Water desalination by forward osmosis: draw solutes and recovery methods – review

References

• Progress on sanitation and drinking water 2015 update and MDG assessment. UNICEF and World Health Organization 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Water for a sustainable world, the United Nation world water development report, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Toze S. Reuse of effluent water – benefits and risks. Agric Water Manag. 2005;80:147–159.
   Google Scholar
• Lasen TA, Hoffman S, Lüthi C, et al. Emerging solutions to the water challenges of an urbanizing world. Science. 2016;352:928–933.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson J. The environmental benefits of water recycling and reuse. Water Sci Tech: Water Supply. 2003;3:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta VK, Ali I, Saleh TA, et al. Chemical treatment technologies for waste-water recycling – an overview. RSC Adv. 2012;2:6380–6388.
   Google Scholar
• Shahzad MW, Burhan M, Ang L, et al. Energy-water-environment nexus underpinning future desalination sustainability. Desalination. 2017;413:52–64.
   Google Scholar
• Voutchkov N. Energy use for membrane seawater desalination – current status and trends. Desalination. 2018;431:2–14.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Karaghouli A, Kazmerski LL. Energy consumption and water production cost of conventional and renewable-energy-powered desalination processes. Renew Sust Energ. Rev. 2013;24:343–356.
   Google Scholar
• Zarzo D, Prats D. Desalination and energy consumption. What can we expect in the near future? Desalination. 2018;427:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Advances in draw solutes for forward osmosis: hybrid organic-inorganic nanoparticles and conventional solutes. Chem Eng J. 2016;309:738–752.
   Google Scholar
• Mazlan NM, Peshev D, Livingston AG. Energy consumption for desalination – a comparison of forward osmosis with reverse osmosis, and the potential for perfect membranes. Desalination. 2016;377:138–151.
   Google Scholar
• Qasim M, Darwish N, Sarp S, et al. Water desalination by forward (direct) osmosis phenomenon: a comprehensive review. Desalination. 2015;374:47–69.
   Google Scholar
• Chekli L, Phuntsho S, Shon HK, et al. A review of draw solutes in forward osmosis process and their use in modern applications. Desalin Water Treat. 2012;43:167–184.
   Google Scholar
• Cai Y, Hu XM. A critical review on draw solutes development for forward osmosis desalination. Desalination. 2016;391:16–29.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway R, Maltos R, Vanneste J, et al. Mixed draw solutions for improved forward osmosis performance. J Membr Sci. 2015;491:121–131.
   Google Scholar
• Ge Q, Ling M, Chung TS. Draw solutions for forward osmosis processes: developments, challenges, and prospects for the future. J Membr Sci. 2013;442:225–237.
   Google Scholar
• Cath T, Childress A, Elimelech M. Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments review. J Membr Sci. 2006;281:70–87.
   Google Scholar
• Klaysom C, Cath T, Depuydt T, et al. Forward and pressure retarded osmosis: potential solutions for global challenges in energy and water supply. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:6959–6989.
   Google Scholar
• Luo H, Wang Q, Zhang T, et al. A review on the recovery methods of draw solutes in forward osmosis. J. Water Process Eng. 2014;4:212–223.
   Google Scholar
• Chung T, Luo L, Wan CF, et al. What is next for forward osmosis (FO) and pressure retarded osmosis (PRO). Sep Purif Tech. 2015;156:856–860.
   Google Scholar
• Akther N, Sodiq A, Giwa A, et al. Recent advancements in forward osmosis desalination: a review. Chem Eng J. 2015;281:502–522.
   Google Scholar
• Chung T, Li X, Ong RC, et al. Emerging forward osmosis (FO) technologies and challenges ahead for clean water and clean energy applications. Curr Opin Chem Eng. 2012;1:201–352.
   Google Scholar
• Li D, Zhang X, Yao J, et al. Composite polymer hydrogels as draw agents in forward osmosis and solar dewatering. Soft Matter. 2011;7:10048–10056.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng Y, Qiu L, Wang K, et al. Significantly enhanced water flux in forward osmosis desalination with polymer graphene composite hydrogels as a draw agent. RSC Adv. 2013;3:887–894.
   Google Scholar
• Wang H, Low Z-X, Ou R, et al. Hydrogel-polyurethane interpenetrating network material as an advanced draw agent for forward osmosis process. Water Res. 2016;96:292–298.
