Asymmetric decentralization, accommodation and separatist conflict: lessons from Aceh and Papua, Indonesia

REFERENCES

• Aalen, L., & Muriaas, R. L. (2017). Power calculations and political decentralisation in African post-conflict states. International Political Science Review, 38(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512115615704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmady, I., Ubaidullah, U., & Hasan, E. (2018, October 17–18). The cycle and risk of conflict in Aceh post Helsinki MoU. Proceedings of the 1st Aceh global conference (AGC 2018), Atlantis Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. (2015). Papua’s insecurity: State failure in the Indonesian periphery. Policy Studies, 73, 1–92.
   Google Scholar
• Anggraini, L., Maksum, I. R., & Halidin, H. (2019). Organizational conflict model in managing indigenous Papuans local economic development: A case study of Jayapura. International Journal of Administrative Science and Organization, 26(1), 33–44.
   Google Scholar
• Aspinall, E. (2005). The Helsinki agreement: A more promising basis for peace in Aceh? Policy Studies, 20, 1–120.
   Google Scholar
• Aspinall, E. (2007). The construction of grievance: Natural resources and identity in a separatist conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(6), 950–972. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002707307120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspinall, E., & Crouch, H. (2003). The Aceh peace process: Why it failed? Policy Studies, 1, 1–90.
   Google Scholar
• Bakiner, O. (2019). Why do peace negotiations succeed or fail? Legal commitment, transparency, and inclusion during peace negotiations in Colombia (2012–2016) and Turkey (2012–2015). Negotiation Journal, 35(4), 471–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barter, S. J. (2008). Resources, religion, rebellion: The sources and lessons of Acehnese separatism. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 19(1), 39–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592310801905769
   Google Scholar
• Barter, S. J., & Côté, I. (2015). Strife of the soil? Unsettling transmigrant conflicts in Indonesia. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 46(1), 60–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463414000617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basta, K. (2017). The state between minority and majority nationalism: Decentralization, symbolic recognition, and secessionist crises in Spain and Canada. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 48(1), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjx048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand, J. (2004). Nationalism and ethnic conflict in Indonesia. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brancati, D. (2006). Decentralization: Fueling the fire or dampening the flames of ethnic conflict and secessionism? International Organization, 60(1), 651–685. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830606019X
   Google Scholar
• Brancati, D. (2008). The origins and strength of regional parties. British Journal of Political Science, 38(1), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brancati, D. (2009). Peace by design: Managing intrastate conflict through decentralization. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brata, A. G., & Lagendijk, A. (2013). Diversity issues in local development in Papua. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 8(2), 64–80.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2005). Rebuilding governance in failed states and post-conflict societies: Core concepts and cross-cutting themes. Public Administration and Development, 25(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. K. (2008). Decentralisation and conflict: Introduction and overview. Conflict, Security & Development, 8(4), 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678800802539283
   Google Scholar
• Bunce, V. (1999). Subversive institutions: The design and the destruction of socialism and the state. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bunce, V., & Watts, S. (2005). Managing diversity and sustaining democracy: Ethnofederal versus unitary states in the postcommunist world. In P. G. Roeder & D. Rothchild (Eds.), Sustainable peace: Power and democracy after civil wars (pp. 133–158). Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cederman, L.-E., Hug, S., Schadel, A., & Wucherpfennig, J. (2015). Territorial autonomy in the shadow of conflict: Too little, too late? American Political Science Review, 109(2), 354–370. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055415000118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, T., & Roeder, P. G. (2007). Partition as a solution to wars of nationalism: The importance of institutions. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 677–691. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055407070438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauvel, R. (2001). Where nationalisms collide. Inside Indonesia, 67(July–September), https://www.insideindonesia.org/where-nationalisms-collide
   Google Scholar
• Chauvel, R., & Bhakti, I. N. (2004). The Papua conflict: Jakarta’s perceptions and policies. Policy Studies, 5, 1–100.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, S. E. (2002). Autonomy as a source of conflict: Caucasian conflicts in theoretical perspective. World Politics, 54(2), 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2002.0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, K. D. (2000). Aceh – the ‘special territory’ in North Sumatra: A self-fulfilling promise? Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 20(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602000050008915
   Google Scholar
• Diprose, R. (2009). Decentralization, horizontal inequalities and conflict management in Indonesia. Ethnopolitics, 8(1), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449050902738804
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, K. (2006). The downside of decentralization: Armed clientelism in Colombia. Security Studies, 15(4), 533–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410601188463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, B., & Yilmaz, S. (2016). Decentralization as a post-conflict stabilization tool: The case of Sierra Leone. Public Administration and Development, 36(5), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, B., Yilmaz, S., & Boex, J. (2015). Decentralization as a post-conflict strategy: Local government discretion and accountability in Sierra Leone. Public Administration and Development, 35(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfversson, E., & Sjögren, A. (2020). Do local power-sharing deals reduce ethnopolitical hostility? The effects of ‘negotiated democracy’ in a devolved Kenya. Ethnopolitics, 19(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2019.1583483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fakhrurrazi. (2011). Peran Badan Reintegrasi Damai Aceh dalam proses gencatan senjata, demobilisasi, dan reintegrasi di Aceh [The role of Aceh Reintegration Agency in ceasefire, demobilization, and reintegration process in Aceh]. Jurnal Komunitas, 3(1), 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrazzi, G. (2000). Using the ‘F’ word: Federalism in Indonesia’s decentralization discourse. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 30(2), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a030085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flamand, S. (2019). Partial decentralization as a way to prevent secessionist conflict. European Journal of Political Economy, 59, 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon, A.-G., & Keating, M. (2012). Political autonomy and divided societies: Imagining democratic alternatives in complex settings. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gjoni, R., Wetterberg, A., & Dunbar, D. (2010). Decentralization as a conflict transformation tool: The challenge in Kosovo. Public Administration and Development, 30(5), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, E. D. (2008). Decentralisation and conflict in Uganda. Conflict, Security & Development, 8(4), 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678800802539317
   Google Scholar
• Gurr, T. R. (2000). Peoples versus states: Minorities at risk in the new century. US. Institute of Peace Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gurr, T. R. (2002). Attaining peace in divided societies: Five principles of emerging doctrine. International Journal on World Peace, 19(2), 27–51.
   Google Scholar
• Hartzell, C., & Hoddie, M. (2007). Crafting peace: Power-sharing institutions and the negotiated settlement of civil wars. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hechter, M. (2000). Containing nationalism. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, B. (2007). Aceh’s rebels turn to ruling. Far Eastern Economic Review, 170(1), 49–52.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, B. (2012). Ethnic politics and local political parties in Indonesia. Asian Ethnicity, 13(4), 419–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2012.710078
   Google Scholar
• Hofman, B., & Kaiser, K. (2004). The making of ‘big bang’ and its aftermath: A political economy perspective. In J. Alm, J. Martinez-Vasquez, & S. Mulyani (Eds.), Reforming intergovernmental fiscal relations and the rebuilding Indonesia: The ‘big bang’ program and its economic consequences (pp. 15–46). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, D. L. (1985). Ethnic groups in conflict. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, D. L. (1993). The challenge of ethnic conflict: Democracy in divided societies. Journal of Democracy, 4(4), 18–38. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1993.0054
   Google Scholar
• Kanol, D. (2015). Inclusiveness and the perceived legitimacy of peace treaties: Findings from a survey experiment in Northern Cyprus. The Cyprus Review, 27(2), 89–102.
   Google Scholar
• Kingsbury, D. (2007). The free Aceh movement: Islam and democratisation. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 37(2), 166–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472330701253759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirksey, E. (2012). Freedom in entangled worlds: West Papua and the architecture of global power. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kivimäki, T. (2006). Initiating a peace process in Papua: Actors, issues, process and the role of the international community. Policy Studies, 25, 1–101.
   Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W. (1998). Is federalism a viable alternative to secessionism? In B. Percy (Ed.), Theories of secessionism (pp. 111–150). Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. (2020). Political orders and peace-building: Ending the Aceh conflict. Conflict, Security & Development, 20(1), 115–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2019.1705071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lele, G. (2019). Asymmetric decentralization and the problem of governance: The case of Indonesia. Asian Politics and Policy, 11(4), 544–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (2008). Thinking about democracy: Power sharing and majority rule in theory and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, A. (2012). Between the integration and accommodation of ethnic difference: Decentralization in the Republic of Macedonia. Journal of Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 11(3), 80–103.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, A. (2015). Political decentralization and the strengthening of consensual, participatory local democracy in the Republic of Macedonia. Democratization, 22(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.834331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, A. (2016). Decentralisation and the management of ethnic conflict: Lessons from the Republic of Macedonia. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, A. (2020). Confronting the empirical and normative challenges to power-sharing governance. Ethnopolitics, 19(1), 85–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2019.1569858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S. M., & Vaughn, B. (2013). Autonomy in the southern borderland of Nepal: A formula for security or cause of conflict? Journal of Borderlands Studies, 28(2), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2013.859808
   Google Scholar
• McGarry, J., O’Leary, B., & Simeon, R. (2008). Integration or accommodation? The enduring debate in conflict regulation. In S. Choudhry (Ed.), Constitutional design for divided societies: Integration or accommodation? (pp. 41–88). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGibbon, R. (2004a). Plural society in peril: Migration, economic change, and the Papua conflict. Policy Studies, 13, 1–99.
   Google Scholar
• McGibbon, R. (2004b). Secessionist challenges in Aceh and Papua: Is special autonomy the solution? Policy Studies, 10, 1–126.
   Google Scholar
• Meuleman, J. (2006). Between unity and diversity: The construction of the Indonesian nation. European Journal of East Asian Studies, 5(1), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006106777998115
   Google Scholar
• Miller, M. A. (2009). Rebellion and reform in Indonesia: Jakarta’s security and autonomy policies in Aceh. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nancheva, N. (2016). Aisling Lyon, decentralisation and the management of ethnic conflict: Lessons from the Republic of Macedonia. Oxford: Routledge, 2016. Pp. 248. £90.00 (hbk); ISBN: 9781138944114. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 22(2), 243–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537113.2016.1169794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandwani, B. (2019). Decentralisation, economic inequality and insurgency. The Journal of Development Studies, 55(7), 1379–1397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2018.1475650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumeyer, H. (2006). Unity in diversity or diversity in unity: Indonesia’s process of political decentralization and its effects on conflicts. Law and Politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America, 39(3), 292–305.
   Google Scholar
• Ostwald, K., Tajima, Y., & Samphantharak, K. (2016). Indonesia’s decentralization experiment: Motivations, successes, and unintended consequences. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 33(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1355/ae33-2b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paffenholz, T. (2014). Civil society and peace negotiations: Beyond the inclusion–exclusion dichotomy. Negotiation Journal, 30(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierskallaa, J. H., & Sacks, A. (2017). Unpacking the effect of decentralized governance on routine violence: Lessons from Indonesia. World Development, 90(C), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.09.008
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, D. (2012). Laughing at leviathan: Sovereignty and audience in West Papua. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, D. (2013). Living, as it were, in the stone age. Indonesia, 95(April), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1353/ind.2013.0004
   Google Scholar
• Saltford, J. (2003). The United Nations and the Indonesian takeover of West Papua, 1962–1969: The anatomy of betrayal. RoutledgeCurzon.
   Google Scholar
• Sambanis, N., Germann, M., & Schädel, A. (2018). SDM: A new data set on self-determination movements with an application to the reputational theory of conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(3), 656–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002717735364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambanis, N., & Milanovic, B. (2014). Explaining regional autonomy differences in decentralized countries. Comparative Political Studies, 47(13), 1830–1855. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013520524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneckener, U., & Wolff, S. (Eds.). (2004). Managing and settling ethnic conflicts: Perspectives on successes and failures in Europe, Africa and Asia. Hurst and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Schou, A., & Haug, M. (2005). Desentralisation in conflict and post-conflict situations. Working Paper, 139, 1–42.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze, K. E. (2003). The struggle for an independent Aceh: The ideology, capacity, and strategy of GAM. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 26(4), 241–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/10576100390209304
   Google Scholar
• Schulze, K. E. (2004). The free Aceh movement (GAM): Anatomy of a separatist organization. Policy Studies, 2, 1–92.
   Google Scholar
• Siegle, J., & O’Mahony, P. (2006). Assessing the merits of decentralization as a conflict mitigation strategy. Office of Democracy and Governance, USAID.
   Google Scholar
• Sindre, G. M. (2018). From secessionism to regionalism: Intra-organizational change and ideological moderation within armed secessionist movements. Political Geography, 64, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, J. (2000). From voting to violence: Democratization and nationalist conflict. W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Sorens, J. (2012). Secessionism: Identity, interest and strategy. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sukma, R. (2004). Security operations in Aceh: Goals, consequences, and lessons. Policy Studies, 3, 1–76.
   Google Scholar
• Tadjoeddin, M. Z. (2011). The economic origins of Indonesia’s secessionist conflicts. Civil Wars, 13(3), 312–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2011.600009
   Google Scholar
• Thaib, L. (2000). Aceh’s case: Possible solution to a festering conflict. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 20(1), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602000050008924
   Google Scholar
• Thorburn, C. (2012). Building blocks and stumbling blocks: Peacebuilding in Aceh, 2005–2009. Indonesia, 93(April), 83–122. https://doi.org/10.5728/indonesia.93.0083
   Google Scholar
• True, J., & Morales, Y. R. (2019). Towards inclusive peace: Analysing gender-sensitive peace agreements 2000–2016. International Political Science Review, 40(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512118808608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M. (2006). From commitment to consequences: Comparative experiences of decentralization in the Philippines, Indonesia and Cambodia. Public Management Review, 8(2), 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600587471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, G. J. (2016). Decentralisation as a post-conflict state-building strategy in Northern Ireland, Sri Lanka, Sierra Leone, and Rwanda. Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal, 1(6), 898–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802014.2016.1369859
   Google Scholar
• Walter, B. (2006). Building reputation: Why governments fight some separatists but not others. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00186.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, R. L. (2015). Can federal political systems accommodate national minorities? In E. M. Belser, A. Fang-Bär, N. Massüger, & R.O. Pillai (Eds.), States falling apart? Secessionist and autonomy movements in Europe (pp. 215–246). Stämpfi Verla.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, D. (2002). ‘Already sovereign as a people’: A foundational moment in West Papuan nationalism. Pacific Affairs, 74(4), 507–528. https://doi.org/10.2307/3557804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller, M., & Wolff, S. (2005). Autonomy, self-governance and conflict resolution: Innovative approaches to institutional design in divided societies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wibbels, E., & Bakke, K. (2006). Diversity, disparity, and civil conflict in federal states. World Politics, 59(1), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2007.0013
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, S. (2011). Post-conflict state building: The debate on institutional choice. Third World Quarterly, 32(10), 1777–1802. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2011.610574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, S. (2013). Conflict management in divided societies: The many uses of territorial self-governance. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 20(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-02001003
   Google Scholar
• Working Group for Papua. (2020). The anatomy of Papuan conflict (Research Report). Universitas Gadjah Mada.
   Google Scholar