Measuring innovation space: numerical devices as governmental technologies

REFERENCES

• Alonso, W., & Starr, P. (1986). The politics of numbers. The population of the United States in the 1980s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation for the National Committee for Research on the 1980 Census.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T. (1992). Flexible specialisation, industrial districts and small firms: A critical appraisal. Regional Development and Contemporary Industrial Response: Extending Flexible Specialisation. Belhaven, London, 45–63, 45–63.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T. (1996). Industrial districts as ‘learning regions’: A condition for prosperity. European Planning Studies, 4(4), 379–400. doi: 10.1080/09654319608720354
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J. L. (1976). How to do things with words: The William James lectures delivered at Harvard university in 1955. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. L. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Frenchs Forest: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bristow, G. (2005). Everyone’s a ‘winner’: Problematising the discourse of regional competitiveness. Journal of Economic Geography, 5(3), 285–304. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbh063
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, I. (2009). The ‘indefinite discipline’ of competitiveness benchmarking as a neoliberal technology of government. Minerva, 47(3), 261–280. doi: 10.1007/s11024-009-9128-0
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cerny, P. G. (1997). Paradoxes of the competition state: The dynamics of political globalization. Government and Opposition, 32(02), 251–274. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.1997.tb00161.x
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: Competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 23(3), 365–382.
   Google Scholar
• County Administrative Board Västernorrland. (2013). Regionalt strukturfondsprogram för investeringar i tillväxt och sysselsättning: Programområde Mellersta Norrland 2014–2020. Härnösand: Länsstyrelsen Västernorrland.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, K. R. (2009). ‘Rescaling the state’ in question. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2(1), 107–121. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsn029
   Google Scholar
• Crampton, J. W. (2010). Cartographic calculations of territory. Progress in Human Geography, 35(1), 92–103. doi: 10.1177/0309132509358474
   Google Scholar
• Crampton, J. W., & Elden, S. (2006). Space, politics, calculation: An introduction. Social & Cultural Geography, 7(5), 681–685. doi: 10.1080/14649360600971168
   Google Scholar
• Cruikshank, B. (1999). The will to Empower: Democratic Citizens and other subjects. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Desrosières, A. (2002). The politics of large numbers: A history of Statistical reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elden, S. (2005). Missing the point: Globalization, deterritorialization and the space of the world. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(1), 8–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00148.x
   Google Scholar
• Elden, S. (2007). Governmentality, calculation, territory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25(3), 562–580. doi: 10.1068/d428t
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1–40. doi: 10.1086/517897
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (2008). A sociology of quantification. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 49(03), 401–436. doi: 10.1017/S0003975609000150
   Google Scholar
• Ettlinger, N. (2011). Governmentality as Epistemology. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(3), 537–560. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2010.544962
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, C. (2000). Regionalisering och regionalism. Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 103(4), 360–379.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. (2012). The rise of the creative class – Revisited: Revised and expanded. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. doi: 10.1177/1077800405284363
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–1978. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Fougner, T. (2006). The state, international competitiveness and neoliberal globalisation: Is there a future beyond ? Review of International Studies, 32(01), 165–185. doi: 10.1017/S0260210506006978
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1991). How should We Do the history of statistics. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality With Two lectures By and An Interview With Michel Foucault (pp. 181–195). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hannah, M. G. (2009). Calculable territory and the West German census boycott movements of the 1980s. Political Geography, 28(1), 66–75. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, H. K. (2015). Numerical operations, transparency illusions and the datafication of governance. European Journal of Social Theory, 18(2), 203–220. doi: 10.1177/1368431014555260
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, H. K., & Flyverbom, M. (2015). The politics of transparency and the calibration of knowledge in the digital age. Organization, 22(6), 872–889. doi: 10.1177/1350508414522315
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. (2006). Re-reading the new regionalism: A sympathetic critique. Space and Polity, 10(1), 21–46. doi: 10.1080/13562570600796754
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (1989). From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in urban governance in Late Capitalism. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 71(1), 3–17. doi: 10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583
   Google Scholar
• Huxley, M. (2008). Space and government: Governmentality and geography. Geography Compass, 2(5), 1635–1658. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00133.x
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2002). The future of the Capitalist state. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M., & MacLeod, G. (2004). Regional spaces, spaces of regionalism: Territory, insurgent politics and the English question. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(4), 433–452. doi: 10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00140.x
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson, M. (2015). Mobilisera för tillväxt – innovationsarbete och smart specialisering i Dalarna. Dalarna: Region Dalarna.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, M. (1998). The new regionalism in Western Europe: Territorial restructuring and political change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kempinsky, P., Hallencreutz, D., & Lindqvist, P. (2012). Innovationsindex 2011: Regional förmåga till ekonomisk förnyelse. Luleå: Reglab.
   Google Scholar
• Kempinsky, P., Lindqvist, P., Öhlin, J. (2014). Innovationsindex 2013: Regional förmåga till ekonomisk förnyelse. Luleå: Reglab.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (1994). Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession. Foreign Affairs, 73(2), 28–44. doi: 10.2307/20045917
   Google Scholar
• Lagendijk, A. (2001). Three stories about regional salience: ‘regional worlds’, ‘political mobilisation’ and ‘performativity’. Zeithschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, 45(3–4), 139–158.
   Google Scholar
• Li, M. T. (2007). The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Durham: Duke University Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lindqvist, P., & Kempinsky, P. (2016). Innovationsindex 2015: Regional förmåga till ekonomisk förnyelse. Luleå: Reglab.
   Google Scholar
• Lobao, L., Martin, R., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2009). Editorial: Rescaling the state: New modes of institutional–territorial organization. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2(1), 3–12. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsp001
   Google Scholar
• Lovering, J. (1999). Theory Led by policy: The Inadequacies of the ‘New regionalism’ (illustrated from the case of Wales). International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2), 379–395. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.00202
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D. A., Muniesa, F., & Siu, L. (2007). Do economists make markets?: On the performativity of economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, G. (2001). New regionalism reconsidered: Globalization and the remaking of political economic space. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(4), 804–829. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.00345
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, G., & Jones, M. (2007). Territorial, Scalar, Networked, connected: In what sense a ‘regional World’? Regional Studies, 41(9), 1177–1191. doi: 10.1080/00343400701646182
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Smart Specialization, regional growth and Applications to European Union Cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291–1302. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.799769
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P., & Rose, N. (2008). Governing the present: Administering economic, social and personal life. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Mitander, T. (2015). Regio ex machina: Om det regionala medborgarskapets villkor. Karlstad: Karlstads Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Öjehag-Pettersson, A. (2015). Space Craft: Globalization and governmentality in regional development. Karlstad: Karlstad University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2015). Fast policy: Experimental Statecraft at the Thresholds of Neoliberalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Region Jämtland Härjedalen. (2016). Innovation programme 2020 - steps for creativity.
   Google Scholar
• Regional Co-operation Council Sörmland. (2014). Innovationskraft Sörmland 2020: Regional innovationsstrategi för Sörmland. Vingåker: Regionförbundet Sörmland.
   Google Scholar
• Rinehart, J. (1995). The ideology of competitiveness. Monthly Review: Independent Socialist Magazine, 47(5), 14. doi: 10.14452/MR-047-05-1995-09_2
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1991). Governing by numbers: Figuring out democracy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(7), 673–692. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(91)90019-B
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose-Redwood, R. (2012). With numbers in place: Security, territory, and the production of calculable space. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(2), 295–319. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2011.620503
   Google Scholar
• Sade-Beck, L. (2004). Internet ethnography: Online and offline. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(2), 45–51. doi: 10.1177/160940690400300204
   Google Scholar
• Säll, L. (2014). Regionalpolitikens diskursiva grunder och gränser: Om politik, makt och kunskap i det regionala samhällsbyggandet. Karlstad: Karlstad University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stockholm County Council. (2013). En ny ekonomisk geografi: Ett regionalt perspektiv på en global förändring i Östra Mellansverige, TMR Rapporter. Stockholm: TMR, Stockholms läns landsting.
   Google Scholar
• Syssner, J. (2006). What kind of regionalism?. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424. doi: 10.1086/257839
   Google Scholar
• WHO. (2016). WHO | International Classification of Diseases. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/
   Google Scholar