References
- Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sciences, 30(2), 361–391. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.01614.x 2 doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.1999.30.issue-2
- Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1997). The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Science, 28(3), 557–582. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01322.x
- Armstrong, J. S. (2012). Illusions in regression analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 28(3), 689–694. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2012.02.001
- Baumgartner, M. (2008). Regularity theories reassessed. Philosophia, 36(3), 327–354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-007-9114-4
- Beynon, M., Curry, B., & Morgan, P. (2001). Knowledge discovery in marketing: An approach through rough set theory. European Journal of Marketing, 35(7/8), 915–937. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005734
- Bigerna, S., Bollino, C. A., & Micheli, S. (2016). Socio-economic acceptability for smart grid development–a comprehensive review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, 399–409. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.010
- Bigné, E., Caplliure, E. M., & Miquel, M. J. (2016). eWOM on travel agency selection: Specialized versus private label. Psychology & Marketing, 33(12), 1046–1053. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20938
- Brancheau, J. C., & Wetherbe, J. C. (1990). The adoption of spread- sheet software: Testing innovation diffusion theory in the context of end-user computing. Information Systems Research, 1(1), 41–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1.2.115
- Brynjolfsson, E., Hu, Y. J., & Rahman, M. S. (2013). Competing in the age of omnichannel retailing. MITSloan. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/competing-in-the-age-of-omnichannel-retailing/
- Chau, Y. K., & Hu, J. H. (2001). Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: A model comparison approach. Decision Sciences, 32(4), 669–719. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2001.tb00978.x
- COMPASSS bibliographical database. http://www. compasss.org/bibdata.htm
- Curchod, C. (2003). The comparative method in management science: Towards a quali-quantitative approach to managerial reality. Finance, Control and Strategy, 6(2), 155–177.
- Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
- De Meur, G., & Rihoux, B. (2002). L’analyse quali-quantitative comparée (AQQC-QCA): Approche, techniques et applications en sciences humaines. Academia-Bruylant.
- De Villiers, R., & Tipgomut, P. (2018). Reviewing the marketing theory adoption journey for studies using QCA as a methodological approach: Insights, gaps and agenda for future research. Australasian Marketing Journal, 26(4), 317–337. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2018.10.007
- Fiss, P., Marx, A., & Rihoux, B. (2014). Comment: Getting QCA right. Sociological Methodology, 44(1), 95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0081175014542079
- Fiss, P. C. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1180–1198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586092
- Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better casual theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
- Gigerenzer, G. (1991). From tools to theories: A heuristic of discovery in cognitive psychology. Psychological Review, 98(2), 254–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.254
- Gigerenzer, G. (2004). Mindless statistics. The Journal of Socio-economics, 33(5), 587–606. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.033
- Gilovich, T. (1991). How we know what isn’t so. Free Press.
- Graßhoff, G., & May, M. (2001). Causal regularities. Current Issues in Causation, 85–114.
- Gross, M. E. (2010). Aligning public-private partnership contracts with public objectives for transportation infrastructure [Doctoral dissertation]. Virginia Tech. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu.ezproxy.aut.ac.nz/theses/available/etd-08242010-173605/unrestricted/Gross_ME_D_2010.pdf.
- Hubbard, R. (1995). The earth is highly significantly round (p<. 0001). American Psychologist, 50(12), 1098. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.12.1098.a
- Hubbard, R. (2015). Corrupt research: The case for reconceptualizing empirical management and social science. Sage.
- Jordan, E., Gross, M. E., Javernick-Will, A. M., & Garvin, M. J. (2011). Use and misuse of qualitative comparative analysis. Construction Management and Economics, 29(11), 1159–1173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.640339
- Kaminski, J. (2011). Diffusion of innovation theory. Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics, 6(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.12.1098.a
- Kan, A. K. S., Adegbite, E., El Omari, S., & Abdellatif, M. (2016). On the use of qualitative comparative analysis in management. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1458–1463. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.125
- Kent, R. (2009a). Rethinking data analysis—Part one. International Journal of Market Research, 51(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530905100107
- Kent, R. (2009b). Rethinking Data Analysis - Part Two: Some Alternatives to Frequentist Approaches. International Journal of Market Research, 51(2), 181–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530905100212
- Kent, R. A. (2005). Cases as configurations: Using combinatorial and fuzzy logic to analyse marketing data. International Journal of Market Research, 47(2), 205–228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530504700202
- Lambert, S. J., & Fairweather, J. R. (2010). The socio-technical networks of technology users’ innovation in New Zealand: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Lincoln University. http://hdl.handle.net/10182/3339
- Lee, Y. H., Hsieh, Y. C., & Hsu, C. N. (2011). Adding innovation diffusion theory to the technology acceptance model: Supporting employees’ intentions to use e-learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(4), 124–137. .ds.unipi.gr/et&s/journals/14_4/12.pdf
- Lehmann, D. R. (2017). Creating and writing effective research. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 27(3), 171–179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2017.1318670
- Lorenzi, N. M., Novak, L. L., Weiss, J. B., Gadd, C. S., & Unertl, K. M. (2008). Crossing the implementation chasm: A proposal for bold action. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 15(3), 290–296. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2583
- Lou, H., Luo, W., & Strong, D. (2000). Perceived critical mass effect on groupware acceptance. European Journal of Information Systems, 9(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000358
- Mackie, J. L. (1965). Causes and conditions. American Philosophical Quarterly, 2(4), 245–264. http://www.jstor.com/stable/<20009173
- Mackie, J. L. (1974). The cement of the universe: A study of causation. Oxford University Press.
- McClelland, D. C. (1998). Identifying competencies with behavioral-event interviews. Psychological Science, 9(5), 331–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00065
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2003). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Moore, G. A. (1999). Crossing the chasm: Marketing and selling high‐tech products to mainstream customers. Harper Business.
- Moore, G. A. (2004). Darwin and the demon: Innovating within established enterprises. Harvard Business Review, 82(7/8), 86‐9. https://hbr.org/2004/07/darwin-and-the-demon-innovating-within-established-enterprises
- Moore, G. A. (2014). Crossing the chasm: Marketing and selling disruptive products to mainstream customers. HarperCollins.
- Oliver, P., Marwell, G., & Teixeira, R. (1985). A theory of the critical mass: Interdependence, group heterogeneity, and the production of collective action. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 522–556. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/228313
- Ordanini, A., Parasuraman, A., & Rubera., G. (2014). When the recipe is more important than the ingredients: A qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of service innovation configurations. Journal of Service Research, 17(2), 134–149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670513513337
- Perry, C. (1998). Processes of a case study methodology for postgraduate research in marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 32(9/10), 785–802. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569810232237
- Perry-Smith, J. E., & Mannucci, P. V. (2017). From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 53–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0462
- Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method. Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press.
- Ragin, C. C. (1994). Introduction to qualitative comparative analysis. In T. Janoski & A. M. Hicks (Eds.), The comparative political economy of the Welfare State (pp. 299–319). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. University of Chicago Press.
- Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press Ltd.
- Ragin, C. C. (2009). Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets (fsQCA). In B. Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (pp. pp.87–122). Sage.
- Rihoux, B. (2006). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related systematic comparative methods: Recent advances and remaining challenges for social science research. International Sociology, 21(5), 679–706. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580906067836
- Rihoux, B., Álamos-Concha, P., Bol, D., Marx, A., & Rezsöhazy, I. (2013). From niche to mainstream method? A comprehensive mapping of QCA applications in journal articles from 1984 to 2011. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 175–184. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23563600
- Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. C. (2009). Configurational comparative methods. Sage.
- Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of Innovations (1 ed.). Free Press.
- Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5 ed.). Free Press.
- Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2007). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) und fuzzy sets. Barbara Budrich.
- Schneider, M. R., & Eggert, A. (2014). Embracing complex causality with the QCA method: An invitation. Journal of Business Market Management, 7(1), 312–328. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/96106
- Segarra-Moliner, J. R., & Moliner-Tena, M. Á. (2016). Customer equity and CLV in Spanish telecommunication services. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4694–4705. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.017
- Sinclair, A., & Agyeman, B. (2005). Building global leadership at the body shop: Strategies for success in an increasingly complex marketplace. Human Resource Management International Digest, 13(4), 5–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09670730510700140
- Sledgianowski, D., & Kulviwat, S. (2009). Using social network sites: The effects of playfulness, critical mass and trust in a hedonic context. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(4), 74–83. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08874417.2009.11645342.
- Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(1), 144–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144
- Van Slyke, C., Illie, V., Lou, H., & Stafford, T. (2007). Perceived critical mass and the adoption of a communication technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(3), 270–283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000680
- Varki, S., Cooil, B., & Rust, R. T. (2000). Modeling fuzzy data in qualitative marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(4), 480–489. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.37.4.480.18785
- Viswanathan, M., & Childers, T. L. (1999). Understanding how product attributes influence product categorization: Development and validation of fuzzy set-based measures of gradedness in product categories. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379903600106
- Wagemann, C., & Schneider, C. Q. (2010). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets: Agenda for a research approach and a data analysis technique. Comparative Sociology, 9(3), 376–396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/156913210X12493538729838
- Wilkie, W. L., & Moore, E. S. (2003). Scholarly research in marketing: Exploring the “4 eras” of thought development. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 22(2), 116–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.22.2.116.17639
- Woodside, A. G. (2010). Bridging the chasm between survey and case study research: Re- search methods for achieving generalization, accuracy, and complexity. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(1), 64–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.03.017
- Woodside, A. G. (2012). Proposing a new logic for data analysis in marketing and consumer behavior: Case study research of large-N survey data for estimating algorithms that accurately profile X (extremely high-use) consumers. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science: Bridging Asia and the World, 22(4), 277–289. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2012.717369
- Woodside, A. G. (2013). Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling of adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 463–472. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.021
- Woodside, A. G. (2016). Diffusion and adoption of good science: Overcoming the dominant logic of NHST and the reporting of rubbish. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 23(4), 327–333. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1051712X.2016.1258191
- Woodside, A. G. (2017). Releasing the death-grip of null hypothesis statistical testing (p <.05): Applying complexity theory and somewhat precise outcome testing (spot). Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 27(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2016.1265323.
- Woodside, A. G., & Baxter, R. (2013). Achieving accuracy, generalization-to-contexts, and complexity in theories of business-to-business decision processes. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(3), 382–393. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.02.004
- Zadeh, L. (1996). Fuzzy Logic: Computing with words. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 4(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/91.493904
- Zwilling, M. (2012, November 10). Crossing the chasm is a major start-up challenge. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/crossing-the-chasm-is-a-major-startup-challenge-2012-12/?r=AU&IR=T.