   Google Scholar
• McGinnis RL, Elimelech M. Energy requirements of ammonia–carbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination. Desalination. 2007;207:370–382.
   Google Scholar
• Pouyfaucon AB, García-Rodríguez L. Solar thermal-powered desalination: A viable solution for a potential market. Desalination. 2018;435:60–69.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson DJ, Suwaileh W A, Mohammed AW, et al. Osmotic’s potential: An overview of draw solutes for forward osmosis. Desalination. 2018;434:100–120.
   Google Scholar
• Su J, Zhang S, Tai MML, et al. Forward osmosis: an emerging technology for sustainable supply of clean water. Clean Techn Environ Policy. 2012;14:507–511.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao S, Zou L, Tang C, et al. Recent developments in forward osmosis: opportunities and challenges. J. Membr Sci. 2012;396:1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Chung T-S, Zhang S, Wang KY, et al. Forward osmosis processes: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Desalination. 2012;287:78–81.
   Google Scholar
• Osmosis LR. Osmometry, and osmoregulation. Postgrad Med J 1999;75:67–73.
   Google Scholar
• Boo C, Khalil Y F, Elimelech M. Performance evaluation of trimethylamine–carbon dioxide thermolytic draw solution for engineered osmosis. J Membr Sci. 2015;473:302–309.
   Google Scholar
• Wang y, Long Q, Xiong S, et al. Application of poly (4-styrenesulfonic acid-co-maleic acid) sodium salt as novel draw solute in forward osmosis for dye-containing wastewater treatment. Desalination. 2017;421:40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Darwish NA, Mohammed F, Qasim M, et al. Forward osmosis desalination using ferric sulfate draw solute. Desalination. 2017;423:12–20.
   Google Scholar
• Plains M. OLI Stream Analyzer, OLI Systems Inc., NJ, 2005. url: http://www.olisystems.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Yokozeki M. Osmotic pressures studied using a simple equation-of-state and its applications. Appl Energ. 2006;83:15–41.
   Google Scholar
• Prickett RC, Elliott JA, McGann LE. Application of the multisolute osmotic virial equation to solutions containing electrolytes. J Phys Chem B. 2011;115:14531–14543.
   Google Scholar
• Widjojo N, Chung T-S, Weber M, et al. The role of sulphonated polymer and macrovoid-free structure in the support layer for thin film composite (TFC) forward osmosis (FO) membranes. J Membr Sci. 2011;383:214–222.
   Google Scholar
• McCutcheon JR, McGinnis RL, Elimelech M. Desalination by ammonia–carbon dioxide forward osmosis influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis. J Membr Sci. 2006;284:237–247.
   Google Scholar
• Lay W, Chong TH, Tang C, et al. Fouling propensity of forward osmosis: investigation of the slower flux decline phenomenon. Water Sci Tech. 2010;61:927–936.
   Google Scholar
• Phillip WA, Yong JS, Elimelech M. Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments. Environ Sci Tech. 2010;44:5170–5176.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan YM, Premkumar T, Joseph DK, et al. Stimuli-responsive poly (N-isopropylacrylamide-co-sodium acrylate) hydrogels: A swelling study in surfactant and polymer solutions. React Funct Polym. 2007;67:844–858.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao D, Chen S, Wang P, et al. A dendrimer-based forward osmosis draw solute for seawater. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2014;53:16170–16175.
   Google Scholar
• Nath K. Membrane separation processes, Prentice-Hall of India Private limited, New Delhi, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Alnaizy R, Aidan A, Qasim M. Draw solute recovery by metathesis precipitation in forward osmosis desalination. Desalin Water Treat. 2013;51:5516–5525.
   Google Scholar
• Batchelder GW. Process for the demineralization of water, US Patent 3,171,799, March 02, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Glew DN. Process for liquid recovery and solution concentration, US Patent 3,216,930, November 09, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• McGinnis RL. Osmotic desalinization process, US Patent 6,391,205 B1, May 21, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• McCutcheon J, McGinnis R, Elimelech M. A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process. Desalination. 2005;174:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Stone M, Rae C, Stewart F, et al. Switchable polarity solvents as draw solutes for forward osmosis. Desalination. 2013;312:124–129.
   Google Scholar
• Sato N, Sato Y, Yanase S. Forward osmosis using dimethyl ether as a draw solute. Desalination. 2014;349:102–105.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Bruggen B, Vandecasteele C, Van Gestel T, et al. A review of pressure-driven membrane processes in wastewater treatment and drinking water production. Environ Prog Sust Energ. 2003;22:46–56.
   Google Scholar
• Cui ZF, Jiang Y, Field RW. Chapter 1. Fundamentals of pressure-driven membrane separation processes. Membr Tech. 2010: 1–18. DOI:10.1016/B978-1-85617-632-3.00001-X
   Google Scholar
• Bowden KS, Achilli A, Childress AE. Organic ionic salt draw solutions for osmotic membrane bioreactors. Bioresour Technol. 2012;122:207–216.
   Google Scholar
• Cath TY, Hancock NT, Lundin CD, et al. A multi-barrier osmotic dilution process for simultaneous desalination and purification of impaired water. J Membr Sci 2010;362:417–426.
   Google Scholar
• Yangali-Quintanilla V, Li Z, Valladares R, et al. Indirect desalination of Red Sea water with forward osmosis and low pressure reverse osmosis for water reuse. Desalination. 2011;280:160–166.
   Google Scholar
• Diallo SM, Cho M, Lee D, et al. Osmotically driven membrane processes: Exploring the potential of branched polyethyleneimine as draw solute using porous FO membranes with NF separation layers. J Membr Sci. 2016;511:278–288.
   Google Scholar
• Dey P, Izake EL. Magnetic nanoparticles boosting the osmotic efficiency of a polymeric FO draw agent: effect of polymer conformation. Desalination. 2015;373:79–85.
   Google Scholar
• Altaee A, Zaragoza G, Van Tonningen HR. Comparison between forward osmosis–reverse osmosis and reverse osmosis processes for seawater desalination. Desalination. 2014;336:50–57.
   Google Scholar
• Achilli A, Cath TY, Childress AE. Selection of inorganic-based draw solutions for forward osmosis applications. J Membr Sci. 2010;364:233–241.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen HT, Chen S-S, Nguyen NC, et al. Exploring an innovative surfactant and phosphate-based draw solution for forward osmosis desalination. J Membr Sci. 2015;489:212–219.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen HT, Nguyen NC, Chen S-S, et al. A new class of draw solutions for minimizing reverse salt flux to improve forward osmosis desalination. Sci Tot Environ. 2015;538:129–136.
   Google Scholar
• Long Q, Qi G, Wang Y. Synthesis and application of Ethylenediamine tetrapropionic salt as a novel draw solute for forward osmosis application. AIChE. 2015;61:1309–1321.
   Google Scholar
• Long Q, Wang Y. Novel carboxyethyl amine sodium salts as draw solutes with superior forward osmosis performance. AIChE. 2016;62:1226–1235.
   Google Scholar
• Long Q, Shen L, Chen R, et al. Synthesis and application of organic Phosphonate salts as draw solutes in forward osmosis for oil-water separation. Environ Sci Tech. 2016;50:12022–12029.
   Google Scholar
• ThiHau N, Sh-Sh C, Nguyen NC, et al. Exploration of EDTA sodium salt as novel draw solution in forward osmosis process for dewatering of high nutrient sludge. J Membr Sci. 2014;455:305–311.
   Google Scholar
• Ge Q, Chung T-S. Hydroacid complexes: a new class of draw solutes to promote forward osmosis (FO) processes. Chem Commun. 2013;49:8415–8415.
   Google Scholar
• Ge Q, Fu F, Chung T-S. Ferric and cobaltous hydroacid complexes for forward osmosis (FO) processes. Water Res. 2014;58:230–238.
   Google Scholar
• Chung TS, Amy GL J, et al. Exploration of polyelectrolytes as draw solutes in forward osmosis processes. Water Res. 2012;46:1318–1326.
   Google Scholar
• Tian E, Hu C, Qin Y, et al. A study of poly (sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) as draw solute in forward osmosis. Desalination. 2015;360:130–137.
   Google Scholar
• Laohaprapanon S, Fu Y-J, Hu C-C, et al. Evaluation of a natural polymer-based cationic polyelectrolyte as a draw solute in forward osmosis. Desalination. 2017;421:72–78.
   Google Scholar
• Wang KY, Teoh MM, Nugroho A, et al. Integrated forward osmosis membrane distillation (FO-MD) hybrid system for the concentration of protein solutions. Chem Eng Sci. 2011;66:2421–2430.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao D, Wang P, Zhao Q, et al. Thermoresponsive copolymer-based draw solution for seawater desalination in a combined process of forward osmosis and membrane distillation. Desalination. 2014;348:26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Yen S, Haja FM, Su ML, et al. Study of draw solutes using 2-methylimidazole-based compounds in forward osmosis. J Membr Sci. 2010;364:242–252.
   Google Scholar
• Hong S, Gwak G, Han S, et al. Evaluation of poly (aspartic acid sodium salt) as a draw solute for forward osmosis. Water Res. 2015;80:294–305.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Al-Haddad S, Al-Rughaib M, et al. Evaluation of hydrolyzed poly(isobutylene-alt-maleic anhydride) as a polyelectrolyte draw solution for forward osmosis desalination. Desalination. 2016;394:148–154.
   Google Scholar
• Chen SS, Nguyen HT, Nguyen NC, et al. Exploring high charge of phosphate as new draw solute in a forward osmosis–membrane distillation hybrid system for concentrating high-nutrient sludge. Sci Tot Environ. 2016;557–558:44–50.
   Google Scholar
• Ray SS, Chen SS, Nguyen NC, et al. Exploration of polyelectrolyte incorporated with Triton-X 114 surfactant based osmotic agent for forward osmosis desalination. J Environ Manage. 2018;209:346–353.
   Google Scholar
• Ge Q, Lau CH, Liu M. A novel multi-charged draw solute that removes organic arsenicals from water in a hybrid membrane process. Environ Sci Tech. 2018;6:3812–3819.
   Google Scholar
• Alnaizy R, Aidan A, Qasim M. Copper sulfate as draw solute in forward osmosis desalination. J Environ Chem Eng. 2013;1:424–430.
   Google Scholar
• Ge Q, Su J, Chung T-S, et al. Hydrophilic superparamagnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, and performance in forward osmosis processes. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2011;50:382–388.
   Google Scholar
• Ling MM, Wang KY, Chung T-S. Highly water-soluble magnetic nanoparticles as novel draw solutes in forward osmosis for water reuse. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2010;49:5869–5587.
   Google Scholar
• Razmjou A, Barati MR, Simon GP. Fast deswelling of nanocomposite polymer hydrogels via magnetic field-induced heating for emerging FO desalination. Environ Sci Tech. 2013;47:6297–6305.
   Google Scholar
• Ge Q, Su J, Chung T, et al. Hydrophilic superparamagnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, and performance in forward osmosis processes. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2011;50:382–388.
   Google Scholar
• Na Y, Yang S, Lee S. Evaluation of citrate-coated magnetic nanoparticles as draw solute for forward osmosis. Desalination. 2014;347:34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Ling MM, Wang KY, Chung T. Highly water-soluble magnetic nanoparticles as novel draw solutes in forward osmosis for water reuse. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2010;49:5869–5876.
   Google Scholar
• Yang H-M, Seo B-K, Lee K-W, et al. Hyperbranched polyglycerol coated magnetic nanoparticles as draw solute in forward osmosis. Asian J Chem. 2014;26:4031–4034.
   Google Scholar
• Bai H, Liu Z, Sun DD. Highly water soluble and recovered dextran coated Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles for brackish water desalination. Sep Purif Tech. 2011;81:392–399.
   Google Scholar
• Ling MM, Chung T-S. Desalination process using super hydrophilic nanoparticles via forward osmosis integrated with ultrafiltration regeneration. Desalination. 2011;278:194–202.
   Google Scholar
• Ling MM, Chung T-S, Lu X. Facile synthesis of thermosensitive magnetic nanoparticles as ‘smart’ draw solutes in forward osmosis. Chem Commun. 2011;47:10788–10790.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou A, Luo H, Wang Q, et al. Magnetic thermoresponsive ionic nanogels as novel draw agents in forward osmosis. RSC Adv. 2015;5:15359–15365.
   Google Scholar
• Hartanto Y, Yun S, Jin B, et al. Functionalized thermo-responsive microgels for high performance forward osmosis desalination. Water Res. 2015;70:385–393.
   Google Scholar
• Ling MM, Chung T. Surface-dissociated nanoparticle draw solutions in forward osmosis and the regeneration in an integrated electric field and nanofiltration system. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2012;51:15463–15471.
   Google Scholar
• Xie R, Chu L, Wang Y. An easily recoverable thermo-sensitive polyelectrolyte as draw agent for forward osmosis process. Chin J Chem Eng. 2016;24:86–93.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JC, Kang H, Choi Y-S, et al. Thermo-responsive oligomeric poly(tetrabutylphosphonium styrenesulfonate)s as draw solutes for forward osmosis (FO) applications. Desalination. 2016;381:84–94.
   Google Scholar
• Cui H, Zhang H, Yu M, et al. Performance evaluation of electric-responsive hydrogels as draw agent in forward osmosis desalination. Desalination. 2018;426:118–126.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta S, Nath K. Prospect of ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents as new generation draw solution in forward osmosis process. J Water Process Eng. 2018;21:163–176.
   Google Scholar
• Smith EL, Abbott AP, Ryder KS. Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) and their applications. Chem Rev. 2014;114:11060–11082.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Vigier KDO, Royer S. Deep eutectic solvents: syntheses, properties and applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:7108–7146.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott AP, Capper G, Davies DL, et al. Novel solvent properties of choline chloride/urea mixtures. Chem Commun. 2003: 70–71. DOI:10.1039/B210714G
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez MC, Ferrer ML, Mateo CR. Freeze-drying of aqueous solutions of deep eutectic solvents: a suitable approach to deep eutectic suspensions of self-assembled structures. Langmuir. 2009;25:5509–5515.
   Google Scholar
• Florindo C, Oliveira FS, Rebelo LPN, et al. Insights into the synthesis and properties of deep eutectic solvents based on cholinium chloride and carboxylic acids. ACS Sust. Chem Eng. 2014;2:2416–2425.
   Google Scholar
• Nataraj SK, Prasad K, Veerababu P, et al. Deep eutectic solvents as a new class of draw agent to enrich low abundance DNA and proteins using forward osmosis. RSC Adv. 2015;5:89539–89544.
   Google Scholar
• Alamaru SK, Prasad K, Mondal D, et al. Dewatering process through forward osmosis using deep eutectic solvents with or without dispersed magnetic nanoparticles as novel draw solutions WO2016027280, February 02, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Mok Y, Nakayama D, Noh M, et al. Circulatory osmotic desalination driven by a mild temperature gradient based on lower critical solution temperature (LCST) phase transition materials. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013;15:19510–19517.
   Google Scholar
• Noh M, Mok Y, Lee S, et al. Novel lower critical solution temperature phase transition materials effectively control osmosis by mild temperature changes. Chem Commun. 2012;48:3845–3847.
   Google Scholar
• Cai Y, Shen W, Wei J, et al. Energy-efficient desalination by forward osmosis using responsive ionic liquid draw solutes. Environ Sci Water Res Tech. 2015;1:341–347.
   Google Scholar
• Nakayama D, Mok Y, Noh M, et al. Lower critical solution temperature (LCST) phase separation of glycol ethers for forward osmotic control. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2014;16:5319–5325.
   Google Scholar
• Zhong Y, Feng X, Chen W, et al. Using UCST ionic liquid as a draw solute in forward osmosis to treat high-salinity water. Environ. Sci Tech. 2016;50:1039–1045.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao P, Gao B, Yue Q, et al. Explore the forward osmosis performance using hydrolyzed polyacrylamide as draw solute for dye wastewater reclamation in the long-term process. Chem Eng J. 2015;273:316–324.
   Google Scholar
• Phuntsho S, Shon HK, Majeed T, et al. Blended fertilizers as draw solutions for fertilizer-drawn forward osmosis desalination. Environ Sci Tech. 2012;46:4567–4575.
   Google Scholar
• Duan J, Litwiller E, Choi S-H, et al. Evaluation of sodium lignin sulfonate as draw solute in forward osmosis for desert restoration. J Membr Sci. 2013;453:463–470.
   Google Scholar
• Stone ML, Wilson AD, Harrup MK, et al. An initial study of hexavalent phosphazene salts as draw solutes in forward osmosis. Desalination. 2013;312:130–136.
   Google Scholar
• Ling MM, Wang KY, Chung T-S. Highly water-soluble magnetic nanoparticles as novel draw solutes in forward osmosis for water reuse. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2010;49:5869–5876.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao D, Chen S, Guo CX, et al. Multi-functional forward osmosis draw solutes for seawater desalination. Chin J Chem Eng. 2015;24:23–30.
   Google Scholar