From Mixing methods to the logic(s) of inquiry: taking a fresh look at developing mixed design studies

References

• Bhaskar, R. (1989). Reclaiming reality. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Braud, W., & Anderson, R. (1998). Transpersonal research methods for the social sciences: Honoring human experience. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Cane, J., O’Connor, D., & Michie, S. (2012). Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implementation Science, 7, 37. Retrieved from www.implementationscience.com/content/7/37 doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, K. M. T., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Johnson, R. B., & Frels, R. K. (2013). Practice note: Using debriefing interviews to promote authenticity and transparency in mixed research. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 7, 271–283. doi: 10.5172/mra.2013.7.2.271
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2008). Mixed methods research. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The sage encyclopaedia of qualitative research methods (Vol. 2, pp. 526–529). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2011). Controversies in mixed methods research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 269–283). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J.W. & Plano Clark, V.L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• D’Avanzo, B., Shaw, R., Riva, S., Apostolo, J., Bobrowicz-Campos, E., Kurpas, D. … Holland, C. (2017). Stakeholders’ views and experiences of care and interventions for addressing frailty and pre-frailty: A meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence. PLOS One, 12, 7. e0180127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denscombe, M. (2008). Communities of practice: A research paradigm for the mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 270–283. doi: 10.1177/1558689808316807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 1–19). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 1–26). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, N. (Ed.). (2011). Qualitative research: Combining core approaches. London: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, N., & Nolas, S.-M. (2011). Exploring and expanding on pluralism in qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 8, 115–119. doi: 10.1080/14780887.2011.572728
   Google Scholar
• Frost, N., & Shaw, R. L. (2015). Evolving mixed and multi-method approaches for psychology. In S. Hesse-Biber & B. Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of mixed and multi-method research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, N., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., & Redwood, S. (2013). Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, 117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin, K., & Todres, L. (2013). Caring and well-being: A lifeworld approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–177). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Guyatt, G. H., Sackett, D. L., Sinclair, J. C., Hayward, R., Cook, D. J., & Cook, R. J. (1995). Users’ guides to the medical literature: 9: A method for grading health-care recommendations. JAMA, 274(22), 1800–1804. doi: 10.1001/jama.1995.03530220066035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwyther, H., Cooke, R., Shaw, R., Marcucci, M., Cano, A., & Holland, C. (2017). Perceptions and experiences of frailty interventions: Quantitative and qualitative results from a survey of partners within the European innovation partnership on active and healthy ageing (EIP-AHA). Ageing and Society, 38, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwyther, H., Shaw, R., Jaime Dauden, E.-A., D'Avanzo, B., Kurpas, D., Bujnowska-Fedak, M. … Holland, C. (2018). Understanding frailty: A qualitative study of European healthcare policy-makers' approaches to frailty screening and management. BMJ Open, 8, e018653. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, G. (1965). Inference to the best explanation. Philosophical Review, 74, 88–95. doi: 10.2307/2183532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hathcoat, J. D., & Meixner, C. (2017). Pragmatism, factor analysis, and the conditional incompatibility thesis in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(4), 433–449. doi: 10.1177/1558689815622114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heron, J., & Reason, P. (1997). A participatory inquiry paradigm. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 274–294. doi: 10.1177/107780049700300302
   Google Scholar
• Higgs, P., & Gilleard, C. (2015). Rethinking old age: Theorizing the fourth age. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hiles, D. R. (1999). Paradigms lost – paradigms regained. Paper presented to the 18th international human science research conference, Sheffield, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Hiles, D. R. (2006). The logic of human inquiry: Epistemological and pluralistic issues. Paper presented at 6th European qualitative research conference in health and social care, Bournemouth.
   Google Scholar
• Hiles, D. R. (2009). Familiar and unfamiliar places: Explorations in tacit knowing. Paper presented to 8th international qualitative research conference, Bournemouth, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Hiles, D. R. (2014). Qualitative inquiry, mixed methods and the logic of scientific inquiry. QMiP Bulletin, 17(spring), 49–62. Retrieved from http://shop.bps.org.uk/qmip-bulletin-issue-17-spring-2014.html
   Google Scholar
• Hiles, D. R. (2016). Weaving and un-Weaving methodology in the human and social sciences. Invited address to the Faculty of Social Sciences, Masaryk University, Brno, CZ. (24th Nov 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Holland, C., Boukouvalas, A., Wallis, S., Clarkesmith, D., Cooke, R., Liddle, L., & Kay, A. (2016). Transition from community dwelling to retirement village in older adults: Cognitive functioning and psychological health outcomes. Ageing and Society, 37, 1499–1526. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X16000477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, C., Carter, M., Cooke, R., Leask, G., Powell, R., Shaw, R., … Wallis, S. (2015). Collaborative Research Between Aston Research Centre for Healthy Ageing (ARCHA) and the ExtraCare Charitable Trust. The Final Report. Aston Research Centre for Healthy Ageing. Retrieved from http://www.aston.ac.uk/lhs/research/centres-facilities/archa/extracare-project/
   Google Scholar
• Howes, L. M. (2017). Developing the methodology for an applied, interdisciplinary research project: Documenting the journey toward philosophical clarity. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(4), 450–468. doi: 10.1177/1558689815622018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. doi: 10.1177/1558689806298224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163–188). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lipton, P. (1991). Inference to the best explanation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M., & Niehaus, L. (2009). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Netten, A., Darton, R., Baumker, T., & Callaghan, L. (2011). Improving housing with care choices for older people. An evaluation of ExtraCare housing. Kent: PSSRU, University of Kent.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, A. (1999). People’s way of knowing: Gender and methodology. In S. Hood, B. Mayall, & S. Oliver (Eds.), Critical issues in social research (pp. 154–170). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2008). The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 13(2), 92–98. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2010). Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ, 341, c4587. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2006). Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures. The Qualitative Report, 11(3), 474–498.
   Google Scholar
• Pluye, P., & Nha Hong, Q. (2014). Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: Mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 29–45. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D. E. (1983). Methodology for the human sciences: Systems of inquiry. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (1989). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. (5th ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robson, C. (2011). Real world research. (3rd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, R. L. (2010). Embedding reflexivity within experiential qualitative psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 7(3), 233–243. doi: 10.1080/14780880802699092
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, R. L., & Hiles, D. R. (2017). Using multiple methods in applied qualitative research. In N. King & J. Brooks (Eds.), Applied qualitative psychology. (pp. 237–250). London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, R. L., Holland, C., Pattison, H. M., & Cooke, R. (2016). Patients’ perceptions and experiences of cardiovascular disease and diabetes prevention programmes: A systematic review and framework synthesis using the theoretical domains framework. Social Science and Medicine, 156, 192–203. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, R. L., Larkin, M., & Flowers, P. (2014). Expanding the evidence within evidence-based healthcare: Thinking about the context, acceptability and feasibility of interventions. Evidence Based Medicine, 20(2), 80. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2014-110165
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, R. L., West, K., Hagger, B., & Holland, C. (2016). Living well to the end: A phenomenological analysis of life in extra care housing. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Health and Wellbeing, 11, 1. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v11.31100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Souto, R., Khanassov, V., Hong, Q. N., Bush, P., Vedel, I., & Pluye, P. (2015). Systematic mixed studies reviews: Updating results on the reliability and efficiency of the mixed methods appraisal tool. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(1), 500–501. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2011). Mixed methods research: Contemporary issues in an emerging field. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 285–299). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. In C. Willig & W. Stainton Rogers (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed., pp. 17–37). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• West, K., Shaw, R. L., Hagger, B., & Holland, C. (2016). Enjoying the third age! Discourse, identity and liminality in extra-care communities. Ageing and Society, 37, 1874–1897. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X16000556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yardley, L., & Bishop, F. L. (2008). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: A pragmatic approach. In C. Willig & W. Stainton Rogers (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 352–369). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yardley, L., & Bishop, F. L. (2017). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: A pragmatic approach. In C. Willig & W. Stainton Rogers (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed., pp. 398–413). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar