Misinformation in the media: global coverage of GMOs 2019-2021

References

• Lewandowsky S, Ecker UKH, Seifert CM, Schwarz N, Cook J. Misinformation and its correction: continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2012;13(3):106–31. doi:10.1177/1529100612451018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, undated. Infodemic. https://www.who.int/health-topics/infodemic
   Google Scholar
• Romer D, Jamieson K. Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S. Soc Sci Med. 2020;263:113356. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evanega S, Lynas M, Adams J, Smolenyak K Quantifying sources and themes in the COVID-19 ‘infodemic.’ (2020) Cornell Alliance for Science. https://allianceforscience.cornell.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Evanega-et-al-Coronavirus-misinformationFINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Watson OJ, Barnsley G, Toor J, Hogan AB, Winskill P, Ghani AC. Global impact of the first year of COVID-19 vaccination: a mathematical modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22(9):1293–302. doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(22)00320-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin K, Ortaliza J, Cox C, Michaud J, Kates J (2022). COVID-19 mortality preventable by vaccines. Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker. https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/brief/covid19-and-other-leading-causes-of-death-in-the-us
   Google Scholar
• Lynas M, Houlton BZ, Perry S. Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature. Environ Res Lett. 2021;16(11):114005. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simauchi K. Europeans badly underestimate scientists’ agreement on climate change. Bloomberg. 2022. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-06-29/scientists-agree-on-man-made-climate-change-more-than-people-think
   Google Scholar
• Poushter J, Fagan M, Huang C. Americans are less concerned – but more divided – on climate change than people elsewhere. Pew Research Center. 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/09/14/americans-are-less-concerned-but-more-divided-on-climate-change-than-people-elsewhere
   Google Scholar
• Lurie P, Adams J, Lynas M, Stockert K, Carlyle RC, Pisani A, Evanega SD. COVID-19 vaccine misinformation in English-language news media: retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(6):e058956. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynas M. Seeds of science: why we got it so wrong on GMOs. Bloomsbury Sigma; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Paarlberg R. Starved for science: how biotechnology is being kept out of Africa. Harvard University: Harvard University Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Evanega S, Conrow J, Adams J, Lynas M. The state of the “GMO” debate - toward an increasingly favorable and less polarized media conversation on ag-biotech? GM Crops & Food. 2022;13(1):38–49. doi:10.1080/21645698.2022.2051243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichim MC. The more favorable attitude of the citizens toward GMOs supports a new regulatory framework in the European Union. GM Crops & Food. 2020;12(1):18–24. doi:10.1080/21645698.2020.1795525.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC, 2021: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis 2021 . Contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C, Berger S, Caud N, Chen Y, Goldfarb L, Gomis MI, et al. editors, Cambridge (United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolia A, Manzo A, Veronesi F, Rosellini D. An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2014;34(1):77–88. doi:10.3109/07388551.2013.823595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissle M, Naranjo SE, Romeis J. Does the growing of Bt maize change abundance or ecological function of non-target animals compared to the growing of non-GM maize? A systematic review. Environ Evid. 2022;11(1). doi:10.1186/s13750-022-00272-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Genetically engineered crops: experiences and prospects. Washington (D.C): National Academies Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. Statement by the AAAS board of directors on labeling of genetically modified foods. 2012. https://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/AAAS_GM_statement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Food, genetically modified. 2014. https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/food-genetically-modified
   Google Scholar
• Royal Society. Is it safe to eat GM crops? 2016. https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/gm-plants/is-it-safe-to-eat-gm-crops
   Google Scholar
• Séralini G-E, Clair E, Mesnage R, Gress S, Defarge N, Malatesta M, Hennequin D, de Vendômois JS. RETRACTED: long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012;50(11):4221–31. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2012.08.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panchin AY, Tuzhikov AI. Published GMO studies find no evidence of harm when corrected for multiple comparisons. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2017;37(2):213–17. doi:10.3109/07388551.2015.1130684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefferon KL, Miller HI. Flawed scientific studies block progress and sow confusion. GM Crops & Food. 2020;1–5. doi:10.1080/21645698.2020.1737482.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sánchez MA, Parrott WA. Characterization of scientific studies usually cited as evidence of adverse effects of GM food/feed. Plant Biotechnol J. 2017;15(10):1227–34. doi:10.1111/pbi.12798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister L, Daly M, Chandler P, McNatt M, Benham A, Boykoff M. Balance as bias, resolute on the retreat? Updates & analyses of newspaper coverage in the United States, United Kingdom, New Zealand, Australia and Canada over the past 15 years. Environ Res Lett. 2021;16(9):094008. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac14eb.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qaim M. Role of new plant breeding technologies for food security and sustainable agricultural development. Appl Econ Perspect Policy. 2020;42(2):129–50. doi:10.1002/aepp.13044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovak E, Blaustein-Rejto D, Qaim M. Genetically modified crops support climate change mitigation. Trends Plant Sci. 2022;27(7):627–29. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2022.01.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookes G, Barfoot P. Environmental impacts of genetically modified (GM) crop use 1996–2018: impacts on pesticide use and carbon emissions. GM Crops & Food. 2020;11(4):215–41. doi:10.1080/21645698.2020.1773198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookes G, Barfoot P. GM crop technology use 1996-2018: farm income and production impacts. GM Crops & Food. 2020;11(4):242–61. doi:10.1080/21645698.2020.1779574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton AM, Hossain MJ, Paranjape V, Prodhan MZH, Azad AK, Majumder R, Sarwer SH, Hossain MA. Bt Brinjal in Bangladesh: the first genetically engineered food crop in a developing country. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2019;11(10):a034678. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a034678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruère G, Sengupta D. Bt cotton and farmer suicides in India: an evidence-based assessment. J Dev Stud. 2011;47(2):316–37. doi:10.1080/00220388.2010.492863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouser S, Qaim M. Impact of Bt cotton on pesticide poisoning in smallholder agriculture: a panel data analysis. Ecol Econ. 2011;70(11):2105–13. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth SJ. The human health benefits from GM crops. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019;18(4). doi:10.1111/pbi.13261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paarlberg R. A dubious success: the NGO campaign against GMOs. GM Crops & Food. 2014;5(3):223–28. doi:10.4161/21645698.2014.952204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Opoku Gakpo, J. GMO cowpea could make protein-rich staple food more affordable, say Nigerian scientists. Alliance for Science; 2021. https://allianceforscience.cornell.edu/blog/2021/12/gmo-cowpea-could-make-protein-rich-staple-food-more-affordable-say-nigerian-scientists
   Google Scholar
• Wesseler J, Smart RD, Thomson J, Zilberman D, Jadhao SB. Foregone benefits of important food crop improvements in Sub-Saharan Africa. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(7):e0181353. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menezes P, Simuzingili, M, Debebe, Z, Pivodic, F, Massiah, E . What is driving COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Sub-Saharan Africa?. World Bank Blogs; 2012. https://blogs.worldbank.org/africacan/what-driving-covid-19-vaccine-hesitancy-sub-saharan-africa
   Google Scholar
• Hilbeck A, Binimelis R, Defarge N, Steinbrecher R, Székács A, Wickson F, Antoniou M, Bereano PL, Clark EA, Hansen M, et al. No scientific consensus on GMO safety. Environ Sci Eur. 2015;27(1). doi:10.1186/s12302-014-0034-1.
   Google Scholar
• Global Warming Petition Project (undated). http://petitionproject.org/index.php
   Google Scholar
• Children’s Health Defense. It’s time to follow the science: COVID vaccines. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/community-forum/follow-the-science-covid-vaccines
   Google Scholar
• Gust D, Weber D, Weintraub E, Kennedy A, Soud F, Burns A. Physicians who do and do not recommend children get all vaccinations. J Health Commun. 2008;13(6):573–82. doi:10.1080/10810730802281726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon G, Clarke C. The effect of falsely balanced reporting of the autism-vaccine controversy on vaccine safety perceptions and behavioral intentions. Health Educ Res. 2012;28(2):352–59. doi:10.1093/her/cys110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomba S, de Figueiredo A, Piatek SJ, de Graaf K, Larson HJ. Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nat Hum Behav. 2021;5(3):337–48. doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar