Metropolitan democracy from below: participation and rescaling in Delhi

REFERENCES

• AAP Manifesto. (2015). Retrieved from https://fr.scribd.com/doc/254260347/AAP-Manifesto-2015#download
   Google Scholar
• Albergo, E. d., & Lefèvre, C. (2018). Constructing metropolitan scales: Economic, political and discursive determinants. Territory, Politics, Governance, 6(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2018.1459203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baud, I. S. A., & De Wit, J. (Eds.). (2009). New forms of urban governance in India: Shifts, models, networks and contestations. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Beaumont, J., & Nicholls, W. (2008). Plural governance, participation and democracy in cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00779.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bherer, L., Fernández-Martínez, J. L., Espín, P. G., & Sánchez, M. J. (2016). The promise for democratic deepening: The effects of participatory processes in the interaction between civil society and local governments. Journal of Civil Society, 12(3), 344–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2016.1215957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, P. (2010). Community, cooperation and metropolitan democracy. Métropoles, no. 7 (June). http://journals.openedition.org/metropoles/4275
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2019). Restructuring, rescaling, and the urban question. Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/oso/9780190627188.001.0001/oso-9780190627188-chapter-3
   Google Scholar
• Brighenti, A. M. (2010). Visibility in social theory and social research. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Buser, M. (2014). Democratic accountability and metropolitan governance: The case of South Hampshire, UK. Urban Studies, 51(11), 2336–2353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013484531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, A., & Payre, R. (2016). Cities as political objects: Historical evolution, analytical categorisations and institutional challenges of metropolitanisation. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A. (2002). Locating citizen participation. IDS Bulletin, 33(2), i–x. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2002.tb00016.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desage, F., & Guéranger, D. (2011). La politique confisquée: Sociologie des réformes et des institutions intercommunales. du Croquant.
   Google Scholar
• Dreze, J., & Sen, A. (2013). An uncertain glory: India and its contradictions. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dumont, L. (2002). La civilisation indienne et nous: Esquisse de sociologie comparée. Editions de l’Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (Eds.). (2003). Deepening democracy. Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Ghertner, D. A. (2011). Gentrifying the state, gentrifying participation: Elite governance programs in Delhi. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(3), 504–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01043.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, A., Kennedy, L., Ruet, J., Tawa Lama-Rewal, S., & Zérah, M.-H. (2009). A comparative overview of urban governance in Delhi, Hyderabad, Kolkata and Mumbai. In Joël Ruet et Stéphanie Tawa Lama-Rewal (Eds.), Governing India’s metropolises (pp. 24–54). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gourgues, G. (2013). Les politiques de démocratie participative. Presses universitaires de Grenoble.
   Google Scholar
• Guarneros-Meza, V., & Geddes, M. (2010). Local governance and participation under neoliberalism: Comparative perspectives. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(1), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00952.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harindranath, R., & Khorana, S. (2014). Civil society movements and the ‘twittering classes’ in the postcolony: An Indian case study. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 37(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2012.744285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harriss, J. (2006). Middle-class activism and the politics of the informal working class. Critical Asian Studies, 38(4), 445–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672710601073002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, P., Mukhopadhyay, P., & Walton, M. (2016). Cabal city: Regime theory and Indian urbanization. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2803570. Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2803570
   Google Scholar
• Hermet, G. (2004). Un régime à pluralisme limité? A propos de la gouvernance démocratique. Revue Française de Science Politique, 54(1), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfsp.541.0159
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howitt, R. (1998). Scale as relation: Musical metaphors of geographical scale. Area, 30(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.1998.tb00047.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• India Times. (2014). With eye on polls, BJP holds ‘Shakti Kendra’ meetings. India Times. http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-11-23/news/56385239_1_satish-upadhyay-delhi-bjp-delhi-polls
   Google Scholar
• Jayal, N. G. (1997). The governance agenda. Making democratic development dispensable. Economic and Political Weekly, 32(8), 407–412.
   Google Scholar
• Jonas, A. E. G., & Ward, K. (2007). Introduction to a debate on city-regions: New geographies of governance, democracy and social reproduction. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(1), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00711.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jouve, B. (2005). La démocratie en métropoles: gouvernance, participation et citoyenneté. Revue Française de Science Politique, 55(2), 317–337. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfsp.552.0317
   Google Scholar
• Jouve, B., & Booth, P. (2005). Démocraties métropolitaines: Transformations de l’Etat et politiques urbaines au Canada, en France et en Grande-Bretagne. Presses de l’Université du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Kejriwal, A. (2012). Swaraj. HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Kelleher, C., & Lowery, D. (2004). Political participation and metropolitan institutional contexts. Urban Affairs Review, 39(6), 720–757. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087404264219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kübler, D., & Heinelt, H. (2002). An analytical framework for democratic metropolitan governance.
