Governing ‘places that don’t matter’: agonistic spatial planning practices in Finnish peripheral regions

REFERENCES

• Act on Regional Development (7/2014) (unofficial translation). https://www.uudenmaanliitto.fi/files/6470/Act_on_regional_development.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2012). Post-political spatial planning in England: A crisis of consensus? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00468.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aro, T. (2007). Valikoiva muuttoliike osana pitkän aikavälin maassamuuttokehitystä. Yhteiskuntapolitiikka, 72(4), 371–379.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, S. (2011). Negotiating a ‘democratic ethos’: Moving beyond the agonistic – Communicative divide. Planning Theory, 10(2), 161–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095210383081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2003). Metropolitan institutional reform and the rescaling of state space in contemporary Western Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(4), 297–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697764030104002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of “actually existing neoliberalism”. Antipode, 34(3), 349–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, R. J. (2018). Counter-governance: Citizen participation beyond collaboration. Politics and Governance, 6(1), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i1.1221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, L., Poelman, H., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2019). The geography of EU discontent. Regional Studies, 54(6), 737–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1654603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias, A. (2008). Introduction: Whatever happened to the Europe of the regions? Revisiting the regional dimension of European politics. Regional & Federal Studies, 18(5), 483–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597560802351655
   Google Scholar
• Eskelinen, H. (2001). Aluepolitiikka rautahäkissä. Polemia 41. Kunnallisalan kehittämissäätiö.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2007). Territorial cohesion policy and the European model of society. European Planning Studies, 15(4), 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310701232079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnish Ministry of Finances. (2013). Kainuun hallintokokeilun päättyminen. Seurantasihteeristön Loppuraportti. Hallinnon kehittäminen 5/2013.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power. Democracy in practice. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen, A.-K. (2008). Aika ennen aluepolitiikkaa. Pohjoisen kehityshankkeet ja alueiden kehittämisen idea 1950-luvun Suomessa. Helsingin yliopisto, Maantieteen laitos.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning. Shaping places in fragmented societies. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1998). Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 30(9), 1531–1546. https://doi.org/10.1068/a301531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. (2003). ‘Agon’izing over consensus: Why Habermasian ideals cannot be ‘real’? Planning Theory, 2(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095203002001005
   Google Scholar
• Humer, A., & Granqvist, K. (2020). The gradual city-ness and town-ness of public service locations: Towards spatially sensitive sector policies. Geoforum, 113, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jäntti, A. (2016). Kunta, muutos ja kuntamuutos. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 2215. Tampere University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jäntti, A., Airaksinen, J., & Haveri, A. (2010). Siniset ajatukset. Vapaasta pudotuksesta hallittuun sopeuttamiseen. Valtiovarainministeriön julkaisuja 20/2010. Finnish Ministry of Finances.
   Google Scholar
• Jauhiainen, J. S. (2008). Regional and innovation policies in Finland – Towards convergence and/or mismatch? Regional Studies, 42(7), 1031–1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701543140
   Google Scholar
• Kainuun liitto. (2020). Nälkämaan laulu. https://www.kainuunliitto.fi/nalkamaan-laulu
   Google Scholar
• Keating, M. (1997). The invention of regions: Political restructuring and territorial government in Western Europe. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 15(4), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1068/c150383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, M. (2008). A quarter century of the Europe of the regions. Regional & Federal Studies, 18(5), 629–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597560802351630
   Google Scholar
• Keskusta. (2019). Tuntematon keskusta – johtopäätöksiä kevään 2019 vaaleista. https://keskusta.fi/loader.aspx?id=66ff89b8-3a82-4a34-8cd8-7af730423cd4
   Google Scholar
• Kinnunen, V. (2018). Tulevaisuuksien muotoilua Lapin varhaisessa seutusuunnittelussa. Alue & Ympäristö, 47(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.30663/ay.65038
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics (2nd ed.). Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Land Use and Building Act (132/1999) (unofficial translation). https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1999/en19990132.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Luukkonen, J. (2011). The Europeanization of regional development: Local strategies and European spatial visions in Northern Finland. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 93(3), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2011.00376.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, G. (1999). Place, politics and ‘scale dependence’: Exploring the structuration of euro-regionalism. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6(3), 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/096977649900600304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancha-Navarro, T., & Garrido-Yserte, R. (2008). Regional policy in the European Union: The cohesion-competitiveness dilemma. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 1(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-7802.2008.00005.x
   Google Scholar
• Mäntylä, M. (2016). Pohjois-Suomea kehittämässä: Periferia Urho Kekkosen politiikan kohteena ja vallankäytön välineenä vuosina 1950–1981. Studia historica septentrionalia, 76, 1–354.
   Google Scholar
• Mattila, H. (2020). Habermas revisited: Resurrecting the contested roots of communicative planning theory. Progress in Planning, 141, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2019.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, R., Tuomisaari, J., Granqvist, K., & Kanninen, V. (2019). The strategic incrementalism of Lahti master planning: Three lessons. Planning Theory & Practice, 20(4), 555–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2019.1652336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MDI (2014). Kainuun tulevaisuuskuva. Kainuun kuntarakenneselvityksen väliraportti. Retrieved December 11, 2020, from https://docplayer.fi/7060647-Kainuun-tulevaisuuskuva.html
   Google Scholar
• Minkkinen, P. (2019). Agonism, democracy, and law. In M. Del Mar, B. Meyler, & S. Stern (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of law and the humanities (pp. 427–442). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moisio, S. (2006, April 8). Aluepolitiikka syntyi torjumaan kommunismin uhkaa. Helsingin Sanomat.
