Passive solar still: recent advancements in design and related performance

References

• Fulekar MH, Pathak B, Kale RK. Environment and sustainable development. New Delhi: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kimani NG. Environmental pollution and impacts on public health: implications of the Dandora Dumping Site Municipal in Nairobi, Kenya, United Nations Environment Programme. 2007: 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Olaniran NS. Environment and health: an introduction. In: Olaniran NSet al., editor. Environment and health. Lagos: Micmillan Nig. Pub. Co for NCf; 1995. p. 34–151.
   Google Scholar
• European Public Health Alliance. Air, Water Pollution and Health Effects; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Tudge C. Global ecology. London: The Natural History Museum; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain I, Raschid L, Hanjra MA, et al. A framework for analyzing socioeconomic, health and environment impacts of wastewater use in agricultural in developing countries. IWMI; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Patel P, Solanki AS, Soni UR, et al. A review to increase the performance of solar still: make it multilayer absorber. Int J Recent Innov Trends Comput Commun. 2014;2:173–177.
   Google Scholar
• Panchal HN. Actual performance analysis of flat plate collector coupled with passive solar still. Int J Eng Stud. 2011;3:51–60.
   Google Scholar
• Madhlopa A, Johnstone C. Numerical study of a passive solar still with separate condenser. Renew Energy. 2009;34:1668–1677. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2008.12.032
   Google Scholar
• Tiwari GN, Shukla SK, Singh IP. Computer modeling of passive /active solar stills by using inner glass temperature. Desalination. 2003;154:171–185. doi: 10.1016/S0011-9164(03)80018-8
   Google Scholar
• El-Sebaii AA, Aboul-Enein S, Ramadan MRI, et al. Thermal performance of an active single basin solar still (ASBS) coupled to shallow solar pond (SSP). Desalination. 2011;280:183–190. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Singh HN, Tiwari GN. Monthly performance of passive and active solar stills for different Indian climatic conditions. Desalination. 2004;168:145–150. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2004.06.180
   Google Scholar
• Aboul-Enei S, El-Sebaii AA, El-bialy E. Investigation of a single-basin solar still with deep basins. Renew Energy. 1998;14:299–305. doi: 10.1016/S0960-1481(98)00081-0
   Google Scholar
• Panchal HN. Shah PK. Effect of varying glass cover thickness on performance of solar still: in a winter climate conditions. Int J Renew Energy Res. 2011;1(4):121–223.
   Google Scholar
• Muftah AF, Alghoul MA, Fudholi A, et al. Factors affecting basin type solar still productivity: a detailed review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;32:430–447. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.052
   Google Scholar
• Durkaieswaran P, Murugavel KK. Various special designs of single basin passive solar still—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;49:1048–1060. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.111
   Google Scholar
• Panchal HN, Shah PK. Char performance analysis of different energy absorbing plates on solar stills. Int J Adv Des Manuf Technol. 2012;4:297–301.
   Google Scholar
• Tripathi AK, Tiwari GN. Annual performance analysis and thermal modeling of passive solar still for different inclinations of condensing cover. Int J Energy Res. 2007;31:1358–1382. doi: 10.1002/er.1309
   Google Scholar
• Vinoth KK, Kasturi BR. Performance study on solar still with enhanced condensation. Desalination. 2008;230:51–61. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.11.015
   Google Scholar
• Badran O. Theoretical analysis of solar distillation using active solar still. Int J Therm Environ Eng. 2011;3:113–120. doi: 10.5383/ijtee.03.02.009
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka H. Experimental study of a basin type solar still with internal and external reflectors in winter. Desalination. 2009;249:130–134. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2009.02.057
   Google Scholar
• Boubekri M, Chaker A. Yield of an improved solar still: numerical approach. Energy Procedia. 2011;6:610–617. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.05.070
   Google Scholar
• Sadineni SB, Hurt R, Halford CK, et al. Theory and experimental investigation of a weir-type inclined solar still. Energy. 2008;33:71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2007.08.003
   Google Scholar
• El-Sebaii AA, El-Bialy E. Advanced designs of solar desalination systems: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;49:1198–1212. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.161
   Google Scholar
• Ranjan KR, Kaushik SC, Panwar NL. Energy and exergy analysis of passive solar distillation systems. Int J Low Carbon Technol. 2013;0:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Zoori HA, Farshchi TF, Faramarz S, et al. Comparison between energy and exergy efficiencies in a weir type cascade solar still. Desalination. 2013;325:113–121. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar Md NI, Sifat AS., Reza SMS, et al. A review of optimum parameter values of a passive solar still and a design for southern Bangladesh. Renew Wind Water Solar. 2017;1:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Manikandan V, Shanmugasundaram K, Janarthanan B, et al. Wick type solar stills: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;20:322–335. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.046
   Google Scholar
• Aruna RK, Janarthanan B. Simulation modeling of floating Cum tilted-wick type solar still. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol. 2014;3:13154–13164.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen RS, Narayanan CS, Murugavel KK. Performance analysis on inclined solar still with different new wick materials and wire mesh. Desalination. 2015;358:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.12.006
   Google Scholar
• Kassem KT. Optimization the performance of single basin solar still with corrugated wick surface at high places. Int Res J Eng Technol. 2016;3:1094–1024.
   Google Scholar
• Mahdi JT, Smith BE, Sharif AO. An experimental wick-type solar still system: design and construction. Desalination. 2011;267:233–238. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.09.032
   Google Scholar
• Udhayabharathi K, Baskar P, Mohhammed Shafee S. A review- performance analysis of wick type solar stills. Int J Chem Sci. 2015;13:1109–1122.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeel AE. Performance of solar still with a concave wick evaporative surface. Energy. 2009;34:1504–1509. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2009.06.050
   Google Scholar
• Sivakumar V, Sundaram EG. Improvement techniques of solar still efficiency: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;28:246–264. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.037
   Google Scholar
• Velmurugan V, Deendayalan CK, Vinod H, et al. Desalination of affluent using fin type solar still. Energy. 2008;33:1719–1727. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2008.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Velmurugan V, Kumar KJN, Haq TN, et al. Performance analysis in stepped solar still for effluent desalination. Energy. 2009;34:1179–1186. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2009.04.029
   Google Scholar
• Omara ZM, Hamed Mofreh H, Kabeel AE. Performance of finned and corrugated absorbers solar still sunder Egyptian conditions. Desalination. 2011;277:281–287. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.04.042
   Google Scholar
• Panchal H.Patel P. Energy absorbing materials used in solar still for enhancement in distillate output: a review. Int J Ambient Energy. 2014; doi: 10.1080/01430750.2014.991839
   Google Scholar
• Shanmugasundaram Sakthivel S. Effect of energy storage medium (black granite ravel) on the performance of a solar still. Int J Energy Resour. 2008;32:68–82. doi: 10.1002/er.1335
   Google Scholar
• Kalidasa MK, Sivakumar S, Riaz AJ, et al. Single basin double slope solar still with minimum basin depth and energy storing materials. Appl Energy. 2010;87:514–523. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.07.023
   Google Scholar
• Murugavel KK, Srithar K. Performance study on basin type double slope solar still with different wick material sand minimum mass of water. Renew Energy. 2011;36:612–620. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2010.08.009
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava PK, Agrawal SK. Experimental and theoretical analysis of single sloped basin type solar still consisting of multiple low thermal inertia floating porous absorbers. Desalination. 2013;311:198–205. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2012.11.035
   Google Scholar
• Gugulothu R, Somanchi NS, Reddy KVK, et al. A review on solar water distillation using sensible and latent heat. Procedia Earth Planet Sci. 2015;11:354–360. doi: 10.1016/j.proeps.2015.06.072
   Google Scholar
• Swetha K, Venugopal J. Experimental investigation of a single slope solar still using PCM. Int J Res Environ Sci Technol. 2011;1:30.M–33.M.
   Google Scholar
• Silakhori M, Naghavi MS, Metselaar HSC, et al. Accelerated thermal cycling test of micro encapsulated paraffin wax/poly- aniline made by simple preparation method for solar thermal energy storage. Materials (Basel). 2013;6:1608–1620. doi: 10.3390/ma6051608
   Google Scholar
• Ahsan A, Imteaz M, Thomas UA, et al. Parameters affecting the performance of a low cost solar still. Appl Energy. 2014;114:924–930. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.066
   Google Scholar
• Jamal W, Siddiqui MA. Effect of water depth and still orientation on productivity for passive solar distillation. Int J Eng Res Appl. 2012;2:1659–1665.
   Google Scholar
• Sathyamurthy R, Kennady HJ, Nagarajan PK, et al. Factors affecting the performance of triangular pyramid solar still. Desalination. 2014;344:383–390. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.04.005
   Google Scholar
• Ahsan A, Imteaz M, Rahman A, et al. Design, fabrication and performance analysis of an improved solar still. Desalination. 2012;292:105–112. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2012.02.013
   Google Scholar
• Ahsan A and Fukuhara T. Evaporability and productivity of a new Tubular Solar Still. In: Advances in water resources and hydraulic engineering. Berlin: Springer; 2009. p. 333–338.
   Google Scholar
• Arunkumar T, Jayaprakash R, Denkenberger D, et al. An experimental study on hemispherical solar still. Desalination. 2012;286:342–348. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.11.047
   Google Scholar
• IIsmail B. Design and performance of a transportable hemispherical solar still. Renew Energy. 2009;34:145–150. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2008.03.013
   Google Scholar
• Aburideh H, Deliou A, Abbad B, et al. An experimental study of a solar still: application on the sea water desalination of Fouka. Procedia Eng. 2012;33:475–484. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.1227
   Google Scholar
• Abderachid T, Abdenacer K. Effect of orientation on the performance of a symmetric solar still with a double effect solar still (comparison study). Desalination. 2013;329:68–77. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.09.011
   Google Scholar
• Rufuss DWD, Iniyan S, Suganthi L, et al. Solar stills: A comprehensive review of designs, performance and material advances. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;63:464–496. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.068
   Google Scholar
• Abed FM, Kassim MS, Rahi MR. Performance improvement of a passive solar still in a water desalination. Int J Sci Technol. 2017;14:1277–1284.
   Google Scholar
• Sharon H, Reddy KS. Performance investigation and environ-economic analysis of active vertical solar distillation units. Energy. 2015;84:794–807. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.045
   Google Scholar
• Gupta B, Shanker P, Sharma R, et al. Performance enhancement using Nano particles in modified passive solar still. Procedia Technol. 2016;25:1209–1216. doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2016.08.208
   Google Scholar
• Singh KA, Singh KH. Performance evaluation of solar still with and without nanofluid. Int J Sci Eng Technol. 2015;4:2395–4752.
   Google Scholar
• Panitapu B, Koneru V, Sagi LS, et al. Solar distillation using Nano-material. Int J Sci Eng Technol. 2014;35:583–587.
   Google Scholar
• Gnanadason MK, Kumar PS, Sivaraman G, et al. Design and performance analysis of a modified vacuum single basin solar still. Smart Grid Renew Energy. 2011;2:388–395. doi: 10.4236/sgre.2011.24044
   Google Scholar
• Panchal, H, Shah PK. Experimental and ANSYS CFD simulation analysis of hemispherical solar still. IIRE Int J Renew Energy. 2013;8(1):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Yi XS, Yu SL, Shi WX, et al. Estimation of fouling stages in separation of oil/ water emulsion using Nano-particlesAl2O3/TiO2 modified PVDFUF membranes. Desalination. 2013;319:38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.03.031
   Google Scholar
• Essalhi M, Khayet M. Fabrication and characterization of electro spunnano- fibrous membranes for desalination by membrane distillation. Procedia Eng. 2012;44:235–237. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.371
   Google Scholar
• Goh PS, Ismail AF, Hilal N. Nano-enabled membranes technology: sustain-able and revolutionary solutions for membrane desalination. Desalination. 2016;380:100–104. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Hong J, He Y. Polyvinylidene fluoride ultrafiltration membrane blended with Nano-ZnO particle for photo-catalysisself-cleaning. Desalination. 2014;332:67–75. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.10.026
   Google Scholar
• Thakker H., Panchal H. Performance Investigation on Solar Still with PCM and Nano-Composites: Experimental Investigation. 2nd International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research & Practice, Elesvier. 2015;3(1):334-349.
   Google Scholar
• Rao ZH, Wang SH, Zhang YL, et al. Thermal properties of paraffin/Nano-AlN phase change energy storage materials. Energy Sources A Recov Util Environ Eff. 2014;36:2281–2286. doi: 10.1080/15567036.2011.590869
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Tiwari GN. Life cycle cost analysis of single slope hybrid (PV/T) active solar still. Appl Energy. 2009;86:1995–2004. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.03.005
   Google Scholar
• Ahsan A, Rahman A, Shanableh A, et al. Life cycle cost analysis of sustainable solar water distillation technique. Desalin Water Treat. 2013;51:7412–7419. doi: 10.1080/19443994.2013.813006
   Google Scholar
• Dev R, Tiwari GN. Characteristic equation of a passive solar still. Desalination. 2009;245:246–265. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2008.07.011
   Google Scholar
• Rajamanickam M, Ragupathy A. Influence of water depth on internal heat and mass transfer in a double slope solar still. Energy Procedia. 2012;14:1701–1708. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.12.1155
   Google Scholar
• Manokar AM, Murugavel K, Esakkimuthu G. Different parameters affecting the rate of evaporation and condensation on passive solar still – a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2014;38:309–322. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.092
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Dubey A, Tiwari GN. A solar still augmented with an evacuated tube collector in forced mode. Desalination. 2014;347:15–24. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.05.019
   Google Scholar
• Wassouf P, Peska T, Singh R, et al. Novel and low cost design of portable solar stills. Desalination. 2011;276:294–302. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.03.069
   Google Scholar
• Rajaseenivasan T, Elango T, Murugavel K. Comparative study of double basin and single basin solar stills. Desalination. 2013;309:27–31. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2012.09.014
   Google Scholar
• Ayoub George M, Malaeb L. Economic feasibility of a solar still desalination system with enhanced productivity. Desalination. 2014;335(1):27–32. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.12.010
   Google Scholar
• Somwanshi A, Tiwari AK. Performance enhancement of a single basin solar still with flow of water from an air cooler on the cover. Desalination. 2014;352:92–102. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.08.011
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim AGM, Allam EE, El shamarka SE. A modified basin type solar still: experimental performance and economic study. Energy. 2015;93:335–342. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.09.045
   Google Scholar
• Arunkumar T, Velraj R, Denkenberger DC, et al. Productivity enhancement of compound parabolic concentrator tubular solar stills. Renew Energy. 2016;88:391–400. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.11.051
   Google Scholar
• Sampathkumar K, Arjunan TV, Senthilkumar P. The experimental investigation of a solar still coupled with an evacuated tube collector. Energy Sources. 2013;35:261–270. doi: 10.1080/15567036.2010.511426
   Google Scholar
• Panchal HN. Enhancement of distillate output of double basin solar still with vacuum tubes. J King Saud Univ – Eng Sci. 2013;30:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy KS, Ravi Kumar K, O'Donovan TS, et al. Performance analysis of an evacuated multi-stage solar water desalination system. Desalination. 2012;288:80–92. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.12.016
   Google Scholar