References

• Akama, J. S., & Kieti, D. M. (2003). Measuring tourist satisfaction with Kenya’s wildlife safari: A case study of Tsavo West National Park. Tourism Management, 24(1), 73–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon, D. R. (2003). A comparison of approaches to importance-performance analysis. International Journal of Market Research, 45(1), 55–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badola, R., Hussain, S. A., Dobriyal, P., Manral, U., Barthwal, S., Rastogi, A., & Gill, A. K. (2018). Institutional arrangements for managing tourism in the Indian Himalayan protected areas. Tourism Management, 66, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., & Falk, J. (2011). Visitors’ learning for environmental sustainability: Testing short- and long-term impacts of wildlife tourism experience using structural equation modelling. Tourism Management, 32, 1243–1252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhalla, P., Coghlan, A., & Bhattacharya, P. (2016). Homestays’ contribution to community-based ecotourism in the Himalayan Region of India. Tourism Recreation Research, 41(2), 213–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bookbinder, M. P., Dinerstein, E., Rijal, A., Cauley, H., & Rajouria, A. (1998). Ecotourism’s support of biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology, 12(6), 1399–1404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, R. C. (2004). Environmental impacts of ecotourism (p. 389). Wallingford: CABI Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, R. C. (2009). Ecotourism: Principles and practices (pp. 368). Wallingford: CABI Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, R. (1980). The concept of a tourist area cycle of evolution: Implications for management of resources. The Canadian Geographer, 14(1), 5–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crilley, G., Weber, D., & Taplin, R. (2012). Predicting visitor satisfaction in parks: Comparing the value of personal benefit attainment and service levels in kakadu national park, Australia. Visitor Studies, 15(2), 217–237. doi:10.1080/10645578.2012.715038
   Google Scholar
• Cuieford, J. P. (1965). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• De Rojas, C., & Camarero, C. (2008). Visitors’ experience, mood and satisfaction in a heritage context: Evidence from an interpretation centre. Tourism Management, 29(3), 525–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, J., & Li, J. (2015). Self-identification of ecotourists. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(2), 255–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, W. (2007). Using a revised importance-performance analysis approach: The case of Taiwanese hot springs tourism. Tourism Management, 28, 1274–1284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drumm, A., & Moore, A. (2005). Ecotourism development – A manual for conservation planners and managers: An introduction to ecotourism planning (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.). Arlington, VA: The Nature Conservancy.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, C. R., & Persia, M. A. (1996). Performance-importance analysis of escorted tour evaluations. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 5(3), 207–223.
   Google Scholar
• Fennell, D. A. (2015). Ecotourism (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gstaettner, A. M., Kobryn, H. T., Rodger, K., Phillips, M., & Lee, D. (2018). Monitoring visitor injury in protected areas – Analysis of incident reporting in two Western Australian parks. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism. doi:10.1016/j.jort.2018.04.002
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (pp. 720). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hausmann, A., Toivonen, T., Slotow, R., Tenkanen, H., Moilanen, A., Heikinheimo, V., & Minin, E-Di. (2018). Media data can be used to understand tourists’ preferences for nature-based experiences in protected areas. Conservation Letters, 11(1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Hollenshorst, S., Olson, D., & Fortney, R. (1992). Use of Importance-performance analysis to evaluate state park cabins: The case of the West Virginia state park system. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 10(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hornback, K., & Eagles, P. (1999). Visitor studies. In K. Hornback & P. Eagles (Eds.), Guidelines for public use measurement and reporting at parks and protected areas (pp. 44–54). Gland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, S., & Shephard, G. W. H. (1998). Measuring service quality at tourist destinations: An application of importance-performance analysis to an alpine ski resort. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 7(3), 61–77.
   Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. (2011). IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Released. Atmonk, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. J. (1998). Exogenous factors and visitor behavior: A regression analysis of exhibit viewing time. Environment and Behavior, 30(3), 322–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, A. K., & Coghlan, A. (2018). Promoting site-specific versus general proenvironmental behavioral intentions: The role of interpretation. Tourism Analysis, 23(1), 77–91(15).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, K., Kreg, M., Stephen, S. F., & Stankey, G. (1997). Rethinking carrying capacity. Annals of Tourism Research, 24(2), 461–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, R. (1999). Studies in outdoor recreation. Search and research for satisfaction. Corvallis: Oregon State University.
   Google Scholar
• Martilla, J., & James, J. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCool, S. (2002). Tourism in protected area: Continuing challenges and emerging issues for sustaining visitor experiences. Paper presented at the Celebrating Mountains Conference, Jindabyne, NSW, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• McCool, S. F., & Lime, D. W. (2000). Tourism carrying capacity: Tempting fantasy or useful reality? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 9(5), 372–388.
   Google Scholar
• Mengak, K. K., Dottavio, F. D., & O’Leary, J. T. (1986). Use of importance-performance analysis to evaluate a visitor center. Journal of Interpretation, 11, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Monz, C. A., Cole, D. N., Leung, Y.-F., & Marion, J. L. (2009). Sustaining visitor use in protected areas: Future opportunities in recreation ecology research based on the USA experience. Environmental Management. doi:10.1007/s00267-009-9406-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscardo, G., & Hughes, K. (2018). All aboard! Strategies for engaging guests in corporate responsibility programmes. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. doi:10.1080/09669582.2018.1428333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, J. (2011). Brand equity, brand loyality and consumer satisfaction. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(3), 1009–1030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newsome, D., Rodger, K., Pearce, J., & Chan, K. L. J. (2017). Visitor satisfaction with a key wildlife tourism destination within the context of a damaged landscape. Current Issues in Tourism, 22(6), 729–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: MacGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, H. (2001). Revisiting importance-performance analysis. Tourism Management, 22, 617–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramkissoon, H., Mavondo, F., & Uysal, M. (2018). Social involvement and park citizenship as moderators for quality-of-life in a national park. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(3), 341–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastogi, A., Badola, R., Hussain, S. A., & Hickey, G. M. (2010). Assessing the utility of stakeholder analysis to protected areas management: The case of Corbett National Park, India. Biological Conservation, 143, 2956–2964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regmi, K. D., & Walter, P. G. (2016). Conceptualising host learning in community-based ecotourism homestays. Journal of Ecotourism. doi:10.1080/14724049.2015.1118108
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, B., Trevor, M., & Uzabeaga, S. (2008). Visitor attraction satisfaction benchmarking project. Gold Coast, Queensland: Sustainable Tourism Cooperative Research Centre. Retrieved from http://www.crctourism.com.au/wms/upload/resources/90069Richie_AttSatbenchmarking%20WEB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roggenbuck, J., & Driver, B. (2000). Benefits of nonfacilitated uses of wilderness. Wilderness Science in a Time of Change Conference. USDA Forest Service RMRS-P-15- (Vol. 3). Fort Collins, CO: Rocky Mountain Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Rome, A. (1999). Tourism impact monitoring, a review of methodologies and recommendations for developing monitoring programs in Latin America (pp. 54). Arlington, VA: The Nature Conservancy.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, C., & Garland, R. (1999). The use of a specific non-response option on Likert type scales. Tourism Management, 20(1), 107–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, C., & Saward, J. (2004). The zoo as ecotourism attraction- visitor reactions, perceptions and management implications: The case of Hamilton Zoo, New Zealand. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 12(3), 245–266.
   Google Scholar
• Sati, V. P. (2018). Carrying capacity analysis and destination development: A case study of Gangotri tourists/pilgrims’ circuit in the Himalaya. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 23(3), 312–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheng, C.-W., & Chen, M.-C. (2012). A study of experience expectations of museum visitors. Tourism Management, 33, 53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, F., Weaver, D., Zhaod, Y., Huang, M.-F., Tang, C., & Liu, Y. (2018). Toward an ecological civilization: Mass comprehensive ecotourism indications among domestic visitors to a Chinese wetland protected area. Tourism Management, 70, 59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spenceley, A. (2008). Responsible tourism: Critical issues for conservation and development (p. 432). London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Taplin, R. (2012). Competitive importance-performance analysis of an Australian wildlife park. Tourism Management, 33(1), 29–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrant, M. A., & Smith, E. K. (2002). The use of a modified importance-performance framework to examine visitor satisfaction with attributes of outdoor recreation settings. Managing Leisure, 7(2), 69–82.
   Google Scholar
• TIES. (2015). What is ecotourism. The International Ecotourism Society Website. Retrieved from https://www.ecotourism.org/what-is-ecotourism
   Google Scholar
• Tomas, S. R., Crompton, J. L., & Scott, D. (2003). Assessing service quality and benefits sought among zoological park visitors. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 21(2), 105–124.
   Google Scholar
• Tonge, J., & Moore, S. (2007). Importance-satisfaction analysis for marine-park hinterlands: A Western Australian case study. Tourism Management, 28, 768–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treweek, J. (1999). Ecological impact assessment. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Turley, S. K. (1999). Conservation and tourism in the traditional UK zoo. The Journal of Tourism Studies, 10(2), 2–13.
   Google Scholar
• Uysal, M., Howard, G., & Jamrozy, U. (1991). An application of importance-performance analysis to a ski resort: A case study in North Carolina. Visions in Leisure and Business, 10(1), 16–25.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, D. J., & Eagles, P. (2003). The use of importance-performance analysis and market segmentation for tourism management in parks and protected areas: An application to Tanzania’s National Parks. Journal of Ecotourism, 2(3), 196–212.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, D. (2007). Personal benefits and place attachment of visitors to four metropolitan and regional protected areas in Australia ( Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., & Lei, S. L. (2012). A structural model of residents’ intention to participate in ecotourism: The case of a wetland community. Tourism Management, 33, 916–925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., & Chan, C.-S. (2016). Nature-based tourism development in Hong Kong: Importance–Performance perceptions of local residents and tourists. Tourism Management Perspectives, 20, 38–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar