Affect is what states make of it: articulating everyday experiences of 9/11

References

• Albright, M. 1998. Interview on NBC-TV “The Today Show” with Matt Lauer, Columbus, OH, February 19.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. 2001. “Witness and Response.” Library of Congress, SR375, Washington, DC, September 13.
   Google Scholar
• Balzacq, T. 2005. “The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context.” European Journal of International Relations 11 (2): 171–201. doi:10.1177/1354066105052960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. 1999. “Culture, Strategy and Foreign Policy Change: Israel’s Road to Oslo.” European Journal of International Relations 5 (1): 5–36. doi:10.1177/1354066199005001001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleiker, R., and E. Hutchison. 2008. “Fear No More: Emotions and World Politics.” Review of International Studies 34 (1): 115–135. doi:10.1017/S0260210508007821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, G. W. 2001. Address to Joint Session of Congress and the American People. Washington, DC, September 20.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2004. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. 1998. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Revised ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. 2001. “Time Is Broken: The Return of the Past in the Response to September 11.” Theory and Event 5: 4.
   Google Scholar
• Castello, V. 2001. “Witness and Response.” Library of Congress, SR321, Washington, DC, October 19.
   Google Scholar
• Chollet, D., and J. Goldgeier. 2008. America Between the Wars. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, W. 2002. Neuropolitics: Thinking, Culture, Speed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, W. 2005. “The Evangelical, Capitalist Resonance Machine.” Political Theory 33 (6): 869–886. doi:10.1177/0090591705280376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, N. 2000. “The Passion of World Politics: Propositions on Emotion and Emotional Relationships.” International Security 24 (4): 116–156. doi:10.1162/016228800560327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croft, S. 2006. Culture, Crisis and America’s War on Terror. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. 1999. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Debrix, F. 2008. Tabloid Terror: War, Culture, Geopolitics. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doty, R. 1993. “Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of US Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines.” International Studies Quarterly 37 (3): 297–320. doi:10.2307/2600810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edkins, J. 2003. Trauma and the Memory of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, J. 2001. “Witness and Response.” SR247, Washington, DC, October 18.
   Google Scholar
• Farley. 2001. “Witness and Response.” Library of Congress, Washington, DC, October 13.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, J. 2008. “Shame on You: The Impact of Human Rights Criticism on Political Repression in Latin America.” International Studies Quarterly 52 (1): 187–211. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00496.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gaddis, J. L. 2004. Surprise, Security, and the American Experience. London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grayson, M. 2001. “Witness and Response.” Library of Congress, SR327, Washington, DC, November 1.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, T. 2011. “We Will Not Swallow This Bitter Fruit: Theorizing a Diplomacy of Anger.” Security Studies 20 (4): 521–555. doi:10.1080/09636412.2011.625771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, L. 2006. Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, L. 2011. “Theorizing the Image for Security Studies: Visual Securitization and the Muhammad Cartoon Crisis.” European Journal of International Relations 17 (1): 51–74. doi:10.1177/1354066110388593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. 1996. “Narrating Crisis: The Discursive Construction of the ‘Winter of Discontent’.” Sociology 30 (2): 253–277. doi:10.1177/0038038596030002004.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J. 2009. “From September 11th, 2001 to 9–11: From Void to Crisis.” International Political Sociology 3 (3): 275–292. doi:10.1111/j.1749-5687.2009.00076.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J. 2010. “Howard’s War on Terror: A Conceivable, Communicable and Coercive Foreign Policy Discourse.” Australian Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 643–661. doi:10.1080/10361146.2010.517179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J. 2012. “Blair’s ‘War on Terror’: Selling Intervention to Middle England.” The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 14 (1): 74–95. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2011.00469.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J. 2013. Selling the War on Terror: Foreign Policy Discourses after 9/11. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J., and L. Jarvis. 2014. “‘Night Fell on a Different World’: Experiencing, Constructing and Remembering 9/11.” Critical Studies on Terrorism. doi:10.1080/17539153.2014.886396.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, E. 2010. “Trauma and the Politics of Emotions: Constituting Identity, Security, and Community after the Bali Bombing.” International Relations 24 (1): 65–86. doi:10.1177/0047117809348712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2005. Writing the War on Terrorism: Language, Politics, and Counter-Terrorism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, L. 2009. Times of Terror: Discourse, Temporality, and the War on Terror. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, T. 1801. First Inaugural Address. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P., ed. 1996. The Culture of National Security. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinfeld, M. 2003. “Strategic Troping in Sri Lanka: September Eleventh and the Consolidation of Political Position.” Geopolitics 8 (3): 105–126. doi:10.1080/14650040412331307732.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, S. 2006. “Brains, Citizens, and Democracy’s New Nobility.” Theory and Event 9: 1.
   Google Scholar
• Krebs, R., and J. Lobasz. 2007. “Fixing the Meaning of 9/11: Hegemony, Coercion, and the Road to War in Iraq.” Security Studies 16 (3): 409–451. doi:10.1080/09636410701547881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapid, Y., and F. Kratochwil, eds. 1995. The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Lebow, R. 2009. A Cultural Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Löwenheim, O., and G. Heimann. 2008. “Revenge in International Politics.” Security Studies 17 (4): 685–724. doi:10.1080/09636410802508055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. 2007. “Potential Politics and the Primacy of Preemption.” Theory and Event 10: 2.
   Google Scholar
• McCrisken, T. 2003. American Exceptionalism and the Legacy of Vietnam. London: Barnes and Noble.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, J. 2010. “Emotional Beliefs.” International Organization 64 (1): 1–31. doi:10.1017/S0020818309990221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milliken, J. 1999. “The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods.” European Journal of International Relations 5 (2): 225–254. doi:10.1177/1354066199005002003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, R. 2004. “Images of Untranslatability in the US War on Terror.” Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies 6 (3): 401–423. doi:10.1080/1369801042000280041.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, J. 2006. Overblown: How Politicians and the Terror Industry Inflate National Security Threats, and Why We Believe Them. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nabers, D. 2009. “Filling the Void of Meaning: Identity Construction in US Foreign Policy after September 11, 2001.” Foreign Policy Analysis 5 (2): 191–214. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2009.00089.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protevi, J. 2009. Political Affect: Connecting the Social and the Somatic. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Protevi, J. 2010. “Rhythm and Cadence, Frenzy and March: Music and the Geo-Bio-Techno-Affective Assemblages of Ancient Warfare.” Theory & Event 13: 3.
   Google Scholar
• Ronald, L., L. Jepperson, A. Wendt, and P. Katzenstein. 1996. “Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security.” In The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, edited by P. Katzenstein. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, A. 2006. “Coming in from the Cold: Constructivism and Emotions.” European Journal of International Relations 12 (2): 197–222. doi:10.1177/1354066106064507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, A. 2014. Mixed Emotions: Beyond Fear and Hatred in International Conflict. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sasley, B. 2010. “Affective Attachments and Foreign Policy: Israel and the 1993 Oslo Accords.” European Journal of International Relations 16 (4): 687–709. doi:10.1177/1354066110366055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasley, B. 2011. “Theorizing States’ Emotions.” International Studies Review 13 (3): 452–476. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2486.2011.01049.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, K. 2001. “Witness and Response.” Library of Congress, SR247, Washington, DC, October 16.
   Google Scholar
• Saurette, P. 2006. “You Dissin Me? Humiliation and Post 9/11 Global Politics.” Review of International Studies 32 (3): 495–522. doi:10.1017/S0260210506007133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schildkraut, D. 2002. “The More Things Change… American Identity and Mass and Elite Responses to 9/11.” Political Psychology 23 (3): 511–535. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senor, J. 2001. “Witness and Response.” Library of Congress, SR015, Washington, DC, October 11.
   Google Scholar
• Shouse, E. 2005. “Feeling, Emotion, Affect.” Media and Culture Journal 8 (5). http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0512/03-shouse.php
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, T. 2012. “‘I Wasn’t Angry, because I Couldn’t Believe It Was Happening’: Affect and Discourse in Responses to 9/11.” Review of International Studies 38 (4): 907–928. doi:10.1017/S0260210511000519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. 2008. Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Troyer, J. 2001. “Language Fails America in Struggle to Understand.” The Minnesota Daily, September 28.
   Google Scholar
• Tuathail, G. 2003. “‘Just Out Looking for a Fight’: American Affect and the Invasion of Iraq.” Antipode 35 (5): 856–870. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2003.00361.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, N. 2001. “Witness and Response.” Library of Congress, SR025, October 27, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Weldes, J., M. Laffey, H. Gusterson, and R. Duvall. 1999. “Introduction: Constructing Insecurity.” In Cultures of Insecurity, edited by J. Weldes, M. Laffey, H. Gusterson, and R. Duvall. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. 2007a. Culture and Security: Symbolic Power and the Politics of International Security. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. 2007b. “From Non-Intervention to Non-Indifference: The Origins and Development of the African Union’s Security Culture.” African Affairs 106 (423): 253–279. doi:10.1093/afraf/adm001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. 1983. Keywords. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar