References
- Alba, R. D., & Nee, V. (2003). Remaking the American mainstream: Assimilation and contemporary immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Anastasopoulos, C. (2018). Applying knowledge about national affiliation and considering resentment towards one’s national identity – German migrants in Greece. Migration and Development, 1–20. doi:10.1080/21632324.2018.1451248
- Basch, L., Schiller, N. G., & Blanc, C. S. (1994). Nations unbound: Transnational projects, postcolonial predicaments, and deterritorialized Nation States. New York, NY: Gordon and Breach.
- Brubaker, R. (2001). The return of assimilation? Changing perspectives on immigration and its sequels in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24(4), 531–548.
- Burawoy, M. (1976). The functions and reproduction of migrant labor: Comparative material from Southern Africa and the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 81(5), 1050–1087.
- Hollifield, J. (2004). The emerging migration state. International Migration Review, 38(3), 885–912.
- Lee, R. (2018). How do parental migration histories matter for children’s economic outcomes? Migration and Development, 1–18. doi:10.1080/21632324.2018.1474589
- Lucas, R. E. B., & Stark, O. (1985). Motivations to Remit: Evidence from Botswana. The Journal of Political Economy, 93(5), 901–918.
- Mahmud, H. (2014). “It’s my money”: Social class and the perception of remittances among Bangladeshi migrants in Japan. Current Sociology, 62(3), 412–430.
- Massey, D. (1999). International migration at the Dawn of the twenty-first century: The role of the state. Population and Development Review, 25(2), 303–322.
- Matallah, S. (2018). The triptych migration-inward FDI-inequality in South Asian countries: How much do governance and institutions matter? Migration and Development, 1–26. doi:10.1080/21632324.2018.1449617
- Munck, R. (2008). Globalisation, governance and migration: An introduction. Third World Quarterly, 29(7), 1227-1246.
- Neumayer, E. (2006). Unequal access to foreign spaces: How states use visa restrictions to regulate mobility in a globalised world. Transactions of the British Institute of Geographers, 31(1), 72–84.
- Salter, M. B. (2004). Passports, mobility, and security: How smart can the border be? International Studies Perspectives, 5, 71–91.
- Sarausad, M. R. G. A. (2018). Bordering and the gray area in the binary classifications of migrants within migration regimes. Migration and Development, 1–12. doi:10.1080/21632324.2018.1480092
- Seol, D., & Skrentny, J. D. (2009). Why is there so little migrant settlement in East Asia? International Migration Review, 43(3), 578–620.
- Shipper, A. W. (2002). The political construction of foreign workers in Japan. Critical Asian Studies, 34(1), 41–68.
- Shum, T. C. T. (2018). Conceptualising integrative exchanges: Marginalisation, music and identity of African diaspora in Hong Kong. Migration and Development, 1–18. doi:10.1080/21632324.2018.1446500
- Soysal, Y. (1994). Limits of citizenship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Tarumoto, H. (2018). Why restrictive refugee policy can be retained? A Japanese case. Migration and Development, 1–18. doi:10.1080/21632324.2018.1482642
- Tseng, Y.-F., & Wang, H.-z. (2013). Governing migrant workers at a distance: Managing thetemporary status of guestworkers in Taiwan. International Migration, 54(4): 1-19.
- Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of Justice. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- World Bank. (2016). Migration and remittances factbook 2016(3rd ed.). Washington, DC: World Bank.
- Zolberg, A. (1999). Matters of state: Theorizing immigration policy. In C. Hirschman, P. Kasinitz, & J. DeWind (Eds.), The handbook of international migration: The American experience (pp. 71–92). New York, NY: Russell Sage.