Governing diversity: a comparative analysis of pragmatic diversity regimes in city centres

REFERENCES

• Adj-Abdou, L. H., & Geddes, A. (2017). Managing superdiversity? Examining the intercultural policy turn in Europe. Policy & Politics, 45(4), 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557317X15016676607077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2012). On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alba, R., & Foner, N. (2013). Comparing immigrant integration in North America and Western Europe: How much do the grand narratives tell us. International Migration Review, 48(1), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12134.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, M. (2007). Cities and labour migration: Comparing policy responses in Amsterdam. Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrosini, M., & Boccagni, P. (2015). Urban multiculturalism beyond the ‘backlash’: New discourses and different practices in immigrant policies across European cities. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 36(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2014.990362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. (2000). The hidden costs of gentrification: Displacement in central London. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 15(4), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010128901782
   Google Scholar
• Bertossi, C., & Duyvendak, J. W. (2012). National models of integration: The costs for comparative research. Comparative European Politics, 10(5), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2012.10
   Google Scholar
• Bianchini, F. (2006). Introduction. European urban mindscapes: Concepts, cultural representations and policy applications. In Godela Weiss-Sussex & Franco Bianchini (Eds.), Urban mindscapes of Europe, European studies (Vol. 23, pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brettell, C. B. (2003). Bringing the city back in: Cities as contexts for immigrant incorporation. In N. Foner (Ed.), American arrivals: Anthropology engages the new immigration (pp. 163–119). School of American Research.
   Google Scholar
• Burchardt, M. (2017). Diversity as neoliberal governmentality: Towards a new sociological genealogy of religion. Social Compass, 64(2), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768617697391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Câmara Municipal de Lisboa (CML). (2010). Carta Estratégica de Lisboa 2010–2024 – Um compromisso para o futuro da cidade. Relatórios 1 a 6, Sumários executivos e Relatório-síntese [Lisbon Strategic Charter 2010–2024]. CML.
   Google Scholar
• Câmara Municipal de Lisboa (CML). (2018). Grandes Opções do Plano para a Cidade de Lisboa 2018/2021 (versão final aprovada em AML a 16 de janeiro 2018) [Major options for the Lisbon City Plan]. CML.
   Google Scholar
• Câmara Municipal de Lisboa (CML). (n.d.). Plano Municipal para a Integração de Imigrantes de Lisboa, 2 vols [Lisbon Municipal Plan for the Integration of Immigrants]. CML.
   Google Scholar
• Caponio, T., & Borkert, M. (2010). Introduction: The local dimension of migration policymaking. In T. Casponio, & M. Borkert (Eds.), The local dimension of migration policymaking (pp. 9–23). Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caponio, T., & Ricucci, R. (2015). Interculturalism: A policy instrument supporting social inclusion? In R. Zapata-Barrero (Ed.), Interculturalism in cities, concept, policy and implementation (pp. 20–34). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, J., Borges, M., Pestana, P., & Quintela, P. (2011). Em Cima da Vila, Manobras no Porto, Setembro e Outubro, Porto.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, J. M. (2019). Immigrants’ acquisition of national citizenship in Portugal and Spain: The role of multiculturalism? Citizenship Studies, 24(2), 228–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2019.1707483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. (2009). Estratégias para a Cultura em Lisboa. Câmara Municipal de Lisboa (CML).
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P., & Magalhães, A. (2014). Novos tempos. Nova vida. Novo centro? Dinâmicas e desafios para uma vida nova do centro histórico de Lisboa, in Revista Rossio, Gabinete de Estudos Olisiponenses/CML, n° 4.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2014). Lisbon: Results of the Intercultural Cities Index, May 2014 – A comparison between more than 50 cities. https://rm.coe.int/16802ff6ce
   Google Scholar
• Cross, M., & Moore, R. (2002). Globalization and the new city: Migrants, minorities and urban transformations in comparative perspective. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• De Frantz, M. (2013). Culture-led urban regeneration: The discursive politics of institutional change. In M. Leary, & J. McCarthy (Eds.), Routledge companion to urban regeneration: Global constraints, local opportunities (pp. 526–535). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Graauw, E., & Vermeulen, F. (2016). Cities and the politics of immigrant integration: A comparison of Berlin, Amsterdam, New York City, and San Francisco. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(6), 989–1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1126089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denters, B., & Rose, L. E. (2005). Towards local governance? In B. Denters, & L. E. Rose (Eds.), Comparing local governance. Trends and developments (pp. 46–62). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Emilsson, H. (2015). A national turn of local integration policy: Multi-level governance dynamics in Denmark and Sweden. Comparative Migration Studies, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-015-0008-5.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G. (2001). Cultural planning. An urban renaissance? Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G. (2005). Measure for measure: Evaluating the evidence of culture’s contribution to regeneration. Urban Studies, 42(5–6), 959–983. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500107102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favell, A. (2000). Philosophies of integration. Immigration and the idea of citizenship in France and Britain. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. (2005). Cities and the creative class. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foner, N., & Rath, J. (2014). New York and Amsterdam: Immigration and the new urban landscape. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, M. L. (2011). Imigração, Diversidade e Política Cultural em Lisboa. Working paper. Centro de Estudos Geográficos, UL.
   Google Scholar
• Gabinete de Apoio aos Bairros de Intervenção Prioritária (GABIP) – Almirante Reis. (2017). Estratégia Territorial de Desenvolvimento Social: Pena – Anjos – Almirante Reis, Lisboa [Territorial Strategy for Social Development: Pena – Anjos – Almirante Reis].
   Google Scholar
• Gebhardt, D. (2014). Building inclusive cities. Challenges in the multilevel governance of immigrant integration in Europe. Migration Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Glick Schiller, N., & Çağlar, A. (2011). Downscaled cities and migrant pathways: Locality and agency without an ethnic lens. In N. G. Schiller, & A. Çağlar (Eds.), Locating migration: Rescaling cities and migrants (pp. 190–212). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glick Schiller, N., & Çağlar, A. (2015). Displacement, emplacement and migrant newcomers: Rethinking urban sociabilities within multiscalar power. Identities, 23(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2015.1016520.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, M. S. (2018). Governing difference in the city: Urban imaginaries and the policy practice of migrant incorporation. Territory, Politics, Governance, 6(3), 362–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2017.1306456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ireland, P. (1994). The policy challenge of ethnic diversity: Immigrant politics in France and Switzerland. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2002). Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance: A state-theoretical perspective. Antipode, 34(3), 452–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joppke, C. (2017). Is multiculturalism dead? Crisis and persistence in the constitutional state. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, M. B. (2012). The diverging logics of integration policy making at national and city level. International Migration Review, 46(1), 244–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2012.00886.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith, M. (2005). After the cosmopolitan. Multicultural cities and the future of racism. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig, M., & Guchtenaire, P. (2007). Political governance of cultural diversity. Democracy and human rights in multicultural societies. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, L. (2009). Making sustainable creative/cultural space: Shanghai and Singapore. Geographical Review, 99(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2009.tb00415.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R., Staham, P., Giugni, M., & Passy, F. (2005). Contested citizenship. Immigration and cultural diversity in Europe. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Le Galés, P. (2011). Urban governance in Europe. What is governed? In G. Bridge, & S. Watson (Eds.), The new Blackwell companion to the city (pp. 747–758). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Malheiros, J. (2011). Promoção da interculturalidade e da integração de proximidade. ACIDI.
   Google Scholar
• Mapril, J. (2010). Banglapara: imigração, negócios e (in)formalidades em Lisboa. Etnográfica, 14(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.4000/etnografica.284
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, L. (2018). The panacea of touristification as a scenario of post-capitalist crisis. In I. David (Ed.), Crisis, Austerity, and Transformation: How Disciplinary Neoliberalism Is Changing Portugal (pp. 25–48). Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, M. M., Oliveira, N., & Mapril, J. (2020). Diversidades, Espaço e Migrações na Cidade Empreendedora. Dezembro, Estudo OM 66. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Menezes, M. (2001). Mouraria: Entre o Mito da Severa e o Martim Moniz. Dissertation for obtaining the degree of Doctor FCSH/UNL, Lisboa.
   Google Scholar
• Menezes, M. (2012). Debatendo mitos, representações e convicções acerca da invenção de um bairro lisboeta. Sociologia. Revista da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto Cultural, 69–95.
   Google Scholar
• Mouzelis, N. (1995). What went wrong with sociological theory? Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, K., & Ashton, P. (2004). Neoliberal urban policy and new paths of neighbourhood change in the American inner city. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 36(7), 1151–1172. https://doi.org/10.1068/a36229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, W., & Uitermark, J. (2013). Post-multicultural cities: A comparison of minority politics in Amsterdam and Los Angeles, 1970–2010. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(10), 1555–1575. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X2013.833686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicodemos, J. C., & Ferro, L. (2018). Entre o fazer etnográfico e o fazer psicanalítico: reflexões sobre a ‘escuta’ da população sem-abrigo na rua de Cimo de Vila da Cidade do Porto. In Sociologia: Revista da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto (pp. 92–115). https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/Sociologia/article/view/4961.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, N. (2015). Producing interculturality. Repertoires, strategies and spaces. New Diversities (Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity), 17(2), 129–143.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, N., & Padilla, B. (2017). Integrating superdiversity in local governance. The case of Lisbon’s inner-city. Policy and Politics, 45(4), 605–622. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557317X14835601760639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padilla, B., & Azevedo, J. (2012). Territórios de diversidade e convivência cultural: considerações teóricas e empíricas. In Maria M. Mendes (Ed.), Sociologia, Revista da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto (pp. 43–67). Número temático.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (2005). Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(), 740–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00620.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penninx, R., Kraal, K., Martiniello, M., & Vertovec, S. (2004). Citizenship in European cities. Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Público. (2007, December 5). Viagem à volta do mundo na Rua do Cimo de Vila [Around the world in the Rua do Cimo de Vila]. Público. https://www.publico.pt/2007/12/05/jornal/viagem-a-volta-do-mundo-na-rua-do-cimo-de-vila-240261
   Google Scholar
• Raco, M. (2018). Critical urban cosmopolitanism and the governance of urban diversity in European Cities. European Urban and Regional Studies, 25(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776416680393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raco, M., & Taşan-Kok, T. (2020). A Tale of Two Cities: Framing urban diversity as content curation in London and Toronto. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(1), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.5130/ccs.v12.i1.6835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha, M. (2017). Dinâmicas Recentes e Urbanismo na Baixa do Porto. In Dissertação de Mestrado em Riscos, Cidades e Ordenamento do Território. FLUP.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, U., & Vanolo, R. (2015). Urban neoliberalism. In James D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, (2nd Ed.) (pp. 846–853). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.74020-7.
   Google Scholar
• Saeys, A., Van Puymbroeck, N., Albeda, Y., Oosterlynck, S., & Verschraegen, G. (2019). From multicultural to diversity policies: Tracing the demise of group representation and recognition in a local urban context. European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(3), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776419854503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, T., Soares, N., Ramalhete, F., & Vicente, A. (2017). Avenida Almirante Reis: diagnóstico urbano. Revista Estudo Prévio, 11, CEACT/UAL – Centro de Estudos de Arquitetura, Cidade e Território da Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa [online].
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, M. (2015). Paradigmatic pragmatism and the politics of diversity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(7), 1120–1136. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2014.992925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholten, P. (2013). Agenda dynamics and the multi-level governance of intractable controversies: The case of migrant integration policies in the Netherlands. Policy Sciences, 46(3), 217–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seixas, J., Magalhães, A., & Costa, P. (2013). Os tempos novos do centro histórico de Lisboa. In R. Fernandes, & M. E. J. Alberto e Sposito (Eds.), A Nova Vida do Velho Centro nas Cidades Portuguesas e Brasileiras, CEGOT (pp. 63–92). FLUP.
   Google Scholar
• Soja, Edward. (2000). Postmetropolis. Critical Studies of Cities and Regions. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Somers, M. (2008). What’s political or cultural about political culture and the public sphere? Toward a historical epistemology of concept formation, in Genealogies of citizenship. Markets, statelessness, and the right to have rights (pp. 171–209). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Syrett, S., & Sepulveda, L. (2011). Realising the diversity dividend: Population diversity and urban economic development. Environment and Planning A, 43(2), 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syrett, S., & Sepulveda, L. (2012). Urban governance and economic development in the diverse city. European Urban and Regional Studies, 19(3), 238–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776411430287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillie, J., & Slijper, B. (2007). Immigrant political integration and ethnic civic communities in Amsterdam. In S. Benhabib, & I. Shapiro (Eds.), Identities, allegiances, and affiliations (pp. 206–225). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uitermark, J. (2012). Dynamics of power in Dutch integration Politics. From accommodation to confrontation. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, P. (2012). Challenges of governance in multi-ethnic cities. In H. K. Anheier, & Y. R. Isar (Eds.), Cultures and globalization: Cities, cultural policy and governance (pp. 44–60). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, P., & Landry, C. (2008). The intercultural city: Planning for diversity advantage. Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Zapata-Barrero, R. (2014). The limits to shaping diversity as public culture: Permanent festivities in Barcelona. Cities, 37, 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata-Barrero, R. (2015). Introduction: Framing the intercultural turn. In Zapata-Barrero (Ed.), Interculturalism in cities: Concept, policy and implementation (pp. viii–xvi). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar