Exploring the role of territorial actors in cross-border regions

REFERENCES

• Ágh, A. (2015). The European Union strategy for the Danube region. In S. Gänzle & K. Kern (Eds.), A ‘macro-regional’ Europe in the making: Theoretical approaches and empirical evidence (pp. 145–168). Basingstoke: Palgrave Mcmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2009). Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: The new spatial planning in the Thames gateway. Environment and Planning A, 41(3), 617–633. doi: 10.1068/a40208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alpine Regions. (2010). Common declaration: Adopted during the summit of regions STRATEGY for the ALPS on march 12th, 2010 at Mittenwald, Bavaria. Mittenwald: Alpine Regions. Retrieved April 22, 2017, from http://www.alpine-region.eu/sites/default/files/uploads/page/24/attachments/alpinespacedeclarationonstrategy12032010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Balsiger, J. (2015). The European Union strategy for the Alpine region. In S. Gänzle & K. Kern (Eds.), A ‘macro-regional’ Europe in the making: Theoretical approaches and empirical evidence (pp. 189–213). Basingstoke: Palgrave Mcmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bialasiewicz, L., Giaccaria, P., Jones, A., & Minca, C. (2013). Re-scaling ‘EU’rope: EU macro-regional fantasies in the Mediterranean. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(1), 59–76. doi: 10.1177/0969776412463372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco, I., Lowndes, V., & Pratchett, L. (2011). Policy networks and governance networks: Towards greater conceptual clarity. Political Studies Review, 9(3), 297–308. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00239.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatter, J. (1997). Explaining cross-border cooperation: A border–focused and border–external approach. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 12(1–2), 151–174. doi: 10.1080/08865655.1997.9695502
   Google Scholar
• Blatter, J. (2002). Grenzüberschreitende Regionenbildung und Europäische Integration: Erkenntnisse aus einem transatlantischen Vergleich [Cross-border region-building and European integration: Findings from a transatlantic comparison]. In T. Conzelmann & M. Knodt (Eds.), Regionales Europa - Europäisierte Regionen [Regional Europe – Europeanized regions] (pp. 257–277). Frankfurt/Main: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Blatter, J. (2003). Beyond hierarchies and networks: Institutional logics and change in transboundary spaces. Governance, 16(4), 503–526. doi: 10.1111/1468-0491.00226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boman, J., & Berg, E. (2007). Identity and institutions shaping cross-border co-operation at the margins of the European Union. Regional & Federal Studies, 17(2), 195–215. doi: 10.1080/13597560701318516
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A. (1998). Organizing Babylon – on the different conceptions of policy networks. Public Administration, 76(2), 253–273. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2001). The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4), 591–614. doi: 10.1191/030913201682688959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2003). ‘Glocalization’ as a state spatial strategy: Urban entrepreneurialism and the new politics of uneven development in Western Europe. In J. Peck & H. Wai-Chung Yeung (Eds.), Remaking the global economy: Economic-geographical perspectives (pp. 197–215). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Committee of the Regions. (2014, December 3-4). An Alpine macro-regional strategy for the European Union, 109th plenary session.
   Google Scholar
• Conference of the Alpine Regions. (2012, June 29). Macro-regional strategy for the Alps – an initiative paper of the Alpine regions. Bad Ragaz. Retrieved April 22, 2017, from http://www.argealp.org/content/download/2522/14860/version/4/file/Initiativpapier_fin_EN.doc.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2015, November 27). Council conclusions on the European Union strategy for the Alpine region (EUSALP). Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Danson, M. (2015). A North Sea macro-region? Partnerships, networking and macro-regional dimensions. In S. Gänzle & K. Kern (Eds.), A ‘macro-regional’ Europe in the making: Theoretical approaches and empirical evidence (pp. 215–242). Basingstoke: Palgrave Mcmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. S. (2002). The governance of urban regeneration: A critique of the ‘governing without government’ thesis. Public Administration, 80(2), 301–322. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J. S., & Spicer, A. (2015). Interrogating networks: Towards an agnostic perspective on governance research. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(2), 223–238. doi: 10.1068/c11292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deas, I., & Lord, A. (2006). From a new regionalism to an unusual regionalism? The emergence of non-standard regional spaces and lessons for the territorial reorganisation of the state. Urban Studies, 43(10), 1847–1877. doi: 10.1080/00420980600838143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debarbieux, B. (2009). Preface: Mountain regions as referents for collective action. Journal of Alpine Research, 97(2), 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Dommett, K., & Flinders, M. (2015). The centre strikes back: Meta-governance, delegation, and the core executive in the United Kingdom, 2010–14. Public Administration, 93(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1111/padm.12121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand, F. (2015). Theoretical framework of the cross-border space production – the case of the Eurometropolis Lille–Kortrijk–Tournai. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 30(3), 309–328. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2015.1066701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand, F., & Nelles, J. (2014). Binding cross-border regions: An analysis of cross-border governance in Lille-Kortrijk–Tournai Eurometropolis. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 105(5), 573–590. doi: 10.1111/tesg.12063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engl, A. (2016). Bridging borders through institution-building: The EGTC as a facilitator of institutional integration in cross-border regions. Regional & Federal Studies, 26(2), 143–169. doi: 10.1080/13597566.2016.1158164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2009). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions concerning the European Union strategy for the Baltic Sea region. COM(2009) 248 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015a). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions concerning the European Union strategy for the Alpine region. COM(2015) 366 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015b). Commission staff working document accompanying the communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions concerning the European Union strategy for the Alpine region: Action plan. COM(2015) 366 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (2013). Presidency conclusions, 19/20 December 2013.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2013). European parliament resolution of 23 May 2013 on a macro-regional strategy for the Alps (2013/2549(RSP)). Brussels: European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• García-Álvarez, J., & Trillo-Santamaría, J. M. (2013). Between regional spaces and spaces of regionalism: Cross-border region building in the Spanish ‘state of the autonomies’. Regional Studies, 47(1), 104–115. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.552495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gualini, E. (2003). Cross-border governance: Inventing regions in a transnational multi-level polity. disP The Planning Review, 39(152), 43–52. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2003.10556833
   Google Scholar
• Gualini, E. (2005). Reconnecting space, place and institutions: Inquiring into ‘local’ governance capacity in urban and regional research. In L. Albrechts & S. Mandelbaum (Eds.), The network society: A new context for planning (pp. 284–306). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (2008). Opportunities for democracy in cross-border regions? Lessons from the Øresund region. Regional Studies, 42(3), 423–435. doi: 10.1080/00343400701281592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamedinger, A. (2011). Challenges of governance in two cross-border city regions: ‘CENTROPE’ and the ‘EuRegio Salzburg – Berchtesgadener Land – Traunstein’. Urban Research & Practice, 4(2), 153–174. doi: 10.1080/17535069.2011.579771
   Google Scholar
• Harguindéguy, J. B., & Bray, Z. (2009). Does cross-border cooperation empower European regions? The case of interreg III-A France–Spain. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27(4), 747–760. doi: 10.1068/c08119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. (2013). Configuring the new ‘regional world’: On being caught between territory and networks. Regional Studies, 47(1), 55–74. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.644239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (2001). What place for ideas in the structure-agency debate? Globalisation as a ‘process without a subject’. Retrieved April 22, 2017, from http://www.criticalrealism.com/archive/cshay_wpisad.html
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (2002). Political analysis: A critical introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Mcmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (2014). Levels of governance and their interaction. In A. Payne & N. Phillips (Eds.), Handbook of the international political economy of governance (pp. 32–47). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level governance and European integration. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (1990). State theory: Putting the capitalist state in its place. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2001). Institutional re(turns) and the strategic–relational approach. Environment and Planning A, 33(7), 1213–1235. doi: 10.1068/a32183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2003). The political economy of scale and the construction of cross-border micro-regions. In F. Söderbaum & T. M. Shaw (Eds.), Theories of new regionalism (pp. 179–196). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2004). The European Union and recent transformations in statehood. In S. Punscher-Riekmann, M. Mokre, & M. Latzer (Eds.), The state of Europe: Transformations of statehood from a European perspective (pp. 75–94). Frankfurt/Main: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2008). State power: A strategic–relational approach. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2010). Metagovernance. In M. Bevir (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of governance (pp. 106–124). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2013). Dynamics of regionalism and globalism: A critical political economy perspective. Ritsumeikan Social Science Review, 5, 3–24. Retrieved April 22, 2017, from http://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/acd/re/k-rsc/hss/book/pdf/vol05_02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2016a). The state: Past, present, future. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2016b). Territory, politics, governance and multispatial metagovernance. Territory, Politics, Governance, 4(1), 8–32. doi: 10.1080/21622671.2015.1123173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., Brenner, N., & Jones, M. (2008). Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(3), 389–401. doi: 10.1068/d9107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. M. (2009). Cross-border regions and territorial restructuring in Central Europe: Room for more transboundary space. European Urban and Regional Studies, 16(2), 177–191. doi: 10.1177/0969776409102190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas, A. E. G., & Pincetl, S. (2006). Rescaling regions in the state: The new regionalism in California. Political Geography, 25(5), 482–505. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. (1997). Spatial selectivity of the state? The regulationist enigma and local struggles over economic governance. Environment and Planning A, 29, 831–864. doi: 10.1068/a290831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M., & MacLeod, G. (2004). Regional spaces, spaces of regionalism: Territory, insurgent politics and the English question. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(4), 433–452. doi: 10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00140.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, M. (2014). Introduction: Rescaling interests. Territory, Politics, Governance, 2(3), 239–248. doi: 10.1080/21622671.2014.954604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler-Koch, B. & Eising, R. (Eds.). (1999). The transformation of governance in the European Union (Vol. 12). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, G. (1999). Place, politics and ‘scale dependence’: Exploring the structuration of Euro-regionalism. European Urban and Region Studies, 6(3), 231–253. doi: 10.1177/096977649900600304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, G., & Goodwin, M. (1999). Space, scale and state strategy: Rethinking urban and regional governance. Progress in Human Geography, 23(4), 503–527. doi: 10.1191/030913299669861026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, G. (1996). An actor-centred approach to multi-level governance. Regional & Federal Studies, 6(2), 20–38. doi: 10.1080/13597569608420966
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, A. (2002). Parlamentarische Demokratie in der Europäischen Union: Der Beitrag des Europäischen Parlaments und der nationalen Parlamente [Parliamentary democracy in the European Union: The contribution of the European parliament and the national parliaments]. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2013). Euro–Meso–Macro: The new regions in Iberian and European space. Regional Studies, 47(8), 1249–1266. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.602336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, J., & Schmitt, P. (2012). When soft spaces harden: The EU strategy for the Baltic Sea region. Environment and Planning A, 44(2), 263–280. doi: 10.1068/a44188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuleman, L. (2008). Public management and the metagovernance of hierarchies, networks and markets: The feasibility of designing and managing governance style combinations. Heidelberg: Physica.
