Agglomeration is in the eye of the beholder: the changing governance of polycentrism

REFERENCES

• Archer, M. S. (1982). Morphogenesis versus structuration: On combining structure and action. The British Journal of Sociology, 33(4), 455–483. https://doi.org/10.2307/589357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, N., Docherty, I., & Turok, I. (2002). Dimensions of city competitiveness: Edinburgh and Glasgow in a UK context. In I. Begg (Ed.), Urban competitiveness: Policies for dynamic cities (pp. 135–160). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, N., & Turok, I. (2001). Central Scotland as a polycentric urban region: Useful planning concept or Chimera? Urban Studies, 38(4), 697–715. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120035295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bristow, G. (2005). Everyone’s a ‘winner’: Problematising the discourse of regional competitiveness. Journal of Economic Geography, 5(3), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbh063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger, M., & Meijers, E. (2012). Form follows function? Linking morphological and functional polycentricity. Urban Studies, 49(5), 1127–1149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011407095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Civil Aviation Authority. (2018). 2018 passenger survey report. https://www.caa.co.uk/uploadedFiles/CAA/Content/Standard_Content/Data_and_analysis/Datasets/Passenger_survey/T05_2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G. (2016). Cities, global cities and Glasgow – Some reflections. University of Strathclyde International Public Policy Institute (IPPI), Occasional Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2003). EUROPEAN BRIEFING: Polycentricity in European spatial planning: From an analytical tool to a normative agenda. European Planning Studies, 11(8), 979–999. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431032000146169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Docherty, I., Gulliver, S., & Drake, P. (2004). Exploring the potential benefits of city collaboration. Regional Studies, 38(4), 445–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/03434002000213950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst and Young. (2013, October). Edinburgh Glasgow improvement programme. Final business case.
   Google Scholar
• Fedeli, V., Feiertag, P., & Harrison, J. (2020). Invoking new metropolitan imaginaries: What type of metropolitan region for what kind of metropolitan planning and governance? In K. Zimmerman, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 173–192). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, P., & Cann, R. (2013). Linking Glasgow and Edinburgh – The Glasgow Edinburgh collaboration Initiative. AECOM. http://starconference.org.uk/star/2013/FinchCann.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L. (2005). Four challenges for Scotland’s cities. In D. Coyle, W. Alexander, & B. Ashcroft (Eds.), New wealth for old nations: Scotland's economic prospects (pp. 73–95). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L. (2011). Triumph of the city. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Glasgow City Council. (2010a). Glasgow – Edinburgh collaboration initiative. report for the business and the economy policy development committee, 2 June.
   Google Scholar
• Glasgow City Council. (2010b). GECI Framework for Action. May.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, D. J. (2007). Agglomeration, productivity and transport investment. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 41(3), 317–343.
   Google Scholar
• Granqvist, K., Sarjamo, S., & Mäntysalo, R. (2019). Polycentricity as spatial imaginary: The case of Helsinki city Plan. European Planning Studies, 27(4), 739–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1569596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. (2020). Seeing like a business: Rethinking the role of business in regional development, planning and governance. Territory, Politics, Governance, online first April 8. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1743201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J., & Growe, A. (2014). When regions Collide: In what sense a New ‘regional Problem’? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 46(10), 2332–2352. https://doi.org/10.1068/a130341p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., & Allmendinger, P. (2015). Fluid spatial imaginaries: Evolving Estuarial city-regional spaces. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(5), 857–873. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hincks, S., Deas, I., & Haughton, G. (2017). Real geographies, real economies and Soft spatial imaginaries: Creating a ‘more than Manchester’ region. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(4), 642–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoole, C., & Hincks, S. (2020). Performing the city-region: Imagineering, devolution and the search for legitimacy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(8), 1583–1601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20921207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. (2019). National Planning Framework 4 – The Essentials! Scottish Government blog. https://blogs.gov.scot/planning-architecture/2019/10/08/national-planning-framework-4-the-essentials/
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2016). Territory, politics, governance and multispatial metagovernance. Territory, Politics, Governance, 4(1), 8–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2015.1123173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., Brenner, N., & Jones, M. (2008). Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(3), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1068/d9107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas, A. E. G. (2012). Region and place: Regionalism in question. Progress in Human Geography, 36(2), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510394118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. (2009). Phase space: Geography, relational thinking, and beyond. Progress in Human Geography, 33(4), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508101599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M., & Jessop, B. (2010). Thinking state/space incompossibly. Antipode, 42(5), 1119–1149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00796.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, B., & Bradley, J. (2013). The metropolitan Revolution: How cities and metros are fixing our broken politics and Fragile economy. Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lever, W. F. (1991). Deindustrialisation and the reality of the post-industrial city. Urban Studies, 28(6), 983–999. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989120081161
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon. (2011). Reconstructing scale: Towards a new scalar politics. Progress in Human Geography, 35(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510367841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. (2020). Governing uneven development: The Northern powerhouse as a ‘state spatial strategy’. Territory, Politics, Governance, online first April 7. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1743202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., Pike, A., Tyler, P., & Gardiner, B. (2016). Spatially rebalancing the UK economy: Towards a new policy model? Regional Studies, 50(2), 342–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1118450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGeoch, A. (2019). The economic rise of the east: Scotland’s powerhouse region. Fraser of Allander Institute blog, 28 October.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, A., Glass, A., & Greig, M. (2001). Spreading the benefits of growth. Training and Employment Research Unit, University of Glasgow. Unpublished report, June.
   Google Scholar
• Meijers, E. J. (2008). Measuring polycentricity and its promises. European Planning Studies, 16(9), 1313–1323. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310802401805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, E. J., & Burger, M. J. (2017). Stretching the concept of ‘borrowed size’. Urban Studies, 54(1), 269–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015597642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthumala, A. (2020). ‘Levelling up’: How can economic growth and prosperity be measured across UK regions? House of Commons Library Insight, 3 March. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/insights/levelling-up-how-can-economic-growth-and-prosperity-be-measured-across-uk-regions/
   Google Scholar
• Münter, A., & Volgmann, K. (2021). Polycentric regions: Proposals for a new typology and terminology. Urban Studies, 58(4), 677–695. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020931695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, P. (2019). Spatial imaginaries and institutional change in planning: The case of the Mersey belt in north-west England. European Planning Studies, 27(8), 1503–1522. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1588859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, P., & Pike, A. (2019). ‘Deal or no deal?’ Governing urban infrastructure funding and financing in the UK city deals. Urban Studies, 56(7), 1448–1476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018757394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parr, J. B. (2004). The polycentric urban region: A closer Inspection. Regional Studies, 38(3), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/003434042000211114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parr, J. B. (2005). Perspectives on the city-region. Regional Studies, 39(5), 555–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400500151798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parr, J. B. (2008). Cities and regions: Problems and potentials. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 40(12), 3009–3026. https://doi.org/10.1068/a40217
   Google Scholar
• Parr, J. B. (2017). The Northern powerhouse: A commentary. Regional Studies, 51(3), 490–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1247951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Sheppard, E. (2010). Worlds apart? Engaging with the World development report 2009: Reshaping economic geography. Economic Geography, 86(4), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2010.01093.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, N. A., & Ozawa, T. (2003). Contrasts in agglomeration: Proto-industrial, industrial and post-industrial forms compared. Progress in Human Geography, 27(5), 583–604. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132503ph449oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purves, G. (2019). Strategic development in Scotland. Report for the UK2070 Commission, April.http://uk2070.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Strategic-Development-in-Scotland-Graeme-Purves-April-2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, S. S., & Strange, W. C. (2008). The attenuation of human capital spillovers. Journal of Urban Economics, 64(2), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2008.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RSA City Growth Commission. (2014). Unleashing metro growth: Final recommendations of the city growth Commission, October.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Executive. (2002). Review of Scotland's cities: The analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Executive. (2004). National planning framework for Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Financial Enterprise. (2018). Scotland’s Financial Services Expertise. October.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2007). The government economic strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2009). National planning framework for Scotland 2.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2014). Scotland’s third national planning framework.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2019). 7 City regions – summary data. https://www.gov.scot/publications/city-regions-summary/
   Google Scholar
• Transport Scotland. (2019). Transport and Travel in Scotland 2018. https://www.transport.gov.scot/publication/transport-and-travel-in-scotland-results-from-the-scottish-household-survey-1/.
   Google Scholar
• Turok, I. (2004). Sources of city prosperity and Cohesion: The case of Glasgow and Edinburgh. In M. Boddy & M. Parkinson (Eds.), City matters: Competitiveness, Cohesion and urban governance (pp. 13–31). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turok, I. (2006). Book review of ‘New wealth for old nations: Scotland’s economic prospects’. Journal of Regional Science, 46(4), 810–812. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2006.00478_12.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turok, I., & Bailey, N. (2004a). Twin track cities? Competitiveness and cohesion in Glasgow and Edinburgh. Progress in Planning, 62(3), 135–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2004.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turok, I., & Bailey, N. (2004b). The theory of polynuclear urban regions and its application to central Scotland. European Planning Studies, 12(3), 371–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431042000195029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Meeteren, M., Poorthuis, A., Derudder, B., & Witlox, F. (2016). Pacifying Babel’s Tower: A scientometric analysis of polycentricity in urban research. Urban Studies, 53(6), 1278–1298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015573455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandermotten, C., Halbert, L., Roelandts, M., & Cornut, P. (2008). European planning and the polycentric Consensus: Wishful thinking? Regional Studies, 42(8), 1205–1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701874206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varró, K. (2014). Spatial imaginaries of the Dutch–German–Belgian Borderlands: A multidimensional analysis of cross-border regional governance. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(6), 2235–2255. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waite, D. (2017). Asset servicing at a second-tier financial centre: Framing embeddedness through mechanisms of the firm–territory nexus. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 80, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waite, D., Maclennan, D., Roy, G., & McNulty, D. (2018). The emergence and evolution of city deals in Scotland. Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary, 42(4), 75–90.
   Google Scholar
• Waite, D., & Morgan, K. (2019). City Deals in the polycentric state: The spaces and politics of Metrophilia in the UK. European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(4), 382–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776418798678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waite, D., Whyte, B., & Muirie, J. (2020). From an agreeable policy label to a practical policy framework: Inclusive growth in city-regions. European Planning Studies, 28(9), 1812–1835. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1691507
   Google Scholar
• Walker, D. (2008, October 1). When two become one. The Guardian. Retrieved June22, 20, from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2008/oct/01/glasgow.edinburgh.connectivity.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2008). World development report 2009: Reshaping economic geography.
   Google Scholar