Urban water trading – hybrid water systems and niche opportunities in the urban water market – a literature review

References

• Fornarelli R, Anda M, Dallas S, et al. Enabling localised and decentralised residential water use through a water credit-debit system. Water Supply, under Review, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Urich C, Rauch W. Modelling the urban water cycle as an integrated part of the city: A review. Water Sci Technol. 2014;70(11):1857–1872.
   Google Scholar
• Prommer H, Descourvieres C, Handyside M, et al. Final Report - Aquifer storage and recovery of potable water in the Leederville Aquifer. 2013: CSIRO: Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Kirshen P, Aytur S, Hecht J, et al. Integrated urban water management applied to adaptation to climate change. Urban Climate. 2018;24:247–263.
   Google Scholar
• Vairavamoorthy K, Eckart J, Tsegaye S, et al. A paradigm shift in urban water management: an imperative to achieve sustainability, in Sustainability of Integrated Water Resources Management. 2015, Springer. p. 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Paton FL, Dandy GC, Maier HR. Integrated framework for assessing urban water supply security of systems with non-traditional sources under climate change. Environ Model Softw. 2014;60:302–319.
   Google Scholar
• Lam KL, Lant PA, O’Brien KR, et al. Comparison of water-energy trajectories of two major regions experiencing water shortage. J Environ Manage. 2016;181:403–412.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs C, Ryan C, Wiseman J, et al. Distributed Water Systems: A networked and localised approach for sustainable water services, in Distributed Systems Briefing Paper No. 2. 2009, Victorian Eco-Innovation Lab (VEIL).
   Google Scholar
• Daigger GT. Evolving urban water and residuals management paradigms: water reclamation and reuse, decentralization, and resource recovery. Water Environ Res. 2009;81(8):809–823.
   Google Scholar
• Doell P, Mueller Schmied H, Schuh C, et al. Global-scale assessment of groundwater depletion and related groundwater abstractions: Combining hydrological modeling with information from well observations and GRACE satellites. Water Resour Res. 2014;50(7):5698–5720.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Burn S, Gardner T, et al. Role of decentralised systems in the transition of urban water systems. Water Sci Technol Water Supply. 2010;10(4):577–583.
   Google Scholar
• Bieker S, Cornel P, Wagner M. Semicentralised supply and treatment systems: integrated infrastructure solutions for fast growing urban areas. Water Sci Technol. 2010;61(11):2905–2913.
   Google Scholar
• Daigger GT, Crawford GV. Enhancing water system security and sustainability by incorporating centralized and decentralized water reclamation and reuse into urban water management systems. J Environ Eng Manag. 2007;17(1):1.
   Google Scholar
• Domènech L, March H, Saurí D. Degrowth initiatives in the urban water sector? A social multi-criteria evaluation of non-conventional water alternatives in Metropolitan Barcelona. J Clean Prod. 2013;38:44–55.
   Google Scholar
• Arora M, Malano H, Davidson B, et al. Interactions between centralized and decentralized water systems in urban context: A review. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water. 2015;2(6):623–634.
   Google Scholar
• Sapkota M, Arora M, Malano H, et al. Development of a framework to evaluate the hybrid water supply systems. Proceedings of 20th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation; 2013. Adelaide, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Sapkota M, Arora M, Malano H, et al. An integrated framework for assessment of hybrid water supply systems. Water (Basel). 2015;8(1):4.
   Google Scholar
• Sapkota M, Arora M, Malano H, et al. An overview of hybrid water supply systems in the context of urban water management: challenges and opportunities. Water (Basel). 2015;7(1):153.
   Google Scholar
• Campisano A, Butler D, Ward S, et al. Urban rainwater harvesting systems: research, implementation and future perspectives. Water Res. 2017;115:195–209.
   Google Scholar
• Moglia M, Tjandraatmadja G, Sharma AK. Exploring the need for rainwater tank maintenance: survey, review and simulations. Water Sci Technol Water Supply. 2013;13(2):191–201.
   Google Scholar
• Vialle C, Sablayrolles C, Lovera M, et al. Water quality monitoring and hydraulic evaluation of a household roof runoff harvesting system in France. Water Resour Manage. 2012;26(8):2233–2241.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed W, Gardner T, Toze S. Microbiological quality of roof-harvested rainwater and health risks: a review. J Environ Qual. 2011;40(1):13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner T, Vieritz A. The role of rainwater tanks in Australia in the twenty first century. Archit Sci Rev. 2010;53(1):107–125.
   Google Scholar
• Heyworth JS, Glonek G, Maynard E, et al. Consumption of untreated tank rainwater and gastroenteritis among young children in South Australia. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35(4):1051–1058.
   Google Scholar
• Cook S, Sharma A, Chong M. Performance analysis of a communal residential rainwater system for potable supply: a case study in Brisbane, Australia. Water Resour Manag. 2013;27(14):4865–4876.
   Google Scholar
• Haque MM, Rahman A, Samali B. Evaluation of climate change impacts on rainwater harvesting. J Clean Prod. 2016;137:60–69.
   Google Scholar
• Bach PM, McCarthy DT, Urich C, et al. A planning algorithm for quantifying decentralised water management opportunities in urban environments. Water Sci Technol. 2013;68(8):1857–1865.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher TD, Deletic A, Mitchell VG, et al. Reuse of urban runoff in Australia: a review of recent advances and remaining challenges. J Environ Qual. 2008;37(5_Supplement):S-116–S-127.
   Google Scholar
• Burns MJ, Fletcher TD, Duncan HP, et al. The performance of rainwater tanks for stormwater retention and water supply at the household scale: an empirical study. Hydrol Process. 2015;29(1):152–160.
   Google Scholar
• Mugume SN, Melville-Shreeve P, Gomez D, et al. Multifunctional urban flood resilience enhancement strategies. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-water management; 2016. Thomas Telford Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bricker SH, Banks VJ, Galik G, et al. Accounting for groundwater in future city visions. Land Use Policy. 2017;69:618–630.
   Google Scholar
• Cigna F, Jordan H, Bateson L, et al. Natural and anthropogenic geohazards in greater London observed from geological and ERS-1/2 and ENVISAT persistent scatterers ground motion data: Results from the EC FP7-SPACE PanGeo project. Pure Appl Geophys. 2015;172(11):2965–2995.
   Google Scholar
• Bonì R, Cigna F, Bricker S, et al. Characterisation of hydraulic head changes and aquifer properties in the London basin using Persistent Scatterer Interferometry ground motion data. J Hydrol (Amst). 2016;540:835–849.
   Google Scholar
• Minnig M, Moeck C, Radny D, et al. Impact of urbanization on groundwater recharge rates in dübendorf, Switzerland. J Hydrol (Amst). 2018;563:1135–1146.
   Google Scholar
• Skurray JH, Roberts E, Pannell DJ. Hydrological challenges to groundwater trading: lessons from south-west Western Australia. J Hydrol (Amst). 2012;412:256–268.
   Google Scholar
• Salama RB, Silberstein R, Pollock D. Soils characteristics of the Bassendean and Spearwood Sands of the Gnangara mound (Western Australia) and their controls on recharge, water level patterns and solutes of the superficial aquifer. Water Air Soil Pollut Focus. 2005;5(1-2):3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Ali R, McFarlane D, Varma S, et al. Potential climate change impacts on the water balance of regional unconfined aquifer systems in south-western Australia. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2012;16(12):4581–4601.
   Google Scholar
• Appleyard S. Impact of stormwater infiltration basins on groundwater quality, Perth metropolitan region, Western Australia. Environ Geol. 1993;21(4):227–236.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson G, Newsome D. Environmental history of an urban wetland: from degraded colonial resource to nature conservation area. Geo Geography Environ. 2017;4(1):e00030.
   Google Scholar
• Barron O, Froend R, Hodgson G, et al. Projected risks to groundwater-dependent terrestrial vegetation caused by changing climate and groundwater abstraction in the Central Perth Basin, Western Australia. Hydrol Process. 2014;28(22):5513–5529.
   Google Scholar
• Ushijima K, Tanaka E, Suzuki LY, et al. Grey water treatment by the slanted soil system with unsorted soil media. Environ Technol. 2015;36(20):2603–2609.
   Google Scholar
• Luostarinen S, Rintala J. Anaerobic on-site treatment of kitchen waste in combination with black water in UASB-septic tanks at low temperatures. Bioresour Technol. 2007;98(9):1734–1740.
   Google Scholar
• de Mes T, Kujawa-Roeleveld K, Zeeman G, et al. Fate of estrogens during anaerobic blackwater treatment with micro-aerobic post-treatment. Water Sci Technol. 2007;56(5):15–23.
   Google Scholar
• Schaum C, Lensch D, Cornel P. Water reuse and reclamation: a contribution to energy efficiency in the water cycle. J Water Reuse Desalinat. 2015;5(2):83–94.
   Google Scholar
• Adeyeye K. Water efficiency in buildings: Theory and practice. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Gikas P, Tchobanoglous G. The role of satellite and decentralized strategies in water resources management. J Environ Manage. 2009;90(1):144–152.
   Google Scholar
• Opher T, Friedler E. Comparative LCA of decentralized wastewater treatment alternatives for non-potable urban reuse. J Environ Manage. 2016;182:464–476.
   Google Scholar
• Leong JYC, Oh KS, Poh PE, et al. Prospects of hybrid rainwater-greywater decentralised system for water recycling and reuse: A review. J Clean Prod. 2017;142:3014–3027.
   Google Scholar
• Cook S, Tjandraatmadja G, Marleni N. Impact of source management strategies on quality and loads in residential wastewater scenario analysis. CSIRO: Water for a Healthy Country. National Research Flagship; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbie MF, Brown RR. A framework for understanding risk perception, explored from the perspective of the water practitioner. Risk Anal. 2014;34(2):294–308.
   Google Scholar
• Marlow DR, Moglia M, Cook S, et al. Towards sustainable urban water management: A critical reassessment. Water Res. 2013;47(20):7150–7161.
   Google Scholar
• Herrick C, Pratt J, Surbaugh H, et al. Changing Organizational culture to promote sustainable water operations: A Guidebook for water utility sustainability Champions. Denver: Water Research Foundation; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Sarni W, Webb R, Cross K. Digital Water: Industry Leaders Chart the Transformation Journey. 2019, International Water Association (IWA) White Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall J, Coleman G, Reason P. Leadership for sustainability: An action research approach. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing Ltd; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbie MF, Brown RR, Farrelly MA. Risk governance in the water sensitive city: Practitioner perspectives on ownership, management and trust. Environ Sci Policy. 2016;55:218–227.
   Google Scholar
• Beal CD, Flynn J. Toward the digital water age: survey and case studies of Australian water utility smart-metering programs. Util Policy. 2015;32:29–37.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard R, Iftekhar S, Green M, et al. Community Perceptions of the Implementation and Adoption of WSUD Approaches for Stormwater Management, in Approaches to Water Sensitive Urban Design. 2019, Elsevier. p. 499-522.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox J, Nasiri F, Bell S, et al. Urban water reuse: A triple bottom line assessment framework and review. Sustain Cities Soc. 2016;27:448–456.
   Google Scholar
• Anda M, le Gay Brereton F, Brennan J, et al. Smart metering infrastructure for residential water efficiency: Results of a trial in a behavioural change program in Perth, Western Australia. Proceedings of the first International Conference on information and communication technologies for sustainability; 2013. 14–16 February, Zurich, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding KS, Spinks A, Russell S, et al. An experimental test of voluntary strategies to promote urban water demand management. J Environ Manage. 2013;114:343–351.
   Google Scholar
• Novak J, Melenhorst M, Micheel I, et al. Behaviour change and incentive modelling for water saving: first results from the SmartH2O project, in International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software. 49. 2016: Toulouse, France.
   Google Scholar
• Eon C, Breadsell JK, Morrison GM, et al. The home as a system of practice and its implications for energy and water metabolism. Sustain Product Consumpt. 2018;13:48–59.
   Google Scholar
• Keyson DV, Morrison GM, Baedeker C, et al. Living labs to accelerate innovation, in Living Labs. 2017, Springer. p. 55-61.
   Google Scholar
• Voytenko Y, McCormick K, Evans J, et al. Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: towards a research agenda. J Clean Prod. 2016;123:45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Elfstrand P, Morrison GM, Toups L, et al. The storyline for the design process that shaped the HSB Living Lab, in Living Labs. 2017, Springer. p. 113–129.
   Google Scholar
• Eon C, Byrne J. 10 household living Labs study–results Summary. Energy Conservat. 2018;25(3):273–291.
   Google Scholar
• Watson R, Mukheibir P, Falletta J, et al. The bathroom of the future-prospects for information and control, prepared by the Institute for Sustainable Futures (UTS) for the GWA Bathrooms and Kitchens Group. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Stec A, Kordana S. Analysis of profitability of rainwater harvesting, gray water recycling and drain water heat recovery systems. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2015;105:84–94.
   Google Scholar
• Stephan A, Stephan L. Life cycle water, energy and cost analysis of multiple water harvesting and management measures for apartment buildings in a Mediterranean climate. Sustain Cities Soc. 2017;32:584–603.
   Google Scholar
• Domènech L, Saurí D. A comparative appraisal of the use of rainwater harvesting in single and multi-family buildings of the metropolitan area of Barcelona (Spain): social experience, drinking water savings and economic costs. J Clean Prod. 2011;19(6-7):598–608.
   Google Scholar
• Khastagir A, Jayasuriya N. Investment evaluation of rainwater tanks. Water Resour Manag. 2011;25(14):3769.
   Google Scholar
• Hajani E, Rahman A. Reliability and cost analysis of a rainwater harvesting system in peri-urban regions of greater Sydney, Australia. Water (Basel). 2014;6(4):945–960.
   Google Scholar
• Coombes P. Energy and economic impacts of rainwater tanks on the operation of regional water systems. Australasian J Water Resour. 2007;11(2):177–191.
   Google Scholar
• Gurung TR, Sharma A. Communal rainwater tank systems design and economies of scale. J Clean Prod. 2014;67:26–36.
   Google Scholar
• Ghisi E, Ferreira DF. Potential for potable water savings by using rainwater and greywater in a multi-storey residential building in southern Brazil. Build Environ. 2007;42(7):2512–2522.
   Google Scholar
• Simms A, Hamilton S, Biswas WK. Carbon footprint assessment of Western Australian groundwater recycling scheme. Environ Manage. 2017;59(4):557–570.
   Google Scholar
• Meda A, Henkel J, Chang Y, et al. Comparison of processes for greywater treatment for urban water reuse: energy consumption and footprint. In: Lazarova V, Choo K-H, Cornel P, editor. Water-Energy interactions in water reuse. London: IWA Publishing; 2012. p. 203–209.
   Google Scholar
• Vieira AS, Beal CD, Ghisi E, et al. Energy intensity of rainwater harvesting systems: A review. Renewable Sustain Energy Rev. 2014;34:225–242.
   Google Scholar
• Siems R, Sahin O, Talebpour MR, et al. Energy intensity of decentralised water supply systems utilised in addressing water shortages. 8th International Conference of the European Water Resources Association; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Siems R, Sahin O. Energy intensity of residential rainwater tank systems: exploring the economic and environmental impacts. J Clean Prod. 2016;113:251–262.
   Google Scholar
• Howell S, Rezgui Y, Beach T. Integrating building and urban semantics to empower smart water solutions. Autom Constr. 2017;81:434–448.
   Google Scholar
• Carragher BJ, Stewart RA, Beal CD. Quantifying the influence of residential water appliance efficiency on average day diurnal demand patterns at an end use level: A precursor to optimised water service infrastructure planning. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2012;62:81–90.
   Google Scholar
• Beal CD, Stewart RA, Fielding K. A novel mixed method smart metering approach to reconciling differences between perceived and actual residential end use water consumption. J Clean Prod. 2013;60:116–128.
   Google Scholar
• Cominola A, Giuliani M, Piga D, et al. Benefits and challenges of using smart meters for advancing residential water demand modeling and management: A review. Environ Model Softw. 2015;72:198–214.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle T, Giurco D, Mukheibir P, et al. Intelligent metering for urban water: a review. Water (Basel). 2013;5(3):1052–1081.
   Google Scholar
• Beal C, Stewart R, Huang T, et al. South East Queensland residential end use study. QLD: Urban Water Security Research Alliance Brisbane; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Cardell-Oliver R. Water use signature patterns for analyzing household consumption using medium resolution meter data. Water Resour Res. 2013;49(12):8589–8599.
   Google Scholar
• Umapathi S, Chong MN, Sharma AK. Evaluation of plumbed rainwater tanks in households for sustainable water resource management: a real-time monitoring study. J Clean Prod. 2013;42:204–214.
   Google Scholar
• Cominola A, Giuliani M, Castelletti A, et al. Implications of data sampling resolution on water use simulation, end-use disaggregation, and demand management. Environ Model Softw. 2018;102:199–212.
   Google Scholar
• Pastor-Jabaloyes L, Arregui F, Cobacho R. Water end use disaggregation based on soft computing techniques. Water (Basel). 2018;10(1):46.
   Google Scholar
• Gurung TR, Stewart RA, Beal CD, et al. Smart meter enabled water end-use demand data: platform for the enhanced infrastructure planning of contemporary urban water supply networks. J Clean Prod. 2015;87:642–654.
   Google Scholar
• Makki AA, Stewart RA, Beal CD, et al. Novel bottom-up urban water demand forecasting model: revealing the determinants, drivers and predictors of residential indoor end-use consumption. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2015;95:15–37.
   Google Scholar
• Londra P, Theocharis A, Baltas E, et al. Optimal sizing of rainwater harvesting tanks for domestic use in Greece. Water Resour Manage. 2015;29(12):4357–4377.
   Google Scholar
• Imteaz MA, Adeboye OB, Rayburg S, et al. Rainwater harvesting potential for southwest Nigeria using daily water balance model. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2012;62:51–55.
   Google Scholar
• Imteaz MA, Ahsan A, Shanableh A. Reliability analysis of rainwater tanks using daily water balance model: Variations within a large city. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2013;77:37–43.
   Google Scholar
• Inamdar P, Cook S, Sharma A, et al. A GIS based screening tool for locating and ranking of suitable stormwater harvesting sites in urban areas. J Environ Manage. 2013;128:363–370.
   Google Scholar
• Xu WD, Fletcher TD, Duncan HP, et al. Improving the multi-objective performance of rainwater harvesting systems using real-time Control technology. Water (Basel). 2018;10(2):147.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt J, Anda M, Ho G. Water balance modelling of alternate water sources at the household scale. Water Sci Technol. 2011;63(9):1873–1879.
   Google Scholar
• Saidi S, Kattan L, Jayasinghe P, et al. Integrated infrastructure systems—A review. Sustainable cities and society, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Mangold M, Morrison G, Harder R, et al. The transformative effect of the introduction of water volumetric billing in a disadvantaged housing area in Sweden. Water Policy. 2014;16(5):973–990.
   Google Scholar
• Castonguay AC, Urich C, Iftekhar MS, et al. Modelling urban water management transitions: A case of rainwater harvesting. Environ Model Softw. 2018;105:270–285.
   Google Scholar
• Low KG, Grant SB, Hamilton AJ, et al. Fighting drought with innovation: Melbourne's response to the Millennium Drought in Southeast Australia. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water. 2015;2(4):315–328.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang F, Polyakov M, Fogarty J, et al. The capitalized value of rainwater tanks in the property market of Perth, Australia. J Hydrol (Amst). 2015;522:317–325.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. Environmental Management of Groundwater Abstraction from the Gnangara Mound July 2000–June 2003, in Environmental Management. 2004, Water and Rivers Commission - Resource Management Division.
   Google Scholar
• Skurray JH. The scope for collective action in a large groundwater basin: An institutional analysis of aquifer governance in Western Australia. Ecol Econ. 2015;114:128–140.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett M, Gardner A. Regulating groundwater in a drying climate: lessons from South west Australia. J Energy Nat Resour Law. 2015;33(4):293–319.
   Google Scholar
• Yu C, Brown R, Morison P. Co-governing small-scale distributed water systems: An analytical framework. Proceedings of 12th International Conference on urban Drainage; 2011; Porto Alegre, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Yu C, Farrelly M, Brown R. Revealing the variables in the management of decentralised water systems in Australia. WSUD 2012: water sensitive urban design; building the water sensiitve community; 7th international conference on water sensitive urban design; 2012; Engineers Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Farrelly M, Brown R. Rethinking urban water management: Experimentation as a way forward? Glob Environ Change. 2011;21(2):721–732.
   Google Scholar
• Sirkiä J, Laakso T, Ahopelto S, et al. Data utilization at Finnish water and wastewater utilities: current practices vs. state of the art. Util Policy. 2017;45:69–75.
   Google Scholar
• Cheong S-M, Choi G-W, Lee H-S. Barriers and solutions to smart water grid development. Environ Manage. 2016;57(3):509–515.
   Google Scholar
• Green J, Newman P. Citizen utilities: The emerging power paradigm. Energy Policy. 2017;105:283–293.
   Google Scholar
• Mengelkamp E, Gärttner J, Rock K, et al. Designing microgrid energy markets: a case study: the Brooklyn microgrid. Appl Energy. 2018;210:870–880.
   Google Scholar
• Kiem AS. Drought and water policy in Australia: challenges for the future illustrated by the issues associated with water trading and climate change adaptation in the Murray–Darling Basin. Glob Environ Change. 2013;23(6):1615–1626.
   Google Scholar
• Giannoccaro G, Castillo M, Berbel J. An assessment of farmers’ willingness to participate in water trading in southern Spain. Water Policy. 2015;17(3):520–537.
   Google Scholar
• McColl J, Young M, Fisher T. Trading water: an urban model. Waste Manag Environ. 2007;18(2):34.
   Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission. Towards Urban Water Reform: A Discussion Paper. 2008, Productivity Commission Research Paper, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley M. Trading irrigation water for hydroelectricity: trade prohibitions and possibilities in the East Kimberley, Western Australia. Water J Australian Water Associat. 2015;42(5):68.
   Google Scholar
• Gao L, Connor J, Doble R, et al. Opportunity for peri-urban Perth groundwater trade. J Hydrol (Amst). 2013;496:89–99.
   Google Scholar
• Valderrama A, Levine L, Bloomgarden E, et al. Creating clean water cash flows developing private markets for green stormwater infrastructure in Philadelphia. Natural Resources Defense Council. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania., 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty S, Hammer R, Valderrama A. Stormwater Credit Trading Programs. NRDC Issue Brief, IB, 2016: p. 16–01.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler SA, Loch A, Crase L, et al. Developing a water market readiness assessment framework. J Hydrol (Amst). 2017;552:807–820.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto FS, Marques RC. Tariff structures for water and sanitation urban households: a primer. Water Policy, 2015: p. wp2015188.
   Google Scholar
• Perugini D, Perugini M, Young M. Water saving incentives: An agent-based simulation approach to urban water trading. Simulation Conference: simulation-Maximising organisational benefits (SimTecT 2008); 2008; Melbourne, Australia. Citeseer.
   Google Scholar
• Roters B, Oelmann M. Designing two-part greywater fees: Conceptual framework and empirical evidence from Germany. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning. 2018;13:457–468.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne J, Green M, Dallas S. WSUD Implementation in a Precinct Residential Development: Perth Case Study, in Approaches to Water Sensitive Urban Design. 2019, Elsevier. p. 541–559.
   Google Scholar
• Schmack M, Anda M. Water micro-nets-the key to achieving water resilience under a changing climate?. 10th International Conference on water Sensitive urban design: Creating water sensitive communities (WSUD 2018 & Hydropolis 2018); 2018; Engineers Australia.
   Google Scholar