   Google Scholar
• Nacchia, C. (2011). European Union strategy for the Baltic Sea region: A pilot strategy for other regions? In U. of Groningen (Ed.), Walking the tightrope: Europe between Europeanisation and globalization (pp. 181–201). Groningen: Euroculture consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Nadalutti, E. (2012). Is cross-border governance emerging over the border between Italy and Slovenia? Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 20(2), 181–197. doi: 10.1080/14782804.2012.685390
   Google Scholar
• Nelles, J., & Durand, F. (2014). Political rescaling and metropolitan governance in cross-border regions: Comparing the cross-border metropolitan areas of Lille and Luxembourg. European Urban and Regional Studies, 21(1), 104–122. doi: 10.1177/0969776413512138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (1986). The institutionalization of regions: A theoretical framework for understanding the emergence of regions and the constitution of regional identity. Fennia – International Journal of Geography, 164(1), 105–146. doi: 10.11143/9052
   Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (2001). Europe as a social process and discourse: Considerations of place, boundaries and identity. European Urban and Regional Studies, 8(1), 7–28. doi: 10.1177/096977640100800102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. (1999). Building governance institutions across European borders. Regional Studies, 33(7), 657–667. doi: 10.1080/00343409950078693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. (2007a). Construction of new territorial scales: A framework and case study of the EUREGIO cross-border region. Regional Studies, 41(2), 253–266. doi: 10.1080/00343400600990517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. (2007b). Policy entrepreneurship and multilevel governance: A comparative study of European cross-border regions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25(6), 861–879. doi: 10.1068/c60m
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2010). Meta-governance and public management. In S. P. Osborne (Ed.), The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. (pp. 36–51). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pfetsch, F. R. (1998). Negotiating the European Union: A negotiation-network approach. International Negotiation, 3, 293–317. doi: 10.1163/15718069820848256
   Google Scholar
• Piattoni, S. (2009). The theory of multi-level governance: Conceptual, empirical, and normative challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piattoni, S. (2015). Exploring EU macro-regional strategies through the lens of multilevel governance. In S. Gänzle & K. Kern (Eds.), A ‘macro-regional’ Europe in the making: Theoretical approaches and empirical evidence (pp. 75–97). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, M. A. (2005). Theorizing the European Union: International organization, domestic polity, or experiment in new governance? Annual Review of Political Science, 8(1), 357–398. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu, G. (2008). The conflicting logics of cross-border reterritorialization: Geopolitics of Euroregions in Eastern Europe. Political Geography, 27, 418–438. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regional Government of Tyrol. (2015). LH Platter: ‘Wichtiger Schritt für Zukunft der Alpenländer gesetzt’. Press release, 28.07.2015. Retrieved April 22, 2017, from http://www.tirol.gv.at/tirol-europa/pressemeldungen/meldung/artikel/lh-platter-wichtiger-schritt-fuer-zukunft-der-alpenlaender-gesetzt/
   Google Scholar
• Salines, M. (2010). Success factors of macro-regional cooperation: The example of the Baltic Sea region ( Bruges Political Research Papers No. 12). Bruges: College of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1994). Games real actors could play: Positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(1), 27–53. doi: 10.1177/0951692894006001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sielker, F. (2016). A stakeholder-based EU territorial cooperation: The example of European macro-regions. European Planning Studies, 24(11), 1995–2013. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1221383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N. (1992). Contours of a spatialized politics: Homeless vehicles and the production of geographical scale. Social Text, 33, 54–81. doi: 10.2307/466434
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, C., & Giffinger, R. (2015). A policy network approach to cross-border metropolitan governance: The cases of Vienna and Bratislava. European Planning Studies, 23(6), 1187–1208. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2014.994089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2), 234–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01753.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2014). European integration and spatial rescaling in the Baltic region: Soft spaces, soft planning and soft security. European Planning Studies, 22(4), 680–693. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.772731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The States and Regions of the Alpine Region (2013, October 18). Political resolution towards a European Union strategy for the Alpine region, Grenoble.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2012). Interactive governance: Advancing the paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Bortel, G., & Mullins, D. (2009). Critical perspectives on network governance in urban regeneration, community involvement and integration. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24(2), 203–219. doi: 10.1007/s10901-009-9140-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weith, T. (2012). Oderpartnership—a long way to go towards cross-border spatial governance. Planning Practice & Research, 27(3), 333–350. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.670945
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, M. (2003). ‘In the shadow of hierarchy’: Meta-governance, policy reform and urban regeneration in the West Midlands. Area, 35(1), 6–14. doi: 10.1111/1475-4762.00105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, M. (2015). The Atlantic Arc: A macro-region in the making? In S. Gänzle & K. Kern (Eds.), A ‘macro-regional’ Europe in the making: Theoretical approaches and empirical evidence (pp. 243–268). Basingstoke: Palgrave Mcmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zäch, C., & Pütz, M. (2014). Regional Governance in der grenzüberschreitenden Zusammenarbeit [Regional governance in cross-border cooperation]. disP The Planning Review, 50(4), 29–42. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2014.1007659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar