References
- Beal, A. L., Holdnack, J. A., Saklofske, D. H., & Weiss, L. G. (2016). Practical considerations in WISC-V interpretation and intervention. In L. G. Weiss, D. H. Saklofske, J. A. Holdnack, & A. Prifitera (Eds.), WISC-V assessment and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 66–93). Academic Press.
- Benson, N. F., Floyd, R. G., Kranzler, J. H., Eckert, T. L., Fefer, S. A., & Morgan, G. B. (2019). Test use and assessment practices of school psychologists in the United States: Findings from the 2017 national survey. Journal of School Psychology, 72, 29–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.12.004
- Braaten, E., & Willoughby, B. (2014). Bright kids who can’t keep up. Guilford.
- Burns, M. K., Codding, R. S., Boice, C. H., & Lukito, G. (2010). Meta-analysis of acquisition and fluency math interventions with instructional and frustration level skills: Evidence for a skill-by-treatment interaction. School Psychology Review, 39(1), 69–83.
- Cahan, S., Nirel, R., & Alkoby, M. (2016). The extra-examination time granting policy: A reconceptualization. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34(5), 461–472. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915616537
- Cattell, J. M. (1890). Mental tests and measurements. Mind, os-XV(59), 373–391. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/os-XV.59.373
- Chaytor, N., & Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2003). The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: A review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychology Review, 13(4), 181–197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/b:nerv.0000009483.91468.fb
- Elliott, S. N., & Marquart, A. M. (2004). Extended time as a testing accommodation: Its effects and perceived consequences. Exceptional Children, 70(3), 349–367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290407000306
- Flanagan, D. P., Alfonso, V. C., Sy, M. C., Mascolo, J. T., McDonough, E. M., & Ortiz, S. O. (2018). Dual discrepancy/consistency operational definition of SLD. In V. C. Alfonso & D. P. Flanagan (Eds.), Essentials for specific learning disability identification (2nd ed., pp. 329–430). Wiley.
- Flanagan, D. P., Fiorello, C. A., & Ortiz, S. O. (2010). Enhancing practice through application of Cattell–Horn–Carroll theory and research: A “third method” approach to specific learning disability identification. Psychology in the Schools, 47(7), 739–760. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20501
- Fletcher, J. M., & Miciak, J. (2018). A response to intervention (RTI) approach to SLD identification. In V. C. Alfonso & D. P. Flanagan (Eds.), Essentials for specific learning disability identification (2nd ed., pp. 221–256). Wiley.
- Floyd, R. G., Clark, M. H., & Shadish, W. R. (2008). The exchangeability of IQs: Implications for professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39(4), 414–423. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.39.4.414
- Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202
- Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into human faculty and its development. Macmillan.
- Goodwin, L. D., & Leech, N. L. (2006). Understanding correlation: Factors that affect the size of r. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74(3), 249–266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.74.3.249-266
- Hammill, D. D., & Larsen, S. (2009). Test of written language (4th ed.). Pro-Ed.
- Harrison, A. G., Nichols, E., & Larochette, A. C. (2008). Investigating the quality of learning disability documentation provided by students in higher education. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 23(2), 161–174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573507312051
- Hemphill, J. F. (2003). Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. The American Psychologist, 58(1), 78–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.58.1.78
- Howieson, D. (2019). Current limitations of neuropsychological tests and assessment procedures. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(2), 200–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2018.1552762
- Lovett, B. J. (2020). Disability identification and educational accommodations: Lessons from the 2019 admissions scandal. Educational Researcher, 49(2), 125–129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20902100
- Lovett, B. J., & Bizub, A. L. (2019). Pinpointing disability accommodation needs: What evidence is most relevant? Psychological Injury and Law, 12(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09341-1
- Mather, N., & Wendling, B. J. (2018). Linking cognitive abilities to academic interventions for students with learning disabilities. In D. P. Flanagan & E. M. McDonough (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (4th ed., pp. 777–809). Guilford.
- Nettlebeck, T. (2011). Basic processes of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 371–393). Cambridge University Press.
- Ofiesh, N. S., Hughes, C., & Scott, S. S. (2004). Extended test time and postsecondary students with learning disabilities: A model for decision making. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19(1), 57–70.
- O’Grady, K. E. (1982). Measures of explained variance: Cautions and limitations. Psychological Bulletin, 92(3), 766–777. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.92.3.766
- Ontario Public Service. (2017). Special education in Ontario. Available at: http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/document/policy/os/onschools_2017e.pdf
- Schneider, W. J. (2013). Principles of assessment of aptitude and achievement. In D. Saklofske, C. Reynolds, & V. Schwean (Eds.), Oxford handbook of psychological assessment of children and adolescents (pp. 286–330). Oxford University Press.
- Schneider, W. J., & McGrew, K. S. (2018). The Cattell–Horn–Carroll theory of cognitive abilities. In D. P. Flanagan & E. M. McDonough (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (4th ed., pp. 73–163). Guilford.
- Schrank, F. A., Mather, N., & McGrew, K. S. (2014). Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Achievement. Riverside.
- Schrank, F. A., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2014). Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Cognitive Abilities. Riverside.
- Silverberg, N. D., & Millis, S. R. (2009). Impairment versus deficiency in neuropsychological assessment: Implications for ecological validity. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society: JINS, 15(1), 94–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617708090139
- Spenceley, L. M., & Wheeler, S. (2016). The use of extended time by college students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 29(2), 141–150.
- Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of Word Reading Efficiency. Pro-Ed.
- Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing. Pro-Ed.
- Wechsler, D. (2001). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (2nd ed.). Harcourt.
- Wechsler, D. (2014). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition. NCS Pearson.
- Weis, R., Dean, E. L., & Osborne, K. J. (2016). Accommodation decision making for postsecondary students with learning disabilities: Individually tailored or one size fits all? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(5), 484–498. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414559648
- Weiss, L. G., Holdnack, J. A., Saklofske, D. H., & Prifitera, A. (2019). Theoretical and clinical foundations of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition. In L. G. Weiss, D. H. Saklofske, J. A. Holdnack, & A. Prifitera (Eds.), WISC-V clinical use and interpretation (2nd ed., pp. 97–128). Academic Press.
- Wiederholt, J. L., & Bryant, B. R. (2012). Gray Oral Reading Tests- Fifth Edition: Examiner's manual. Pro-Ed.