2,292
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Neoliberal commensuration and new enclosures of the commons: mining and market–environmentalism governmentalities

, &
Pages 1480-1500 | Received 27 Mar 2020, Published online: 27 Apr 2021

REFERENCES

  • Achterhuis, H., Boelens, R., & Zwarteveen, M. (2010). Water property relations and modern policy regimes: Neoliberal utopia and the disempowerment of collective action. In D. Boelens, A. Getches, & G.-G. Out (Eds.), Out of the mainstream: Water rights, politics and identity (pp. 27–56). Earthscan.
  • Acueducto Metropolitano de Bucaramanga (AMB). (2014). Usos, oferta y demanda de Agua Potable. Informe de Sustentabilidad. Bucaramanga. AMB.
  • Acueducto Metropolitano de Bucaramanga (AMB). (2016). Informe de Gestión. Bucaramanga.
  • Bakker, K. (2010). The limits of ‘neoliberal natures’: Debating green neoliberalism. Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), 715–735. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510376849
  • Bakker, K. (2014). The business of water: Market environmentalism in the water sector. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39(1), 469–494. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-070312-132730
  • Baptiste, B. (2011, October 11). La importancia de Santurbán. [Blog] Conciencia Ciudadana. http://concienciaciudadana.org/la-importancia-de-Santurbán/.
  • Baud, M., Boelens, R., & Damonte, G. (2019a). Nuevos capitalismos y transformaciones territoriales en la región Andina. Estudios Atacameños, 63, 195–208. https://doi.org/10.22199/issn.0718-1043-2019-0033
  • Baud, M., Boelens, R., de Castro, F., Hogenboom, B., Klaufus, C., Koonings, K., & Ypeij, A. (2019b). Commoning Xela: Negotiating collective spaces around a Central American intermediate city. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 108(108), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.32992/erlacs.10584
  • Bebbington, A., & Bury, J. (Eds.). (2013). Subterranean struggles: New dynamics of mining, oil, and gas in Latin America. University of Texas Press.
  • Boelens, R., Hoogesteger, J., & Baud, M. (2015). Water reform governmentality in Ecuador: Neoliberalism, centralization and the restraining of polycentric authority and community rule-making. Geoforum, 64, 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.07.005
  • Boelens, R., Hoogesteger, J., Swyngedouw, E., Vos, J., & Wester, P. (2016). Hydrosocial territories: A political ecology perspective. Water International, 41(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2016.1134898
  • Buitrago, E. (2012). Entre el Agua y el Oro: Tensiones y Reconfiguraciones Territoriales en el Municipio de Vetas, Santander, Colombia [Bachelor thesis]. Universidad Nacional, Bogotá.
  • Cardoso, A. (2018). Valuation languages along the coal chain from Colombia to the Netherlands and to Turkey. Ecological Economics, 146, 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.09.012
  • Castaño, D. (2014, December 20). Con la delimitación, la minería tiene una ‘puerta’ entreabierta en Santurbán. Vanguardia. www.vanguardia.com/economia/local/292032-con-la-delimitacion-la-mineria-tiene-una-puerta-entreabierta-en-santurban.
  • Castellanos, C. M. (2011, March 4). Consideraciones para no conceder la licencia ambiental del proyecto Agostura explotación a cielo abierto de minerales Auroargentíferos en el páramo de Santurbán. [Presentation to defend Santurbán páramo]. Luis Carlos Pérez Attorneys’ Collective. https://www.colectivodeabogados.org/porque-no-se-le-ha-negado-la-licencia-ambiental/.
  • Cohen, A., & Bakker, K. (2014). The eco-scalar fix: Rescaling environmental governance and the politics of ecological boundaries in Alberta, Canada. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(1), 128–146. https://doi.org/10.1068/d0813
  • Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality. Power and rule in modern society (2nd ed.). Sage.
  • De Castro, F., Hogenboom, B., & Baud, M. (2016). Environmental governance in Latin America. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907–1912. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091015
  • Dressler, W. H., & Guieb, E. R. (2015). Violent enclosures, violated livelihoods: Environmental and military territoriality in a Philippine frontier. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 42(2), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.991718
  • Duarte, C. (2012, June 1). Gobernabilidad Minera: Cronologías legislativas del subsuelo en Colombia. [Blog]. http://gobernabilidadminera.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/gobernabilidad-minera-cronologicc81as-legislativas-del-subsuelo-en-colombia.pdf.
