“Five” or “ten”: analysing a co-operative correction in Muay Thai coaching

References

• Amerine, R., & Bilmes, J. (1988). Following instructions. Human Studies, 11(2–3), 327–339. doi:10.1007/BF00177308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arano, Y. (2020). Doing reflecting: embodied solitary confirmation of instructed enactment. Discourse Studies, 22(3), 261–290. doi:10.1177/1461445620906037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, W. A. (1993). Transitional regularities for ‘casual’ “okay” usages. Journal of Pragmatics, 19(4), 325–352. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(93)90092-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilmes, J. (1995). Negotiation and compromise:a microanalysis of a discussion in the United States Federal Trade Commission. In A. Firth (Ed.), The discourse of negotiation: studies of language in the workplace (pp. 61–81). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Broth, M., & Keevallik, L. (2014). Getting ready to move as a couple: accomplishing mobile formations in a dance class. Space and Culture, 17(2), 107–121. doi:10.1177/1206331213508483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchill, E. (2022). The education of attention in enskillment. Journal of Pragmatics, 193, 155–172. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2022.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulter, J. (1983). Contingent and a priori structures in sequential analysis. Human Studies, 6(1), 361–376. doi:10.1007/BF02127769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deppermann, A. (2013). Multimodal interaction from a conversation analytic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deppermann, A. (2018). Changes in turn-design over interactional histories: the case of instructions in driving school lessons. In A. Deppermann & J. StreeckEds., Time in embodied interaction: Synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources (pp. 293–324). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.293.09dep.
   Google Scholar
• Deppermann, A., & Streeck, J. (Eds.). (2018). Time in embodied interaction: Synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Douglah, J. (2020). “Use the mirror now”: demonstrating through a mirror in show dance classes. Multimodal Communication, 9(2), 20200002. doi:10.1515/mc-2020-0002
   Google Scholar
• Ehmer, O. (2021). Synchronization in demonstrations: multimodal practices for instructing body knowledge. Linguistics Vanguard, 7(4), 20200038. doi:10.1515/lingvan-2020-0038
   Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J., & Levinson, S. C. (2006). Introduction: Human sociality as a new interdisciplinary field. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 1–35). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, B., & Fitzgerald, R. (2017a). The categorial and sequential work of ‘embodied mapping’ in basketball coaching. Journal of Pragmatics, 118, 81–98. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2017.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, B., & Fitzgerald, R. (2017b). ‘You gotta see both at the same time’: visually analyzing player performances in basketball coaching. Human Studies, 40(1), 121–144. doi:10.1007/s10746-016-9415-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, B., & Lindwall, O. (2020). Show them or involve them?: two organizations of embodied instruction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(2), 223–246. doi:10.1080/08351813.2020.1741290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, B., & Reynolds, E. (2016). The organization of corrective demonstrations using embodied action in sports coaching feedback. Symbolic Interaction, 39(4), 525–556. doi:10.1002/symb.255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frake, C. O. (1964). Notes on queries in ethnography. American Anthropologist, 66(3), 132–145. doi:10.1525/aa.1964.66.3.02a00860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: working out durkeim’s aphorism (A. W. Rawls Ed.). Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H., & Wieder, D. L. (1992). Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In G. Watson & R. M. Seiler (Eds.), Text in context: studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 175–206). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (2015). The ecological approach to visual perception. ( Original work published 1979). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633. doi:10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1996). Transparent vision. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 370–404). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2003). Pointing as situated practice. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp. 217–241). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2007). 15 environmentally coupled gestures. In S. D. Duncan, J. Cassell, & E. T. LevyEds., Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language (pp. 195–212). John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.1.18goo.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-operative action. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781139016735
   Google Scholar
• Green, T. A., & Svinth, J. R., (Eds.). (2010). Martial arts of the world: an encyclopedia of history and innovation (Vol. 2). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC–CLIO.
   Google Scholar
• Hayashi, M., & Yoon, K. (2009). Negotiating boundaries in talk. In J. Sidnell (Ed.), Conversation analysis: comparative perspectives (pp. 250–278). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. (2010). Talk in action: interactions, identities, and institutions. Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781444318135
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Sorjonen, M. L. (1994). Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: and-prefacing as a feature of question design. Language in Society, 23(1), 1–29. doi:10.1017/S0047404500017656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hester, S., & Eglin, P. (Eds.). (1997). Culture in action: studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, D.C.: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2010). Bodily quoting in dance correction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(4), 401–426. doi:10.1080/08351813.2010.518065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2013). Here in time and space: decomposing movement in dance instruction. In P. Haddington, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Interaction and mobility: Language and the body in motion (pp. 345–370). De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2014). Turn organization and bodily-vocal demonstrations. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 103–120. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2014.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2020a). Chapter 6. Linguistic structures emerging in the synchronization of a pilates class. In C. Taleghani-Nikazm, E. Betz, & P. GolatoEds., Mobilizing others: grammar and lexis within larger activities (pp. 147–173). John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.33.06kee.
   Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2020b). Grammatical coordination of embodied action: the estonian ja ‘and’ as a temporal organizer of pilates moves. In Y. Maschler, S. Pekarek Doehler, J. Lindström, & L. KeevallikEds., Emergent syntax for conversation: clausal patterns and the organization of action (pp. 221–244). John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.32.08kee.
   Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2021). Vocalizations in dance classes teach body knowledge. Linguistics Vanguard, 7(s4), 20200098. doi:10.1515/lingvan-2020-0098
   Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L., & Ogden, R. (2020). Sounds on the margins of language at the heart of interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 1–18. doi:10.1080/08351813.2020.1712961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushida, S., Hiramoto, T., & Hayashi, M. (2017). Kaiwa bunseki nyūmon [an introduction to conversation analysis]. Tokyo, Japan: Keisō Shobō.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, A. (2016). The coordination of moves in aikido interaction. Gesture, 15(2), 123–155. doi:10.1075/gest.15.2.01lef
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, A. (2021). To touch and to be touched: the coordination of touching-whole-body-movements in aikido practice. In A. Cekaite & L. Mondada (Eds.), Touch in social interaction: touch, language, and body (pp. 150–170). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Macbeth, D. (2004). The relevance of repair for classroom correction. Language in Society, 33(5), 703–736. doi:10.1017/S0047404504045038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, C., & Wedelstaedt, U. V. (Eds.). (2017). Moving bodies in interaction – interacting bodies in motion: intercorporeality, interkinesthesia, and enaction in sports. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Moerman, M. (1988). Talking culture: ethnography and conversation analysis. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85–106. doi:10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2019). Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 47–62. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2021). Sensing in social interaction: the taste for cheese in gourmet shops. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muntanyola-Saura, D., & Sánchez-García, R. (2018). Distributed attention: a cognitive ethnography of instruction in sport settings. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 48(4), 433–454. doi:10.1111/jtsb.12183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevile, M. (2007). Seeing the point: attention and participation in the airline cockpit. In L. Mondada (Ed.), Conference proceedings of interacting bodies 2007: Gestures and the organisation of social interaction: Ethnomethodological and conversational perspectives (pp. 1–12). ICAR Ecole Normale Suierieure Lettres et Sciences Humaines. http://gesture-lyon2005.ens-lyon.fr/IMG/pdf/NevileFINALb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nishizaka, A. (2006). What to learn: the embodied structure of the environment. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(2), 119–154. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3902_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishizaka, A. (2017). The perceived body and embodied vision in interaction. Mind Culture and Activity, 24(2), 110–128. doi:10.1080/10749039.2017.1296465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishizaka, A. (2021). Seeing and knowing in interaction: two distinct resources for action construction. Discourse Studies, 23(6), 759–777. doi:10.1177/14614456211017712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okada, M. (2018). Imperative actions in boxing sparring sessions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 67–84. doi:10.1080/08351813.2017.1375798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Råman, J. (2018). The organization of transitions between observing and teaching in the budo class. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19(1). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/2657
   Google Scholar
• Råman, J. (2019). Budo demonstrations as shared accomplishments: the modalities of guiding in the joint teaching of physical skills. Journal of Pragmatics, 150, 17–38. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2019.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Råman, J., & Haddington, P. (2018). Demonstrations in sports training:communicating a technique through parsing and the return-practice in the budo class. Multimodal Communication, 7(2), 20180001. doi:10.1515/mc-2018-0001
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, E. (2020). Respecifying dualities: the case of ‘feel enquiries’ used in sports coaching. In S. Wiggins & K. Osvaldsson Cromdal (Eds.), Discursive psychology and embodiment (pp. 139–167). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. D. (2013). Overall structural organization. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 257–280). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 21–27). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. (G. Jefferson Ed.). (Vol. I & II). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (2002). Home position. Gesture, 2(2), 133–146. doi:10.1075/gest.2.2.02sac
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Analyzing single episodes of interaction: an exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 101–114. doi:10.2307/2786745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3), 462–482. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2011). Word repeats as unit ends. Discourse Studies, 13(3), 367–380. doi:10.1177/1461445611402749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simone, M., & Galatolo, R. (2020). Climbing as a pair: instructions and instructed body movements in indoor climbing with visually impaired athletes. Journal of Pragmatics, 155, 286–302. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2019.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, A. (2021). Fighting with race: complex solidarities & constrained sameness. Identities, 29(3), 301–319. doi:10.1080/1070289X.2021.1953785
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, D. C. (2012). Ultimate fighting and embodiment: violence, gender, and mixed martial arts. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203142912
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, D. C. (2013). Authenticity’, Muay Thai and habitus. In D. Spencer & R. Sánchez García (Eds.), Fighting scholars: habitus and ethnographies of martial arts and combat sports (pp. 171–184). London, UK: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M., & Monzoni, C. (2016). On the hierarchy of interactional resources: embodied and verbal behavior in the management of joint activities with material objects. Journal of Pragmatics, 103, 15–32. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft: the manu-facture of meaning. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. D. (Eds.). (2011). Embodied interaction: language and body in the material world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stukenbrock, A. (2014). Take the words out of my mouth: verbal instructions as embodied practices. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 80–102. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stukenbrock, A. (2017). Intercorporeal phantasms. In C. Meyer, J. Streeck, & J. S. Jordan (Eds.), Intercorporeality: emerging socialities in interaction (pp. 237–263). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stukenbrock, A. (2018). Forward-looking: where do we go with multimodal projections? In A. Deppermann & J. StreeckEds., Time in embodied interaction: Synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources (pp. 31–68). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.293.01stu.
   Google Scholar
• Stukenbrock, A. (2021). Multimodal gestalts and their change over time: is routinization also grammaticalization? Frontiers in Communication, 6, 662240. doi:10.3389/fcomm.2021.662240
   Google Scholar
• Sutinen, M. (2014). Negotiating favourable conditions for resuming suspended activities. In P. Haddington, T. Keisanen, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction (pp. 137–166). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• ten Have, P. (2002). The notion of member is the heart of the matter: on the role of membership knowledge in ethnomethodological inquiry. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(3). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/834
   Google Scholar
• Turner, R. (1970). Words, utterances, activities. In J. D. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding everyday life: towards a reconstruction of sociological knowledge (pp. 169–187). Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, D. (2003). Why pointing with the index finger is not a universal (in sociocultural and semiotic terms). In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp. 171–215). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Yagi, J. (2021). Embodied micro-transitions: A single-case analysis of an amateur band studio session. Social Interaction Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(4), 1–28. doi:10.7146/si.v4i4.128655
   Google Scholar
• Yagi, J. (2022). Achieving (a)synchrony through choral chanting: co-operative corrections in taiko ensemble rehearsals. Journal of Pragmatics, 195, 48–68. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2022.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar