Validation of the Indonesian translated Zoom Exhaustion and Fatigue (ZEF-I) scale: a RASCH Model and Factor Analysis

References

• Fajrin MU, Tiorida E. Faktor yang Memengaruhi Minat Perilaku Penggunaan Teknologi (Studi: Pengguna Aplikasi Video Conference selama Physical Distancing). 11th Ind Res Work Natl Semin. Bandung, West Java, Indonesia: Politeknik Negeri Bandung; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• McArthur BA, Racine N, Browne D, et al. Recreational screen time before and during COVID-19 in school-aged children. Acta Paediatr. 2021;110(10):2805–2807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangkuliguna G M, Sidharta VM, et al. Sedentary screen time as a coping strategy of distance learning-induced distress during COVID-19 pandemic. J Educ Heal Community Psychol. 2021;10:175–196.
   Google Scholar
• Akulwar-Tajane I, Parmar KK, Naik PH, et al. Rethinking screen time during COVID-19: impact on psychological well-being in physiotherapy students. Int J Clin Exp Med Res. 2020;4:201–216.
   Google Scholar
• Prochaska MT, Newcomb R, Block G, et al. Association between anemia and fatigue in hospitalized patients: does the measure of anemia matter? J Hosp Med. 2017;12:898–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borren NZ, van der Woude CJ, Ananthakrishnan AN. Fatigue in IBD: epidemiology, pathophysiology and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16:247–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauville G, Luo M, Queiroz ACM, et al. Zoom exhaustion & fatigue scale. SSRN Electron J. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• EF Education First Ltd. EF english proficiency index. Miami, FL; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Euro-Reves. Appendix 2: translation protocol. United States; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Tafforeau J, Cobo ML, Tolonen H, et al. Partnership on health statistics. European Community Member States.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. WHODAS 2.0 translation package (Version 1.0) | Translation and linguistic evaluation protocol and supporting material. Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Hagell P, Westergren A. Sample size and statistical conclusions from tests of fit to the Rasch model according to the Rasch unidimensional measurement model (Rumm) program in health outcome measurement. J Appl Meas. 2016;17:416–431.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salim J, Agustina F, Maker JJR. Pre-coronavirus disease 2019 pediatric acute appendicitis: risk factors model and diagnosis modality in a developing low-income country. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2022;25:30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susongko P. Validation of science achievement test with the Rasch model. J Pendidik IPA Indones. 2016;5:268–277.
   Google Scholar
• Lipovetsky S. Modern psychometrics With R. Technometrics. 2020;62:135–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazali NHCM, Hamzah M, Abdullah N, et al. Validation of an instrument to measure the feedback conceptions scale. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci. 2019;9:55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas-Gualdrón DF, Ayala-Hernández JM, Cardona-Arango D, et al. Rasch analysis of the katz index of independence in activities of daily living in senior citizens from antioquia, Colombia. Rev Fac Nac Salud Pública. 2019;37:89–95.
   Google Scholar
• Hidayat R, Patras YE, Harijanto S, et al. Analisis instrumen dan Prioritas Tindakan untuk Kepuasan Kerja Guru di Indonesia Berdasarkan Pemodelan Rasch. J Manaj Pendidik. 2020;7:110–130.
   Google Scholar
• Andrich D, Marais I. Review of principles of test analysis using Rasch measurement theory. Singapore: Springer Texts in Education; 2019. 327–342.
   Google Scholar
• Pham HD. Impact of human resource management practices on enterprises’ competitive advantages and business performance: Evidence from telecommunication industry. Manag Sci Lett. 2020: 721–732.
   Google Scholar
• Hasanah U, Ismarmiaty I, Bachtiar A. Analisis simulasi goodness of fit (GOF) pada Uji model penerimaan E-learning. 05 Agustus 2017. Yogyakarta. Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi 2017. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Suraji FLTS, Khumaedi M. The analysis of instrument of the ability to acting and thinking creatively based rasch model. J Res Educ Res Eval. 2019;8:48–56.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail NE, Jimam NS, Dapar MLP, et al. Validation and reliability of healthcare workers’ knowledge, attitude, and practice instrument for uncomplicated malaria by Rasch measurement model. Front Pharmacol. 2020;10:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin J. Confirmatory factor analysis in R with Lavaan. UCLA Stat. Consult. Gr. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Darmana A, Sutiani A, Nasution HA, et al. Analysis of RASCH model for the validation of chemistry national exam instruments. Indones J Sci Educ. 2021;9:329–345.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher WPJ. Rasch measurement transaction. Transaction of the Rasch measurement. Am Educ Res Assoc. 2007;21:1095.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Reliability and separation of measures. Winsteps®. [cited 2022 Mar 10].
   Google Scholar
• Hayati S, Lailatussaadah L. Validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen pengetahuan pembelajaran aktif, kreatif, dan menyenangkan (PAKEM) menggunakan model RASCH. J Ilm Didakt. 2016;16:169.
   Google Scholar
• Setiawan B, Panduwangi M, Sumintono B. A Rasch analysis of the community’s preference for different attributes of islamic banks in Indonesia. Int J Soc Econ. 2018;45:1647–1662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taherdoost H. Validity & reliability of the research instrument; How to test the validation of questionnaire/survey in a research. Int J Acad Res Manag. 2016;5:28–36.
   Google Scholar
• Baghaei P. The RASCH Model as A Construct Validation Tool. RASCH Meas. Trans. Mashad, Iran; [cited 2022 Mar 14].
   Google Scholar
• Patel N, Desai S. ABC of face validity for questionnaire. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2020;65:164–168.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues IB, Adachi JD, Beattie KA, et al. Development and validation of a new tool to measure the facilitators, barriers and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18:540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Barros AR, da Silva LL, de FA. Construct validity and reliability of the work environment assessment instrument WE-10. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:7364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone WJ. Rasch analysis for instrument development: Why, when, and How? Dolan E, editor. CBE—Life Sci Educ. 2016;15:rm4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Liao M, Cai W, et al. Physical activity, screen exposure and sleep among students during the pandemic of COVID-19. Sci Rep. 2021;11:8529.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Safranek C. Stanford students now spend four-fifths of the waking day staring at a screen; is this the new college normal?. Stanford Dly. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Khalil R, Mansour AE, Fadda WA, et al. The sudden transition to synchronized online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia: a qualitative study exploring medical students’ perspectives. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20:285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afrianty TW, Artatanaya IG, Burgess J. Working from home effectiveness during COVID-19: Evidence from university staff in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Manag Rev. 2022;27:50–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Pembelajaran secara Daring dan Bekerja dari Rumah untuk Mencegah Penyebaran Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19). Indonesia: Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia; 2020 p. 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Pandya A, Lodha P. Social connectedness, excessive screen time during COVID-19 and mental health: a review of current evidence. Front Hum Dyn. 2021;3:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan A, Sen P, Shah C, et al. Prevalence and risk factor assessment of digital eye strain among children using online e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: digital eye strain among kids (DESK study-1). Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;69:140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Vanderloo LM, Keown-Stoneman CDG, et al. Screen use and mental health symptoms in Canadian children and youth during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2140875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhawan S. Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. J Educ Technol Syst. 2020;49:5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Arai Y, Naganuma S. The geographical digital divide in broadband access and governmental policies in Japan: three case studies. Netcom. 2010;24-1/2:7–26.
   Google Scholar
• Riddlesden D, Singleton AD. Broadband speed equity: A new digital divide? Appl Geogr. 2014;52:25–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czaja SJ, Plude D. The benefits and challenges of technology for older adults: lessons from create. Innov Aging. 2018;2:213–213.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadi J, Nourabadi S. Implementation barriers in virtual education in Payame Noor University in Iran. Utop y Prax Latinoam. 2020;25:202–209.
   Google Scholar
• Bhuana GP, Apriliyanti DL. Teachers’ encounter of online learning: Challenges and support system. J English Educ Teach. 2021;5:110–122.
   Google Scholar