  • Duarte-Abadía, B., & Boelens, R. (2016). Disputes over territorial boundaries and diverging valuation languages: The Santurbán hydrosocial highlands territory in Colombia. Water International, 41(1), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2016.1117271
  • Duarte-Abadía, B., & Boelens, R. (2019). Colonizing rural waters: The politics of hydro-territorial transformation in the Guadalhorce Valley, Málaga, Spain. Water International, 44(2), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2019.1578080
  • Duarte-Abadía, B., Boelens, R., & Roa-Avendaño, T. (2015). Hydropower, encroachment and the re-patterning of hydrosocial territory: The case of Hidrosogamoso in Colombia. Human Organization, 74(3), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.17730/0018-7259-74.3.243
  • Dupuits, E. (2019). Water community networks and the appropriation of neoliberal practices: Social technology, depoliticization, and resistance. Ecology and Society, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10857-240220
  • Dupuits, E., Baud, M., Boelens, R., de Castro, F., & Hogenboom, B. (2020). Scaling up but losing out? Water commons’ dilemmas between transnational movements and grassroots struggles in Latin America. Ecological Economics, 172, 106625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106625
  • Eaton, K. (2015). Disciplining regions: Subnational contention in neoliberal Peru. Territory, Politics, Governance, 3(2), 124–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2015.1005126
  • Elden, S. (2009). Terror and territory: The spatial extent of sovereignty. University of Minnesota Press.
  • El Tiempo. (2011, July 10). Estamos a puertas de una tragedia ambiental: Exministro de Minas (Interview Manuel Rodríguez-Becerra). El Tiempo. www.eltiempo.com/archivo/documento/CMS-9866464.
  • Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development. The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton University Press.
  • Escobar, A. (2008). Territories of difference: Place, movements, life, redes. Duke University Press.
  • Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (1998). Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 313–343. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.313
  • Ferguson, J., & Gupta, A. (2002). Spatializing states: Toward an ethnography of neoliberal governmentality. American Ethnologist, 29(4), 981–1002. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2002.29.4.981
  • Fletcher, R. (2010). Neoliberal environmentality: Towards a poststructuralist political ecology of the conservation debate. Conservation and Society, 8(3), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.73806
  • Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). University of Chicago Press.
  • Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population. Springer.
  • Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics. Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Goldman, M. (2011). The birth of a discipline: Producing authoritative green knowledge, world bank-style. Ethnography, 2(2), 191–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/14661380122230894
  • Gonzalez-Vicente, R. (2020). The liberal peace fallacy: Violent neoliberalism and the temporal and spatial traps of state-based approaches to peace. Territory, Politics, Governance, 8(1), 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2018.1550012
  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
  • Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford University Press.
  • Hidalgo, J. P., Boelens, R., & Isch, E. (2018). Hydroterritorial configuration and confrontation: The Daule–Peripa multipurpose hydraulic scheme in coastal Ecuador. Latin American Research Review, 53(3), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.25222/larr.362
  • Hommes, L., & Boelens, R. (2017). Urbanizing rural waters: Rural–urban water transfers and the reconfiguration of hydrosocial territories in Lima. Political Geography, 57, 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.12.002
  • Hommes, L., & Boelens, R. (2018). From natural flow to ‘working river’: Hydropower development, modernity and socio-territorial transformations in Lima’s Rímac watershed. Journal of Historical Geography, 62, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2018.04.001
  • Hoogendam, P., & Boelens, R. (2019). Dams and damages. Conflicting epistemological frameworks and interests concerning ‘compensation’ for the Misicuni project’s socio-environmental impacts in Cochabamba, Bolivia. Water, 11(3), 408. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030408
  • Hoogesteger, J., Boelens, R., & Baud, M. (2016). Territorial pluralism: Water users’ multi-scalar struggles against state ordering in Ecuador’s highlands. Water International, 41(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2016.1130910
  • Huxley, M. (2008). Space and government: Governmentality and geography. Geography Compass, 2(5), 1635–1658. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00133.x
  • INGETEC. (2017). Estudio de Impacto ambiental para el proyecto de explotación subterránea de minerales auroargentiferos ‘Soto Norte’. INGETEC.
  • Instituto Alexander Von Humboldt (IAVH). (2011). El gran libro de los páramos. Proyecto páramo andino.
  • Jackson, S. (2018). Water and Indigenous rights: Mechanisms and pathways of recognition, representation, and redistribution. WIREs Water, 2018, 5. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1314.
  • Jessop, B. (2007). State power. Polity.
  • Kilo, E. (2017, June 3). Acueducto de Bucaramanga llegaría a más zonas de la meseta y áreas vecinas. Vanguardia. www.vanguardia.com/area-metropolitana/bucaramanga/399599-acueducto-abre-posibilidad-de-llevar-agua-a-mas-zonas-de-la-me.
  • La Silla, V. (2017, June 18). Rodolfo Hernández-Suárez. La Silla Vacia http://lasillavacia.com/quienesquien/perfilquien/rodolfo-hernandez-suarez.
  • Lefebvre, H. (2009). Dialectical materialism. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Li, F. (2013). Relating different worlds: Mines, aquifers and sacred mountains in Peru. Anthropologica, 55(2), 399–411. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24467345
  • Li, T. M. (2007). The will to improve. Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Duke University Press.
  • Li, T. M. (2011). Rendering society technical: Government through community and the ethnographic turn at the World Bank in Indonesia. In D. Mosse (Ed.), Adventures in Aidland (pp. 57–81). Berghahn.
  • Linton, J., & Budds, J. (2014). The hydrosocial cycle: Defining and mobilizing a relational–dialectical approach to water. Geoforum, 57, 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.10.008
  • Lliso, B., Pascual, U., Engel, S., & Mariel, P. (2020). Payments for ecosystem services or collective stewardship of Mother Earth? Applying deliberative valuation in an indigenous community in Colombia. Ecological Economics, 169, 106499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106499
  • Marks, D. (2019). Assembling the 2011 Thailand floods: Protecting farmers and inundating high-value industrial estates in a fragmented hydro-social territory. Political Geography, 68, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.10.002
  • Martínez-Alier, J. (with Klaus Schluepmann) (1987). Ecological economics. Blackwell.
  • Martínez-Alier, J. (2002). The environmentalism of the poor. Edward Elgar.
  • Martínez-Alier, J., Munda, G., & O'Neill, J. (1998). Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 26(3), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00120-1
  • Marx, K. (1976). Capital: A critique of political economy; Vol I, II, III. Penguin Harmondsworth.
  • Minesa. (2017, October 14). Cuentas Claras Sobre el Agua. Opinión Juan Camilo Montoya. Hechos de Agua.com [Blog]. http://hechosdeagua.com/cuentas-claras-agua/.
  • Minesa. (2017, October 19). Interview Jaime Arteaga [Youtube Video]. Retrieved October 19, 2017, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMPBnBvjf1Y
  • More, T. (1975[1516]). Utopia. Penguin Classics.
  • Neumann, R. P. (2004). Nature–state–territory: Toward a critical theorization of conservation enclosures. In R. Peet, & M. Watts (Eds.), Liberation ecologies (pp. 179–199). Routledge.
  • Osejo, A. (2014). Caracterización del posicionamiento de los actores frente al uso, manejo y conservación del Complejo Jurisdicciones – Santurbán–Berlín. [Internal research document]. IAvH.
  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
  • Pardo, L. A. (2013). Propuestas para recuperar la gobernanza del sector minero colombiano. In J. Viana, O. Alarcón & R. Medina (Eds.), Minería en Colombia (pp. 9–19). Imprenta Nacional and Contraloría General de la Republica.
  • Parra Romero, A. (2019). Producción y movilización de conocimiento en conflictos socioambientales: minería a gran escala y defensa del agua en el páramo de Santurbán-Colombia [Doctoral thesis]. Universidade Estadual de Campinas.
  • Peck, J. (2013). Explaining (with) neoliberalism. Territory, Politics, Governance, 1(2), 132–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2013.785365
  • Perreault, T. (2014). Minería, Agua y Justicia Social en los Andes. Experiencias Comparativas de Perú y Bolivia. CBC and Justica Hídrica.
  • Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Farrar and Rinehart.
  • Redacción Vanguardia. (2018, July 31). Estudian esquema de pagos por servicios ambientales en el Páramo de Santurbán. Vanguardia. www.vanguardia.com/area-metropolitana/bucaramanga/estudian-esquema-de-pago-para-servicios-ambientales-en-el-páramo-de-santurban-FBvl440588.
  • Roa-García, M. C. (2017). Environmental democratization and water justice in extractive frontiers of Colombia. Geoforum, 85, 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.07.014
  • Roa-García, M. C., Urteaga-Crovetto, P., & Bustamante-Zenteno, R. (2015). Water laws in the Andes: A promising precedent for challenging neoliberalism. Geoforum, 64, 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.12.002
  • Roca-Servat, D., & Ocando, L. P. (2019). ‘Sí a la vida, al agua y al territorio’: Relaciones hidrosociales alternativas en colombia. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 107(107), 117–138. https://doi.org/10.32992/erlacs.10389
  • Rodríguez-de-Francisco, J. C., & Boelens, R. (2015). Payment for environmental services: Mobilising an epistemic community to construct dominant policy. Environmental Politics, 24(3), 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1014658
  • Rodríguez-de-Francisco, J. C., & Boelens, R. (2016). PES hydrosocial territories: De-territorialization and re-patterning of water control arenas in the Andean highlands. Water International, 41(1), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2016.1129686
  • Ross, A., & Chang, H. (2020). Socio-hydrology with hydrosocial theory: Two sides of the same coin? Hydrological Sciences Journal, 65(9), 1443–1457. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1761023
  • Sarmiento, C., Cadena, C., Sarmiento, M., Zapata, J., & León, O. (2013). Aportes a la conservación estratégica de los páramos de Colombia: cartografía de los complejos de páramo a escala 1:100.000. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt.
  • Semana Sostenible. (2016, March 9). El fracaso de la delimitación del páramo de Santurbán. Revista Semana. http://sostenibilidad.semana.com/medio-ambiente/articulo/Santurbán-el-fracaso-de-la-delimitacion/34878.
  • Sosa, M., Boelens, R., & Zwarteveen, M. (2017). The influence of large mining: Restructuring water rights among rural communities in apurimac, Peru. Human Organization, 76(3), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.17730/0018-7259.76.3.215
  • Stoltenborg, D., & Boelens, R. (2016). Disputes over land and water rights in gold mining: The case of Cerro de San Pedro, Mexico. Water International, 41(3), 447–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2016.1143202
  • Sullivan, S. (2009). Green capitalism, and the cultural poverty of constructing nature as service provider. Radical Antropology, 3, 18–27.
  • Sullivan, S. (2010). ‘Ecosystem service commodities’: A new imperial ecology? Implications for animist immanent ecologies, with Deleuze and Guattari. New Formations, 69(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.3898/NEWF.69.06.2010
  • Svampa, M. (2015). Commodities consensus: Neoextractivism and enclosure of the commons in Latin America. South Atlantic Quarterly, 114(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-2831290
  • Swyngedouw, E., & Boelens, R. (2018). ‘ … and not a single injustice remains’: hydro–territorial colonization and techno-political transformations in Spain. In R. Boelens, T. Perreault, & J. Vos (Eds.), Water justice (pp. 115–133). Cambridge University Press.
  • Ulloa, A. (2014). Geopolíticas del desarrollo y la confrontación extractivista minera en territorios indígenas en América Latina. In B. Gobel, & A. Ullao (Eds.), Extractivismo minero en Colombia y América Latina (pp. 425–458). Universidad Nacional.
  • Ungar, P., Osejo, A., Roldán, L., & Buitrago, E. (2014). Caracterización del sistema social asociado al territorio. In C. Sarmiento, & P. Ungar (Eds.), Aportes a la delimitación del complejo de páramos Jurisdicciones-Santurbán-Berlín (pp. 54–58). IAvH.
  • Valladares, C., & Boelens, R. (2017). Extractivism and the rights of nature: Governmentality, ‘convenient communities’, and epistemic pacts in Ecuador. Environmental Politics, 26(6), 1015–1034. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1338384
  • Valladares, C., & Boelens, R. (2019). Mining for mother earth. governmentalities, sacred waters and nature’s rights in Ecuador. Geoforum, 100, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.02.009
  • van Teijlingen, K., & Hogenboom, B. (Eds.) (2016). Debating alternative development at the mining frontier: Buen Vivir and the conflict around El Mirador Mine in Ecuador. Journal of Developing Societies, 32(4), 382–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X16667190
  • Vos, J., & Boelens, R. (2018). Neoliberal water governmentalities, virtual water trade, and contestations. In R. Boelens, T. Perreault, & J. Vos (Eds.), Water justice (pp. 283–301). Cambridge University Press.
  • Wilson, N. J., & Inkster, J. (2018). Respecting water: Indigenous water governance, ontologies, and the politics of kinship on the ground. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 1(4), 516–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848618789378
  • Yates, J. S., Harris, L. M., & Wilson, N. J. (2017). Multiple ontologies of water: Politics, conflict and implications for governance. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35(5), 797–815. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775817700395
  • Zapata, J. (2012). Análisis de jurisdicciones Santurbán y Berlín, relativa a los procesos de ordenamiento territorial y actividad minera [consulting report]. IAVH.
  • Zenko, M., & Menga, F. (2019). Linking water scarcity to mental health: Hydro–social interruptions in the Lake Urmia Basin, Iran. Water, 11(5), 1092. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11051092