharmacoEconomics 38 (5): 443–458.
  • Swamy, P. A. 1970. “Efficient Inference in a Random Coefficient Regression Model.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 38 (2): 311–323.
  • Vossler, C. A., M. Doyon, and D. Rondeau. 2012. “Truth in Consequentiality: Theory and Field Evidence on Discrete Choice Experiments.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 4 (4): 145–171.
  • Vossler, C. A., and S. B. Watson. 2013. “Understanding the Consequences of Consequentiality: Testing the Validity of Stated Preferences in the Field.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 86 (February): 137–147.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.