   Google Scholar
• Moisio, S. (2008). Towards attractive and cost-efficient state space: Political geography of the production of state transformation in Finland. World Political Science, 4(3), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-6226.1053
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics. Thinking the world politically. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2018). For a left populism. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, V. (2006). The role and scope of spatial planning. Literature review. Spatial plans in practice: Supporting the reform of spatial planning. Department for Communities and Local Government.
   Google Scholar
• Nordberg, K. (2014). On the democracy and relevance of governance networks. The case of Ostrobothnia, Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 18(2), 23–48.
   Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (2002). Bounded spaces in the mobile world: Deconstructing ‘regional identity’. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 93(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (2013). Regional planning and the mobilization of ‘regional identity’: From bounded spaces to relational complexity. Regional Studies, 47(8), 1206–1219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.661410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pløger, J. (2004). Strife: Urban planning and agonism. Planning Theory, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095204042318
   Google Scholar
• Pløger, J. (2018). Conflict and agonism. In M. Gunder, A. Madanipour, & W. Watson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of planning theory (pp. 264–275). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pulkkinen, P. (1998). Opiskelijat ja työttömät muuttavat keskuksiin. In A.-M. Kontio (Ed.), Tilastokeskuksen Kuntapuntari 2/1998. Väestö ja muuttoliike (pp. 3–7). Tilastokeskus.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. (2008). Recapturing democracy. Neoliberalization and the struggle for alternative urban futures. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. (2009). Resisting neoliberalization: Communicative planning or counter-hegemonic movements? Planning Theory, 8(2), 140–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095209102232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purkarthofer, E. (2018). Understanding Europeanisation from within: The interpretation, implementation and instrumentalisation of European spatial planning in Austria and Finland [Doctoral dissertation, Aalto University]. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/34575
   Google Scholar
• Purkarthofer, E., & Mattila, H. (2018). Integrating regional development and planning into “spatial planning” in Finland: The untapped potential of the Kainuu experiment. Administrative Culture, 18(2), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.32994/ac.v18i2.166
   Google Scholar
• Remahl, T. (2008). Aluepolitiikan yhteiskunnalliset merkitykset ja muutos. Hyvinvointivaltiosta kilpailuvaltioon. Nordia Geographical Publications, 37(5), 1–141.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (2007). Understanding governance: Ten years on. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1243–1264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607076586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018). The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roskamm, N. (2015). On the other side of “agonism”: “The enemy,” the “outside,” and the role of antagonism. Planning Theory, 14(4), 384–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095214533959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saukkonen, P. (2012). Suomalaisen yhteiskunnan poliittinen kulttuuri. In K. Paakkunainen (Ed.), Suomalaisen politiikan murroksia ja muutoksia (Vol. 1, pp. 27–51). Politiikan ja talouden tutkimuksen laitoksen julkaisuja.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C. (1976). The concept of the political. Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, M. (1998). Competitiveness and cohesion – Are the two compatible? Research Policy, 27(6), 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00057-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöblom, S. (2010). Finland: The limits of the unitary decentralized model. In F. Hendriks, A. Lidström, & J. Loughlin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of local and regional democracy (pp. 241–260). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. (2002). Democratic theory and network governance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 24(4), 693–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2002.11029383
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfving, J. (2005). Network governance and post-liberal democracy. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27(2), 197–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2005.11029489
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M. (2010). Regional development and regional networks: The role of regional development officers in Finland. European Urban and Regional Studies, 17(4), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776409352581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, P. (2013). Twenty years of multi-level governance: ‘Where does it come from? What is it? Where is it going?’. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(6), 817–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.781818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatham, M. (2008). Going solo: Direct regional representation in the European Union. Regional & Federal Studies, 18(5), 493–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597560802351523
   Google Scholar
• Tatham, M. (2017). Networkers, fund hunters, intermediaries, or policy players? The activities of regions in Brussels. West European Politics, 40(5), 1088–1108. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1303246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tervo, H. (2003). Onko maallamme yhä malttia vaurastua? Kansantaloudellinen aikakauskirja, 99(1), 80–85.
   Google Scholar
• Tervo, H. (2005). Regional policy lessons from Finland. In D. Felsenstein, & B. A. Portnov (Eds.), Regional disparities in small countries. Advances in Spatial Science (pp. 267–282). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Toivanen, T. (2018). Pohjoinen polku kapitalismin ympäristöhistoriaan. Tervakapitalismi, yhteisvauraus ja sosioekologinen mullistus 1800-luvun Kainuussa. Publications of the Faculty of Social Sciences 99/2018. University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Vanolo, A. (2010). European spatial planning between competitiveness and territorial cohesion: Shadows of neo-liberalism. European Planning Studies, 18(8), 1301–1315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654311003791358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterhout, B. (2008). Institutionalisation of European spatial planning. Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Westphal, M. (2019). Overcoming the institutional deficit of agonistic democracy. Res Publica (Liverpool), 25(2), 187–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-018-9397-2
   Google Scholar