   Google Scholar
• Kübler, D., & Tomàs, M. (2010). Jeux d’échelles et démocratie métropolitaine. Métropoles, no. 7 (June). https://metropoles.revues.org/4221
   Google Scholar
• Lefèvre, C. (2010). The improbable metropolis: Decentralization, local democracy and metropolitan areas in the Western world. Análise Social, 45(197), 623–637.
   Google Scholar
• Lemanski, C., & Tawa Lama-Rewal, S. (2013). The ‘missing middle’: Participatory practices in Delhi’s unauthorized colonies. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(1), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00514.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidström, A., & Schaap, L. (2018). The citizen in city-regions: Patterns and variations. Journal of Urban Affairs, 40(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2017.1355668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• lokrajandolan.org. (n.d.). Detailed guidelines on how to conduct mohalla sabhas. Retrieved from http://www.lokrajandolan.org/images/mohalla_sabhas_a_how_to_guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• “Maken lashes out at Bhagidari”, The Hindu, March 10, 2006 https://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-newdelhi/maken-lashes-out-at-bhagidari/article3162573.ece
   Google Scholar
• Mander, H., & Joshi, A. (s. d). The movement for right to information in India. People’s Power for the Control of Corruption. http://www.rtigateway.org.in/Documents/References/English/Reports/12. An article on RTI by Harsh Mander.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mehra, D. (2013). RWAs and the political process in Delhi. In K. Coelho, L. Kamath, et M. Vijayabaskar (Eds.), Participolis. Consent and contention in neoliberal and urban India (pp. 222–239). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Melo, M. A., & Baiocchi, G. (2006). Deliberative democracy and local governance: Towards a new agenda. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(3), 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00686.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miraftab, F. (2004). Invited and invented spaces of participation: Neoliberal citizenship and feminists’ expanded notion of politics. Wagadu, 1, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Pinson, G., & Journel, C. M. (2016). The neoliberal city – Theory, evidence, debates. Territory, Politics, Governance, 4(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2016.1166982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. (2006). Urban democracy and the local trap. Urban Studies, 43(11), 1921–1941. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980600897826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. (2007). City-regions, neoliberal globalization and democracy: A research agenda. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(1), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00714.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, S. (2014). Being the change. The Aam Aadmi party and the politics of the extraordinary in Indian democracy. Economic and Political Weekly, 49(15), 45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Ruet, J., & Tawa Lama-Rewal, S. (Eds.). (2009). Governing India’s metropolises. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. (2010). The representative claim. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (2003). Problem solving effectiveness and democratic accountability in the EU. 2003. http://europeana.eu/portal/record/09403/europeana_local_at_index_php_option_com_mdm_Itemid_2_form_display_oaiid_IHS_000000161580.html
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2013). Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: Input, output and ‘throughput’. Political Studies, 61(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00962.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivaramakrishnan, K. C. (2006). People’s participation in urban governance: A comparative study of the working of wards committees in Karnataka, Kerala, Maharashtra and West Bengal. Concept.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00106
   Google Scholar
• Tawa Lama-Rewal, S. (2013). Participation as a support to neo-populism? The case of the Bhagidari scheme. In K. Coelho, L. Kamath, et M. Vijayabaskar (Eds.), Participolis. Consent and contention in neoliberal and urban India (pp. 207–221). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tawa Lama-Rewal, S. (2018). Les avatars de la participation: Forme et ambiguïtés de la démocratie participative en Inde. du Croquant.
   Google Scholar
• Tawa Lama-Rewal, S. (2019). Political representation in the discourse and practices of the ‘party of the common man’ in India. Politics and Governance, 7(3), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i3.2122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawa Lama-Rewal, S., et Zérah, M.-H. (2011). Introduction urban democracy: A South Asian perspective. South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal, 5 (December). https://doi.org/10.4000/samaj.3188
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, K. (2014). Democratic metropolitan governance: Experiences in five German metropolitan regions. Urban Research & Practice, 7(2), 182–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2014.910923
   Google Scholar