The political production of ethical war: rethinking the ethics/politics nexus with Laclau

References

• Baumann, R., and G. Hellmann. 2001. “Germany and the Use of Military Force: “Total war”, the “Culture of restraint” and the Quest for Normality.” German Politics 10 (1): 61–82. doi:10.1080/09644000412331307394.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, T. U. 1998. Cultures of Antimilitarism: National Security in Germany and Japan. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, U. 2013. “The Case for a Postcolonial Approach to the Study of Politics.” New Political Science 35 (3): 479–491. doi:10.1080/07393148.2013.813700.
   Google Scholar
• Critchley, S. 2004. “Is There a Normative Deficit in the Theory of Hegemony?” In Laclau: A Critical Reader, edited by S. Critchley and O. Marchart, 113–122. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley-Frolick, K. A. 2017. “Revisiting and Reimagining the Notion of Responsibility in German Foreign Policy.” International Studies Perspectives 18 (4): 443–464. doi:10.1093/isp/ekv025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalgaard-Nielsen, A. 2006. Germany, Pacifism and Peace Enforcement. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doty, R. L. 1996. Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North-South Relations. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eberle, J. 2019. Discourse and Affect in Foreign Policy: Germany and the Iraq War. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eckstein, H. 1975. “Case Study and Theory in Political Science.” In Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 7: Strategies of Inquiry, edited by F. I. Greenstein and N. W. Polsby, 79–137. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Engelkamp, S., and K. Glaab. 2015. “Writing Norms: Constructivist Norm Research and The Politics Of Ambiguity.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 40 (3–4): 201–218. doi: 10.1177/0304375415612270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geis, A., and H. Pfeifer. 2017. “Deutsche Verantwortung in der „Mitte der Gesellschaft“ aushandeln? Über Politisierung und Entpolitisierung der deutschen Außenpolitik.” In Politik und Verantwortung: Analysen zum Wandel politischer Entscheidungs- und Rechtfertigungspraktiken, edited by C. Daase, J. Junk, S. Kroll, and V. Rauer, 218–243. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Harnisch, S., and H. W. Maull, eds. 2001. Germany as a Civilian Power? the Foreign Policy of the Berlin Republic. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herschinger, E. 2011. Constructing Global Enemies: Hegemony and Identity in International Discourses on Terrorism and Drug Prohibition. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, C. 2001. Manly States: Masculinities, International Relations, and Gender Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, K. 2008. “Making Sense of Masculinity and War.” Men and Masculinities 10 (4): 389–404. doi:10.1177/1097184X07306740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inayatullah, N. 2014. “Why Do Some People Think They Know What Is Good for Others?” In Global Politics: A New Introduction, edited by J. Edkins and M. Zehfuss, 450–471. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2017. “Pacifism: The Anatomy of a Subjugated Knowledge.” Critical Studies on Security 6 (2): 160–175. doi:10.1080/21624887.2017.1342750.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 1990. “New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time.” In New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time, edited by E. Laclau, 3–85. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 1994. “Introduction.” In The Making of Political Identities, edited by E. Laclau, 1–10. London & New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 1996. “Why Do Empty Signifiers Matter to Politics?” In Emancipation(s), edited by E. Laclau, 36–46. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2000. “Identity and Hegemony: The Role of Universality in the Constitution of Political Logics.” In Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, edited by J. Butler, E. Laclau, and S. Žižek, 44–89. London & New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2004. “An Ethics of Militant Engagement.” In Think Again: Alain Badiou and the Future of Philosophy, edited by P. Hallward, 120–137. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2005. On Populist Reason. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2012. “Reply.” Cultural Studies 26 (2–3): 391–415. doi:10.1080/09502386.2011.647651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2014a. “The Death and Resurrection of the Theory of Ideology.” In The Rhetorical Foundations of Society, edited by E. Laclau, 11–36. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2014b. “An Ethics of Militant Engagement.” In The Rhetorical Foundations of Society, edited by E. Laclau, 181–206. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2014c. “Ethics, Normativity and the Heteronomy of the Law.” In The Rhetorical Foundations of Society, edited by E. Laclau, 127–137. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2014d. “On the Names of God.” In The Rhetorical Foundations of Society, edited by E. Laclau, 37–51. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., ed. 2014e. The Rhetorical Foundations of Society. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. 2nd ed. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Longhurst, K. 2004. Germany and the Use of Force. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maull, H. W. 2007. “Deutschland als Zivilmacht.” In Handbuch zur deutschen Außenpolitik, edited by G. Hellmann, R. Wolf, and S. Schmidt, 73–84. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Nabers, D. 2015. A Poststructuralist Discourse Theory of Global Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Norval, A. J. 2004. “Hegemony after Deconstruction: The Consequences of Undecidability.” Journal of Political Ideologies 9 (2): 139–157. doi:10.1080/13569310410001691187.
   Google Scholar
• Nuñez-Mietz, F. G. 2018. “Legalization and the Legitimation of the Use of Force: Revisiting Kosovo.” International Organization 72 (3): 725–757. doi:10.1017/S0020818318000152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, V. S. 2010. “Gendered Identities, Ideologies, and Practices in the Context of War and Militarism.” In Gender, War, and Militarism: Feminist Perspectives, edited by L. Sjoberg and S. Via, 17–29. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
   Google Scholar
• Philippi, N. 1997. Bundeswehr-Auslandseinsätze als außen- und sicherheitspolitisches Problem des geeinten Deutschlands. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Renner, J. 2013. Discourse, Normative Change and the Quest for Reconciliation in Global Politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothe, D. 2015. Securitizing Global Warming: A Climate of Complexity. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sayre-McCord, G. 2012. “Metaethics.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012 edition), edited by E. N. Zalta. Stanford: Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/metaethics/
   Google Scholar
• Schwab-Trapp, M. 2002. Kriegsdiskurse. Die politische Kultur des Krieges im Wandel 1991–1999. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, T. 2014. The Politics of Subjectivity in American Foreign Policy Discourses. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, B. 2017. “Verantwortung – Welche Verantwortung? Der deutsche Verantwortungsdiskurs und die Waffenlieferungen an die Peschmerga.” Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 27 (4): 437–471. doi:10.1007/s41358-017-0113-0.
   Google Scholar
• Stengel, F. A. 2019. “Securitization as Discursive (Re)articulation: Explaining The Relative Effectiveness Of Threat Construction.” New Political Science 41 (2): 294-312. doi: 10.1080/07393148.2019.1596682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stengel, F. A. forthcoming. The Politics of Military Force: Antimilitarism, Ideational Change and Post-War German Security Discourse. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stengel, F. A., and D. Nabers. 2019. “The Contribution of Laclau’s Discourse Theory to International Relations and International Political Economy: Introduction to the Symposium.” New Political Science 41 (2): 248–262. doi:10.1080/07393148.2019.1596683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 2011. “Why Don’t We Talk about ‘violence’ in International Relations?” Review of International Studies 37 (4): 1815–1836. doi:10.1017/S0260210510001154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomassen, L. 2005. “Antagonism, Hegemony and Ideology after Heterogeneity.” Journal of Political Ideologies 10 (3): 289–309. doi:10.1080/13569310500244313.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. 2005. “Discourse Theory: Achievements, Arguments, and Challenges.” In Discourse Theory in European Politics, edited by D. Howarth and J. Torfing, 1–32. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. 2003. “The Logic of Masculinist Protection: Reflections on the Current Security State.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture & Society 29 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1086/375708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zehfuss, M. 2002. Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge Un.
   Google Scholar
• Zehfuss, M. 2007. Wounds of Memory: The Politics of War in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zehfuss, M. 2018. War and the Politics of Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar