0
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Coronavirus

Factors associated with the COVID-19 booster vaccine intentions of young adults in the United States

ORCID Icon, , , , , , & show all
Article: 2383016 | Received 06 Mar 2024, Accepted 18 Jul 2024, Published online: 24 Jul 2024

References

  • Nicola M, Alsafi Z, Sohrabi C, Kerwan A, Al-Jabir A, Iosifidis C, Agha M, Agha R. The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): a review. Int J Surg. 2020;78:185–11. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018.
  • Mishra NP, Das SS, Yadav S, Khan W, Afzal M, Alarifi A, Ansari MT, Hasnain MS, Nayak AK. Global impacts of pre-and post-COVID-19 pandemic: focus on socio-economic consequences. Sens Int. 2020;1:100042. doi:10.1016/j.sintl.2020.100042.
  • Buheji M, da Costa Cunha K, Beka G, Mavric B, De Souza Y, da Costa Silva SS, Hanafi M, Yein TC. The extent of COVID-19 pandemic socio-economic impact on global poverty. A global integrative multidisciplinary review. Am J Econ. 2020;10(4):213–224. doi:10.5923/j.economics.20201004.02.
  • Tewarson H, Greene K, Fraser MR. State strategies for addressing barriers during the early US COVID-19 vaccination campaign. Am J Public Health. 2021;111(6):1073–1077. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2021.306241.
  • World Health Organization. Statement on the fifteenth meeting of the IHR (2005) emergency committee on the COVID-19 pandemic. [accessed 2023 Dec 21]. https://www.who.int/news/item/05-05-2023-statement-on-the-fifteenth-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-pandemic.
  • Mbaeyi S, Oliver SE, Collins JP, Godfrey M, Goswami ND, Hadler SC, Jones J, Moline H, Moulia D, Reddy S, et al. The advisory committee on immunization practices’ interim recommendations for additional primary and booster doses of COVID-19 vaccines—United States, 2021. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(44):1545. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7044e2.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Map of COVID-19 vaccinations by age and sex. [accessed 2023 Dec 21]. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccination-states-jurisdictions.
  • Boehmer TK, DeVies J, Caruso E, van Santen KL, Tang S, Black CL, Hartnett KP, Kite-Powell A, Dietz S, Lozier M, et al. Changing age distribution of the COVID-19 pandemic—United States, May–August 2020. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(39):1404. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6939e1.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID Data Tracker; [accessed 2023 Dec 21]. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#demographics.
  • Monod M, Blenkinsop A, Xi X, Hebert D, Bershan S, Tietze S, Baguelin M, Bradley VC, Chen Y, Coupland H. Age groups that sustain resurging COVID-19 epidemics in the United States. Science. 2021;371(6536):eabe8372. doi:10.1126/science.abe8372.
  • Jørgensen F, Bor A, Petersen MB. Compliance without fear: Individual‐level protective behaviour during the first wave of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Br J Health Psychol. 2021;26(2):679–696. doi:10.1111/bjhp.12519.
  • Furuse Y, Sando E, Tsuchiya N, Miyahara R, Yasuda I, Ko YK, Saito M, Morimoto K, Imamura T, Shobugawa Y. Clusters of coronavirus disease in communities, Japan, January–April 2020. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(9):2176. doi:10.3201/eid2609.202272.
  • Limbu YB, Gautam RK, Zhou W. Predicting vaccination intention against COVID-19 using theory of planned behavior: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccines. 2022;10(12):2026. doi:10.3390/vaccines10122026.
  • Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
  • Almokdad E, Kiatkawsin K, Lee CH. Antecedents of booster vaccine intention for domestic and international travel. Sustainability. 2023;15(8):6399. doi:10.3390/su15086399.
  • Barattucci M, Pagliaro S, Ballone C, Teresi M, Consoli C, Garofalo A, De Giorgio A, Ramaci T. Trust in science as a possible mediator between different antecedents and COVID-19 booster vaccination intention: an integration of health belief model (HBM) and theory of planned behavior (TPB). Vaccines. 2022;10(7):1099. doi:10.3390/vaccines10071099.
  • Catalano HP, Richards K, Shaw KHH, Catalano M. Applying the theory of planned behavior to predict COVID-19 booster vaccination intentions of college students. J Am Coll Health. 2023;1–0. doi:10.1080/07448481.2023.2228425.
  • Geers AL, Clemens KS, Colagiuri B, Jason E, Colloca L, Webster R, Vase L, Seig M, Faasse K. Do side effects to the primary COVID-19 vaccine reduce intentions for a COVID-19 vaccine booster? Ann Behav Med. 2022;56(8):761–768. doi:10.1093/abm/kaac027.
  • Folcarelli L, Miraglia Del Giudice G, Corea F, Angelillo IF. Intention to receive the COVID-19 vaccine booster dose in a university community in Italy. Vaccines. 2022;10(2):146. doi:10.3390/vaccines10020146.
  • Hagger MS, Hamilton K. Predicting COVID‐19 booster vaccine intentions. Appl Psychol Health Well‐Being. 2022;14(3):819–841. doi:10.1111/aphw.12349.
  • Hwang L-A, Vaithilingam S, Ng JWJ, Nair M, Ahmed P, Musa KI, Mahmoud AB. The continuance intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: an empirical study from Malaysia. PLoS One. 2024;19(4):e0301383. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0301383.
  • Liu CC, Ling J, Zahry NR, Liu C, Ammigan R, Kaur L, Mehmood K. Using the theory of planned behavior to determine COVID-19 vaccination intentions and behavior among international and domestic college students in the United States. PLoS One. 2024;19(2):e0293130. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0293130.
  • Lounis M, Bencherit D, Rais MA, Riad A. COVID-19 vaccine booster hesitancy (VBH) and its drivers in Algeria: national cross-sectional survey-based study. Vaccines. 2022;10(4):621. doi:10.3390/vaccines10040621.
  • Maria S, Pelupessy DC, Koesnoe S, Yunihastuti E, Handayani DOT, Siddiq TH, Mulyantini A, Halim ARV, Wahyuningsih ES, Widhani A, et al. COVID-19 booster vaccine intention by health care workers in Jakarta, Indonesia: using the extended model of health behavior theories. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022;7(10):323. doi:10.3390/tropicalmed7100323.
  • Orellana D, Mercado A, Roth E. Psychosocial factors associated with the intention to get a COVID-19 booster vaccine: evidence from a low-income country. J Public Health (Berl). 2023;2023:1–9. doi:10.1007/s10389-023-01937-x.
  • Sugawara N, Yasui-Furukori N, Fukushima A, Shimoda K. Attitudes of medical students toward COVID-19 vaccination: who is willing to receive a third dose of the vaccine? Vaccines. 2021;9(11):1295. doi:10.3390/vaccines9111295.
  • Wang Z, Fang Y, Yu F-Y, Chan P-F, Chen S, Sun F. Facilitators and barriers to take up a COVID-19 vaccine booster dose among community-dwelling older adults in Hong Kong: a population-based random telephone survey. Vaccines. 2022;10(6):966. doi:10.3390/vaccines10060966.
  • Wang J, Li T, Ge J, Zhou M, Walker AN, Chen J, Zhang T, Zhang K, Gu S, You H, et al. Applying two behavioral theories to predict the willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccine booster in the elderly: a cross-sectional study. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2023;19(3):495–501. doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.10.011.
  • Wong LP, Alias H, Siaw Y-L, Muslimin M, Lai LL, Lin Y, Hu Z. Intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine booster dose and associated factors in Malaysia. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022;18(5):2078634. doi:10.1080/21645515.2022.2078634.
  • Xiang H, Li Y, Guo Y. Promoting COVID-19 booster vaccines in Macao: a psychological reactance perspective. Soc Sci Med. 2023;332:116128. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116128.
  • Zhou M, Liu L, Gu S-Y, Peng X-Q, Zhang C, Wu Q-F, Xu X-P, You H. Behavioral intention and its predictors toward COVID-19 booster vaccination among Chinese parents: applying two behavioral theories. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(12):7520. doi:10.3390/ijerph19127520.
  • Reyes CT, Cao W, Astorini AG, Drohan MM, Schulz CT, Shuster CL, Robbins ML, Yang M, Stamates AL. Using the theory of planned behavior to assess willingness and attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination among a predominantly white US college sample. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2023;11(1):2248236. doi:10.1080/21642850.2023.2248236.
  • Agarwal V. A/H1N1 vaccine intentions in college students: an application of the theory of planned behavior. J Am Coll Health. 2014;62(6):416–424. doi:10.1080/07448481.2014.917650.
  • Yang ZJ. Predicting young adults’ intentions to get the H1N1 vaccine: an integrated model. J Health Commun. 2015;20(1):69–79. doi:10.1080/10810730.2014.904023.
  • Willis DE, Andersen JA, Bryant-Moore K, Selig JP, Long CR, Felix HC, Curran GM, McElfish PA. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: Race/ethnicity, trust, and fear. Clin Transl Sci. 2021;14(6):2200–2207. doi:10.1111/cts.13077.
  • Nápoles AM, Stewart AL, Strassle PD, Quintero S, Bonilla J, Alhomsi A, Santana-Ufret V, Maldonado AI, Pérez-Stable EJ. Racial/ethnic disparities in intent to obtain a COVID-19 vaccine: a nationally representative United States survey. Prev Med Rep. 2021;24:101653. doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101653.
  • Nguyen LH, Joshi AD, Drew DA, Merino J, Ma W, Lo CH, Kwon S, Wang K, Graham, MS, Polidori L, et al. Racial and ethnic differences in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and uptake. medRxiv. 2021; doi:10.1101/2021.02.25.21252402.
  • Mensah GA, Johnson LE, Zhang X, Stinson N, Carrington K, Malla G, Land SR, Huff E, Freeman N, Stoney C, et al. Community Engagement Alliance (CEAL): a national institutes of health program to advance health equity. Am J Public Health. 2023;114(S1):e1–e6. doi:10.2105/ajph.2023.307476.
  • Bonett S, Lin W, Sexton Topper P, Wolfe J, Golinkoff J, Deshpande A, Villarruel A, Bauermeister J. Assessing and improving data integrity in web-based surveys: comparison of fraud detection systems in a COVID-19 study. JMIR Form Res. 2024;8:e47091. doi:10.2196/47091.
  • Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. The Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453–1457. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X.
  • National Research Council. Investing in the health and well-being of young adults. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press; 2015.
  • City of Philadelphia. Health of the city: Philadelphia’s community health assessment 2021. 2021 [accessed 2024 June 12]. https://www.phila.gov/media/20220718132807/HealthOfTheCity-2021.pdf.
  • Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Predicting and changing behavior: the reasoned action approach. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2011.
  • Montano DE, Kasprzyk D. Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, and the integrated behavioral model. Health Behav: Theory, Res Pract. 2015;70(4):231.
  • Guassi Moreira JF, Tashjian SM, Galván A, Silvers JA. Parents versus peers: assessing the impact of social agents on decision making in young adults. Psychol Sci. 2018;29(9):1526–1539. doi:10.1177/0956797618778497.
  • Halpern-Felsher B, Baker M, Stitzel S. Decision-making in adolescents and young adults. Handb Health Decis Sci. 2016;157–167. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3486-7_12.
  • Yu H, Bonett S, Oyiborhoro U, Aryal S, Kim A, Kornides ML, Jemmott JB, Glanz K, Villarruel AM, Bauermeister JA, et al. Psychosocial correlates of parents’ willingness to vaccinate their children against COVID-19. PLOS ONE. 2024;19(6):e0305877. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0305877.
  • Center for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC statement on ACIP booster recommendations. [accessed 2023 Dec 21]. https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/p0924-booster-recommendations-.html.
  • Rosseel Y. lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Soft. 2012;48(2):1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02.
  • Beaujean AA. Latent variable modeling using R: a step-by-step guide. New York: Routledge; 2014.
  • Nachtigall C, Kroehne U, Funke F, Steyer R, Schiller F. v. Pros and cons of structural equation modeling. Methods Psychol Res Online. 2003;8(2):1–22.
  • Ullman JB, Bentler PM. Structural equation modeling. Handb Phychol, Second Ed. 2012;2. doi:10.1002/9781118133880.hop202023.
  • Cheung MW-L, Chan W. Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: a two-stage approach. Psychol Methods. 2005;10(1):40. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.40.
  • National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities. Minority health and health disparities: definitions and parameters 2024. [accessed 2024 June 12]. https://www.nimhd.nih.gov/about/strategic-plan/nih-strategic-plan-definitions-and-parameters.html.
  • Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model: Multidiscip J. 1999;6(1):1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
  • Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. New York: Psychology Press; 2004.
  • Shi D, Lee T, Maydeu-Olivares A. Understanding the model size effect on SEM fit indices. Educ Psychol Meas. 2019;79(2):310–334. doi:10.1177/0013164418783530.
  • Van Buuren S, Brand JP, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, Rubin DB. Fully conditional specification in multivariate imputation. J Stat Comput Simul. 2006;76(12):1049–64. doi:10.1080/10629360600810434.
  • Little RJ. A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. J Am Stat Assoc. 1988;83(404):1198–1202. doi:10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722.
  • Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1987. doi:10.1002/9780470316696.
  • Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Market Sci. 2015;43(1):115–135. doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.
  • Garfat T. A child and youth care approach to working with families. Child & Youth Serv. 2004;25(1–2):7–37. doi:10.1300/J024v25n01_02.
  • Kyriazos TA. Applied psychometrics: sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology. 2018;9(8):2207. doi:10.4236/psych.2018.98126.
  • Valente TW. Network interventions. Science. 2012;337(6090):49–53. doi:10.1126/science.1217330.
  • Park S, Oh S. The relationships of perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, and subjective norms with COVID-19 preventive behaviors: a secondary data analysis comparing adolescents and emerging adults in South Korea. Child Health Nurs Res. 2023;29(2):149. doi:10.4094/chnr.2023.29.2.149.
  • Na L, Banks S, Wang PP. Racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a mediation framework. Vaccine. 2023;41(14):2404–11. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.02.079.
  • Medcalfe SK, Slade CP. Racial residential segregation and COVID-19 vaccine uptake: an analysis of Georgia USA county-level data. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):1392. doi:10.1186/s12889-023-16235-0.
  • Dou K, Yang J, Wang LX, Li JB. Theory of planned behavior explains males’ and females’ intention to receive COVID-19 vaccines differently. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022;18(5):2086393. doi:10.1080/21645515.2022.2086393.
  • Gallup. U.S. LGBT identification steady at 7.2% 2023. [accessed 2024 June 12]. https://news.gallup.com/poll/470708/lgbt-identification-steady.aspx.