Genome editing of crops: A renewed opportunity for food security

REFERENCES

• Abdallah NA, Prakash CS, McHughen AG. Genome editing for crop improvement: Challenges and opportunities. GM Crops Food 2015; 6(4):183-205; PMID:26930114; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2015.1129937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdeeva I, Abdeev R, Bruskin S Piruzian E. Transgenic Plants as a Tool for Plant Functional Genomics. In: Çiftçi YO, ed. Transgenic Plants - Advances and Limitations. pp 259-284 INTECH 2013; 259-284.
   Google Scholar
• Ali Z, Ali S, Tashkandi M, Zaidi SS, Mahfouz MM. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated immunity to geminiviruses: differential interference and evasion. Sci Rep 2016; 6:2691; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep26912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckie HJ. Herbicide-Resistant (HR) Crops in Canada: HR Gene Effects on Yield Performance. Prairie Soils Crops J 2013; 6:33-39.
   Google Scholar
• Bortesi L, Fischer R. The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond. Biotechnol Adv 2015; 33(1):41-52; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan GT, Wu KS, Farrall L, Jia Y, Hershey HP, McAdams SA, Faulk KN, Donaldson GK, Tarchini R, Valent B. A single amino acid difference distinguishes resistant and susceptible alleles of the rice blast resistance gene Pi-ta. Plant Cell 2000; 12(11):2033-2045; PMID:11090207; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.12.11.2033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne J. France asks ECJ to decide if plants from new breeding techniques are GMO. 14-Oct-2016. http://www.feednavigator.com/Regulation/France-asks-ECJ-to-decide-if-plants-from-new-breeding-techniques-are-GMOs.
   Google Scholar
• Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, Lin S, Barretto R, Habib N, Hsu PD, Wu X, Jiang W, Marraffini LA, Zhang F. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 2013; 339(6121):819-823; PMID:23287718; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1231143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cookson C, Bryant C, Chaffin J. An end to GM crop development for Europe. Financial Times. 16 January 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Czaja-Bulsa G. Non coeliac gluten sensitivity-A new disease with gluten intolerance. Clin Nutri 2015; 34(2):189-94; PMID:25245857; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2014.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz-Gomez J, Marin S, Capell T, Sanchis V, Ramos AJ. The impact of Bacillus thuringiensis technology on the occurrence of fumonisins and other mycotoxins in maize. World Mycotoxin J 2016; 9(3):475-486; http://dx.doi.org/10.3920/WMJ2015.1960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doudna JA, Charpentier E. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 2014; 346(6213):1258096; PMID:25430774; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1258096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endo M, Mikami M, Toki S. Multi-gene knockout utilizing off-target mutations of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in rice. Plant Cell Physiol 2015; 56(1):41-47; PMID:25392068; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcu154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan D, Liu T, Li C, Jiao B, Li S, Hou Y, Luo K. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Targeted Mutagenesis in Populus in the First Generation. Scientific Reports 2015; 5:12217; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep12217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Z, Zhang B, Ding W, Liu X, Yang DL, Wei P, Cao F, Zhu S, Zhang F, Mao Y, Zhu JK. Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system. Cell Res 2013; 23:1229-1232; PMID:23958582; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cr.2013.114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fondong VN, Nagalakshmi U, Dinesh-Kumar SP. Novel functional genomics approaches: a promising future in the combat against plant viruses. Phytopathol 2016; 106(10):1231-1239; PHYTO-03; http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-03-16-0145-FI
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao SQ, Chen M, Xu ZS, Zhao CP, Li L, Xu HJ, Tang YM, Zhao X, Ma YZ. The soybean GmbZIP1 transcription factor enhances multiple abiotic stress tolerances in transgenic plants. Plant Mol Biol 2011; 75(6):537-53; PMID:21331631; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11103-011-9738-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse AM, Ferry N, Raemaekers RJ. The case of the monarch butterfly: a verdict is returned. Trends Genet 2002; 18(5):249-51; PMID:12047949; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9525(02)02664-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georges F, Das S, Ray H, Bock C, Nokhrina K, Kolla VA, Keller W. Over expression of Brassica napus phosphatidylinositol-phospholipase C2 in canola induces significant changes in gene expression and phytohormone distribution patterns, enhances drought tolerance and promotes early flowering and maturation. Plant Cell Environment 2009; 32(12):1664-1681; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02027.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gewin V. Genetically Modified Corn— Environmental Benefits and Risks. PLoS Biol 2003; 1(1):e8; PMID:14551906; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0000008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilbert LA, Larson MH, Morsut L, Liu Z, Brar GA, Torres SE, Stern-Ginossar N, Brandman O, Whitehead EH, Doudna JA, Lim WA. CRISPR-mediated modular RNA-guided regulation of transcription in eukaryotes. Cell 2013; 154:442-451; PMID:23849981; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartung F, Schiemann J. Precise plant breeding using new genome editing techniques: opportunities, safety and regulation in the EU. Plant J 2014; 78:742-752; PMID:24330272; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu PD, Lander ES, Zhang F. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell 2014; 157(6):1262-1278; PMID:24906146; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang W, Zhou H, Honghao B, Fromm M, Yang B, Weeks DP. Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41(20):e188; PMID:23999092; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 2012; 337(6096):816-821; PMID:22745249; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1225829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konermann S, Brigham MD, Trevino AE, Joung J, Abudayyeh OO, Barcena C, Hsu PD, Habib N, Gootenberg JS, Nishimasu H, Nureki O. Genome-scale transcriptional activation by an engineered CRISPR-Cas9 complex. Nature 2015; 517:583-600; PMID:25494202; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature14136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurila J, Laakso I, Valkonen JPT, Hiltunen R, Pehu E. Formation of parental type and novel alkaloids in somatic hybrids between Solanum brevidens and S. tuberosum. Plant Sci 1996; 118:145-155; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(96)04435-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrenson T, Shorinola O, Stacey N, Li C, Østergaard L, Patron N, Uauy C, Harwood W. Induction of targeted, heritable mutations in barley and Brassica oleracea using RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease. Genome Biol 2015; 16(1):1; PMID:25583448; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0826-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyser O. Moving beyond the GM Debate. PLoS Biol 2014; 12(6):e1001887; PMID:24914954; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001887
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li JF, Norville JE, Aach J, McCormack M, Zhang D, Bush J, Church GM, Sheen J. Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9. Nat Biotechnol 2013; 31:688-691; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Liu ZB, Xing A, Moon BP, Koellhoffer JP, Huang L, Ward RT, Clifton E, Falco SC, Cigan AM. Cas9-guide RNA directed genome editing in soybean. Plant Physiol 2015; 169(2):960-970; PMID:26294043; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishida K, Arazoe T, Yachie N, Banno S, Kakimoto M, Tabata M, Mochizuki M, Miyabe A, Araki M, Hara KY, Shimatani Z, Kondo A. Targeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems. Science 2016; 353(6305):aaf8729; PMID:27492474; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf8729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piffanelli P, Ramsay L, Waugh R, Benabdelmouna A, D'Hont A, Hollricher K, Jørgensen JH, Schulze-Lefert P, Panstruga R. A barley cultivation-associated polymorphism conveys resistance to powdery mildew. Nature 2004; 430(7002):887-891; PMID:15318221; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puchta H, Fauser F. Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants: prospects for a bright future. Plant J 2014; 78(5):727-741; PMID:24112784; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Que Q, Chilton MDM, de Fontes CM, He C, Nuccio M, Zhu T, Wu Y, Chen JS, Shi L. Trait stacking in transgenic crops: challenges and opportunities. GM Crops 2010; 1(4):220-229; PMID:21844677; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/gmcr.1.4.13439
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raybould A, Poppy GM. Commercializing genetically modified crops under EU regulations: objectives and barriers. GM Crops Food 2012; 3(1):9-20; PMID:22430852; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/gmcr.18961
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roscoe TJ, Lessire R, Puyaubert J, Renard M, Delseny M. Mutations in the fatty acid elongation 1 gene are associated with a loss of β-ketoacyl-CoA synthase activity in low erucic acid rapeseed. FEBS Letters 2001; 492(1):107-111; PMID:11248246; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02243-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaeffer SM, Nakata PA. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing and gene replacement in plants: transitioning from lab to field. Plant Sci 2015; 240:130-142; PMID:26475194; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiml S, Fauser F, Puchta H. The CRISPR/Cas system can be used as nuclease for in planta gene targeting and as paired nickases for directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis resulting in heritable progeny. Plant J 2014; 80(6):1139-1150; PMID:25327456; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt CW. Genetically modified foods: breeding uncertainty. Environ Health Perspect 2005; 113:A526-A533; PMID:16079054; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.113-a526
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smyth SJ, Phillips PW. Risk, regulation and biotechnology: the case of GM crops. GM Crops Food 2014; 5(3):170-177; PMID:25437235; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/21645698.2014.945880
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steinert J, Schiml S, Fauser F, Puchta H. Highly efficient heritable plant genome engineering using Cas9 orthologues from Streptococcus thermophilus and Staphylococcus aureus. Plant J 2014; 84:1295-1305; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svitashev S, Young JK, Schwartz C, Gao H, Falco SC, Cigan AM. Targeted mutagenesis, precise gene editing, and site-specific gene insertion in maize using Cas9 and guide RNA. Plant Physiol 2015; 169(2):931-945; PMID:26269544; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabashnik BE. Communal Benefits of Transgenic Corn. Science 2010; 330(6001):189-190; PMID:20929767; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1196864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabashnik BE, Brévault T, Carrière Y. Insect resistance to Bt crops: lessons from the first billion acres. Nat Biotechnol 2013; 31(6):510-521; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan S, Evans RR, Dahmer ML, Singh BK, Shaner DL. Imidazolinone-tolerant crops: history, current status and future. Pest Management Sci 2005; 61(3):246-257; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broeck HC, de Jong HC, Salentijn EMJ, Dekking L, Bosch D, Hamer RJ, Gilissen LJWJ, van der Meer IM, Smulders MJM. Presence of celiac disease epitopes in modern and old hexaploid wheat varieties: wheat breeding may have contributed to increased prevalence of celiac disease. Theor Appl Genet. 2010; 121:1527-1539; PMID:20664999; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1408-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz E. CRISPR-edited crops free to enter market, skip regulation. Nat Biotechnol 2016a; 34:582; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt0616-582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz E. Gene-edited CRISPR mushroom escapes US regulation. Nature 2016b; 532:293; PMID:27111611; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.19754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Cheng X, Shan Q, Zhang Y, Liu J, Gao C, Qiu JL. Simultaneous editing of 3 homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew. Nat Biotechnol 2014; 32(9):947-951; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2969
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolt JD, Wang K, Yang B. The Regulatory Status of Genome-edited Crops. Plant Biotechnol J 2016; 14:510-518; PMID:26251102; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo JW, Kim J, Kwon SI, Corvalán C, Cho SW, Kim H, Kim SG, Kim ST, Choe S, Kim JS. DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Nat Biotechnol 2015; 33:1162-1164; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zetsche B, Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, Slaymaker IM, Makarova KS, Essletzbichler P, Volz SE, Joung J, van der Oost J, Regev A, Koonin EV. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell 2015; 163(3):759-771; PMID:26422227; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar