Engagement all the way down

References

• Amicelle, A. 2018. “Policing through Misunderstanding: Insights from the Configuration of Financial Policing.” Crime, Law, and Social Change 69 (2): 207–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoore, L. 2006. “There Is No Great Refusal.” In International Political Economy and Poststructural Politics, edited by M. E. Goede. Palgrave, 255–274.
   Google Scholar
• Amoore, L., and P. Langley. 2004. “Ambiguities of Global Civil Society.” Review of International Studies 30 (1): 89–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anwar, T. 2020. “Unfolding the Past, Proving the Present: Social Media Evidence in Terrorism Finance Court Cases.” International Political Sociology. doi:10.1093/ips/olaa006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aradau, C. 2010. “Security that Matters: Critical Infrastructure and Objects of Protection.” Security Dialogue 41 (5): 491–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, J. L. 2019. “A Parasitic Critique for International Relations.” International Political Sociology 13 (2): 215–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, J. L., R. Bellanova, and M. Kaufmann. 2019. “Doing and Mediating Critique: An Invitation to Practice Companionship.” Security Dialogue 50 (1): 3–19
   Google Scholar
• Bellanova, R., and A. Rudinow Saetnan. 2019. “How to Discomfort a Worldview? Social Sciences, Surveillance Technologies, and Defamiliarization.” In Science, Technology and Arts in International Relations, edited by J. P. Singh, M. Carr, and R. Marlin-Bennett, 29–39. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bellanova, R., and G. Gonzalez-Fuster. 2013. “Politics of Disappearance: Scanners and (Unobserved) Bodies as Mediators of Security Practices.” International Political Sociology 7 (2): 188–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Best, J., and W. Walters. 2013. “Actor-network Theory” and International Relationality: Lost (And Found) in Translation. Introduction.” International Political Sociology 7 (3): 332–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. K. 1994. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhambra, G., and B. de Sousa Santos. 2017. “Introduction: Global Challenges for Sociology.” Sociology 51 (1): 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bilgin, P. 2016. “Contrapunctual Reading as a Method, an Ethos, and a Metaphor for Global IR.” International Studies Review 18 (1): 134–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleiker, R. 2000. Popular Dissent, Human Agency and Global Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bosma, E. 2020. “Multi-sited Ethnography of Digital Security Technologies.” In Secrecy and Methods in Security Research: A Guide to Qualitative Fieldwork, edited by M. de Goede, E. Bosma, and P. Pallister-Wilkins, 193–212. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourne, M., and D. Lisle. 2019. “The Many Lives of Border Automation: Turbulence, Coordination and Care.” Social Studies of Science 49 (5): 682–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brassett, J. 2015. “British Comedy, Global Resistance: Russell Brand, Charlie Brooker, and Stewart Lee.” European Journal of International Relations 22 (1): 168–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C. 1994. “Turtles All the Way Down.” Millennium 23 (2): 213–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueger, C., and T. Villumsen. 2007. “Beyond the Gap: Relevance, Fields of Practice and the Securitizing Consequences of (Democratic Peace) Research.” Journal of International Relations and Development 10: 417–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, P. J. 2019. “The Insecurity of Critique.” Security Dialogue 50 (1): 95–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M., P. Lascoumes, and Y. Barthe. 2001. Acting in an Uncertain World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, L. M., and D. Rosenow. 2016. “Security (Studies) and the Limits of Critique: Why We Should Think through Struggle.” Critical Studies on Security 4 (2): 202–220.
   Google Scholar
• de Goede, M. 2012. Speculative Security: The Politics of Pursuing Terrorist Monies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Goede, M. 2018. “The Chain of Security.” Review of International Studies 44 (1): 24–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijstelbloem, H., and A. Pelizza. 2020. “The State Is the Secret.” In Secrecy and Methodology in Security Studies, edited by M. de Goede, E. Bosma, and P. Pallister-Wilkins, 48–62. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doty, R. L. 1997. “Aporia: A Critical Exploration of the Agent-Structure Problematique in International Relations Theory.” European Journal of International Relations 3 (3): 365–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edkins, J. 1999. Poststructuralism and International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In. London: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980) “Truth and Power.” In Power/Knowledge, Selected Interviews & Other Writings. Ed. C. Gordon. NewYork: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1981) “Is It Really Important to Think?” translated by Thomas Keenan.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1989. “Foucault Live: Collected Interviews 1961-1984.” In The Masked Philosopher, edited by S. Lotringer, 302–312. New York: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Galison, P. 2004. “Specific Theory.” Critical Inquiry 30: 379–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerst, D., and H. Krämer. 2019. “‘Lucy Suchman in Conversation with Dominik Gerst & Hannes Krämer.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 20: 2.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. 2009. Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. Victoria: Re.press.
   Google Scholar
• Heath-Kelly, C. 2012. “Reinventing Prevention or Exposing the Gap? False Positives in UK Terrorism Governance and the Quest for Pre-emption.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 5 (1): 69–87.
   Google Scholar
• Hoenke, J., and M. Muller. 2016. The Global Making of Policing: Postcolonial Perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoijtink, M. 2014. “Capitalizing on Emergence: The ‘New’ Civil Security Market in Europe.” Security Dialogue 45 (5): 458–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoijtink, M., and M. Leese, eds. 2019. Technology and Agency in International Relations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huysmans, J. 2011. “What’s in an Act: On Security Speech Acts and Little Security Nothings.” Security Dialogue 42 (4–5): 371–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huysmans, J., and J. P. Nogueira. 2016. “Ten Years of IPS: Fracturing IR.” International Political Sociology 10 (4): 299–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, R. 2019. “Speculative Policing.” Public Culture 31 (3): 447–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahn, B. 2017. “Theorizing the Political Relevance of International Relations Theory.” International Studies Quarterly 61: 64–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., ed.. 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., and S.-H. Kim. 2009. “Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea.” Minerva 47 (2): 119–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koddenbrock, K. 2015. “Strategies of Critique in International Relations: From Foucault and Latour Towards Marx.” European Journal of International Relations 21 (2): 243–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagerwaard, P. 2020. “Flattening the International: Producing Financial Intelligence through a Platform.” Critical Studies on Security 8 (2): 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2020.1762156.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? from Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30 (Winter): 225–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, A. 2016. “The Politics of Whitelisting: Regulatory Work and Topologies in Commercial Security.” Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space 34 (1): 48–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leese, M., K. Lidén, and B. Nikolova. 2019. “Putting Critique to Work: Ethics in CEU Security Research.” Security Dialogue 50 (1): 59–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindskov Jacobsen, K. 2020. “Intervention, Materiality, and Contemporary Somali Counterpiracy.” Journal of Global Security Studies 5 (1): 3: 511–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisle, D. 2016. “Waiting for International Political Sociology. A Field Guide to Living In-Between.” International Political Sociology 10 (4): 417–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macey. 1993. The Lives of Michel Foucault. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. 2010. “On Critique.” Inflexions 4: 337–340.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 2000. “‘Dit Is Geen Programma: Over Empirische Filosofie,’ [‘this Is Not a Programme: On Empirical Philosophy’].” Krisis: Journal for Contemporary Philosophy 1: 6–26.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monsees, L. 2019. “Public Relations: Theorizing the Contestation of Security Technology.” Security Dialogue 50 (6): 531–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsees, L. 2020. “‘A war against truth’ - understanding the fake news controversy.” Critical Studies on Security 8 (2): 116–129. doi:10.1080/21624887.2020.1763708.
   Google Scholar
• Nyman, J. 2016. “What Is the Value of Security? Contextualising the Negative/Positive Debate.” Review of International Studies 42 (5): 821–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odysseos, L. 2001. “Laughing Matters: Peace, Democracy and the Challenge of the Comic Narrative.” Millennium 30 (3): 709–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N. 2013. “Why I Am a Presentist.” Science in Context 26 (4): 595–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuters. (2020) “U.S. Sanctions ‘Severely Hamper’ Iran Coronavirus Fight, Rouhani Says.” March 14 accessed 17 March 2020. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-iran/us-sanctions-severely-hamper-iran-coronavirus-fight-rouhani-idUSKBN2110HL
   Google Scholar
• Salter, M. B. 2013. “Expertise in the Aviation Security Field.” In Research Methods in Critical Security Studies, edited by M. B. Salter and C. E. Mutlu, 105–108. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, M. B., ed.. 2015. Making Things International 1. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, M. B., and W. Walters. 2016. “Bruno Latour Encounters International Relations: An Interview.” Millennium 44 (3): 524–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savransky, M. 2018. “Introduction: Isabelle Stengers and the Dramatization of Philosophy.” SubStance 47 (1): 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Savransky, M., and I. Stengers. 2018. “Relearning the Art of Paying Attention: A Conversation.” SubStance 47 (1): 130–145.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, N. 2017. “Gunning for War: Infantry Rifles and the Calibration of Lethal Force.” Critical Studies on Security 5 (1): 81–104.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, M. J., and H. R. Alker, eds. 1996. Challenging Boundaries: Global Flows, Territorial Identities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sjoberg, L. 2019. “Failure and Critique in Critical Security Studies.” Security Dialogue 50 (1): 77–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. 2000. The Invention of Modern Science, Translated by Daniel W. Smith. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. 2011. Thinking with Whitehead. Translated by Michael Chase. Cambridge MS: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. 2015. In Catastrophic Times: Resisting the Coming Barbarism. Translated by Andrew Goffey. Paris: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. 2019. “Putting Problematization to the Test of Our Present.” Theory, Culture & Society FirstView: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I., and V. Despret. 2014. Women Who Make a Fuss. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. translated by April Knudson.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L., K. Follis, and J. Weber. 2017. “Tracking and Targeting: Sociotechnologies of (In) Security.” Science, Technology & Human Values 42 (6): 983–1002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toscano, A. 2012. “Seeing It Whole.” The Sociological Review 60 (SI): 64–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villumsen Bering, T., and C. Bueger. 2017. “Expertise in the Age of Post-Factual Politics: An Outline of Reflexive Strategies.” Geoforum 84: 332–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, W. 2014. “Drone Strikes, Dingpolitik and Beyond.” Security Dialogue 45 (2): 101–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, J. 2016. “Keep Adding. On Kill Lists, Drone Warfare and the Politics of Databases.” Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space 34 (1): 107–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox, L. 2017. “Embodying Algorithmic War: Gender, Race, and the Posthuman in Drone Warfare.” Security Dialogue 48 (1): 11–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wissink, L. 2020. “Material Guides in Ethically Challenging Fields.” In Secrecy and Methods in Security Research, edited by M. de Goede, E. Bosma, and P. Pallister-Wilkins, 291–305. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 2001. “Creating Public Alienation: Expert Cultures of Risk and Ethics on GMOs.” Science as Culture 10 (4): 445–481.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zourabichvili, F. 2012. Deleuze: A Philosophy of the Event, Translated by Kieran Aarons. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.
   Google Scholar