3,884
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Promoting HPV vaccination on social media: interactive effects of threat, efficacy and social cues

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 4442-4456 | Received 28 Apr 2021, Accepted 28 Aug 2021, Published online: 08 Oct 2021

References

  • HPV Information Centre. Human papillomavirus and related diseases report: China. [accessed 2020 Dec 6]. http://www.hpvcentre.net/statistics/reports/CHN.pdf
  • Hull R, Mbele M, Makhafola T, Hicks C, Wang SM, Reis RM, Mehrotra R, Mkhize Kwitshana Z, Kibiki G, Bates DO, et al. Cervical cancer in low and middle income countries. Oncol Lett. 2020 Sep 1;20(3):2058–74. doi:10.3892/ol.2020.11754.
  • Bruni L, Albero G, Serrano B, Mena M, Gómez D, Muñoz J, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S. ICO/IARC information centre on HPV and Cancer (HPV information centre).Human papillomavirus and related diseases in China. Summary Report. 2019 June 17 [Accessed 2021 Apr 5]. https://hpvcentre.net/statistics/reports/CHN.pdf?t=1617614054427
  • Xiang J, Han L, Fan Y, Feng B, Wu H, Hu C, Qi M, Wang H, Liu Q, Liu Y. Prevalence and genotype distribution of human papillomavirus among attendees at a sexually transmitted diseases clinic in Urban Tianjin, China. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:1983. doi:10.2147/IJGM.S308215.
  • National Institutes of Health. Cervical cancer treatment (PDQ®)–Health professional version. [accessed 2020 Dec 6]. https://www.cancer.gov/types/cervical/hp/cervical-treatment-pdq#_284_toc
  • Chen L, Song Y, Ruan G, Zhang Q, Lin F, Zhang J, Sun P, An J, Dong B, Sun P. Knowledge and attitudes regarding HPV and vaccination among Chinese women aged 20 to 35 years in Fujian province: a cross-sectional study. Cancer Control. 2018;25:1–9. doi:10.1177/1073274818775356.
  • Hu S, Xu X, Zhang Y. A nationwide post-marketing survey of knowledge, attitude and practice toward human papillomavirus vaccine in general population: implications for vaccine roll-out in mainland China. Vaccine. 2021;39:35–44.
  • Zhang Y, Wang Y, Liu L, Fan Y, Liu Z, Wang Y, Nie S. Awareness and knowledge about human papillomavirus vaccination and its acceptance in China: a meta-analysis of 58 observational studies. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:216. doi:10.1186/s12889-016-2873-8.
  • Zhou L, Zhang D, Yang CC, Wang Y. Harnessing social media for health information management. Electron Commer Res Appl. 2018;27:139–51. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2017.12.003.
  • Graham AL, Cobb CO, Cobb NK. The internet, social media, and health decision-making. In: Diefenbach MA, Miller-Halegoua S, Bowen DJ, editors. Handbook of health decision science. New York (NJ): Springer; 2016. p.335–55.
  • Shi J, Chen L. Social support on Weibo for people living with HIV/AIDS in China: a quantitative content analysis. Chin J Commun. 2014;7:285–98.
  • McMullan M. Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient–health professional relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63:24–28. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.006.
  • Chen L, Yang X. Using EPPM to evaluate the effectiveness of fear appeal messages across different media outlets to increase the intention of breast self-examination among Chinese women. Health Commun. 2019;34:1369–76. doi:10.1080/10410236.2018.1493416.
  • Chou WYS, Trivedi N, Peterson E, Gaysynsky A, Krakow M, Vraga E. How do social media users process cancer prevention messages on Facebook? An eye-tracking study. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;103:1161–67. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2020.01.013.
  • Tong ST, van der Heide B, Langwell L, Walther JB. Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. J Comput-Mediat Commun. 2018;13:531–49. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00409.x.
  • Chen L, Tang H, Liao S, Hu Y. e-Health campaigns for promoting influenza vaccination: examining effectiveness of fear appeal messages from different sources. Telemed e-Health. 2020;27:763–70. doi:10.1089/tmj.2020.0263.
  • Wang X, Chen L, Shi J, Peng T. What makes cancer information viral on social media? Comput Hum Behav. 2019;93:149–56. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.024.
  • Shi J, Poorisat T, Salmon CT. The use of social networking sites (SNSs) in health communication campaigns: review and recommendations. Health Commun. 2018;33:49–56. doi:10.1080/10410236.2016.1242035.
  • Witte K. Predicting risk behaviors: development and validation of a diagnostic scale. J Health Commun. 1996;1:317–42. doi:10.1080/108107396127988.
  • Maloney EK, Lapinski MK, Witte K. Fear appeals and persuasion: a review and update of the extended parallel process model. Soc Pers Psychol Compa. 2011;5:206–19. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00341.x.
  • De Hoog N, Stroebe W, De Wit JB. The impact of vulnerability to and severity of a health risk on processing and acceptance of fear-arousing communications: a meta-analysis. Rev Gen Psychol. 2007;11:258–85. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.11.3.258.
  • Witte K, Allen M. A meta-analysis of fear appeals: implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Educ Behav. 2000;27(5):591–615. doi:10.1177/109019810002700506.
  • Witte K. Fear control and danger control: a test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Commun Monogr. 1994;61:113–34. doi:10.1080/03637759409376328.
  • Shi J, Smith SW. The effects of fear appeal message repetition on perceived threat, perceived efficacy, and behavioral intention in the extended parallel process model. Health Commun. 2016;31:275–86. doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.948145.
  • Smith SW, Rosenman KD, Kotowski MR, Glazer E, McFeters C, Keesecker NM, Law A. Using the EPPM to create and evaluate the effectiveness of brochures to increase the use of hearing protection in farmers and landscape workers. J Appl Commun Res. 2008;36:200–18. doi:10.1080/00909880801922862.
  • Sheeran P, Harris PR, Epton T. Does heightening risk appraisals change people’s intentions and behavior? A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Psychol Bull. 2014;140:511. doi:10.1037/a0033065.
  • Avery EJ, Park S. HPV vaccination campaign fear visuals: an eye-tracking study exploring effects of visual attention and type on message informative value, recall, and behavioral intentions. Public Relat Rev. 2018;44:321–30. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.02.005.
  • Prati G, Pietrantoni L, Zani B. Influenza vaccination: the persuasiveness of messages among people aged 65 years and older. Health Commun. 2012;27:413–20. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.606523.
  • Walther JB. Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Commun Res. 1996;23:3–43. doi:10.1177/009365096023001001.
  • Sundar SS. The MAIN model: a heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In: Miriam JM, Andrew JF, editors. Digital media, youth, and credibility. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press; 2008. p. 73–100.
  • Metzger MJ, Flanagin AJ, Medders RB. Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. J Commun. 2010;60:413–39. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x.
  • Westerman D, Spence PR, van der Heide B. A social network as information: the effect of system generated reports of connectedness on credibility on Twitter. Comput Hum Behav. 2012;28:199–206. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.001.
  • Chen L, Yang X, Fu L, Liu X, Yuan C. Using the extended parallel process model to examine the nature and impact of breast cancer prevention information on mobile-based social media: content analysis. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2019;7:e13987. doi:10.2196/13987.
  • Boyd D, Golder S, Lotan G. Tweet, tweet, retweet: conversational aspects of retweeting on twitter. In: 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. USA, Hawaii: IEEE; 2010. p. 1–10.
  • Borah P, Xiao X. The importance of ‘Likes’: the interplay of message framing, source, and social endorsement on credibility perceptions of health information on Facebook. J Health Commun. 2018;23:399–411. doi:10.1080/10810730.2018.1455770.
  • Winter S, Brückner C, Krämer NC. They came, they liked, they commented: social influence on Facebook news channels. Cyberpsychology Behav Soc Netw. 2015;18:431–36. doi:10.1089/cyber.2015.0005.
  • Phua J, Ahn SJ. Explicating the ‘like’on Facebook brand pages: the effect of intensity of Facebook use, number of overall ‘likes,’ and number of friends”likes’ on consumers’ brand outcomes. J Mark Commun. 2016;22:544–59. doi:10.1080/13527266.2014.941000.
  • Ma Z, Nan X. Investigating the interplay of self-construal and independent Vs. interdependent self-affirmation. J Health Commun. 2019;24:293–302. doi:10.1080/10810730.2019.1601300.
  • Chen M, Chen L. Promoting smoking cessation in China: using an expansion of the EPPM with other-oriented threat. J Health Commun. 2021;26:1–10.
  • Napper LE, Harris PR, Klein WM. Combining self-affirmation with the extended parallel process model: the consequences for motivation to eat more fruit and vegetables. Health Commun. 2014;29:610–18. doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.791962.
  • Witte K, Meyer G, Martell D. The risk behavior diagnosis scale. Effective health risk messages: a step-by-step guide. Los Angeles (CA): Sage; 2001. p. 67–76.
  • Carcioppolo N, Jensen JD, Wilson SR, Collins WB, Carrion M, Linnemeier G. Examining HPV threat-to-efficacy ratios in the extended parallel process model. Health Commun. 2013;28:20–28. doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.719478.
  • Chaiken S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980;39:752. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752.
  • Chaiken S, Liberman A, Eagly AH, Uleman JS, Bargh JA. Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In: James SU, John AB, editors. Unintended thought. New York (NJ): Gulford Press; 1989. p. 212–52.
  • Hong H. An extension of the extended parallel process model (EPPM) in television health news: the influence of health consciousness on individual message processing and acceptance. Health Commun. 2011;26:343–53. doi:10.1080/10410236.2010.551580.
  • Goei R, Boyson AR, Lyon-Callo SK, Schott C, Wasilevich E, Cannarile S. An examination of EPPM predictions when threat is perceived externally: an asthma intervention with school workers. Health Commun. 2010;25:333–44. doi:10.1080/10410231003775164.
  • Li L, Li J. Factors affecting young Chinese women’s intentions to uptake human papillomavirus vaccination: an extension of the theory of planned behavior model. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020;16:3123–30. doi:10.1080/21645515.2020.1779518.
  • Oinas-Kukkonen H, Harjumaa M. Persuasive systems design: key issues, process model and system features. In: Michael H, Ishani M, editors. Routledge handbook of policy design. New York (NJ): Routledge; 2018. p. 105–23.
  • Trumbo CW. Information processing and risk perception: an adaptation of the heuristic-systematic model. J Commun. 2002;52:367–82. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02550.x.
  • Peters GJY, Ruiter RA, Kok G. Threatening communication: a critical re-analysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory. Health Psychol Rev. 2013;7(sup1):S8–S31. doi:10.1080/17437199.2012.703527.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.